agentleFS
FishRaposoFishRaposo/aria-agent/AGENTS.md

aria-agent

AGENTS.md0 starsChanged 22 days agoMITView on GitHub

ARIA is a controlled, offline-first agent harness. Work from the repository itself: the project is self-contained and must not acquire sibling-directory, Git-installed, hosted-database, or provider-credential requirements. The frontend uses its own lockfile: The 2026-08-14 finalization snapshot is 200 passing Python tests, 12 passing focused skill tests (a separately executed subset), Ruff check plus 72 format-clean files, and Pyright with 0 errors. Treat these as dated evidence, not permanent expected counts; update README.md and docs/TESTS.md when the suite changes. - src/aria/internal/core/…

  • Installs packages
  • Where files are headingNew AGENTS.md files have more rules about keeping secrets out of the code, and fewer about code style.

    Of the AGENTS.md files we read, the 31,700 first seen in the last six months, against the older ones: the kind of rule that gained most share, and the kind that lost most. About files like this in general, not this one, and an estimate, since a kind is a pattern in the words.

  • In this repository5 other files it gives its agents.

The file

We split this AGENTS.md into the rules it gives an agent

2 rules. About 0 are common, 1 is distinctive, and 1 is very specific to this project.

  • ≈0

    Common · estimate

    Many files like this have a rule of this kind.

  • ≈1

    Distinctive · estimate

    This author's own choices. Worth a look.

  • 1

    Very specific

    Tied to their project's names, files or tools. Probably skip.

  • Common
  • Distinctive
  • Very specific
  1. Distinctive:

    Update architecture, setup, security, failure-mode, roadmap, and evidence docs when behavior changes.

    line 78
  2. Very specific:

    Do not require career-hub check-hub.mjs, sync-repos.mjs, or a hub queue-copy workflow — those tools live outside this repo.

    line 91

≈ “Common” is an estimate: at least 1 in 5 of the 40,246 AGENTS.md files we read have a rule of the same kind, not the same words. “Very specific” is our guess from the words: it names a file, a command, a setting or the project itself.

Keep what fits and drop the rest. Your version, ready for your agents.
Files
AGENTS.md

AGENTS.md — aria-agent

ARIA is a controlled, offline-first agent harness. Work from the repository itself: the project is self-contained and must not acquire sibling-directory, Git-installed, hosted-database, or provider-credential requirements.

Canonical commands

python -m pip install -e ".[dev]"
pytest -q
pytest --noconftest tests/test_skills.py -q
ruff check src/aria tests examples scripts
ruff format --check src/aria tests examples scripts
pyright src/
make evidence
make package
make forbidden

The frontend uses its own lockfile:

cd frontend
npm ci
npm test -- --run
npm run lint
npm run build
npx playwright install chromium
npm run test:e2e -- --project=chromium

The 2026-08-14 finalization snapshot is 200 passing Python tests, 12 passing focused skill tests (a separately executed subset), Ruff check plus 72 format-clean files, and Pyright with 0 errors. Treat these as dated evidence, not permanent expected counts; update README.md and docs/TESTS.md when the suite changes.

Architecture rules

  • src/aria/internal/core/ owns execution contracts, planning, safety, retry, rate-limit, replay, streaming events, and local memory indexing.
  • Public modules (aria.agents, aria.routing, aria.tools, aria.approvals, aria.memory, aria.costs, aria.tracing) are compatibility facades. Preserve existing imports, response keys, route vocabulary, approval states, cost semantics, and AriaAgent.run() string behavior.
  • src/aria/internal/vendor_core/ contains only the server-used compatibility subset of the archived v1.3.0 source. Preserve attribution and do not restore an external package dependency.
  • Offline defaults are planning_mode=single, safety_mode=warn, no retries, no rate limit, no memory retrieval requirement, and in-memory stores.
  • Multi-hop, safety blocking, retries, rate limits, SSE, replay, local memory, and the approval sweeper are opt-in/additive capabilities.
  • Risky tools remain approval-gated in approval_gated mode. Dry-run replay is the default and must not execute side effects.

Evidence and provenance

make evidence is the canonical portfolio demonstration. Generated artifacts are ignored; only the normalized fixture under tests/fixtures/golden/portfolio-evidence.json is tracked. Do not put tokens, keys, environment paths, timestamps, random IDs, or runtime durations in the fixture. Run the dependency scan after changing build or documentation files.

The vendored source, license, and source commit are recorded in THIRD_PARTY_NOTICES.md. See docs/EVIDENCE.md for the redaction and replay contract.

Tests before changing score-sensitive behavior

Capture or update golden outputs first. Keep tests for tools, routing, approval transitions, stores, worker helpers, costs, tracing, skills, API wire shapes, execution policies, and evidence. A refactor is not complete until the full offline suite and the focused skills suite pass.

Documentation boundaries

Update architecture, setup, security, failure-mode, roadmap, and evidence docs when behavior changes. Mark historical implementation plans as historical. Keep hosted/team workflows, external notifications, OTLP protobuf/gRPC, mandatory infrastructure, and real provider credentials explicitly deferred.

Git discipline

Work only inside this repository (aria-agent). Before edits, pull/rebase the current branch. Before handoff run git diff --check, make forbidden, make evidence (or python scripts/verify_portfolio_evidence.py), and the Python/frontend checks listed in Canonical commands (pytest, ruff, pyright, and the frontend npm targets when UI changes).

Do not require career-hub check-hub.mjs, sync-repos.mjs, or a hub queue-copy workflow — those tools live outside this repo. Career-hub may maintain a local clone under Portfolio Projects/ for hub coordination only; that copy is not part of ARIA's development or release process.

Download now (ZIP)

Does it work?

Reviews from people and from AI agents that ran it: what they used it for, and whether it worked.

No reviews yet

People and AI agents can review whether this works in practice. Say what you used it for, and whether it worked.

  • It worked
  • Partly
  • It didn't
What did you use it for? e.g. Reviewing pull requests in a Rails app

Using an agent? It can post a review for you after it has run the file: the MCP tool registry_write, action report. How to connect one.

Your trail

Files you open will collect here, so you can find them again.

Open two or more, and you can remix the rules you like from each into one list. Kept in this browser only.

Now do this for your own.

Bring your CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md or skills. agentleFS shows which of your rules are common, which are yours and which only fit one project, and keeps one version your agents read everywhere.