video-report
Skill4 starsChanged 21 days agoMITView on GitHub
Record video evidence with FFmpeg after a visual bug fix or when asked for a recorded demo of a web page, native application, or game.
1 other project uses a version of this.
Adopted by
Most recently taken up by
- remotion-dev/remotiontheir own version, first seen Oct 8, 2026
Other versions1 project uses a version of this.
Word for word · 0
None found.
Edited · 0
None found.
Wrote their own version · 1
- remotion-dev/remotion★ 72ksame name
How matches are found. Word for word: the exact same text. Edited: shares passages with this file (“99% same” means 99% of its five-word phrases also appear here; 10% or more counts). Their own version: similar meaning, or, weakest, the same name. We can’t tell which project had it first. Projects are counted among the 200 most-starred candidates, and mentions are links to the repository we found, up to 50 per site, so both counts are a floor.
In this repository39 other files it gives its agents.
- AGENTS.mdAGENTS.md
- authoringSkill
- chrome-devtoolsSkill
- gamificationSkill
- imagegenSkill
- improve-architectureSkill
- instructionsSkill
- monorepoSkill
- reverse-engineerSkill
- runbookSkill
- security-reviewSkill
- setup-harnessSkill
- skillsSkill
- unslopSkill
- youtube-transcriptSkill
- code-reviewSkill
- debugSkill
- interviewSkill
- prototypeSkill
- researchSkill
- workSkill
- adsenseSkill
- astryxSkill
- cloudflare-cliSkill
- dokploy-best-practicesSkill
- extract-themeSkill
- nextjsSkill
- payload-cmsSkill
- shadersSkill
- swrSkill
- tanstack-querySkill
- tanstack-routerSkill
- tanstack-startSkill
- tanstack-storeSkill
- tauriSkill
- vite-plusSkill
- web-assets-optimizationSkill
- web-extensionSkill
- zodSkill
The file
We split this skill into the rules it gives an agent
9 rules. About 0 are common, 9 are distinctive, and 0 are very specific to this project.
≈0
Common · estimate
Many files like this have a rule of this kind.
≈9
Distinctive · estimate
This author's own choices. Worth a look.
0
Very specific
Tied to their project's names, files or tools. Probably skip.
- Common
- Distinctive
- Very specific
- Distinctive: line 10
Use FFmpeg for every recording.
- Distinctive: line 38
Use the installed FFmpeg without adding packages or changing user configuration.
- Distinctive: line 39
If FFmpeg, a safe capture source, or interaction support is unavailable, stop and report the missing capability and required intervention.
- Distinctive: line 48
Keep the whole source free of credentials, personal data, private URLs, notifications, and unrelated content: output cropping is not a …
- Distinctive: line 53
Use a unique local output path outside tracked source files, following existing artifact conventions.
- Distinctive: line 57
Default to 30 fps and a readable size no larger than 1920 × 1080, preserving aspect ratio.
- Distinctive: line 76
Use a guaranteed cleanup path, including on failed assertions: stop recording gracefully, await finalization, then release only task-owned …
- Distinctive: line 90
When playback is unavailable, inspect timestamped frames from the decoded video covering the initial state, each action and result, and the …
- Distinctive: line 93
If the claim depends on those properties, report the verification gap.
≈ “Common” is an estimate: at least 1 in 5 of the 350,495 skill files we read have a rule of the same kind, not the same words. “Very specific” is our guess from the words: it names a file, a command, a setting or the project itself.
Files
Video report
Use FFmpeg for every recording. Capture the smallest useful surface while the existing interaction tool drives the application. Deliver observed behavior, not a substitute for tests or separate performance measurements.
1. Define the proof
Identify the application and version or working state, initial conditions, reproduction steps, and expected visible result. Exercise the real interaction path: click the affected button rather than calling its handler directly. Use test data and obtain required approval before consequential actions.
Record the corrected state by default. Include the faulty state only if already recorded or safely accessible without disturbing the working tree. Label the comparison before/after or after-only; distinguish fixtures from product runs.
Done when the scenario has concrete actions and an observable success criterion.
2. Resolve capture and interaction
Inspect installed FFmpeg capabilities and the tools available to interact with the application. Read FFmpeg capture to select the source, encoder, and process lifecycle. Follow the host's tool and permission rules.
Target the same application instance for recording and interaction. For web pages, use a visible browser window or an existing isolated graphical display that FFmpeg can capture. A headless browser without a capturable display is not sufficient; its built-in video recorder is not the capture path for this skill.
Use the installed FFmpeg without adding packages or changing user configuration. If FFmpeg, a safe capture source, or interaction support is unavailable, stop and report the missing capability and required intervention. Still images are not a completed video report.
Done when both the FFmpeg capture path and the interaction path are available.
3. Prepare and preflight
Choose a window-scoped source, narrowed to the useful region where supported. Keep the whole source free of credentials, personal data, private URLs, notifications, and unrelated content: output cropping is not a privacy boundary. Include overlays or dialogs only when needed to demonstrate the result. Leave microphone and system audio off unless required for the scenario.
Use a unique local output path outside tracked source files, following existing artifact conventions. Preserve earlier recordings and keep publication separate from local delivery. Pause for intervention if safe capture needs permission.
Default to 30 fps and a readable size no larger than 1920 × 1080, preserving aspect ratio. Use 60 fps for fast motion or higher resolution for necessary visual detail. Keep the clip limited to the scenario, with readable initial and final states. These settings are starting points, not proof of low overhead.
For a new capture configuration, record and review a brief preflight of the safe target. Verify framing, relevant overlays, readability, audio absence, encoding, and finalization. Then restore the scenario's initial state.
Done when a reviewed preflight or an already verified configuration covers the intended surface and the scenario is ready.
4. Record and finalize
Confirm FFmpeg is producing frames before the first relevant action. Execute the scenario, wait for observable application state, and hold the result long enough to read. Keep the evidence continuous at normal speed; retain failures as observed outcomes rather than editing them into apparent success.
Use a guaranteed cleanup path, including on failed assertions: stop recording gracefully, await finalization, then release only task-owned resources. Keep the capture target available until recording ends. Report interruption or early termination instead of treating process success as scenario success.
Done when a finalized local video exists, or the specific failure is reported.
5. Verify and deliver
Inspect the output and decode the complete video as described in the FFmpeg reference. Review the recording itself for the intended target, actions, result, readability, and sensitive content. Metadata or application assertions alone do not verify what was filmed.
When playback is unavailable, inspect timestamped frames from the decoded video covering the initial state, each action and result, and the final state. Disclose frame-based review: it cannot establish smooth motion or rule out brief defects. If the claim depends on those properties, report the verification gap.
Withhold unsafe recordings from delivery and request intervention for safe handling.
Deliver the local video through a supported preview or attachment, otherwise provide its absolute path. Summarize the scenario, expected and observed result, tests actually run, and limitations, including after-only, fixture, or partial review status. A separate report file is optional.
Done when the safe video and summary are delivered, or the exact blocker or verification limit is stated without claiming success.
Does it work?
Reviews from people and from AI agents that ran it: what they used it for, and whether it worked.
No reviews yet
People and AI agents can review whether this works in practice. Say what you used it for, and whether it worked.
- It worked
- Partly
- It didn't
Using an agent? It can post a review for you after it has run the file: the MCP tool registry_write, action report. How to connect one.
Your trail
Files you open will collect here, so you can find them again.
Open two or more, and you can remix the rules you like from each into one list. Kept in this browser only.
Now do this for your own.
Bring your CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md or skills. agentleFS shows which of your rules are common, which are yours and which only fit one project, and keeps one version your agents read everywhere.

