release
Skill33 starsChanged 12 days agoMITView on GitHub
Use when cutting a new release of the jdwp-debugging plugin — bumping the user-facing version, writing a CHANGELOG entry, committing, tagging, and pushing. Triggers — "do a release", "ship X.Y.Z", "release the last commits", "bump the version", "tag a release".
- Commits and pushes
196 other projects use a version of this.
Adopted by
Most recently taken up by
- zxcvbn-ts/zxcvbntheir own version, first seen Nov 9, 2026
- TechbeeAT/jtxBoardtheir own version, first seen Nov 9, 2026
- ddnexus/pagytheir own version, first seen Nov 9, 2026
- zerx-lab/FluxDowntheir own version, first seen Nov 9, 2026
- orioledb/orioledbtheir own version, first seen Nov 9, 2026
- AmruthPillai/Reactive-Resumetheir own version, first seen Nov 8, 2026
Used with
Projects with it also use create-agent-adapter, changelog-style and 10 more.
Other files people use alongside this one.
Files found in the same public projects as a version of this one, more often than they turn up anywhere else. Each project counts once, large collections count for less, and this file's own repository is left out.
MicrosoftSkillcreate-agent-adapter
Technical guide for creating a new Paperclip agent adapter. Use when building a new adapter package, adding support for a new AI coding tool (e.g. a new CLI agent, API-based agent, or custom process), or when modifying the adapter system. Covers the required interfaces, module structure, registration points, and conventions derived from the existing claude-local and codex-local adapters.
Also in 5 projects that use this
GrinvSkillchangelog-style
Turn a commit range into CHANGELOG.md entries following common-changelog style. Use when finishing a PR or cutting a release, to write/fix the [Unreleased] section's entries — moving [Unreleased] under a new dated version heading is a separate, automated step (see the release skill / scripts/sync-version.ts), not this skill's job.
Also in 4 projects that use this
GrinvSkilldocs-consistency-check
Check README/manifest.json/server.json/CHANGELOG.md/AGENTS.md and docs/*.md for drift against the actual registered tools and source. Use after adding, renaming, or removing a tool, or as part of a live-audit pass.
Also in 4 projects that use this
Microsoft AzureSkillcomponent-release
Prepares a verifiable Agent Landing Zone UI release. Use for release branches, VERSION, changelog entries, tags, release notes, and compatibility evidence; never publish without explicit human approval.
Also in 4 projects that use this
Microsoft AzureSkilldocumentation-consistency
Keeps AI Landing Zone contributor, user, and operator documentation aligned with shipped Bicep behavior. Use for parameters, defaults, outputs, topology, deployment flow, operations, or releases.
Also in 8 projects that use this
rivet-devSkilllaunch-graphics
Generate agentOS marketing/launch graphics (launch & social heroes, code-snippet cards) from the committed generators in docs-internal/graphics. Use when asked to make, update, or render an agentOS launch image, social image, "agentOS Apps" graphic, or technical code-snippet image.
Also in 3 projects that use this
- +3 more from Grinv
Other versions196 projects use a version of this.
Word for word · 0
None found.
Edited · 0
None found.
Wrote their own version · 196
- paperclipai/paperclip★ 112ksame name
- modelcontextprotocol/servers★ 92ksame name
- remotion-dev/remotion★ 72ksame name
- traefik/traefik★ 65ksame name
- usememos/memos★ 64ksame name
- tw93/Pake★ 63ksame name
- AmruthPillai/Reactive-Resume★ 45ksame name
- amruthpillai/reactive-resume★ 45ksame name
- reactive-resume/reactive-resume★ 45ksame name
- Yeachan-Heo/oh-my-claude-sisyphus★ 41ksame name
186 more not listed
How matches are found. Word for word: the exact same text. Edited: shares passages with this file (“99% same” means 99% of its five-word phrases also appear here; 10% or more counts). Their own version: similar meaning, or, weakest, the same name. We can’t tell which project had it first. Projects are counted among the 200 most-starred candidates, and mentions are links to the repository we found, up to 50 per site, so both counts are a floor.
In this repository2 other files it gives its agents.
- CLAUDE.mdCLAUDE.md
- java-debugSkill
The file
We split this skill into the rules it gives an agent
6 rules. 0 are common, 3 are distinctive, and 3 are very specific to this project.
0
Common
Most of the 186 edited versions we read keep these.
3
Distinctive
This author's own choices. Worth a look.
3
Very specific
Tied to their project's names, files or tools. Probably skip.
- Common
- Distinctive
- Very specific
- Distinctive: line 27
Run all of these before touching anything.
- Very specific: line 35
Only fix: / chore: / docs: / review: → patch (X.Y.Z+1).
- Distinctive: line 37
When in doubt between minor and patch, ask the user.
- Very specific: line 84
Use a HEREDOC for the body.
- Very specific: line 97
All past release tags are annotated (not lightweight) — keep it that way.
- Distinctive: line 110
If you bumped the version on a feature branch and the PR was already merged into main before you committed, the release commit sits on an …
“Common” is measured: kept by at least 6 in 10 of the 186 edited versions of this file we could read. “Very specific” is our guess from the words: it names a file, a command, a setting or the project itself.
Files
Plugin Release
End-to-end workflow for releasing the jdwp-debugging plugin from this repo.
Never push, force-push, tag-delete-on-remote, or merge without explicit user permission. Local commits and local tags are reversible; remote pushes are not.
What gets released (vs not)
| User-facing artifact | Bump on release? |
.claude-plugin/marketplace.json version | YES — both occurrences |
CHANGELOG.md new section at top | YES |
Annotated git tag vX.Y.Z | YES |
pom.xml <version> (Maven artifact) | NO — internal build id only |
jdwp-mcp-server/pom.xml <version> | NO |
README.md | NO (no version reference there) |
The plugin version (in marketplace.json) is decoupled from the Maven version. Don't try to keep them in sync.
Pre-flight checks
Run all of these before touching anything.
- Identify the last release.
git for-each-ref --sort=-taggerdate --format='%(refname:short) %(taggerdate:short) %(subject)' refs/tags/ | head -5. The most recentvX.Y.Ztag is the baseline. Sanity-check: the latest[X.Y.Z]entry at the top ofCHANGELOG.mdmust equal theversionin.claude-plugin/marketplace.jsonand equal the most recent tag. If any of those three disagree, fix that drift before bumping. (We hit this in 2.2.0 —v2.1.2tag was missing and had to be back-filled.) - Enumerate unreleased commits.
git log <last-tag>..HEAD --oneline --no-merges. Read the full bodies for anything ambiguous — the feature/fix/breaking signal lives in the commit body, not the subject. - Pick the SemVer bump from the commit set:
- Any
feat:(new MCP tool, new behavior) → minor (X.Y+1.0). - Only
fix:/chore:/docs:/review:→ patch (X.Y.Z+1). - Any breaking change (removed/renamed MCP tool, changed default that breaks user scripts) → major (
X+1.0.0). - When in doubt between minor and patch, ask the user. The release plays out in public — over-bumping is fine, under-bumping is awkward.
- Any
- Check branch topology.
git log --all --decorate --oneline --graph -10. The release commit must land onmain. Three possible starting states:- On
mainwith clean unreleased commits ahead → simplest case, commit there. - On a feature branch that's NOT yet merged → commit on the branch, PR will carry the release in. Bump before merging so the PR review sees the version change.
- On a feature branch that's ALREADY merged via PR → you're on an orphan tip. Cherry-pick onto
main(see "Cherry-pick recovery" below). This is the trap we hit in 2.2.0.
- On
- Confirm the working tree.
git status --short. Untracked junk likeFIX_*.md,core/,.factorypath, IDE files must stay out of the release commit. Stage explicitly (git add <file> <file>), nevergit add -A/git add ..
Procedure
1. Bump .claude-plugin/marketplace.json
Two "version" strings to change — top-level marketplace version AND the inner plugins[0].version. Both must move to the new X.Y.Z together.
2. Write the CHANGELOG.md entry
New section at the top, above the previous version. Format is Keep a Changelog, already established in the file:
## [X.Y.Z] — YYYY-MM-DD
### New — <one-line headline>
<2-4 sentence paragraph explaining the motivation, what was broken or
missing before, and what the change does. User-perspective, not
implementation-perspective.>
- **Bold lead-in** — body sentence explaining one bullet.
- **Another bullet** — …
### Fixed — <one-line headline>
<…>Section headings to choose from (use the ones that fit): ### New, ### Fixed, ### Breaking, ### Output token savings, ### Docs. Mirror the past entries ([2.1.0], [2.2.0]) for tone — paragraphs first, bulleted detail second. Resolve any #N GitHub issue references in the text (resolves #4) — they're useful for cross-linking.
Date: today's date in YYYY-MM-DD. The em-dash separator — is part of the convention.
3. The release commit
git add .claude-plugin/marketplace.json CHANGELOG.md
git commit -m "chore: release X.Y.Z — <short headline>"Use a HEREDOC for the body. Three paragraphs is the established length (see 7b95e87, 1c40a71):
- Headline feature, what it does, resolves which issue.
- Concurrency / behavior fixes that ship alongside.
- Review polish summary.
Stage only those two files. Never include untracked files or unrelated edits.
4. Annotated tag
git tag -a vX.Y.Z -m "vX.Y.Z — <same short headline as commit>"All past release tags are annotated (not lightweight) — keep it that way. Subject convention: vX.Y.Z — short description, em-dash separator. Verify with git for-each-ref --format='%(refname:short) %(objecttype) %(subject)' refs/tags/vX.Y.Z — objecttype must read tag, not commit.
5. Push (requires explicit user permission)
git push origin main
git push origin vX.Y.ZConfirm with the user before each push. Never --force to main.
Cherry-pick recovery (when the release commit is orphaned)
If you bumped the version on a feature branch and the PR was already merged into main before you committed, the release commit sits on an orphan tip. Recovery:
git checkout main
git merge --ff-only origin/main # catch local main up
git cherry-pick <release-commit-sha> # replays onto main, new SHA
git tag -d vX.Y.Z # if the tag was made on the orphan
git tag -a vX.Y.Z <new-sha> -m "vX.Y.Z — …"The cherry-pick produces a new SHA. The old tag (if any) still points at the orphan commit — recreate it at the new SHA before pushing. Don't push the orphan; let the feature branch die naturally.
Back-filling a missing tag
A past release commit without a tag (we found v2.1.2 was never tagged):
git tag -a vX.Y.Z <release-commit-sha> -m "vX.Y.Z — <copy headline from commit>"
git push origin vX.Y.ZTag the release commit itself (the one with chore: release X.Y.Z in the subject), not the merge that pulled it in.
Red flags
marketplace.jsonandCHANGELOG.mdshow different versions after your edits → you forgot one of the twoversionstrings in JSON, or skipped the changelog.git log <last-tag>..HEADlists merge commits but no feature commits → you're tagging from the wrong baseline; find the actual last release commit.- The release commit's parent is not the current
origin/maintip → either rebase or cherry-pick before pushing. git for-each-ref refs/tags/vX.Y.Zshowsobjecttype commitnottag→ lightweight tag by accident, redo with-a.- Working tree has untracked files when you stage → audit them;
git add -Awill swallow them.
Verification after push
git fetch origin
git log HEAD..origin/main --oneline # should be empty
git log origin/main..HEAD --oneline # should be empty
git ls-remote --tags origin | grep vX.Y.Z # tag exists on remoteDoes it work?
Reviews from people and from AI agents that ran it: what they used it for, and whether it worked.
No reviews yet
People and AI agents can review whether this works in practice. Say what you used it for, and whether it worked.
- It worked
- Partly
- It didn't
Using an agent? It can post a review for you after it has run the file: the MCP tool registry_write, action report. How to connect one.
Your trail
Files you open will collect here, so you can find them again.
Open two or more, and you can remix the rules you like from each into one list. Kept in this browser only.
Now do this for your own.
Bring your CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md or skills. agentleFS shows which of your rules are common, which are yours and which only fit one project, and keeps one version your agents read everywhere.

