validate-bib
Skill8 starsChanged 4 months agoMITView on GitHub
Validate bibliography entries against citations in source files. Find missing entries and unused references. Use when concerned about bibliography completeness or citation keys.
6 other projects use a version of this, 5 of them edited.
Adopted by
Most recently taken up by
- pedrohcgs/claude-code-my-workflowtheir own version, first seen Nov 8, 2026
- ociupitu/academic-workflow-templateedited, first seen Oct 25, 2026
- MatthewMair42/claude-configedited, first seen Oct 12, 2026
- maxwell2732/my-submission-formatting-agentedited, first seen Mar 15, 2026
- clearsmog/claude-skillsedited, first seen Feb 25, 2026
- luischanci/claude-code-research-starteredited, first seen Feb 13, 2026
Used with
Projects with it also use learn.
Other files people use alongside this one.
Files found in the same public projects as a version of this one, more often than they turn up anywhere else. Each project counts once, large collections count for less, and this file's own repository is left out.
genomewalkerSkilllearn
Learn from web sources, generate SKILL.md, and store key patterns in soul memory. Trigger keywords: learn, skill-gen, web-learn, documentation, tutorial.
Also in 3 projects that use this
Other versions6 projects use a version of this.
Word for word · 0
None found.
Edited · 5
- maxwell2732/my-submission-formatting-agent★ 10670% same
- ociupitu/academic-workflow-template★ 944% same
- clearsmog/claude-skills★ 253% same
- luischanci/claude-code-research-starter★ 120% same
- MatthewMair42/claude-config★ 041% same
Wrote their own version · 1
- pedrohcgs/claude-code-my-workflow★ 1.7ksame name
How matches are found. Word for word: the exact same text. Edited: shares passages with this file (“99% same” means 99% of its five-word phrases also appear here; 10% or more counts). Their own version: similar meaning, or, weakest, the same name. We can’t tell which project had it first. Projects are counted among the 200 most-starred candidates, and mentions are links to the repository we found, up to 50 per site, so both counts are a floor.
In this repository12 other files it gives its agents.
- data-analysisSkill
- data-finderSkill
- lit-reviewSkill
- new-projectSkill
- proofreadSkill
- quality-gateSkill
- research-setupSkill
- review-paperSkill
- review-rSkill
- revise-paperSkill
- session-logSkill
- write-paperSkill
The file
We split this skill into the rules it gives an agent
1 rule. 1 is common, 0 are distinctive, and 0 are very specific to this project.
1
Common
Most of the 6 edited versions we read keep these.
0
Distinctive
This author's own choices. Worth a look.
0
Very specific
Tied to their project's names, files or tools. Probably skip.
- Common
- Distinctive
- Very specific
- Common: line 31
No malformed characters or encoding issues
“Common” is measured: kept by at least 6 in 10 of the 6 edited versions of this file we could read. “Very specific” is our guess from the words: it names a file, a command, a setting or the project itself.
Files
Validate Bibliography
Cross-reference all citations in source files against bibliography entries.
Steps
- Read the bibliography file and extract all citation keys
- Scan all source files for citation keys:
.texfiles: look for\cite{,\citet{,\citep{,\citeauthor{,\citeyear{.qmdfiles: look for@key,[@key],[@key1; @key2]- Extract all unique citation keys used
- Cross-reference:
- Missing entries: Citations used in source files but NOT in bibliography
- Unused entries: Entries in bibliography not cited anywhere
- Potential typos: Similar-but-not-matching keys
- Check entry quality for each bib entry:
- Required fields present (author, title, year, journal/booktitle)
- Author field properly formatted
- Year is reasonable
- No malformed characters or encoding issues
- Report findings:
- List of missing bibliography entries (CRITICAL)
- List of unused entries (informational)
- List of potential typos in citation keys
- List of quality issues
Files to scan:
manuscripts/**/*.tex
Quarto/**/*.qmdBibliography location:
Bibliography_base.bib (repo root)Does it work?
Reviews from people and from AI agents that ran it: what they used it for, and whether it worked.
No reviews yet
People and AI agents can review whether this works in practice. Say what you used it for, and whether it worked.
- It worked
- Partly
- It didn't
Using an agent? It can post a review for you after it has run the file: the MCP tool registry_write, action report. How to connect one.
Your trail
Files you open will collect here, so you can find them again.
Open two or more, and you can remix the rules you like from each into one list. Kept in this browser only.
Now do this for your own.
Bring your CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md or skills. agentleFS shows which of your rules are common, which are yours and which only fit one project, and keeps one version your agents read everywhere.

