issue-triage
Skill6.3k starsChanged 21 days agoApache-2.0View on GitHub
给 DS Bot 仓库的 Issue 和 PR 分诊:打类型、优先级、领域标签,判断该关闭、追问、转讨论还是留着做,并把结论写回 GitHub。触发词:分诊、整理 Issue、打标签、打优先级、这个该不该关、追问报告人、needs-info 到期。
63 other projects use a version of this.
Trending
More talk lately.thin dataabout the whole repository
Most recently taken up by
- DnsQueen/orcinus-skillstheir own version, first seen Nov 8, 2026
- ericwang200608-beep/LANYANT-Skillstheir own version, first seen Nov 8, 2026
- gyuha/forgetheir own version, first seen Nov 6, 2026
- okou-ai/okou-skillstheir own version, first seen Nov 4, 2026
- nesquena/steward-ostheir own version, first seen Nov 3, 2026
- anthony-chaudhary/faktheir own version, first seen Nov 3, 2026
Who's talking about Fei2411/DeepSeek-Bot
- @future-beginner.bsky.social“github.com/Fei2411/Deep...”Bluesky · Oct 23, 2026 · 1 likes
- ultrametricai/ultrametric“vendor-radar: daily scan 2026-10-24”GitHub · Oct 24, 2026
- AppImage/appimage.github.io“Add DeepSeek_Bot”GitHub · Oct 24, 2026
- sudosilo/free-as-in-links“FMHY suggestions 2026-10-21”GitHub · Oct 21, 2026
- Fei2411/DS-Bot“Widget views: follow-ups from the #388 review”GitHub · Oct 21, 2026
The biggest 5 of 13 mentions linking to the repository that our crawl found. Each line is their own headline.
See all 13
Talked about on GitHub and Bluesky (13 times).
On GitHub · 12
- Oct 24, 2026vendor-radar: daily scan 2026-10-24 — ultrametricai/ultrametric0 reactions · 3 comments
- Oct 24, 2026Add DeepSeek_Bot — AppImage/appimage.github.io0 reactions · 1 comment
- Oct 21, 2026FMHY suggestions 2026-10-21 — sudosilo/free-as-in-links0 reactions
- Oct 21, 2026Widget views: follow-ups from the #388 review — Fei2411/DS-Bot0 reactions
- Oct 19, 2026feat/fix: free agent preset pick + waiting card on DSH 0.2.1-rc.2 (fork branch ready) — Fei2411/DS-Bot0 reactions · 4 comments
7 more on GitHub
- Oct 15, 2026Fei2411 'DeepSeek-Bot' — DeepSeek Harness용 장수 봇 팀 플러그인, 봇간 메시지·그룹챗 (10/7, GitHub) — roomedia/ax-trend0 reactions
- Oct 14, 2026点击反馈提示浏览器拦截了新窗口 — Fei2411/DS-Bot0 reactions · 1 comment
- Oct 13, 2026Group chat relay never runs: the synthesized group_relay call is rejected by DSH (only run_code is callable directly) — Fei2411/DS-Bot0 reactions · 4 comments
- Oct 12, 2026[已由 #99 取代] create_bot 与 update_bot 无法设置思考档 — Fei2411/DS-Bot0 reactions
- Oct 12, 2026Weekly discovery: new DeepSeek Harness ecosystem candidates — fendouai/awesome-deepseek-harness0 reactions · 1 comment
- Oct 12, 2026加两个功能:群聊反问卡片 + 权限策略设置页(基于 v0.1.3) — Cirsever/DeepSeek-Bot0 reactions · 3 comments
- Oct 12, 2026npm test fails on Node 22: the web-search slow-endpoint timeout never fires (unref'd AbortSignal.timeout), 14 subtests cancelled — Fei2411/DS-Bot0 reactions · 2 comments
On Bluesky · 1
- Oct 23, 2026github.com/Fei2411/Deep... — @future-beginner.bsky.social1 likes and repost
Used with
Projects with it also use meeting-notes-and-actions, pr-review-ci-fix and 10 more.
Other files people use alongside this one.
Files found in the same public projects as a version of this one, more often than they turn up anywhere else. Each project counts once, large collections count for less, and this file's own repository is left out.
ComposioHQSkillmeeting-notes-and-actions
Turn meeting transcripts or rough notes into crisp summaries with decisions, risks, and owner-tagged action items; use for Zoom/Meet/Teams transcripts, call notes, or long meeting chats to generate share-ready outputs.
Also in 4 projects that use this
ComposioHQSkillpr-review-ci-fix
Automated PR review and CI auto-fix for GitHub and GitLab using the Composio CLI. Pulls diffs, fetches failing job logs, posts review comments, and loops fix commits until checks go green.
Also in 4 projects that use this
FlorianBruniauxSkilltdd-rust
Also in 3 projects that use this
GitHubSkillphoenix-cli
Debug LLM applications using the Phoenix CLI. Fetch traces, analyze errors, structure trace review with open coding and axial coding, inspect datasets, review experiments, query annotation configs, and use the GraphQL API. Use whenever the user is analyzing traces or spans, investigating LLM/agent failures, deciding what to do after instrumenting an app, building failure taxonomies, choosing what evals to write, or asking "what's going wrong", "what kinds of mistakes", or "where do I focus" — even without naming a technique.
Also in 3 projects that use this
petestewartSkilldatadog-logs
Query Datadog logs via the Logs Search API v2. Use when the user asks to "check the logs", "search logs", "find errors in Datadog", "look up logs for", "show me production logs", "check for errors", "search Datadog", or any request involving log search, error investigation, or production debugging that requires Datadog log data.
Also in 3 projects that use this
- +7 more from ComposioHQ
Other versions63 projects use a version of this.
Word for word · 0
None found.
Edited · 0
None found.
Wrote their own version · 63
- denoland/deno★ 109ksame name
- modelcontextprotocol/servers★ 92ksame name
- rtk-ai/rtk★ 86ksame name
- rustfs/rustfs★ 36ksame name
- dotnet/maui★ 23ksame name
- ImranR98/Obtainium★ 21ksame name
- dotnet/runtime★ 18ksame name
- ComposioHQ/awesome-codex-skills★ 17ksame name
- composio-community/awesome-codex-skills★ 16ksame name
- Arize-ai/phoenix★ 12ksame name
53 more not listed
How matches are found. Word for word: the exact same text. Edited: shares passages with this file (“99% same” means 99% of its five-word phrases also appear here; 10% or more counts). Their own version: similar meaning, or, weakest, the same name. We can’t tell which project had it first. Projects are counted among the 200 most-starred candidates, and mentions are links to the repository we found, up to 50 per site, so both counts are a floor.
In this repository2 other files it gives its agents.
- AGENTS.mdAGENTS.md
- record-browser-gifSkill
The file
Files
Issue 分诊
目标:每个 Open Issue 都有一个类型、一个优先级,需要时有一个领域;每个关闭的 Issue 都有证据。
标签的含义和流程以 CONTRIBUTING.zh.md 为准,本文只写怎么做。
边界:只动 Issue、PR 的标签、评论和关闭状态。不改代码,不改 Issue 正文,不合并 PR。带 maintainer 的条目只分诊、不下结论。
1. 取快照
在仓库根目录运行(只读,不写 GitHub):
node .agents/skills/issue-triage/scripts/snapshot.mjs --out /tmp/triage先读 digest.md 再判断,不要只看标题。digest 把每个 Issue 列成:标签、天数、评论数、正文和别人评论的摘要、dev/main 上引用它的提交、引用它的 Open PR。最上面是待处理:
- 没有类型或没有优先级的
- 有两个优先级的
needs-info超过 14 天、报告人没再回复的
动手之前读一遍 references/gh-gotchas.md。
2. 分类
每条落三个坐标:
| 坐标 | 取值 | 怎么判 |
| 类型 | bug · enhancement · documentation | 行为和设计不一致才是 bug。设计本来就这样、用户想要别的,是 enhancement。拿不准时先读 docs/vision.zh.md 和 docs/plans/ |
| 优先级 | P0–P3 | P0 崩溃、丢数据、完全不能用 · P1 影响日常使用、刚引入的回归 · P2 普通 bug 或功能 · P3 建议、窄场景 |
| 领域 | area/* 之一 | 按改动会落在哪个目录判。跨好几个领域或不属于任何领域,就不挂 |
规则:
- 已有的优先级默认保留。那是之前的判断,不是噪声。觉得该改,在评论里说理由。
- 一个 Issue 只有一个 P 标签。
--add-label不会去掉旧的,改优先级要同时--remove-label。 - PR 不打类型和领域。
3. 判动作
按证据归组。证据不够就留着做,不要猜着关。
| 组 | 判据 | 动作 |
| 已修,未发版 | dev 上有提交或已合并的 PR 修了它 | 不关。评论写明 PR 号,等发版时 Release PR 的 Fixes #N 自动关 |
| 已修,已发版 | main 上有修复,CHANGELOG 有记录,或能指出守住它的测试 | completed 关,评论写具体的 PR、提交或测试名 |
| 重复 | 和另一个 Issue 是同一个原因 | 加 duplicate,链接那一个,not planned 关 |
| 上游 | 原因在 DSH 或别的插件 | 加 upstream,链接该去的地方。我们这边无事可做时 not planned 关 |
| 提问 | 怎么装、怎么用 | 在网页上 Convert to discussion,转到 Q&A(CLI 做不了,见 gotchas) |
| 缺信息 | 现象定位不了,没有版本、日志或复现步骤 | 加 needs-info,追问一次(模板见下) |
needs-info 到期 | 追问后 14 天没有新信息 | not planned 关,评论写「没有收到补充信息,补充后会重新打开」 |
| 有 PR 在做 | 有 Open PR 引用它 | 不动 |
| 需要方向 | 涉及产品方向、已定设计、协作规则、发版、架构 | 加 maintainer,等维护者 |
| 留着做 | 其余 | 打好标签就行。小而清楚的可以加 good first issue |
4. 写评论和关闭
- 用 Issue 自己的语言:正文是中文就用中文,否则用英文。
- 关闭的评论必须是「为什么可以关」的证据:PR 号、提交号、文件和测试名、重复的 Issue 号、报告人自己的更正。
- 一条命令完成关闭和评论:
gh issue close <n> --reason "completed" --comment-file <file>或--reason "not planned"。 - 中文评论先写进 UTF-8 文件,再用
--body-file或--comment-file发。
追问模板(按情况删改,写清楚缺什么):
感谢反馈。为了找到原因,请补充:
1. DS Bot 和 DSH 的版本。
2. ……(具体缺的东西)
3. ……
14 天内没有新信息,我们会先关闭这个 Issue;补充后我们会重新打开。5. 回读自查
写回之后再拉一次,确认:
gh issue list --state open --limit 300 --json number,labels --jq '.[] | select([.labels[].name | select(test("^P[0-3]$"))] | length != 1) | .number'
gh issue list --state open --limit 300 --json number,labels --jq '.[] | select([.labels[].name | select(. == "bug" or . == "enhancement" or . == "documentation")] | length == 0) | .number'两条都没有输出才算完成。
6. 汇报
向提出请求的人汇报一张表:编号、标题、打了什么标签、动作、证据。关闭和追问在执行前先给对方看;对方确认后再发。
Does it work?
Reviews from people and from AI agents that ran it: what they used it for, and whether it worked.
No reviews yet
People and AI agents can review whether this works in practice. Say what you used it for, and whether it worked.
- It worked
- Partly
- It didn't
Using an agent? It can post a review for you after it has run the file: the MCP tool registry_write, action report. How to connect one.
Your trail
Files you open will collect here, so you can find them again.
Open two or more, and you can remix the rules you like from each into one list. Kept in this browser only.
Now do this for your own.
Bring your CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md or skills. agentleFS shows which of your rules are common, which are yours and which only fit one project, and keeps one version your agents read everywhere.

