agentleFS
Fei2-LabsFei2-Labs/skill-genie/skills/ecommerce-golive-check/SKILL.md

ecommerce-golive-check

Skill12 starsChanged 50 days agoMITView on GitHub

Pre-launch go-live gate for an ecommerce / online store. Orchestrates the existing specialist skills into one ordered, evidence-based checklist with a BLOCKING launch gate: payment & checkout end-to-end, order webhook signature + status flow, feature completeness (no stubs / fake data / auth gaps), legal compliance (GDPR/DSGVO cookie consent, required policy pages, Art. 13 elements) via web-compliance-builder, CRO conversion audit via psychology-master, responsive adaptation on mobile / tablet / desktop via web-verify, SEO/AEO/GEO, deployed-vs-served parity, and release hygiene (no real infra identifiers, CI green, secrets read at runtime). Use when the user says 电商上线检查 / go-live check / 上线前检查 / pre-launch audit / 发布清单 for a store, or wants to verify an ecommerce site is ready to launch. Classifies the store first; marks every item Blocking / High / Medium / Low; produces a pass/fail gate, not prose. Not legal advice.

The file

We split this skill into the rules it gives an agent

11 rules. About 0 are common, 7 are distinctive, and 4 are very specific to this project.

  • ≈0

    Common · estimate

    Many files like this have a rule of this kind.

  • ≈7

    Distinctive · estimate

    This author's own choices. Worth a look.

  • 4

    Very specific

    Tied to their project's names, files or tools. Probably skip.

  • Common
  • Distinctive
  • Very specific
  1. Very specific:

    Not for: a pure marketing landing page with no transactions — use landing-launch-check directly.

    line 26
  2. Distinctive:

    If a delegated skill is not installed, mark its block Needs-skill in the gate (not silently skipped) and tell the user which one to install.

    line 49
  3. Very specific:

    Never run checks blind. Establish, via web-compliance-builder step 1–5 and the questionnaire (scripts/intake.py here, or …

    line 56
  4. Distinctive:

    Run the eight blocks below.

    line 70
  5. Very specific:

    Add-to-cart → checkout → provider → success/fail/cancel return all land correctly

    line 74
  6. Distinctive:

    No fake data / stubs / placeholder content on a shipping page

    line 84
  7. Distinctive:

    No auth gaps (endpoints that should require login do)

    line 85
  8. Distinctive:

    No dead links / orphan endpoints.

    line 86
  9. Distinctive:

    Ethics gate: no deception, no dark patterns.

    line 102
  10. Distinctive:

    No real infrastructure identifiers in any public artifact (prod IPs, instance/app names, company name, absolute paths)

    line 116
  11. Very specific:

    Run scripts/gate.py with the recorded block verdicts (JSON).

    line 122

≈ “Common” is an estimate: at least 1 in 5 of the 350,495 skill files we read have a rule of the same kind, not the same words. “Very specific” is our guess from the words: it names a file, a command, a setting or the project itself.

Keep what fits and drop the rest. Your version, ready for your agents.
Files
SKILL.md

ecommerce-golive-check

An orchestration skill. It does not re-implement checks — it sequences the repo's existing specialist skills into one ordered pre-launch flow and rolls their findings up into a single blocking go-live gate.

The deliverable is a gate (pass/fail with evidence), not a report. A store is "launch-ready" only when every Blocking item passes with recorded evidence.

When to use

  • The user says 电商上线检查 / 上线前检查 / go-live check / pre-launch audit / 发布清单 for a store, shop, or ecommerce site.
  • A store was built (often on a shared app layer) and needs a final sign-off before it takes real orders and real money.
  • Auditing an existing live store for launch-readiness gaps.

Not for: a pure marketing landing page with no transactions — use landing-launch-check directly. This skill calls landing-launch-check for the SEO/compliance block, then adds the ecommerce-only blocks (payment, webhook, order flow, CRO, responsive) on top.

Delegated skills (the orchestra)

This skill is the conductor. Each block below is OWNED by a specialist skill — read and run that skill for the block, then record its verdict here. Never re-derive a check this skill already delegates.

BlockOwned byLives in
Legal compliance (classify, policies, GDPR/DSGVO, cookie consent)web-compliance-builderrepo
GDPR Art. 13 + cookie-banner live behavior + SEO/AEO/GEOlanding-launch-checkrepo
CRO conversion audit (funnel, CTA, forms, pricing, trust, ethics)psychology-masterrepo
Responsive adaptation (mobile / tablet / desktop) + a11yweb-verify (local); ui-ux-pro-max, web-accessibility-audit (remote)repo + skills.yaml
Payment & checkout, settlement, refunds, readiness gatecross-layer-payment-provider-migrationinstalled (auto/)
Order webhook signature + status flow + confirmation email deliveryreal-signed-webhook-replay-verification (+ inline real-inbox email test)installed (auto/)
Feature completeness (stubs, fake data, auth gaps, dead links)nuxt-app-feature-gap-audit / audit-feature-claims-with-evidenceinstalled (auto/)
Ad pixel consent-gating + conversion eventsverify-consent-gated-ad-pixel-launchinstalled (auto/)
Deployed-vs-served parity, real-device screenshotsweb-verify / verify-and-ship-visual-data-fixrepo + installed

If a delegated skill is not installed, mark its block Needs-skill in the gate (not silently skipped) and tell the user which one to install.

Mandatory workflow (in order)

Step 0 — Classify the store first

Never run checks blind. Establish, via web-compliance-builder step 1–5 and the questionnaire (scripts/intake.py here, or web-compliance-builder/scripts/compliance_questionnaire.py):

  • Business model: own-stock / dropshipping / digital goods / subscription / marketplace / cross-border
  • Target markets (which drives GDPR vs CCPA vs PIPEDA…)
  • Payment provider(s) and whether checkout is hosted or embedded
  • Data collected, cookies, pixels, analytics, SDKs
  • Fulfilment & returns model (who ships, where returns go)

The intake object is the single source of truth for every downstream block.

Step 1 — Run each block through its owning skill

Run the eight blocks below. For each, read the owning skill, run it, and record: status (Pass / Fail / Warning / Needs-skill) · evidence · severity · fix.

  1. Payment & checkout → cross-layer-payment-provider-migration
    • Add-to-cart → checkout → provider → success/fail/cancel return all land correctly
    • Amount, currency, tax, shipping computed right; refund path exists
    • Front-of-store copy does not name unfamiliar processors (generic wording)
  2. Order webhook, status & confirmation email → real-signed-webhook-replay-verification (+ inline email-delivery test)
    • Webhook endpoint verifies signature (real signed replay, not a mock)
    • order_created / payment_succeeded actually transitions order state
    • Order confirmation email actually reaches the customer on a real test order — received in a real inbox, NOT just a mail-API 200 / "queued" (a queued send is not a delivered email)
    • Confirmation email has correct order details (order number, line items, total, delivery/returns info) and an authenticated sender (SPF/DKIM/DMARC pass, not landing in spam)
    • Failures retry or alert; no silent dropped orders and no silently dropped emails
  3. Feature completeness → nuxt-app-feature-gap-audit + audit-feature-claims-with-evidence
    • No fake data / stubs / placeholder content on a shipping page
    • No auth gaps (endpoints that should require login do)
    • No dead links / orphan endpoints; stock / out-of-stock state correct
  4. Legal compliance → web-compliance-builder (AUDIT mode if the site exists)
    • Required pages present per classification (Privacy, Cookie, ToS, Refund/Return, Shipping, Subscription terms)
    • Each item labelled Legal / Platform / Best-practice / Risk-based
    • Gap report with Present-OK / Inadequate / Missing / Mismatch
    • Auto-escalate "Legal review required" on high-risk triggers
  5. GDPR/DSGVO consent + Art. 13 → landing-launch-check Phase 5
    • Cookie banner on first visit; "Accept all" and "Essential only" equally prominent (no dark pattern)
    • No third-party tag fires before consent
    • Privacy policy carries all 8 Art. 13 elements (controller, legal basis, retention, rights, supervisory authority, processors, transfers, contact)
  6. CRO conversion audit → psychology-master (conversion_audit.py + references/conversion-optimization.md)
    • Above-the-fold: value-prop headline, hero, CTA, social proof
    • CTA: action-oriented, first-person, specific, high-contrast, anxiety reducers
    • Forms: minimal fields, single column, inline validation, progress on multi-step
    • Pricing: anchoring, tiers, charm pricing, value stack
    • Objection handling + friction (cognitive/emotional/physical/social)
    • Ethics gate: no deception, no dark patterns; urgency/scarcity must be real
  7. Responsive adaptation (3 viewports) → web-verify (+ ui-ux-pro-max / web-accessibility-audit)
    • Real-device screenshots at mobile (≤480), tablet (768–1024), desktop (≥1280)
    • Touch targets sized, images don't overflow, nav usable on small screens
    • Checkout flow completes on all three
    • Accessibility: contrast, focus order, alt text
  8. SEO / AEO / GEO → landing-launch-check Phase 2–4 (+ remote seo-aeo-audit)
    • Per-locale title / description / canonical / hreflang (no leaked wrong-locale meta)
    • JSON-LD (Organization / WebSite / Product / FAQPage) for AI search citation
    • sitemap / robots; auth pages not indexed

Step 2 — Deployed-vs-served parity + release hygiene

  • web-verify: the commit deployed is the commit served (no "it's only on a branch")
  • No real infrastructure identifiers in any public artifact (prod IPs, instance/app names, company name, absolute paths)
  • CI exists and is green for the release commit
  • Secrets read at runtime, never hardcoded

Step 3 — Roll up into the blocking gate

Run scripts/gate.py with the recorded block verdicts (JSON). It produces:

  1. Summary table — block × status × severity
  2. Blocking gate — every Blocking item with pass/fail + evidence; ANY Blocking fail ⇒ NOT launch-ready
  3. Remediation list — ordered by severity
  4. Needs-verification / Legal-review — surfaced, not hidden
  5. Disclaimer — this is not legal advice

Severity → gate mapping

SeverityExamplesGate effect
🔴 Blockingpayment can't complete, webhook unverified, order confirmation email never reaches the customer, tag fires pre-consent, missing required legal page, checkout broken on mobile, wrong-locale meta, real infra identifier in public artifactFails the gate
🟠 Highmissing JSON-LD, weak CTA, inadequate (present-but-thin) policy, no refund path shownFix before launch; recorded as waiver if overridden
🟡 Mediumsuboptimal pricing layout, minor a11y, medium form frictionFix after launch
🟢 Lowcosmetic, future improvementBacklog

A Blocking fail cannot be waived silently. If the user chooses to launch anyway, gate.py records it as an explicit waiver with reason, so the gate output still tells the truth.

Scripts

  • scripts/intake.py — prints the ecommerce-specific intake questionnaire and emits an empty structured intake object (JSON) to fill. Superset of web-compliance-builder's intake with payment/webhook/fulfilment fields.
  • scripts/gate.py — takes the filled intake + per-block verdicts (JSON) and emits the summary table, the blocking gate, and the remediation list. Deterministic; assembles, does not interpret law or judge CRO itself.

Reference files (load on demand)

  • references/block-catalog.md — the eight blocks in full: every check, its owning skill, how to run it, and what evidence proves a pass.
  • references/gate-schema.md — the verdict JSON schema gate.py consumes and the pass/fail rules.

Required disclaimer (append to every gate output)

This output is not legal advice. Compliance and launch-readiness vary by jurisdiction, business model, and actual operational practice. High-risk, regulated, sensitive-data, or cross-border stores should have final materials reviewed by qualified counsel. This skill orchestrates issue-spotting, checklisting, and gating only.

Download now (ZIP)

Does it work?

Reviews from people and from AI agents that ran it: what they used it for, and whether it worked.

No reviews yet

People and AI agents can review whether this works in practice. Say what you used it for, and whether it worked.

  • It worked
  • Partly
  • It didn't
What did you use it for? e.g. Reviewing pull requests in a Rails app

Using an agent? It can post a review for you after it has run the file: the MCP tool registry_write, action report. How to connect one.

Your trail

Files you open will collect here, so you can find them again.

Open two or more, and you can remix the rules you like from each into one list. Kept in this browser only.

Now do this for your own.

Bring your CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md or skills. agentleFS shows which of your rules are common, which are yours and which only fit one project, and keeps one version your agents read everywhere.