deploy-verify
Skill0 starsChanged 15 days agoApache-2.0View on GitHub
Verify deployed infra after merge/restart. Triggers: PR merged, deployed, daemon/MCP restart, live probe.
9 other projects use a version of this.
Adopted by
Most recently taken up by
- kimkon1011/orgiast-claude-rulestheir own version, first seen Nov 8, 2026
- jaywedgeworth22/BotFleettheir own version, first seen Nov 3, 2026
- Simple-With-Us/BotFleettheir own version, first seen Nov 3, 2026
- jonmumm/skillstheir own version, first seen Oct 21, 2026
- kensaurus/cursor-kenjitheir own version, first seen Oct 1, 2026
- kensaurus/skillstheir own version, first seen Oct 1, 2026
Used with
Projects with it also use session-start.
Other files people use alongside this one.
Files found in the same public projects as a version of this one, more often than they turn up anywhere else. Each project counts once, large collections count for less, and this file's own repository is left out.
bitwize-music-studioSkillsession-start
Runs the session startup procedure - verifies setup, loads config and state, checks skill models, and reports project status. Use at the beginning of a fresh session.
Also in 3 projects that use this
Other versions9 projects use a version of this.
Word for word · 0
None found.
Edited · 0
None found.
Wrote their own version · 9
- wolverin0/claude-skills★ 41same name
- kirillgreen/skills★ 23same name
- kensaurus/cursor-kenji★ 9same name
- kensaurus/skills★ 9same name
- jaywedgeworth22/BotFleet★ 4same name
- Simple-With-Us/BotFleet★ 4same name
- jonmumm/skills★ 2same name
- danielarif26/agentic-os-starter★ 1same name
- kimkon1011/orgiast-claude-rules★ 0same name
How matches are found. Word for word: the exact same text. Edited: shares passages with this file (“99% same” means 99% of its five-word phrases also appear here; 10% or more counts). Their own version: similar meaning, or, weakest, the same name. We can’t tell which project had it first. Projects are counted among the 200 most-starred candidates, and mentions are links to the repository we found, up to 50 per site, so both counts are a floor.
In this repository64 other files it gives its agents.
- AGENTS.mdAGENTS.md
- CLAUDE.mdCLAUDE.md
- verify-lead-waitSkill
- verify-merge-receiptsSkill
- branded-docSkill
- explanatory-docSkill
- 1passwordSkill
- agada-benchSkill
- agent-browserSkill
- agent-routingSkill
- architectural-conformance-auditSkill
- audio-dashboardSkill
- brain-store-fallbackSkill
- claude-desktop-researchSkill
- cmux-agentsSkill
- cmuxSkill
- coachSkill
- coderabbitSkill
- codex-workflowsSkill
- collab-monitorSkill
- content-demo-creationSkill
- convention-auditSkill
- cursor-workflowsSkill
- cyberSkill
- drive-filingSkill
- eas-prebuild-checkSkill
- ecosystem-healthSkill
- eli5Skill
- false-green-gateSkill
- figma-loopSkill
- fleet-wrap-gateSkill
- fleet-wrapSkill
- frustration-captureSkill
- gemini-researchSkill
- git-guardianSkill
- github-researchSkill
- golem-installSkill
- grill-meSkill
- heredoc-guardSkill
- html-dashboardSkill
- human-confirm-gateSkill
- i-have-adhdSkill
- install-runbook-linterSkill
- large-planSkill
- m1-window-gateSkill
- model-pin-gateSkill
- never-fabricateSkill
- orcSkill
- plan-councilSkill
- pr-loopSkill
- qa-verdict-gateSkill
- qa-videoSkill
- repogolemSkill
- research-lifecycleSkill
- reviewer-order-gateSkill
- session-handoffSkill
- skill-creatorSkill
- stitch-designSkill
- t3-visualsSkill
- tmp-blockSkill
- The first 60 shown.
The file
Show its rules and text
We split this skill into the rules it gives an agent
16 rules. 0 are common, 10 are distinctive, and 6 are very specific to this project.
0
Common
Most of the 8 edited versions we read keep these.
10
Distinctive
This author's own choices. Worth a look.
6
Very specific
Tied to their project's names, files or tools. Probably skip.
- Common
- Distinctive
- Very specific
- Distinctive: line 13
After any infra PR merges
- Distinctive: line 14
When a worker, collab entry, or review comment says "deployed", "restarted", or "now running"
- Distinctive: line 15
Before closing a pane, removing a worktree, or telling the user a runtime fix shipped
- Very specific: line 45
If any step fails, the verdict is NOT DEPLOYED.
- Distinctive: line 49
Before running the sequence, classify the PR:
- Very specific: line 54
If the PR is no_deploy_required, say so explicitly and stop.
- Very specific: line 56
If it is deploy_bearing, continue through all four steps.
- Very specific: line 103
run /post-merge-deploy-check when the component is in the canonical deploy registry
- Distinctive: line 122
Use the narrowest real probe that exercises the changed path:
- Distinctive: line 148
if yes, start the four-step sequence
- Distinctive: line 152
Do not treat this as deployment proof.
- Distinctive: line 180
When reporting verification, use this structure:
- Very specific: line 191
If any evidence is missing, say UNVERIFIED and keep the verdict negative.
- Distinctive: line 197
Never answer "done" or "deployed" from GitHub merge state alone.
- Distinctive: line 213
Do not close the pane, remove the worktree, or report success until all required steps pass.
- Very specific: line 238
Use the canonical deploy registry when available.
“Common” is measured: kept by at least 6 in 10 of the 8 edited versions of this file we could read. “Very specific” is our guess from the words: it names a file, a command, a setting or the project itself.
Files
Skill: Deploy Verify
A merged PR is not a deployed system. Verify the runtime, or do not claim the deploy is done.
When to Use
- After any infra PR merges
- When a worker, collab entry, or review comment says "deployed", "restarted", or "now running"
- Before closing a pane, removing a worktree, or telling the user a runtime fix shipped
- For LaunchAgents, daemons, CLI tools, MCP servers, and app bundles whose merged code must be reflected in a live artifact
Infra PRs include:
- LaunchAgent plist changes
- daemon or socket server changes
- CLI binary changes
- MCP server changes
- app bundle or build-stamp changes
Composition
This skill composes directly with:
/never-fabricate/post-merge-deploy-check
/post-merge-deploy-check proves merged-PR metadata, registry state, bundle provenance, and canonical-path/process drift. This skill is the agent-side workflow that decides when to run that script, what additional runtime checks must be collected, and when "done" is still unverified.
The Rule
After an infra PR merges, do not claim deployed until all four verification steps pass.
Required sequence:
- process replacement
launchctl printstatus- build-stamp match
- end-to-end live probe
If any step fails, the verdict is NOT DEPLOYED. Fix the deploy or open a fix PR. Do not narrate success.
Step 0: Classify the Merge
Before running the sequence, classify the PR:
no_deploy_required: docs, skill-only, or other artifact-free changesdeploy_bearing: LaunchAgent, daemon, CLI, MCP server, app bundle, socket service, or anything that changes live runtime behavior
If the PR is no_deploy_required, say so explicitly and stop.
If it is deploy_bearing, continue through all four steps.
The Four-Step Sequence
1. Process Replacement
Goal: prove the old runtime exited and a fresh runtime is now the one serving requests.
Required evidence:
- the old PID is gone, replaced, or otherwise no longer the serving process
- the new PID exists when the service is expected to be running
- the running command path does not point at a stale worktree or dev artifact
Acceptable checks:
pgrep -alf <process-pattern>ps -p <pid> -o pid=,ppid=,etime=,command=- path checks against known stale-process patterns from the canonical deploy registry
Failure examples:
- old PID still alive after a merge that required restart
- multiple copies of the same app or daemon are serving simultaneously
- process path still resolves into a worktree or
*-DEV-*app bundle
2. LaunchAgent Status
Goal: prove launchd knows about the correct service state.
Required evidence:
launchctl print gui/$(id -u)/<service-label>or equivalent for the relevant domain- state is consistent with the intended deploy outcome
ProgramorProgramArgumentspoint at the canonical artifact, not stale paths
Failure examples:
Could not find service- state still points at the pre-merge path
- launchd reports the job loaded but the artifact path is wrong
3. Build-Stamp Match
Goal: prove the artifact serving requests was built from the merged mainline commit.
Required evidence:
- for app bundles:
Info.plistprovenance fields such asGitCommit,BuildTimeUTC, and expected bundle metadata - for CLIs or daemons:
--version,version.json, or equivalent commit/build stamp - the stamped commit matches the merged main branch commit or a descendant on canonical main
Required action:
- run
/post-merge-deploy-checkwhen the component is in the canonical deploy registry
What /post-merge-deploy-check covers:
- PR is merged
- merge target is the canonical branch
- registry entry resolves to the canonical repo path
- bundle
GitCommitmatches the registry - deployed artifact is at or after the merged PR commit
- running process path does not match stale forbidden patterns
Failure examples:
- app version updated but commit stamp still points at the old build
- merged PR exists but the deployed artifact lineage does not include it
- registry matches an older build while the collab says "done"
4. End-to-End Live Probe
Goal: prove the runtime actually serves post-merge behavior, not just the right metadata.
Use the narrowest real probe that exercises the changed path:
- actual MCP tool call
- socket ping or request/response round-trip
- CLI invocation against the real installed binary
- HTTP endpoint hit
- app-side behavior probe when the change is app-facing
The probe must hit the changed behavior, not just process liveness.
Failure examples:
- socket accepts connections but returns old behavior
- MCP server starts but the changed tool path still fails
- app bundle stamp is correct but the launched service is not the one responding
Decision Tree
1. Merge report arrives
Example inputs:
- "PR #264 merged"
- "worker says the daemon is restarted"
- "collab says deployed"
Action:
- classify whether this is
deploy_bearing - if yes, start the four-step sequence
2. A worker says TASK_DONE
Do not treat this as deployment proof.
Action:
- require process evidence
- require
launchctl print - require build-stamp evidence
- require a live probe
Until those exist, the status is UNVERIFIED DEPLOY CLAIM.
3. /post-merge-deploy-check passes but the live probe fails
Verdict:
NOT DEPLOYED
Reason:
- provenance is necessary but insufficient; runtime behavior is still wrong
4. Live probe passes but build stamp fails
Verdict:
DRIFTED OR NON-CANONICAL DEPLOY
Reason:
- behavior may look right now, but the agent cannot claim the merged PR is what is serving
Output Contract
When reporting verification, use this structure:
Deploy verification for <repo>#<pr>:
- Step 1 Process replacement: PASS|FAIL — <evidence>
- Step 2 LaunchAgent status: PASS|FAIL — <evidence>
- Step 3 Build-stamp match: PASS|FAIL — <evidence>
- Step 4 End-to-end probe: PASS|FAIL — <evidence>
- Verdict: DEPLOYED | NOT DEPLOYED | NO DEPLOY REQUIREDIf any evidence is missing, say UNVERIFIED and keep the verdict negative.
Hard Rules
1. Merge Is Not Deploy
Never answer "done" or "deployed" from GitHub merge state alone.
2. Subagent Report Is Not Deploy
TASK_DONE, collab notes, and "restarted locally" claims are not verification. /never-fabricate applies in full.
3. Provenance Alone Is Not Deploy
Passing /post-merge-deploy-check is not enough without the end-to-end probe.
4. Liveness Alone Is Not Deploy
A running PID or loaded LaunchAgent is not enough without build-stamp evidence.
5. Clean Up Only After Verification
Do not close the pane, remove the worktree, or report success until all required steps pass.
Anti-Patterns
| Anti-pattern | Why it fails | Fix |
| "PR merged, so deploy is done" | GitHub state is not runtime state | Run all four verification steps |
| "worker said restarted" | Worker self-report is not proof | Collect process, launchctl, stamp, and probe evidence |
| "PID exists, looks good" | Liveness does not prove the right build or behavior | Check stamp and probe |
| "build stamp matches, so done" | Provenance does not prove serving behavior | Run the live probe |
| "probe works, close pane" | Probe without canonical provenance can hide drift | Run /post-merge-deploy-check and record the receipt |
Receipts
Recommended commands include:
: "${ORCHESTRATOR_REPO:?ORCHESTRATOR_REPO must be set}"
pgrep -alf '<pattern>'
launchctl print gui/$(id -u)/<service-label>
python3 "$ORCHESTRATOR_REPO/scripts/post-merge-deploy-check.py" <repo> <pr-number>
<canonical-binary> --version
<real socket, MCP, or endpoint probe>Use the canonical deploy registry when available. If the component is not registered yet, say so explicitly and still complete the process, launchctl, build-stamp, and live-probe checks with whatever local evidence is available.
Does it work?
Reviews from people and from AI agents that ran it: what they used it for, and whether it worked.
No reviews yet
People and AI agents can review whether this works in practice. Say what you used it for, and whether it worked.
- It worked
- Partly
- It didn't
Using an agent? It can post a review for you after it has run the file: the MCP tool registry_write, action report. How to connect one.
Your trail
Files you open will collect here, so you can find them again.
Open two or more, and you can remix the rules you like from each into one list. Kept in this browser only.
Now do this for your own.
Bring your CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md or skills. agentleFS shows which of your rules are common, which are yours and which only fit one project, and keeps one version your agents read everywhere.

