agentleFS
EllAchEEllAchE/skill-observability/skills/skillify/SKILL.md

skillify

Skill0 starsChanged 3 months agoMITView on GitHub

Turn one previous Claude Code or Codex session into a focused reusable skill. Use when the user provides a transcript, session ID, or remembered task and asks to capture, extract, or skillify the repeatable workflow.

51 other projects use a version of this.

Adopted by

Most recently taken up by

Used with

Projects with it also use plan-tune, ios-clean and 10 more.

Other files people use alongside this one.

Files found in the same public projects as a version of this one, more often than they turn up anywhere else. Each project counts once, large collections count for less, and this file's own repository is left out.
  • ShreyRaviSkill

    plan-tune

    Self-tuning question sensitivity + developer psychographic for gstack (v1: observational). Review which AskUserQuestion prompts fire across gstack skills, set per-question preferences (never-ask / always-ask / ask-only-for-one-way), inspect the dual-track profile (what you declared vs what your behavior suggests), and enable/disable question tuning. Conversational interface — no CLI syntax required.

    Also in 9 projects that use this

  • Saqlain-811Skill

    ios-clean

    Remove the DebugBridge SPM package and all #if DEBUG wiring from an iOS app. (gstack)

    Also in 5 projects that use this

  • Saqlain-811Skill

    ios-fix

    Autonomous iOS bug fixer. (gstack)

    Also in 5 projects that use this

  • ShreyRaviSkill

    landing-report

    Read-only queue dashboard for workspace-aware ship. Shows which VERSION slots are currently claimed by open PRs, which sibling Conductor workspaces have WIP work likely to ship soon, and what slot /ship would pick next. No mutations — just a snapshot. Use when asked to "landing report", "what's in the queue", "show me open PRs", or "which version do I claim next". (gstack)

    Also in 8 projects that use this

  • timurgaleevSkill

    document-generate

    Generate missing docs for a feature, module or project as tutorials, how-tos, reference and explanation.

    Also in 7 projects that use this

  • bastosSkill

    ios-design-review

    Review iOS app UI/UX design quality using Apple's design principles and the Liquid Glass-era design language from WWDC25/26. Use when asked for a design review, UX critique, visual design assessment, or evaluation of an app's interface quality, design intent, alignment with the new Apple design system, or usability. Triggers: "design review", "UX review", "visual design critique", "review the UI", "does this design work", "evaluate this interface", "design feedback", "Liquid Glass review".

    Also in 5 projects that use this

  • +1 more from Saqlain-811
  • +5 more from ShreyRavi

The file

We split this skill into the rules it gives an agent

5 rules. 0 are common, 4 are distinctive, and 1 is very specific to this project.

  • 0

    Common

    Most of the 44 edited versions we read keep these.

  • 4

    Distinctive

    This author's own choices. Worth a look.

  • 1

    Very specific

    Tied to their project's names, files or tools. Probably skip.

  • Common
  • Distinctive
  • Very specific
  • could be automatic: a setting could enforce it
  1. Distinctive:

    Read the selected transcript without resuming or modifying it.

    line 17
  2. Distinctive:

    Remove secrets, ephemeral identifiers, local-only values, dated status, and incidental conversation.

    line 22
  3. Distinctive:

    Stop if the session only records a one-off action.

    line 24
  4. Very specific:

    After approval, route the artifact through create-skill, including its inventory check, script tests, and structural audit.

    line 30
  5. Distinctive:

    Do not infer authority for publishing, messaging, deployment, production writes, or spending from the source session.

    line 35

“Common” is measured: kept by at least 6 in 10 of the 44 edited versions of this file we could read. “Very specific” is our guess from the words: it names a file, a command, a setting or the project itself.

Keep what fits and drop the rest. Your version, ready for your agents.
Files
SKILL.md

Skillify

Produce an operating guide, not a transcript recap or a skill for a one-off result.

Workflow

  1. Require a concrete transcript path, session ID, or remembered description. Do not search or write when the reference is empty.
  2. Find one source session in the local Claude or Codex transcript store. Widen a text search only when needed. If multiple candidates remain plausible, show their source, ID, project, time, and matching evidence, then ask the user to choose.
  3. Read the selected transcript without resuming or modifying it. Never merge separate sessions into one source workflow.
  4. Extract the durable goal, inputs, decisions, ordered actions, outputs, validation, corrections, failure paths, tools, and human checkpoints. Treat later user corrections as authoritative over earlier behavior.
  5. Remove secrets, ephemeral identifiers, local-only values, dated status, and incidental conversation. Mark any unsupported inference as an assumption.
  6. Stop if the session only records a one-off action. Explain why it does not merit a skill.
  7. Infer a name, triggers, arguments, and destination only when unambiguous. Resolve material gaps with concise questions.
  8. Draft the complete proposed SKILL.md and any genuinely reusable resources. Show the exact artifact and destination before writing.
  9. After approval, route the artifact through create-skill, including its inventory check, script tests, and structural audit.
  10. Report the source session ID, saved path, invocation examples, validation result, and transcript-unsupported assumptions.

Do not infer authority for publishing, messaging, deployment, production writes, or spending from the source session. Encode a fresh approval checkpoint instead.

Download now (ZIP)

Does it work?

Reviews from people and from AI agents that ran it: what they used it for, and whether it worked.

No reviews yet

People and AI agents can review whether this works in practice. Say what you used it for, and whether it worked.

  • It worked
  • Partly
  • It didn't
What did you use it for? e.g. Reviewing pull requests in a Rails app

Using an agent? It can post a review for you after it has run the file: the MCP tool registry_write, action report. How to connect one.

Your trail

Files you open will collect here, so you can find them again.

Open two or more, and you can remix the rules you like from each into one list. Kept in this browser only.

Now do this for your own.

Bring your CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md or skills. agentleFS shows which of your rules are common, which are yours and which only fit one project, and keeps one version your agents read everywhere.