git-review
Skill1 starsChanged 3 months agoMITView on GitHub
Git repository and commit review skill for FlowMind. Review commit history, analyze changes, and ensure code quality.
2 other projects use a version of this.
Adopted by
Most recently taken up by
- gitByEOS/open-part-skillstheir own version, first seen Nov 2, 2026
- dkubb/skillstheir own version, first seen Oct 14, 2026
Other versions2 projects use a version of this.
Word for word · 0
None found.
Edited · 0
None found.
Wrote their own version · 2
- gitByEOS/open-part-skills★ 38same name
- dkubb/skills★ 14same name
How matches are found. Word for word: the exact same text. Edited: shares passages with this file (“99% same” means 99% of its five-word phrases also appear here; 10% or more counts). Their own version: similar meaning, or, weakest, the same name. We can’t tell which project had it first. Projects are counted among the 200 most-starred candidates, and mentions are links to the repository we found, up to 50 per site, so both counts are a floor.
In this repository30 other files it gives its agents.
- api-syncSkill
- archive-changeSkill
- auto-flowSkill
- build-reportSkill
- change-impact-reviewSkill
- code-review-auditSkill
- code-reviewSkill
- coverage-reportSkill
- data-logic-validationSkill
- data-risk-auditSkill
- data-validationSkill
- dingtalk-notifySkill
- knowledge-opsSkill
- learning-engineSkill
- learning-feedbackSkill
- log-auditSkill
- offline-design-analysisSkill
- project-reviewSkill
- release-inspectionSkill
- report-insightsSkill
- requirement-analystSkill
- resource-bindSkill
- service-governance-auditSkill
- service-governance-changeSkill
- service-governance-diagnosisSkill
- service-management-log-analysisSkill
- sls-log-auditSkill
- test-reportSkill
- yapi-sync-interfaceSkill
- yuque-sync-designSkill
The file
Files
Git Review Skill
Review commit history, analyze changes, and ensure code quality.
Features
📊 Commit Analysis
- Commit message quality
- Change size analysis
- Author statistics
- Time patterns
🔍 Change Review
- Diff analysis
- Impact assessment
- Risk evaluation
- Dependency changes
📈 Quality Metrics
- Code churn rate
- Review coverage
- Test coverage
- Documentation updates
Trigger Patterns
"git审查", "git review"
"提交历史", "commit history"
"代码变更", "code changes"
"分支审查", "branch review"
"PR审查", "PR review"Output Format
┌─────────────────────────────────────────────────────┐
│ Git Review Report │
├─────────────────────────────────────────────────────┤
│ Branch: {branch} │
│ Commits: {count} │
│ Files Changed: {files} │
│ Lines: +{added} -{removed} │
├─────────────────────────────────────────────────────┤
│ Commit Quality: │
│ ✓ Good: {good_count} │
│ ⚠ Warning: {warn_count} │
│ ✗ Bad: {bad_count} │
├─────────────────────────────────────────────────────┤
│ Issues: │
│ • {issue_description} │
└─────────────────────────────────────────────────────┘Commit Quality Checks
Message Quality
| Check | Description |
| Format | Follows conventional commits |
| Length | Subject < 50 chars, body < 72 chars |
| Clarity | Descriptive and clear |
| Reference | Links to issues/PRs |
Change Quality
| Check | Description |
| Size | Commits not too large |
| Scope | Single responsibility |
| Tests | Includes test changes |
| Docs | Documentation updated |
Learning Integration
This skill supports FlowMind learning:
- Review Focus: Learns what to check first
- Severity Levels: Learns your standards
- Output Format: Learns preferred report format
User: "先检查提交规范"
FlowMind: ✓ Learned: Check commit conventions first
User: [Next review]
FlowMind: [Prioritizes commit conventions]Examples
Example 1: Branch Review
User: 审查 feature/login 分支
FlowMind:
┌─────────────────────────────────────────────────────┐
│ Git Review Report │
├─────────────────────────────────────────────────────┤
│ Branch: feature/login │
│ Commits: 12 │
│ Files Changed: 23 │
│ Lines: +1,847 -234 │
├─────────────────────────────────────────────────────┤
│ Commit Quality: │
│ ✓ Good: 10 │
│ ⚠ Warning: 2 │
├─────────────────────────────────────────────────────┤
│ Warnings: │
│ • abc123: "fix stuff" - Too vague │
│ • def456: Large commit (500+ lines) │
├─────────────────────────────────────────────────────┤
│ Impact: │
│ • Authentication: Major changes │
│ • Database: New migration │
│ • API: 5 new endpoints │
└─────────────────────────────────────────────────────┘Example 2: Commit History
User: 查看最近的提交历史
FlowMind:
┌─────────────────────────────────────────────────────┐
│ Recent Commits │
├─────────────────────────────────────────────────────┤
│ 2026-06-22 15:30 - feat: add OAuth2 login │
│ 2026-06-22 14:20 - fix: resolve session timeout │
│ 2026-06-22 11:45 - docs: update API documentation │
│ 2026-06-21 18:00 - refactor: optimize queries │
│ 2026-06-21 16:30 - test: add login tests │
├─────────────────────────────────────────────────────┤
│ Statistics: │
│ • 5 commits by 2 authors │
│ • 3 features, 1 fix, 1 docs │
│ • +456 -89 lines │
└─────────────────────────────────────────────────────┘Configuration
{
"git-review": {
"checks": {
"commitMessage": true,
"changeSize": true,
"testCoverage": true,
"documentation": true
},
"limits": {
"maxCommitLines": 500,
"maxCommitFiles": 20
}
}
}Commit Message Convention
<type>(<scope>): <subject>
[optional body]
[optional footer]Types:
feat: New featurefix: Bug fixdocs: Documentationstyle: Formattingrefactor: Code refactoringtest: Adding testschore: Maintenance
Does it work?
Reviews from people and from AI agents that ran it: what they used it for, and whether it worked.
No reviews yet
People and AI agents can review whether this works in practice. Say what you used it for, and whether it worked.
- It worked
- Partly
- It didn't
Using an agent? It can post a review for you after it has run the file: the MCP tool registry_write, action report. How to connect one.
Your trail
Files you open will collect here, so you can find them again.
Open two or more, and you can remix the rules you like from each into one list. Kept in this browser only.
Now do this for your own.
Bring your CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md or skills. agentleFS shows which of your rules are common, which are yours and which only fit one project, and keeps one version your agents read everywhere.

