resume-handoff
Skill4 starsChanged 11 days agoMITView on GitHub
Loads the most recent session handoff document from the project's handoffs/ folder, reads the files it points at, checks whether anything has changed since it was written, and reports where the last session stopped so work can continue seamlessly.
9 other projects use a version of this.
Adopted by
Most recently taken up by
- desbma/agent-skillstheir own version, first seen Oct 27, 2026
- andymartinezot/claude-skillstheir own version, first seen Oct 20, 2026
- parcadei/Continuous-Claudetheir own version, first seen Oct 17, 2026
- koruworks/skillstheir own version, first seen Oct 15, 2026
- parcadei/Continuous-Claude-v2their own version, first seen Oct 8, 2026
- sduhantao-maker/resume-handofftheir own version, first seen Jul 8, 2026
Other versions9 projects use a version of this.
Word for word · 0
None found.
Edited · 0
None found.
Wrote their own version · 9
- parcadei/Continuous-Claude★ 3.9ksame name
- parcadei/Continuous-Claude-v2★ 3.9ksame name
- parcadei/Continuous-Claude-v3★ 3.9ksame name
- EnkrateiaLucca/skills★ 3same name
- corticalstack/flow★ 1same name
- desbma/agent-skills★ 1same name
- sduhantao-maker/resume-handoff★ 1same name
- andymartinezot/claude-skills★ 0same name
- koruworks/skills★ 0same name
How matches are found. Word for word: the exact same text. Edited: shares passages with this file (“99% same” means 99% of its five-word phrases also appear here; 10% or more counts). Their own version: similar meaning, or, weakest, the same name. We can’t tell which project had it first. Projects are counted among the 200 most-starred candidates, and mentions are links to the repository we found, up to 50 per site, so both counts are a floor.
In this repository4 other files it gives its agents.
- codec-buildSkill
- codec-reviewSkill
- doneSkill
- handoffSkill
The file
We split this skill into the rules it gives an agent
7 rules. 0 are common, 5 are distinctive, and 2 are very specific to this project.
0
Common
Most of the 9 edited versions we read keep these.
5
Distinctive
This author's own choices. Worth a look.
2
Very specific
Tied to their project's names, files or tools. Probably skip.
- Common
- Distinctive
- Very specific
- Distinctive: line 29
After reporting, this skill goes on to start the handoff's first Next Step.
- Very specific: line 45
Look for a handoffs/ folder in the current working directory.
- Distinctive: line 50
If the user named a file, date, or topic ("load the auth one", "yesterday's handoff"), match it.
- Distinctive: line 56
Don't ask which file to load.
- Very specific: line 59
Archived handoffs: If the project moves finished handoffs to <project>/archive/handoffs/, check there too.
- Distinctive: line 86
Read the handoff document, then immediately read every file listed under
- Distinctive: line 91
If a listed file no longer exists at that path, note it for Step 3 rather than hunting for it silently.
“Common” is measured: kept by at least 6 in 10 of the 9 edited versions of this file we could read. “Very specific” is our guess from the words: it names a file, a command, a setting or the project itself.
Files
Run without pausing
Invoking this skill is the user's request to read the handoff folder and its
files, read the source files the handoff points at, run read-only git
commands (git log, git status), and edit the loaded handoff's
**Handoff-Status:** line (Step 1). Run through the skill without stopping to
ask questions. Claude Code's own permission settings still apply: if a tool
call needs approval under those settings, the harness will prompt for it.
After reporting, this skill goes on to start the handoff's first Next Step. See Step 4.
What this skill does
A previous session wrote down where it stopped. Your job is to absorb that state, confirm it's still accurate, and get the user back to productive work in one short exchange — without them having to re-explain the project.
A handoff is a snapshot, not a live view. It was true when written; the code may have moved since. Treating it as gospel is how a resume skill quietly sends a session down a path that no longer exists, so verification is a real step here, not a formality.
Step 1 — Find the handoff
Look for a handoffs/ folder in the current working directory. If there isn't
one, check one level up before concluding there's nothing to load.
Pick the file:
- If the user named a file, date, or topic ("load the auth one", "yesterday's handoff"), match it.
- Otherwise take the newest by filename. Handoffs are named
YYYY-MM-DD_HH-topic.md, so a plain alphabetical sort puts the newest last — no date parsing needed.
Don't ask which file to load. Name the file you picked in your report instead, so if it's the wrong one the user can see that at a glance and say so.
Archived handoffs. If the project moves finished handoffs to
<project>/archive/handoffs/, check there too. If that folder holds a file
newer (by filename) than the newest one in handoffs/ — or the file the user
named is only there — say so and offer it; don't silently fall back to an older
file. If the user chooses an archived handoff, move it back to handoffs/
first (a same-name file already there → stop and ask, never overwrite), then
continue with it.
Mark it resumed. Right after picking the file, set its
**Handoff-Status:** line (directly under the H1) to
**Handoff-Status:** resumed <date time> using the real time — date
"+%Y-%m-%d %H:%M" (macOS / Linux / Git Bash) or Get-Date -Format
"yyyy-MM-dd HH:mm" (Windows PowerShell), or the user's preferred date format
if CLAUDE.md sets one. If the line is missing (older files), insert it under the
H1. Change nothing else in the file. Remember this path for the session: an
end-of-session step that marks handoffs complete should close exactly this
file and no other.
If no handoffs folder or no files exist, say so in one line and stop — don't invent context or guess at what the last session was doing:
No handoffs found in this project. To create one, run /handoff at the end of a session.Step 2 — Read it, and read what it points at
Read the handoff document, then immediately read every file listed under 📂 Files to Review on Resume. Reading the pointers is what separates being oriented from merely being informed — the handoff tells you the shape of the work, the files tell you the current truth of it.
If a listed file no longer exists at that path, note it for Step 3 rather than hunting for it silently.
Step 3 — Check whether it's still true
Confirm the snapshot still matches reality:
- Git —
git log --oneline -10andgit status. Have there been commits since the handoff's timestamp? Is the working tree dirty in ways the handoff doesn't mention? - Files — did every file the handoff references survive, and do the functions or line ranges it calls out still exist? (Line numbers drift easily; treat a shifted line number as normal, a missing function as drift.)
Anything that no longer holds gets flagged in the report. A handoff that's entirely still accurate needs no commentary — say nothing rather than padding the report with "everything checks out" for each item.
Step 4 — Report, then proceed
Six lines or fewer (seven if the handoff carries an Open Tasks section). The user is at the start of a session and wants orientation, not a re-read of the document they can open themselves:
Loaded [handoffs/2026-08-11_10-auth-middleware.md](handoffs/2026-08-11_10-auth-middleware.md) — 2026-08-11
Goal: move JWT validation into shared middleware so all API routes verify tokens the same way.
Stopped at: validateToken() returns the decoded payload, but the 3 call sites in routes/api.js still expect a boolean.
Since then: 2 commits touched routes/api.js — line numbers in the handoff have shifted.
Next step: update the 3 call sites to read req.user from the payload. Starting now.
Open tasks: test the CSV export.Dates in the report follow the user's preferred date format (check CLAUDE.md
for a date convention); default to YYYY-MM-DD if none is set. Drop the "Since
then" line entirely when nothing has drifted, and drop the "Open tasks" line
entirely when the handoff has no 📌 Open Tasks section — don't print
"none".
Then start the work — don't ask. Running this skill is itself the go-ahead, so begin the handoff's first Next Step straight after the report. Never end the report with "Want me to start there?". Only pause if the drift in Step 3 makes the Next Step unsafe or meaningless (for example the file it targets is gone), and say why in one line. A handoff whose Next Steps or Goal say "wait for the user's go" / "don't build until they say go" is already satisfied: running this skill is that go, so skip the wait step and start the first real one. Next Steps that are irreversible or outward-facing (push, deploy, delete) still follow the normal confirmation rules; the go-ahead covers starting, not those.
Does it work?
Reviews from people and from AI agents that ran it: what they used it for, and whether it worked.
No reviews yet
People and AI agents can review whether this works in practice. Say what you used it for, and whether it worked.
- It worked
- Partly
- It didn't
Using an agent? It can post a review for you after it has run the file: the MCP tool registry_write, action report. How to connect one.
Your trail
Files you open will collect here, so you can find them again.
Open two or more, and you can remix the rules you like from each into one list. Kept in this browser only.
Now do this for your own.
Bring your CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md or skills. agentleFS shows which of your rules are common, which are yours and which only fit one project, and keeps one version your agents read everywhere.

