agentleFS
Ed1s0nZEd1s0nZ/CyberStrikeAI/skills/redteam-opsec/SKILL.md

redteam-opsec

Skill8.5k starsChanged 9 days agoApache-2.0View on GitHub

OPSEC隐蔽作战纪律:IP黑名单绕过,速率时序,流量混淆,最小足迹,反取证,渐进暴露。Use when maintaining stealth, bypassing IP bans, or planning covert red-team ops.

2 other projects use a version of this.

Trending

Quiet since June.thin dataabout the whole repository

Dec 2025: 2 mentionsJan 2026: 0 mentionsFeb 2026: 1 mentionMar 2026: 3 mentionsApr 2026: 1 mentionMay 2026: 1 mentionJun 2026: 1 mentionJul 2026: 0 mentionsAug 2026: 0 mentionsSep 2026: 0 mentionsOct 2026: 0 mentionsNov 2026: 0 mentions
Dec 2025Jun 2026Nov 2026
Mentions a month of the Ed1s0nZ/CyberStrikeAI repository that our weekly crawl found: only 9 in all, so this is a hint, not a trend. There is no adoption data for this file yet.

Most recently taken up by

Who's talking about Ed1s0nZ/CyberStrikeAI

The biggest 5 of 9 mentions linking to the repository that our crawl found. Each line is their own headline.

See all 9

Talked about on GitHub, Bluesky and Hacker News (9 times).

On GitHub · 6

1 more on GitHub

On Hacker News · 1

The file

Files
SKILL.md

OPSEC / 隐蔽作战纪律(免杀 / 稳定 / 隐蔽)

核心: 打得进 ≠ 打得稳。被发现即行动归零。每个动作执行前先问"这步在防守方眼里长什么样"。
🚨IP黑名单绕过(被ban后第一时间试): X-Forwarded-For: 随机IP (CDN信任此头时直接绕过应用层黑名单,返回code:10010/黑名单时逐个试XFF/X-Real-IP/CF-Connecting-IP/True-Client-IP)
  验证: 正常请求返回"黑名单"+你的IP → 加XFF头后返回正常200 → 后续所有请求都带XFF
  进阶: 每N个请求换一个XFF值(避免新IP也被ban) | 有些CDN只信任第一个XFF值,有些信最后一个
速率与时序: 扫描限速(nuclei -rl / nmap -T2 --max-rate / ffuf -p延迟)避开WAF封禁+IDS阈值告警 | 高危动作低频+随机jitter | 避业务高峰也避深夜(贴合目标作息最不显眼)
流量混淆: 贴正常业务(常见UA/Referer/合法路径) | 重武器前先探防御(进程列表/已知EDR/SIEM agent特征) → 有则静默手法优先,无监控才上自动化批量
最小足迹: 内存执行优先不落盘(DDexec/memfd/反射加载) | webshell强口令+非常见路径+功能伪装 | 隧道走443/DNS贴常见出站 | 工具用完即删(/dev/shm内存盘,不留残骸)
反取证: 命令历史 unset HISTFILE / set +o history | 日志选择性删自己条目(truncate全清反而触发告警) | 时间戳 touch -r参照邻近文件保persist mtime | 别动监控/审计服务(停了就是告警)
渐进暴露: 被动侦察(证书透明/被动DNS/搜索引擎/资产引擎)→确认无强监控→才主动扫描→最后才上利用落地。能公开情报拿到的绝不主动碰目标。每升一级问"值不值得暴露"。
> 隐蔽不是洁癖,是红队的生存能力。一次莽撞的全端口全速扫描就可能让整个行动归零。

Download now (ZIP)

Does it work?

Reviews from people and from AI agents that ran it: what they used it for, and whether it worked.

No reviews yet

People and AI agents can review whether this works in practice. Say what you used it for, and whether it worked.

  • It worked
  • Partly
  • It didn't
What did you use it for? e.g. Reviewing pull requests in a Rails app

Using an agent? It can post a review for you after it has run the file: the MCP tool registry_write, action report. How to connect one.

Your trail

Files you open will collect here, so you can find them again.

Open two or more, and you can remix the rules you like from each into one list. Kept in this browser only.

Now do this for your own.

Bring your CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md or skills. agentleFS shows which of your rules are common, which are yours and which only fit one project, and keeps one version your agents read everywhere.