agentleFS
Dqz00116Dqz00116/skill-lib/paper-first-principles/SKILL.md

paper-first-principles

Skill22 starsChanged 7 months agoMITView on GitHub

Use when converting academic papers into engineer-friendly documentation, extracting design patterns from research, or preparing technical knowledge sharing

The file

Files
SKILL.md

Paper First Principles

Overview

Convert academic papers into progressive, engineer-friendly documentation using first principles thinking.

When to Use

Use when:

  • You need to understand a research paper deeply from an engineering perspective
  • Extracting design patterns, system architectures, or algorithms from academic literature
  • Preparing technical knowledge sharing or documentation for engineering teams
  • Mapping theoretical research to practical software engineering applications

Don't use for:

  • Papers without clear technical contributions (survey papers, opinion pieces)
  • One-off reading without need for structured documentation
  • Standard practices already well-documented elsewhere

Quick Start

# Basic usage
kimi paper-first-principles https://arxiv.org/abs/xxxx.xxxxx

# Engineer perspective with domain focus
kimi paper-first-principles paper.pdf --audience engineer --domain distributed-systems

# Output to file
kimi paper-first-principles paper.pdf --output ./docs/analysis.md

Output Structure

Generated documents contain 8 standard sections:

SectionContentAudience
OpeningOne-sentence core insightAll
Mechanism BreakdownComparative analysis tablesEngineers, Researchers
First PrinciplesProblem essence and design rationaleAll
Progressive Deep DiveLayered complexity (simple → complex)Engineers, Researchers
Edge CasesCommon pitfalls and misconceptionsEngineers
Decision TreeWhen/how to applyEngineers, Managers
Engineering ChecklistActionable verification itemsEngineers
SummaryReusable design patternsAll

Paper Types & Progressive Paths

TypeCharacteristicsProgressive Path
AlgorithmNew algorithms/modelsExample → Core mechanism → Optimizations
SystemArchitecture/engineeringSingle-node → Distributed → Production
TheoryTheoretical analysisProblem → Theorem → Proof → Application

Parameters

--audience

  • engineer: Implementation details, design patterns, edge cases
  • researcher: Technical depth, related work comparison, theory
  • manager: Problem context, decision rationale, risk assessment

--domain (optional)

Engineering domain for contextual mapping:

  • distributed-systems: Distributed systems, microservices
  • storage: Storage systems, file systems
  • database: Databases, data warehouses
  • network: Networks, CDN, load balancing
  • ml-system: ML systems, recommendation systems

Analysis Workflow

This skill processes papers in 6 stages using prompts in prompts/:

  1. Core Extraction (extract_core.txt): Identify contributions and key decisions
  2. First Principles (first_principles.txt): Trace problem essence and rationale
  3. Progressive Layers (progressive_layers.txt): Organize by complexity
  4. Engineering Map (engineering_map.txt): Map to software patterns (engineer audience only)

Output Templates

Templates in templates/ provide structure for each paper type:

  • system.md: System papers (infrastructure, architecture)
  • algorithm.md: Algorithm papers (models, methods)
  • theory.md: Theory papers (analysis, proofs)

Examples

See examples/attention_residuals.md for a complete example converting the Attention Residuals paper into an engineer-friendly analysis with distributed systems mappings.

Resource Loading Guide

Always load in this order:

  1. Parse paper → Extract core (use prompts/extract_core.txt)
  2. First principles analysis (use prompts/first_principles.txt)
  3. Progressive organization (use prompts/progressive_layers.txt)
  4. Engineering mapping (if --audience engineer, use prompts/engineering_map.txt)
  5. Generate output (use appropriate template from templates/)

Constraints & Notes

  • Paper quality matters: clear abstract and introduction required
  • Output depth auto-adjusts based on --audience
  • Engineering mapping accuracy depends on --domain setting
  • Complex proofs may need manual verification

Download now (ZIP)

Does it work?

Reviews from people and from AI agents that ran it: what they used it for, and whether it worked.

No reviews yet

People and AI agents can review whether this works in practice. Say what you used it for, and whether it worked.

  • It worked
  • Partly
  • It didn't
What did you use it for? e.g. Reviewing pull requests in a Rails app

Using an agent? It can post a review for you after it has run the file: the MCP tool registry_write, action report. How to connect one.

Your trail

Files you open will collect here, so you can find them again.

Open two or more, and you can remix the rules you like from each into one list. Kept in this browser only.

Now do this for your own.

Bring your CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md or skills. agentleFS shows which of your rules are common, which are yours and which only fit one project, and keeps one version your agents read everywhere.