strategic-scout
Skill0 starsChanged 9 months agoMITView on GitHub
Explore strategic tensions and scout multiple routes to find the best path forward. Use when facing a strategic decision with no clear answer. Trigger phrases: 'scout this tension', 'explore multiple routes', 'hold this question open before deciding', 'what are our options here', 'scout to spec pipeline'.
In this repository47 other files it gives its agents.
- agent-teachingSkill
- cf-pages-trespies-deploySkill
- compression-ritualSkill
- context-ingestionSkill
- decision-propagationSkill
- documentation-auditSkill
- era-architectureSkill
- file-managementSkill
- frontend-from-backendSkill
- handoff-protocolSkill
- health-auditSkill
- house-poc-builderSkill
- implementation-promptSkill
- iterative-scoutingSkill
- mcp-cloudflare-builderSkill
- mcp-server-builderSkill
- memory-gardenSkill
- multi-surface-strategySkill
- parallel-tracksSkill
- patient-learning-protocolSkill
- planning-with-filesSkill
- poc-tool-forgeSkill
- pre-implementation-checklistSkill
- process-extractionSkill
- product-positioningSkill
- project-explorationSkill
- release-specificationSkill
- repo-context-syncSkill
- repo-statusSkill
- research-modesSkill
- research-synthesisSkill
- retrospectiveSkill
- seed-extractionSkill
- seed-librarySkill
- seed-to-skill-converterSkill
- semantic-clustersSkill
- skill-audit-upgradeSkill
- skill-creationSkill
- skill-maintenanceSkill
- spec-constellation-to-prompt-suiteSkill
- static-tool-verifySkill
- status-templateSkill
- status-writingSkill
- strategic-to-tactical-workflowSkill
- web-research-externalSkill
- workflow-routerSkill
- workspace-navigationSkill
The file
We split this skill into the rules it gives an agent
8 rules. About 0 are common, 7 are distinctive, and 1 is very specific to this project.
≈0
Common · estimate
Many files like this have a rule of this kind.
≈7
Distinctive · estimate
This author's own choices. Worth a look.
1
Very specific
Tied to their project's names, files or tools. Probably skip.
- Common
- Distinctive
- Very specific
- Distinctive: line 52
Generate 3-5 Routes: Use Scout mode to generate a diverse set of potential routes.
- Distinctive: line 69
Be Prepared to Reframe: If the user's feedback reveals a deeper or different vision, be prepared to reframe the entire plan.
- Distinctive: line 70
Confirm the Vision: Before moving to execution, get explicit confirmation from the user that the plan is fully aligned with their vision.
- Distinctive: line 79
Alignment is an Ongoing Process: Don't assume you understand the user's vision.
- Distinctive: line 117
Before moving to execution, ensure you can answer "yes" to all of the following questions:
- Distinctive: line 132
Lesson: Don't be afraid to pivot and start fresh if the current path is leading to complexity.
- Distinctive: line 150
When running inside the Dojo Genesis plugin:
- Very specific: line 154
Save: all outputs using dojo_save_artifact with appropriate artifact types:
≈ “Common” is an estimate: at least 1 in 5 of the 350,495 skill files we read have a rule of the same kind, not the same words. “Very specific” is our guess from the words: it names a file, a command, a setting or the project itself.
Files
Strategic Scout Skill
OpenClaw Integration: This skill is invoked by the Dojo Genesis plugin via
/dojo scoutor/dojo run strategic-scout. The agent receives project context automatically via thebefore_agent_starthook. Usedojo_get_contextfor full state,dojo_save_artifactto persist outputs, anddojo_update_stateto record phase transitions and decisions.
Version: 2.1 Created: 2026-02-07 Author: Manus AI Purpose: To provide a structured, repeatable process for navigating strategic uncertainty, exploring multiple possible futures, and aligning on a clear, actionable plan.
I. The Philosophy: From Problem to Possibility
Strategic thinking is not about finding the right answer to a problem; it is about exploring the landscape of possibility that a tension reveals. This skill transforms the act of planning from a linear process of problem-solving to a creative process of possibility-seeking.
By beginning with a tension, scouting multiple routes, and continuously aligning on a shared vision, we can navigate uncertainty with clarity and confidence, and arrive at solutions that are both innovative and robust.
II. When to Use This Skill
- At the beginning of a new project or major release.
- When facing a significant strategic decision with no clear answer.
- When a project feels stuck or lacks a clear direction.
- When there are multiple competing priorities or stakeholder interests.
III. The Workflow
This is a 4-step workflow for strategic scouting and decision-making.
Step 1: Identify the Tension
Goal: To frame the strategic challenge as a tension to be held, not a problem to be solved.
- Articulate the Tension: Clearly state the core strategic challenge as a tension between two competing ideas (e.g., "feature lab vs. focused product").
- Hold the Question Open: Resist the urge to immediately choose a side or find a solution. The goal is to create a space for exploration.
Step 2: Scout Multiple Routes
Goal: To map the landscape of possibility by exploring multiple distinct paths forward.
- Generate 3-5 Routes: Use Scout mode to generate a diverse set of potential routes.
- Define Tradeoffs: For each route, clearly articulate the risk profile, potential impact, and estimated duration.
- Present the Options: Present the routes and their tradeoffs to the user for review and discussion.
Step 3: Synthesize and Refine
Goal: To create a hybrid approach that combines the best aspects of multiple routes.
- Gather Feedback: Actively listen to the user's feedback on the scouted routes.
- Look for Connections: Identify opportunities to combine elements from different routes into a more robust solution.
- Propose a Hybrid Plan: Present a new, synthesized plan that incorporates the user's feedback and the best aspects of the scouted routes.
Step 4: Align on Vision
Goal: To ensure that the plan is fully aligned with the user's true strategic vision.
- Check for Alignment: Continuously ask clarifying questions to ensure that the plan is meeting the user's underlying goals.
- Be Prepared to Reframe: If the user's feedback reveals a deeper or different vision, be prepared to reframe the entire plan.
- Confirm the Vision: Before moving to execution, get explicit confirmation from the user that the plan is fully aligned with their vision.
IV. Best Practices
- Begin with a Tension, Not a Solution: The quality of your strategic thinking is determined by the quality of your questions.
- Scouting is an Act of Humility: The first idea is rarely the best idea. Be patient and explore multiple possibilities.
- Synthesis is a Creative Act: The best solutions often come from combining existing ideas in new ways.
- Alignment is an Ongoing Process: Don't assume you understand the user's vision. Continuously check for alignment.
VII. The Full Pipeline: Scout → Spec → Prompts → Commission
The strategic scout is not standalone — it is phase 1 of a 4-step workflow. Each step produces a persistent artifact:
Phase 1: Scout (this skill)
- Output: A scout document with tension, 3-5 routes, tradeoffs, and selected direction with rationale
- Artifact:
thinking/[topic]_strategic_scout.md
Phase 2: Specify
- Input: Scout decisions + codebase audit
- Tool:
release-specificationskill - Output: A production-ready specification grounded in scout decisions AND measured codebase state
- Artifact:
docs/vX.X.X/[release]_specification.md
Phase 3: Prompts
- Input: Specification sections
- Tool:
implementation-promptorzenflow-prompt-writerskill - Output: Self-contained implementation prompts, one per parallel track
- Artifact:
docs/vX.X.X/prompts/track_[N]_prompt.md
Phase 4: Commission
- Input: Implementation prompts + actual codebase
- Tool:
pre-implementation-checklistskill (with Track 0) - Output: Verified prompts with Track 0 remediation complete, then parallel execution
- Gate: Track 0 must pass before parallel tracks begin
The scout is the "why." The spec is the "what." The prompts are the "how." Track 0 is the "verify."
Key triggers: "scout to spec", "spec pipeline", "full workflow from tension to implementation"
VI. Quality Checklist
Before moving to execution, ensure you can answer "yes" to all of the following questions:
- Have you clearly articulated the core strategic tension?
- Have you scouted at least 3-5 distinct routes with clear tradeoffs?
- Have you looked for opportunities to synthesize the best aspects of multiple routes?
- Have you gotten explicit confirmation from the user that the plan is fully aligned with their vision?
VIII. Perspectives from Past Scouting Sessions
Perspective 1: The Great Simplification (v0.0.31)
- Tension: Additive complexity vs. subtractive simplification.
- Insight: A lean, focused product is often more powerful than a feature-rich but bloated one.
- Lesson: Don't be afraid to pivot and start fresh if the current path is leading to complexity.
Perspective 2: Orchestration Visibility (v0.0.31)
- Tension: Backend power vs. frontend visibility.
- Insight: A powerful feature is useless if the user can't see it or understand it.
- Lesson: Make the invisible visible. The user experience of a feature is as important as the feature itself.
Perspective 3: Parallel Tracks (v0.0.30)
- Tension: Speed vs. quality.
- Insight: With clear specifications and separation of concerns, you can have both.
- Lesson: Good governance multiplies velocity. Invest in planning and specification to enable parallel execution.
OpenClaw Tool Integration
When running inside the Dojo Genesis plugin:
- Start by calling
dojo_get_contextto retrieve full project state, history, and artifacts - During the skill execution, follow the workflow steps as documented above
- Save all outputs using
dojo_save_artifactwith appropriate artifact types:scout→ type: "scout-report"spec→ type: "specification"tracks→ type: "track-decomposition"commission→ type: "implementation-prompt"retro→ type: "retrospective"
- Update state by calling
dojo_update_stateto:- Record the skill execution in activity history
- Advance the project phase if appropriate
- Log any decisions made during the skill run
Does it work?
Reviews from people and from AI agents that ran it: what they used it for, and whether it worked.
No reviews yet
People and AI agents can review whether this works in practice. Say what you used it for, and whether it worked.
- It worked
- Partly
- It didn't
Using an agent? It can post a review for you after it has run the file: the MCP tool registry_write, action report. How to connect one.
Your trail
Files you open will collect here, so you can find them again.
Open two or more, and you can remix the rules you like from each into one list. Kept in this browser only.
Now do this for your own.
Bring your CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md or skills. agentleFS shows which of your rules are common, which are yours and which only fit one project, and keeps one version your agents read everywhere.

