idea-capture
Skill1 starsChanged 6 days agoMITView on GitHub
Capture a raw idea the moment it arrives and keep it in a durable store, so it survives between sessions. Use whenever an idea comes up mid-work, in passing, or outside a calibration session — before it is lost — and when you need to find, promote, or drop a stored idea. Only invoke via the orcinus router.
1 other project uses a version of this.
Adopted by
Most recently taken up by
- bozhouDev/bozhou-skillstheir own version, first seen Mar 22, 2026
Other versions1 project uses a version of this.
Word for word · 0
None found.
Edited · 0
None found.
Wrote their own version · 1
- bozhouDev/bozhou-skills★ 78same name
How matches are found. Word for word: the exact same text. Edited: shares passages with this file (“99% same” means 99% of its five-word phrases also appear here; 10% or more counts). Their own version: similar meaning, or, weakest, the same name. We can’t tell which project had it first. Projects are counted among the 200 most-starred candidates, and mentions are links to the repository we found, up to 50 per site, so both counts are a floor.
In this repository35 other files it gives its agents.
- accessibilitySkill
- api-and-interface-designSkill
- architectureSkill
- ask-questions-if-underspecifiedSkill
- breaking-changeSkill
- buildSkill
- codebase-knowledge-builderSkill
- database-designerSkill
- diagnosing-bugsSkill
- finalizeSkill
- frontend-architectureSkill
- frontend-data-contractsSkill
- frontend-optimistic-mutationsSkill
- handoffSkill
- i18nSkill
- idea-calibrateSkill
- incomplete-refactorSkill
- independent-reviewSkill
- issue-triageSkill
- mcp-builderSkill
- monitoring-observabilitySkill
- monitoringSkill
- mutation-testing-pythonSkill
- mutation-testingSkill
- orcinusSkill
- orcinus-verifySkill
- performance-optimizationSkill
- refactorSkill
- registry-publishSkill
- scaffoldSkill
- security-reviewSkill
- skill-creatorSkill
- visual-regressionSkill
- wazaSkill
- webapp-testingSkill
The file
We split this skill into the rules it gives an agent
4 rules. About 0 are common, 1 is distinctive, and 3 are very specific to this project.
≈0
Common · estimate
Many files like this have a rule of this kind.
≈1
Distinctive · estimate
This author's own choices. Worth a look.
3
Very specific
Tied to their project's names, files or tools. Probably skip.
- Common
- Distinctive
- Very specific
- Very specific: line 25
Run the script (scripts/capture.py, Python 3.11+, standard library only):
- Very specific: line 42
When the idea is calibrated with idea-calibrate, record it:
- Very specific: line 48
When the calibrated brief is scoped into v1, promote it to scoped.
- Distinctive: line 54
Every move appends one line to the file's History.
≈ “Common” is an estimate: at least 1 in 5 of the 350,495 skill files we read have a rule of the same kind, not the same words. “Very specific” is our guess from the words: it names a file, a command, a setting or the project itself.
Files
IDEA-CAPTURE — a fleeting idea that is not captured is lost
An idea that arrives mid-work and is not written down is gone by the next session. This skill is the store for raw ideas: one Markdown file per idea, in the project's ideas/ directory, written verbatim and never edited. Calibration is a separate step (idea-calibrate); this skill only makes sure the idea is still there when you are ready for it.
Rules
- Capture first, calibrate later. When a raw idea arrives, write it down before doing anything else with it — before answering, before coding, before the next message.
- Verbatim, always. The raw text is the idea as spoken, with the date and who said it. Never edit, improve, or interpret it after capture.
- The store lives in the project (
ideas/), committed with it. A store in/tmpis lost on the next restart; a store in the project survives. - A dropped idea is never deleted. Dropping only changes the status and records the reason. The file, the raw text, and the reason stay.
- Statuses move one way:
raw→calibrated→scoped, or any →dropped. A dropped idea never comes back as raw; if it returns, capture it again as a new idea.
Steps, in order
1. Capture
Run the script (scripts/capture.py, Python 3.11+, standard library only):
capture.py capture --store <project>/ideas --text "<the idea, verbatim>" --source "<who said it>"It prints the idea id (YYYYMMDD-HHMMSS-slug). The slug is ASCII only (a-z, 0-9, hyphen): the raw text may be any language — a Persian-only idea gets the slug idea (with a -2 suffix if two collide in the same second) — while the raw text itself is stored verbatim. An empty idea is refused (exit 1, no file created). If two ideas arrive in the same second, the second gets a -2 suffix — the id is always unique. The raw text is stored exactly as given; only the emptiness check strips whitespace, and CRLF line endings are normalised to LF. The frontmatter carries raw_length (the length of the raw text), so an idea that itself contains a line reading ## History is not truncated. The source must be a single line (a newline would inject a frontmatter field). The id is strictly validated (only the generated shape is accepted) and the resolved path must stay inside the store, so an id can never escape it — even through a symlink. Listing and searching resolve every file and require it to stay inside the store, and a file whose frontmatter id does not match its filename is reported as malformed. A status change takes a lock file (created with O_EXCL; the holder's PID is written into it, so a lock left by a dead process is recognised as stale and removed with a note, while a lock with no readable PID is never stolen and a lock is never removed for age) for the whole read-modify-write, then writes atomically (temp file + replace), so two concurrent changes cannot lose a History entry and an interruption cannot leave a half-written file. A capture creates its file exclusively, so two concurrent captures cannot overwrite each other. A file that cannot be parsed is reported to stderr, never silently skipped — and a list or search that skipped one exits 2 (partial), so a machine caller never treats an incomplete result as complete. A status change edits only the frontmatter's status: line, never a status: line inside the raw text, and a file with no status recorded fails cleanly instead of assuming one.
2. Find it later
capture.py list --store <project>/ideas— every idea, with status and date.capture.py list --store <project>/ideas --status raw— only the unprocessed ones.capture.py search --store <project>/ideas <keyword>— ideas whose raw text contains the keyword (case-insensitive; works in Persian and English). Search matches only the raw idea text, not the frontmatter or the History, so searching for "raw" or "dropped" does not return everything.capture.py show --store <project>/ideas <id>— the whole file.
3. Move it forward
When the idea is calibrated with idea-calibrate, record it:
capture.py promote --store <project>/ideas <id> calibrated --note "<what it became>"When the calibrated brief is scoped into v1, promote it to scoped. When the idea is not going ahead, drop it — with a reason, always:
capture.py drop --store <project>/ideas <id> --reason "<why not>"Every move appends one line to the file's History. The raw text is never touched.
Report
Return the report in this form:
- Captured (id, date, source).
- Store (path, number of ideas by status).
- Moved (every status change, with the reason).
- Verdict: PASS (the idea is on disk verbatim, findable by search, and every move is recorded) or FAIL (an idea was lost, edited, or deleted, or a move was not recorded).
Scope
This skill is the store only. It does not sharpen, validate, or scope an idea — that is idea-calibrate. It does not decide what to build — that is the user, at the Idea → Code gate. The store is plain Markdown files; there is no database, no server, and no sync — the project's own git history is the backup.
Sources
Written from scratch. No ready skill answers this need: the research found capture-in-session (idea-calibrate, step 1) but no persistent store for fleeting ideas between sessions.
Does it work?
Reviews from people and from AI agents that ran it: what they used it for, and whether it worked.
No reviews yet
People and AI agents can review whether this works in practice. Say what you used it for, and whether it worked.
- It worked
- Partly
- It didn't
Using an agent? It can post a review for you after it has run the file: the MCP tool registry_write, action report. How to connect one.
Your trail
Files you open will collect here, so you can find them again.
Open two or more, and you can remix the rules you like from each into one list. Kept in this browser only.
Now do this for your own.
Bring your CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md or skills. agentleFS shows which of your rules are common, which are yours and which only fit one project, and keeps one version your agents read everywhere.

