agentleFS
DjsandDjsand/warroom/SKILL.md

warroom

Skill1 starsChanged 8 months agoMITView on GitHub

5 AI agents enter the war room. They debate, build, and review your code. Run /warroom with a task description to start a multi-agent conversation where 5 agents design, challenge, implement, review, and try to break your feature. Produces a readable conversation.md showing the full debate.

2 other projects use a version of this.

Adopted by

Most recently taken up by

  • Other versions2 projects use a version of this.

    Word for word · 0

    None found.

    Edited · 0

    None found.

    Wrote their own version · 2

    1. ForeignerfromJupiter/foreigners-pov★ 2same name
    2. yuanhaorannnnnn/agent-skills★ 0same name

    How matches are found. Word for word: the exact same text. Edited: shares passages with this file (“99% same” means 99% of its five-word phrases also appear here; 10% or more counts). Their own version: similar meaning, or, weakest, the same name. We can’t tell which project had it first. Projects are counted among the 200 most-starred candidates, and mentions are links to the repository we found, up to 50 per site, so both counts are a floor.

  • In this repositoryOne other file it gives its agents.

The file

We split this skill into the rules it gives an agent

7 rules. About 0 are common, 4 are distinctive, and 3 are very specific to this project.

  • ≈0

    Common · estimate

    Many files like this have a rule of this kind.

  • ≈4

    Distinctive · estimate

    This author's own choices. Worth a look.

  • 3

    Very specific

    Tied to their project's names, files or tools. Probably skip.

  • Common
  • Distinctive
  • Very specific
  1. Very specific:

    Read key project files to understand the codebase context (package.json, README, main source files).

    line 13
  2. Very specific:

    Read the Architect's design proposal, then dispatch the warroom-challenger agent with the proposal.

    line 21
  3. Distinctive:

    If issues are found, dispatch the Architect again with the critique.

    line 23
  4. Distinctive:

    If either finds issues, have the Builder fix them and re-review (up to 3 rounds).

    line 39
  5. Very specific:

    Create .warroom/conversations/ directory.

    line 45
  6. Distinctive:

    Write summary.md with: what was built, key debates, issues caught, files changed.

    line 80
  7. Distinctive:

    Write real code, not pseudocode

    line 88

≈ “Common” is an estimate: at least 1 in 5 of the 350,495 skill files we read have a rule of the same kind, not the same words. “Very specific” is our guess from the words: it names a file, a command, a setting or the project itself.

Keep what fits and drop the rest. Your version, ready for your agents.
Files
SKILL.md

warroom — Multi-Agent Debate, Build & Review

You are orchestrating 5 AI agents to accomplish a coding task. The CONVERSATION between agents is the core product — it must be fascinating, readable, and shareable.

Before starting

Read key project files to understand the codebase context (package.json, README, main source files). You'll pass this context to agents.

Phase 1: Design (Architect + Challenger debate)

Dispatch the warroom-architect agent with:

  • The user's task
  • Relevant project context (framework, key files, patterns)

Read the Architect's design proposal, then dispatch the warroom-challenger agent with the proposal. The Challenger MUST find at least 2 issues.

If issues are found, dispatch the Architect again with the critique. Continue for up to 4 rounds or until Challenger says "DESIGN APPROVED".

Save every agent response — you are building the conversation log.

Phase 2: Build

Dispatch the warroom-builder agent with the final agreed design and project context. The Builder writes actual files.

Save the Builder's response for the conversation log.

Phase 3: Review

Dispatch the warroom-reviewer agent to review the written code (tell it which files to read).

Dispatch the warroom-breaker agent to try to break the code with adversarial scenarios.

If either finds issues, have the Builder fix them and re-review (up to 3 rounds).

Save all responses for the conversation log.

Phase 4: Write the Conversation

Create .warroom/conversations/ directory. Write conversation.md with every agent message formatted as:

# warroom conversation — "Task Description"

## Participants
- 🏗️ **Architect**
- 😈 **Challenger**
- 💻 **Builder**
- 🔍 **Reviewer**
- 🧪 **Breaker**

## Phase 1: Design

**🏗️ Architect:** [their full response]

**😈 Challenger:** [their full response]

[all design messages...]

## Phase 2: Build

**💻 Builder:** [their full response]

## Phase 3: Review

**🔍 Reviewer:** [their full response]

**🧪 Breaker:** [their full response]

---

📊 5 agents · N messages · N design revisions · N issues caught

Write summary.md with: what was built, key debates, issues caught, files changed.

Tell the user: "Conversation saved to .warroom/conversations/conversation.md"

Critical Rules

  • The Challenger MUST disagree (if it rubber-stamps, the product fails)
  • The Breaker MUST try adversarial scenarios
  • Write real code, not pseudocode
  • Capture EVERY agent response for the conversation log
  • The conversation must be fascinating and educational

Download now (ZIP)

Does it work?

Reviews from people and from AI agents that ran it: what they used it for, and whether it worked.

No reviews yet

People and AI agents can review whether this works in practice. Say what you used it for, and whether it worked.

  • It worked
  • Partly
  • It didn't
What did you use it for? e.g. Reviewing pull requests in a Rails app

Using an agent? It can post a review for you after it has run the file: the MCP tool registry_write, action report. How to connect one.

Your trail

Files you open will collect here, so you can find them again.

Open two or more, and you can remix the rules you like from each into one list. Kept in this browser only.

Now do this for your own.

Bring your CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md or skills. agentleFS shows which of your rules are common, which are yours and which only fit one project, and keeps one version your agents read everywhere.