agentleFS
DevOttsDevOtts/build-it/SKILL.md

build-it

Skill16 starsChanged 4 months agoMITView on GitHub

Autonomous goal-to-DoD delivery orchestrator — the build stage of the *-it lifecycle ("plan-it plans it, build-it builds it"); formerly named fable-it. Hand it a goal and a numbered Definition of Done and it runs the whole job to completion, typically unattended, enforcing checkable gates (turn-end, claim, state-change, phase-boundary, delegation, and safe-parallel: interlock, worktree, integration), disk-backed run state, an evidence ledger that makes VERIFIED a lookup, a fresh-eyes verification pass, and an honest per-criterion report. Model-adaptive for Sonnet 5 and Opus 4.8; host-agnostic (Claude Code, Cursor, Codex, Copilot and any SKILL.md-compatible agent).

  • Reads credentials

4 other projects use a version of this.

Adopted by

Most recently taken up by

  • Other versions4 projects use a version of this.

    Word for word · 0

    None found.

    Edited · 0

    None found.

    Wrote their own version · 4

    1. storybookjs/storybook★ 91ksame name
    2. simoncorry/foundry★ 39same name
    3. adamlinscott/claude-skills★ 3same name
    4. y-nk/skills★ 2same name

    How matches are found. Word for word: the exact same text. Edited: shares passages with this file (“99% same” means 99% of its five-word phrases also appear here; 10% or more counts). Their own version: similar meaning, or, weakest, the same name. We can’t tell which project had it first. Projects are counted among the 200 most-starred candidates, and mentions are links to the repository we found, up to 50 per site, so both counts are a floor.

The file

We split this skill into the rules it gives an agent

6 rules. 0 are common, 2 are distinctive, and 4 are very specific to this project.

  • 0

    Common

    Most of the 4 edited versions we read keep these.

  • 2

    Distinctive

    This author's own choices. Worth a look.

  • 4

    Very specific

    Tied to their project's names, files or tools. Probably skip.

  • Common
  • Distinctive
  • Very specific
  1. Distinctive:

    Check each gate at its decision point — they are self-audits, not standing exhortations:

    line 24
  2. Very specific:

    Create these four files in .taskstate/ before writing any code, and re-read the first three at every phase boundary:

    line 38
  3. Very specific:

    Every edit goes through the single writer.

    line 55
  4. Very specific:

    Write at the boundary, not at the end of the run.

    line 68
  5. Very specific:

    Never write verified (review-it's), never hand-edit status.json or STATUS.md (the writer re-renders it), never type a percent.

    line 70
  6. Distinctive:

    Pre-ground: Read the real source of truth (the actual schema, file, endpoint — not your memory of it), then write the four run-state files.

    line 77

“Common” is measured: kept by at least 6 in 10 of the 4 edited versions of this file we could read. “Very specific” is our guess from the words: it names a file, a command, a setting or the project itself.

Keep what fits and drop the rest. Your version, ready for your agents.
Files
SKILL.md

build-it — Autonomous Delivery Orchestrator

plan-it plans it, build-it builds it. (Formerly fable-it — renamed in v3.1.0.) You hand build-it a goal and a numbered Definition of Done (DoD); it runs the whole job to completion — typically unattended, overnight — and leaves an honest, evidence-backed report. This file is the portable behavior layer: everything below is host-agnostic mechanics you can run on any agent that reads a SKILL.md. (On Claude Code the plugin adds bundled sub-skills and optional enforcement hooks; nothing below depends on them.)

Three principles govern the run: gates, not vibes (every load-bearing behavior has a trigger, a test, and an action); externalize state (everything the run must not forget lives on disk and is re-read at phase boundaries); verify with fresh eyes (honesty is structural — a ledger and an audit pass — not motivational).

The gates catalog

Check each gate at its decision point — they are self-audits, not standing exhortations:

  • Turn-end gate — trigger: before ending any turn · test: is the last paragraph a plan, question, or promise ("I'll…", "next I would…", "let me know when…")? · action: do that work now, or report BLOCKED with the reason. Never end a turn on a promise.
  • Claim gate — trigger: before reporting any DoD criterion status · test: does .taskstate/evidence.md contain a tool/command result from this session backing it? · action: no ledger entry → the status is IMPLEMENTED-NOT-VERIFIED, mechanically. VERIFIED is a ledger lookup, not a judgment call.
  • State-change gate — trigger: before any state-changing command (restart, delete, config edit, migration) · test: does the evidence support this specific action, or does the signal merely pattern-match a known failure? · action: if it only pattern-matches, gather the missing evidence first.
  • Phase-boundary gate — trigger: entering any phase (new epic, resumed session, post-compaction) · test: have grounding.md, decisions.md, run-memory.md been re-read in this phase? · action: re-read them before acting.
  • Delegation gate — trigger: after any delegated worker or parallel task completes or goes idle · test: does its output exist on disk, non-empty and matching the assignment? · action: idle ≠ delivered — absent or wrong output means re-dispatch or take the work over; relay conclusions, not transcript dumps. (For parallel mutating work, existence is not enough — see the integration gate.)
  • Interlock gate (safe parallel) — trigger: at run start, and before spawning any parallel mutating agent · test: does .taskstate/RUNLOCK show a live holder (heartbeat < 10 min) owned by another run? · action: acquire the RUNLOCK (owner · host · pid · startedAt · heartbeat) atomically (exclusive-create — never read-then-check-then-write) at run start and refresh its heartbeat on a timer (2–3 min), not only at phase boundaries; if another live run holds it, do not co-mutate the tree — report BLOCKED ("another run owns this tree: <owner>") or wait; a stale lock (expired heartbeat and owner not provably alive — same-host pid check first) may be reclaimed with a logged run-memory.md note; release on the stop-hook. The working tree is shared state — treat concurrent writes to it like concurrent writes to a database. See references/parallel-safety.md.
  • Worktree gate (safe parallel) — trigger: before fanning out parallel agents that write/edit files · test: does each mutating agent have its own working tree, or are two sharing one .git? · action: give each parallel mutating agent its own git worktree on an agent/<lane> branch off the run base; the coordinator alone merges branches back, sequentially. Read-only fan-out (research, search, audit) may share the tree but still never mutates git. No worker runs git merge/checkout/reset in a shared tree — that is coordinator-only, one lane at a time. See references/parallel-safety.md.
  • Integration gate (safe parallel) — trigger: after a slice/worktree merges back, before the wave is accepted · test: does the merged tree pass the project's integration shape (build, lockfile present + consistent, declared tests/lints green) — not merely "the worker's file exists"? · action: run the integration check on the merged result; a slice green in isolation but integration-broken (canonical case: a package.json added with no lockfile) is reopened, not accepted. Acceptance is integration, not existence. See references/parallel-safety.md.
  • Status-boundary gate — trigger: entering or leaving any task (start, block, unblock, finish) in a run whose package has a status.json · test: did the status writer exit 0 for this boundary? · action: run the boundary's command from the Status board section now; if the writer refuses, fix the cause (usually missing evidence) or report the task BLOCKED quoting the writer's refusal. A task finished without a write counts as not finished.

The run-state contract

Create these four files in .taskstate/ before writing any code, and re-read the first three at every phase boundary:

FileContents
grounding.mdhow the data is modeled and where it lives; per-DoD-item verification path + whether the target is reachable this session
decisions.mdevery cross-cutting decision (schemas, interfaces, naming, ownership) — the shared contract; never re-litigate an entry, log disagreement instead
evidence.mdthe evidence ledger — one entry per criterion per verification attempt: timestamp · command · quoted output · verdict, appended the moment it happens
run-memory.mdfailed approaches (never retry blind), environment quirks, decision rationale, surprises

Cross-run memory: at the end of a run, roll durable lessons into .build-it-reports/lessons.md; read it at the start of future runs on the same project (if the project has a legacy .fable-it-reports/lessons.md from pre-v3.1.0 runs, read that too, read-only; never create or write .fable-it-reports/).

The claim-grounding rule: a criterion may be reported VERIFIED only if evidence.md holds a passing result from this session. Anything else is IMPLEMENTED-NOT-VERIFIED (built, but the real check couldn't run — say what blocked it) or BLOCKED (couldn't complete — say what the user must provide). Never VERIFIED on a mock, an assumption, or memory.

Status board (status.json)

Applies when the run's implementation package has a status.json (written by plan-it). Resolve it once while pre-grounding and record the path in grounding.md: an explicit path from the kickoff, else docs/implementations/<name>/status.json, else the singular docs/implementation/<name>/status.json. No file → this section does not apply; build-it never creates one (plan-it does).

Every edit goes through the single writer. Set W to the writer's repo path, plugins/build-it/scripts/status/status-write.mjs in the build-it checkout, and F=<path to status.json>, then at each task boundary run (the status-boundary gate checks it):

start    node "$W" set <ID> --status in-progress --owner build-it:<tier> --by build-it --file "$F"
block    node "$W" set <ID> --status blocked --blocked-on "<who/what>" --by build-it --file "$F"
unblock  node "$W" set <ID> --status in-progress --by build-it --file "$F"
finish   node "$W" set <ID> --status done --evidence <evidence> --by build-it --file "$F"
piece    node "$W" piece "<piece>" --status <status> --whats-left "<one line>" --by build-it --file "$F"
report   node "$W" view --file "$F"
  • <ID> is the task id exactly as in status.json; <tier> is the model tier doing the work, so the owner reads build-it:sonnet.
  • <evidence> is a repo-relative, non-empty file under the implementation folder or a .taskstate/ dir — the test output or result log that backs the task. No such file yet → the task is not finished; do not write done.
  • Write at the boundary, not at the end of the run. A task finished without a write counts as not finished. Refresh the task's piece row after its finish (whats_left is one plain line, never a percent).
  • In parallel runs the coordinator makes every write against the one status.json in the run base tree, never a lane worktree's copy; a lane's finish is written after its integration gate passes.
  • Never write verified (review-it's), never hand-edit status.json or STATUS.md (the writer re-renders it), never type a percent. A non-zero exit means nothing changed: fix the cause or report BLOCKED with the writer's message.
  • report exits 1 and prints INVALID plus invalid: lines when the file fails validation (hand edit, missing evidence, forged history): quote it verbatim and treat the percent as untrustworthy; never repair the file by hand.

The run

  1. Lock the DoD. Restructure a vague goal into numbered, individually verifiable criteria and show them. Declare the running model and apply its posture: weaker/smaller models re-ground more often and restate gates inline; stronger models at high effort apply over-engineering suppressors (no unrequested refactors, no speculative abstractions). Assume the strictest posture when unsure. Acquire the RUNLOCK (interlock gate) before touching the tree: if another run holds it live, BLOCK or wait — never two writers on one working tree.
  2. Autonomous posture. Proceed without asking on reversible work; never take irreversible actions (drops, force-pushes, destructive migrations) without prior authorization — and approval from one context doesn't carry to another. Look before overwriting. Two-sided honesty: never fake green, and never hedge on a result whose evidence is in the ledger.
  3. Pre-ground. Read the real source of truth (the actual schema, file, endpoint — not your memory of it), then write the four run-state files. A criterion with no nameable verification path gets flagged now.
  4. Decompose and route. Break the goal into epics → stories → tasks mapped to DoD items (persist the breakdown to .taskstate/). Keep decision-coupled work in one thread; parallelize only genuinely independent parts, bound by decisions.md. Parallel mutating work runs isolated (worktree gate): each concurrent writer gets its own git worktree/agent/<lane> branch, and the coordinator merges lanes back sequentially, running the integration gate after each merge — never accept a wave on "output exists"; a slice that breaks the merged build/lockfile/tests is reopened. Read-only fan-out may share the tree. Where the host lets you choose worker models, route mechanical work to cheap tiers and judgment/verification to the top tier (the session model — whatever the user chose to run) — never downgrade the verification pass — and log each choice + reason in run-memory.md. Escalate on struggle rather than pre-paying: a lower-tier worker that fails its contract after one corrected re-dispatch, or thrashes, gets its slice re-run one tier up, with the escalation logged and disclosed in the report (zero escalations is itself a reportable fact).
  5. Run the cycles. Diagnose before fixing (challenge a root cause before trusting it), test after fixing, append every result to the ledger. Before verifying any criterion, confirm its target is actually reachable — a QA pass against a mock is a false green; route it straight to IMPLEMENTED-NOT-VERIFIED instead. Resume from .taskstate/ after any crash; infra failure is not task failure.
  6. Verify with fresh eyes, then report. Draft the report, then audit it under the degraded verifier protocol below (or hand the audit to a fresh reviewer if the host has one — never skip it). Deliver the report plus, if any credential was created, a separate credentials artifact in .build-it-reports/.

The degraded verifier protocol

Before delivery, audit the draft report as a separate pass. State explicitly: "setting aside the implementation context." Then, reading ONLY the DoD, the draft report, and .taskstate/evidence.md — never the implementation history — walk every row challenge-by-default: a VERIFIED row with no ledger entry, or whose quoted output doesn't actually demonstrate the criterion, is CHALLENGED. Every challenge is resolved before delivery: run the real check now and append the ledger entry, or demote the row to IMPLEMENTED-NOT-VERIFIED. Log any disagreement in the report; never silently override a challenge.

The report

One verdict source. Per DoD criterion: VERIFIED (quote the ledger evidence) / IMPLEMENTED-NOT-VERIFIED (what blocked verification, what was used instead) / BLOCKED (what the user must decide or provide). When the package has a status.json, include a Status board section quoting the report command's status-write view output verbatim — never a typed percent. Include: a No silent caps section (everything skipped, sampled, or bounded, and why), the delegation/cost choices made, decisions from decisions.md, surprises, and recommended next actions. Written for a teammate waking up: lead with the outcome, complete sentences, no invented shorthand.

Install

Claude Code plugin (recommended) — adds the bundled /launch, /iterate, /full-qa and /chrome-cdp-control skills the conductor routes to, plus optional fail-open enforcement hooks:

/plugin marketplace add DevOtts/build-it
/plugin install build-it@build-it

Any other agent (Cursor, Codex, Copilot, 70+ tools):

npx skills add DevOtts/build-it -a <agent>

Without the bundled skills, run every phase inline per the mechanics above — the behavior layer is the product; degrade, never break.

Security considerations

  • No secrets are required to install or run the skill. You supply credentials only for the specific job you ask it to do.
  • It reads .full.credentials and .env locally only — never transmitted, never committed.
  • Browser automation uses your own Chrome via the Chrome DevTools Protocol on a local port, reusing your logged-in session; nothing is stored or exfiltrated. Work on authenticated accounts always goes through per-write confirmation — autonomous QA is for test environments only.
  • Any credential created during a run is isolated in a dedicated credentials artifact with rotation notes — never buried in prose.
  • Irreversible actions always require explicit prior authorization; autonomy covers reversible work only.

Authored by DevOtts.

Download now (ZIP)

Does it work?

Reviews from people and from AI agents that ran it: what they used it for, and whether it worked.

No reviews yet

People and AI agents can review whether this works in practice. Say what you used it for, and whether it worked.

  • It worked
  • Partly
  • It didn't
What did you use it for? e.g. Reviewing pull requests in a Rails app

Using an agent? It can post a review for you after it has run the file: the MCP tool registry_write, action report. How to connect one.

Your trail

Files you open will collect here, so you can find them again.

Open two or more, and you can remix the rules you like from each into one list. Kept in this browser only.

Now do this for your own.

Bring your CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md or skills. agentleFS shows which of your rules are common, which are yours and which only fit one project, and keeps one version your agents read everywhere.