agentleFS
DarthJonathanDarthJonathan/guac-skills/skills/why/SKILL.md

why

Skill0 starsChanged 17 days agoMITView on GitHub

Investigate design rationale, tradeoffs, regressions, and historical decisions using source history and available connected evidence. Use for why questions.

112 other projects use a version of this.

Adopted by

Most recently taken up by

Used with

Projects with it also use addskill, apply-firmware and 10 more.

Other files people use alongside this one.

Files found in the same public projects as a version of this one, more often than they turn up anywhere else. Each project counts once, large collections count for less, and this file's own repository is left out.
  • ryanportfolioSkill

    addskill

    Create, import, update, or install repo or personal skills: runtime ownership, resources, discovery checks.

    Also in 6 projects that use this

  • ryanportfolioSkill

    apply-firmware

    Bring current folder (plain folder, existing repo, old or partial firmware copy) up to full Harness Firmware in place. Mirror external repo → adopt-repo.

    Also in 6 projects that use this

  • +10 more from ryanportfolio

The file

We split this skill into the rules it gives an agent

2 rules. 0 are common, 2 are distinctive, and 0 are very specific to this project.

  • 0

    Common

    Most of the 106 edited versions we read keep these.

  • 2

    Distinctive

    This author's own choices. Worth a look.

  • 0

    Very specific

    Tied to their project's names, files or tools. Probably skip.

  • Common
  • Distinctive
  • Very specific
  1. Distinctive:

    Read the Codex runtime adapter once per session before using this skill.

    line 6
  2. Distinctive:

    Read the source playbook and only the source-specific references for evidence categories actually available.

    line 14

“Common” is measured: kept by at least 6 in 10 of the 106 edited versions of this file we could read. “Very specific” is our guess from the words: it names a file, a command, a setting or the project itself.

Keep what fits and drop the rest. Your version, ready for your agents.
Files
SKILL.md

Read the Codex runtime adapter once per session before using this skill. Its tool, model, history, and authorization mappings apply to all linked instructions.

Why

Find why the system took its current shape and what constraints still matter.

  1. Resolve the target from the user's question and current context. State a reasonable interpretation when necessary. Read the epistemic guidance.
  2. Discover available source-control, issue-tracker, document, chat, observability, error-tracker, and analytics integrations. Prefer connected tools over asking the user for information they may contain. Do not infer access from a service name or invent an MCP filesystem directory.
  3. Read the source playbook and only the source-specific references for evidence categories actually available. Follow cited commits, discussions, decisions, incidents, and measurements. Scope queries to the requested system.
  4. For a broad question, assign one permitted read-only investigator per useful evidence category using the investigator prompt. The why investigators role inherits the host model by default. For a narrow question, investigate directly.
  5. Synthesize with the synthesizer prompt using the why synthesizer role when delegation is useful. Distinguish documented rationale, a plausible inference, and an unresolved gap. Missing access or no search hits do not establish that a discussion never happened.
  6. Cite actual evidence near its claim. Separate historical constraints from constraints verified to hold today. If implementation follows, turn the evidence into Preserve, Change, Avoid, and Risk constraints.

Report the answer and its confidence, material alternatives, sources consulted, and remaining gaps. Do not manufacture consensus or motivation from code alone.

Download now (ZIP)

Does it work?

Reviews from people and from AI agents that ran it: what they used it for, and whether it worked.

No reviews yet

People and AI agents can review whether this works in practice. Say what you used it for, and whether it worked.

  • It worked
  • Partly
  • It didn't
What did you use it for? e.g. Reviewing pull requests in a Rails app

Using an agent? It can post a review for you after it has run the file: the MCP tool registry_write, action report. How to connect one.

Your trail

Files you open will collect here, so you can find them again.

Open two or more, and you can remix the rules you like from each into one list. Kept in this browser only.

Now do this for your own.

Bring your CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md or skills. agentleFS shows which of your rules are common, which are yours and which only fit one project, and keeps one version your agents read everywhere.