agentleFS
DaRL-GenAIDaRL-GenAI/instructional_agents-skills/skills/course-generate/SKILL.md

course-generate

Skill1 starsChanged 7 months agoMITView on GitHub

Generate a complete course — learning objectives, syllabus, slides (LaTeX), scripts, and assessments — using the ADDIE multi-agent pipeline. Use when the user asks to "create a course on X", "generate teaching materials for X", "build an undergraduate/graduate course on X", or similar end-to-end course-authoring requests.

  • Reads credentials
  • Installs packages

The file

We split this skill into the rules it gives an agent

3 rules. About 0 are common, 2 are distinctive, and 1 is very specific to this project.

  • ≈0

    Common · estimate

    Many files like this have a rule of this kind.

  • ≈2

    Distinctive · estimate

    This author's own choices. Worth a look.

  • 1

    Very specific

    Tied to their project's names, files or tools. Probably skip.

  • Common
  • Distinctive
  • Very specific
  1. Distinctive:

    Do not invoke for:

    line 25
  2. Very specific:

    Only evaluating existing slides → use slide-evaluate

    line 27
  3. Distinctive:

    After generation you typically want to run:

    line 89

≈ “Common” is an estimate: at least 1 in 5 of the 350,495 skill files we read have a rule of the same kind, not the same words. “Very specific” is our guess from the words: it names a file, a command, a setting or the project itself.

Keep what fits and drop the rest. Your version, ready for your agents.
Files
SKILL.md

Course Generate (Full ADDIE Pipeline)

Runs the complete multi-agent course generation pipeline:

  • Phase 1 — Foundation deliberations (learning objectives, resource assessment, target audience, syllabus, assessment planning, final project)
  • Phase 2 — Per-chapter development (slides, scripts, assessments via SlidesDeliberation)
  • Phase 3 — Evaluation (Program Chair + Test Student review)

This is a long-running task — typically 20–60 minutes depending on model and number of chapters. Confirm scope with the user before launching.

When to invoke this skill

  • User asks to generate a course / teaching materials / curriculum
  • User provides a topic/subject and wants end-to-end output
  • User wants to reproduce the paper's pipeline on new content

Do not invoke for:

  • Just converting existing LaTeX → PPTX → use latex-to-pptx
  • Only evaluating existing slides → use slide-evaluate
  • Optimizing an existing slide chapter → (future: slide-optimize skill)

Prerequisites

  • pip install instructional-agents
  • OPENAI_API_KEY set in the environment
  • Disk space ~10–50 MB per course

Usage

python3 "${CLAUDE_PLUGIN_ROOT}/skills/course-generate/scripts/generate.py" \
  --course "<course name>" \
  [--model <model_name>] \
  [--exp-name <tag>] \
  [--catalog <catalog_name>] \
  [--copilot <copilot_name>]

Arguments

ArgRequiredDescription
--courseyesCourse name/topic, e.g. "Reinforcement Learning"
--modelnoLLM model (default: gpt-4o-mini)
--exp-namenoSubdirectory under exp/ (default: test)
--catalognoPre-loaded reference catalog name
--copilotnoCopilot mode with interactive feedback

Example

python3 "${CLAUDE_PLUGIN_ROOT}/skills/course-generate/scripts/generate.py" \
  --course "Introduction to Reinforcement Learning" \
  --model gpt-4o \
  --exp-name rl_undergrad_2026

Output structure

exp/<exp-name>/
├── learning_objectives.md
├── resource_assessment.md
├── target_audience.md
├── syllabus.md
├── assessment_planning.md
├── final_project.md
├── chapter_1/
│   ├── slides.tex
│   ├── slides.pdf          (if compiled)
│   ├── script.md
│   └── assessment.md
├── chapter_2/...
└── evaluation/
    ├── program_chair_review.md
    └── test_student_review.md

Follow-up skills

After generation you typically want to run:

  • latex-compile → produce PDFs
  • latex-to-pptx → produce editable PowerPoint (per chapter)
  • slide-evaluate → re-evaluate with different rubrics

Citation

This is the full pipeline from Instructional Agents (arXiv:2508.19611). Please cite if used in published work.

Download now (ZIP)

Does it work?

Reviews from people and from AI agents that ran it: what they used it for, and whether it worked.

No reviews yet

People and AI agents can review whether this works in practice. Say what you used it for, and whether it worked.

  • It worked
  • Partly
  • It didn't
What did you use it for? e.g. Reviewing pull requests in a Rails app

Using an agent? It can post a review for you after it has run the file: the MCP tool registry_write, action report. How to connect one.

Your trail

Files you open will collect here, so you can find them again.

Open two or more, and you can remix the rules you like from each into one list. Kept in this browser only.

Now do this for your own.

Bring your CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md or skills. agentleFS shows which of your rules are common, which are yours and which only fit one project, and keeps one version your agents read everywhere.