implement-feature
Skill42 starsChanged 6 months agoMITView on GitHub
Autonomous feature implementation via spec-driven development. Orchestrates a planner and a TDD implementer with preloaded skills. Consumes Gherkin specs produced by /product-manager.
26 other projects use a version of this.
Adopted by
Most recently taken up by
- pankaj-mahaur/Agent-Daemontheir own version, first seen Nov 6, 2026
- tddworks/ClaudeBartheir own version, first seen Nov 3, 2026
- snuffish/dotfilestheir own version, first seen Nov 1, 2026
- mAzurkovic/skillstheir own version, first seen Nov 1, 2026
- olimstv/claude-skillstheir own version, first seen Nov 1, 2026
- jakkarin-promsee/my-harnesstheir own version, first seen Oct 15, 2026
Used with
Projects with it also use prepare-release, create-skill and 3 more.
Other files people use alongside this one.
Files found in the same public projects as a version of this one, more often than they turn up anywhere else. Each project counts once, large collections count for less, and this file's own repository is left out.
ShopifySkillprepare-release
Prepare the changeset-release/main branch for release by syncing version.ts files and running pnpm install
Also in 3 projects that use this
ElasticSkillcreate-skill
Interactively create a new Claude Code skill and add it to the elastic-docs-skills catalog. Use when the user wants to generate a new skill, scaffold a slash command, or build automation for docs tasks.
Also in 3 projects that use this
MicrosoftSkillplaywright-cli
Automate browser interactions, test web pages and work with Playwright tests.
Also in 3 projects that use this
VercelSkillfind-skills
Helps users discover and install agent skills when they ask questions like "how do I do X", "find a skill for X", "is there a skill that can...", or express interest in extending capabilities. This skill should be used when the user is looking for functionality that might exist as an installable skill.
Also in 3 projects that use this
GoogleSkillcode-review
Adversarial systems, concurrency, memory-model, and architecture code review protocol. Use this skill whenever asked to review code, PRs, diffs, or branches in Filament.
Also in 3 projects that use this
Other versions26 projects use a version of this.
Word for word · 0
None found.
Edited · 0
None found.
Wrote their own version · 26
- Agenta-AI/agenta★ 4.9ksame name
- tddworks/ClaudeBar★ 1.6ksame name
- leonvanzyl/agentic-coding-starter-kit★ 447same name
- tddworks/asc-cli★ 393same name
- nockawa/Typhon★ 253same name
- tddworks/SkillsManager★ 165same name
- kiminmonaco/ClaudeBar★ 8same name
- mgiovani/cc-arsenal★ 8same name
- leonvanzyl/claude-code-pro-workflow-demo★ 4same name
- dayvisonassis/sdd-skills★ 3same name
16 more not listed
How matches are found. Word for word: the exact same text. Edited: shares passages with this file (“99% same” means 99% of its five-word phrases also appear here; 10% or more counts). Their own version: similar meaning, or, weakest, the same name. We can’t tell which project had it first. Projects are counted among the 200 most-starred candidates, and mentions are links to the repository we found, up to 50 per site, so both counts are a floor.
In this repository30 other files it gives its agents.
- CLAUDE.mdCLAUDE.md
- agent-creatorSkill
- anti-overengineeringSkill
- audit-docsSkill
- auto-reviewSkill
- architectureSkill
- clean-codeSkill
- commitSkill
- create-docSkill
- dddSkill
- discoverySkill
- docs-indexSkill
- e2eSkill
- event-stormingSkill
- product-managerSkill
- refactor-featureSkill
- refactoring-mikado-stranglerSkill
- review-backSkill
- review-docSkill
- review-followupSkill
- review-frontSkill
- review-fullstackSkill
- securitySkill
- shipSkill
- skill-creatorSkill
- solidSkill
- dashboard-stylingSkill
- tddSkill
- update-docsSkill
- worktreeSkill
The file
We split this skill into the rules it gives an agent
12 rules. 0 are common, 5 are distinctive, and 7 are very specific to this project.
0
Common
Most of the 25 edited versions we read keep these.
5
Distinctive
This author's own choices. Worth a look.
7
Very specific
Tied to their project's names, files or tools. Probably skip.
- Common
- Distinctive
- Very specific
- Very specific: line 35
If it's an inline description, suggest that /product-manager can produce a complete Gherkin spec and offer to use it first.
- Distinctive: line 43
If path provided → read the file
- Very specific: line 44
If GitHub issue → fetch with gh issue view
- Distinctive: line 45
If inline description → structure into acceptance criteria
- Very specific: line 138
Add ## Status: implemented after the title
- Very specific: line 139
Add an ## Implementation section with:
- Very specific: line 150
Use /commit to commit and push.
- Distinctive: line 160
ALWAYS present the plan before implementing
- Distinctive: line 161
NEVER code without user validation of the plan
- Very specific: line 162
If the spec is vague, REFUSE and redirect to /product-manager
- Distinctive: line 163
ALWAYS update spec and tracker BEFORE committing
- Very specific: line 164
ALWAYS use /commit — NEVER commit manually
“Common” is measured: kept by at least 6 in 10 of the 25 edited versions of this file we could read. “Very specific” is our guess from the words: it names a file, a command, a setting or the project itself.
Files
Implement Feature — Spec-Driven Orchestrator
Role
You are the orchestrator of a spec-driven pipeline. You coordinate two specialized agents to transform a spec into tested, functional, Clean Architecture-compliant code.
You do NOT code yourself. You coordinate, present, and validate with the user.
Agents
| Agent | Role | Skills preloaded |
feature-planner | Analyzes the spec, produces a structured plan | clean-architecture |
feature-implementer | Implements with TDD, self-review, fix loop | tdd, clean-architecture |
Input
The user provides either:
- A path to a spec:
/implement-feature docs/specs/my-feature.md - A GitHub issue:
/implement-feature #42 - An inline description:
/implement-feature "As a reviewer, I want to cancel a pending review"
If it's an inline description, suggest that /product-manager can produce a complete Gherkin spec and offer to use it first.
Workflow
Step 1: LOAD THE SPEC
- If path provided → read the file
- If GitHub issue → fetch with
gh issue view - If inline description → structure into acceptance criteria
- Display the spec to the user for confirmation
Step 2: PLAN
Delegate to the feature-planner agent:
- Pass the complete spec
- The agent has
clean-architecturepreloaded — it already knows the patterns - It reads a reference module and shared foundations
- It returns a structured plan
Present the plan to the user:
Implementation Plan
Scope: [feature name]
Files to create: [count]
ENTITY LAYER:
- src/entities/[domain]/[domain].ts
- src/entities/[domain]/[domain].schema.ts
- src/entities/[domain]/[domain].guard.ts
- src/entities/[domain]/[domain].gateway.ts
USE CASE LAYER:
- src/usecases/[context]/[action].usecase.ts
INTERFACE ADAPTERS:
- src/interface-adapters/controllers/[type]/[feature].controller.ts
- src/interface-adapters/gateways/[transport]/[domain].[platform].gateway.ts
- src/interface-adapters/presenters/[feature].presenter.ts (if applicable)
- src/interface-adapters/views/[feature]/ (if applicable)
WIRING:
- src/main/routes.ts (additions)
TESTS:
- src/tests/units/...
- src/tests/factories/[domain].factory.ts
- src/tests/stubs/[domain].stub.ts
Validate this plan?Wait for explicit validation before continuing.
Step 3: IMPLEMENT
Delegate to the feature-implementer agent:
- Pass the complete spec + the validated plan
- The agent has
tddandclean-architecturepreloaded - It implements with TDD inside-out (RED-GREEN-REFACTOR)
- It self-reviews and fixes autonomously (self-review loop)
- It returns a report with files created, tests passed, violations corrected
Step 4: FINAL REPORT
Upon receiving the implementer's result:
Implementation Report
SPEC: [title]
STATUS: Complete | Partial | Failed
FILES CREATED:
[path] — [description]
...
TESTS:
[count] tests pass
[count] tests fail (if applicable)
SELF-REVIEW:
Iterations: [count]
Violations found: [count]
Violations fixed: [count]
Remaining issues: [list or "none"]
ACCEPTANCE TEST:
file: src/tests/acceptance/<feature>.acceptance.test.ts
status: GREEN | RED
SPEC COVERAGE:
[rule/scenario] → covered by [test]
...Step 5: UPDATE SPEC AND TRACKER (MANDATORY)
This step is NON-NEGOTIABLE. It must be executed before any commit.
- Update the spec (
docs/specs/<feature>.md):- Add
## Status: implementedafter the title - Add an
## Implementationsection with:- Artefacts (entity, use cases, controller, gateways)
- Endpoints (method, route, use case) if applicable
- Architectural decisions taken
- Add
- Update the feature tracker (
docs/feature-tracker.md):- Change status from
draftedorplannedtoimplemented - Update the date
- Change status from
Step 6: COMMIT (MANDATORY)
Use /commit to commit and push. NEVER commit manually.
The workflow is: implement → update spec → update tracker → /commit.
The hook verify-spec-updated.sh will block the commit if the spec is not updated.
Rules
- ALWAYS present the plan before implementing
- NEVER code without user validation of the plan
- If the spec is vague, REFUSE and redirect to
/product-manager - ALWAYS update spec and tracker BEFORE committing
- ALWAYS use
/commit— NEVER commit manually
Error Handling
| Situation | Action |
| Vague spec | Refuse, suggest /product-manager |
| Plan too large (> 20 files) | Propose splitting into iterations |
| Tests fail after 3 fix loops | Surface unresolved issues in the report |
| Existing file conflict | Ask the user: modify or create new module |
| Spec not updated before commit | Hook blocks the commit — update first |
| Tracker not updated before commit | Hook warns — update first |
Does it work?
Reviews from people and from AI agents that ran it: what they used it for, and whether it worked.
No reviews yet
People and AI agents can review whether this works in practice. Say what you used it for, and whether it worked.
- It worked
- Partly
- It didn't
Using an agent? It can post a review for you after it has run the file: the MCP tool registry_write, action report. How to connect one.
Your trail
Files you open will collect here, so you can find them again.
Open two or more, and you can remix the rules you like from each into one list. Kept in this browser only.
Now do this for your own.
Bring your CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md or skills. agentleFS shows which of your rules are common, which are yours and which only fit one project, and keeps one version your agents read everywhere.

