agentleFS
CsHengCsHeng/agent-skills/skills/review-plan/SKILL.md

review-plan

Skill3 starsChanged 9 days agoMITView on GitHub

Read-only evaluator for one bounded implementation plan. Return evidence-backed scope, dependency, oracle, authority, and recovery findings; direct review requests belong to review-change.

35 other projects use a version of this.

Adopted by

Most recently taken up by

Used with

Projects with it also use implement-plan, review-code and 9 more.

Other files people use alongside this one.

Files found in the same public projects as a version of this one, more often than they turn up anywhere else. Each project counts once, large collections count for less, and this file's own repository is left out.
  • JasonPaffSkill

    implement-plan

    Execute implementation plan with structured tracking and validation using subagent architecture

    Also in 5 projects that use this

  • NVIDIASkill

    review-code

    Review a code repository for concrete issues in correctness, robustness, security, maintainability, tests, and integration. Use for repository-wide or focused code review where practical engineering judgment and strict scope control matter.

    Also in 7 projects that use this

  • PydanticSkill

    review-security

    Security review of the current branch against its merge base — sandbox escapes, memory errors, panics and resource-limit bypasses. Use when reviewing changes for security risk, or before merging anything touching the heap/ module, path_security.rs, the wire protocol or the pool.

    Also in 3 projects that use this

  • am-willSkill

    planner

    Create comprehensive, phased implementation plans with sprints and atomic tasks. Use when user says: "make a plan", "create a plan", "plan this out", "plan the implementation", "help me plan", "design a plan", "draft a plan", "write a plan", "outline the steps", "break this down into tasks", "what's the plan for", or any similar planning request. Also triggers on explicit "/planner" or "/plan" commands.

    Also in 3 projects that use this

  • sahinSkill

    execute

    Also in 3 projects that use this

  • nicolasestremSkill

    brainstorm

    Structured idea generation and solution exploration with systematic analysis.

    Also in 6 projects that use this

The file

We split this skill into the rules it gives an agent

1 rule. 0 are common, 0 are distinctive, and 1 is very specific to this project.

  • 0

    Common

    Most of the 34 edited versions we read keep these.

  • 0

    Distinctive

    This author's own choices. Worth a look.

  • 1

    Very specific

    Tied to their project's names, files or tools. Probably skip.

  • Common
  • Distinctive
  • Very specific
  1. Very specific:

    Read the supplied approved design or scope, the bounded plan target, and only explicitly justified supporting files, under the finding …

    line 8

“Common” is measured: kept by at least 6 in 10 of the 34 edited versions of this file we could read. “Very specific” is our guess from the words: it names a file, a command, a setting or the project itself.

Keep what fits and drop the rest. Your version, ready for your agents.
Files
SKILL.md

Review Plan

Read the supplied approved design or scope, the bounded plan target, and only explicitly justified supporting files, under the finding rules and verdict in review-change. Implementation code is not read to invent requirements.

Plan-Specific Checks

  • First real result: the thin business path comes early; each disputed pre-cutover check names the concrete loss it prevents or why the operation cannot proceed without it, otherwise it moves after cutover or is reused.
  • Two verification levels: binding outcome or boundary acceptance at the delivery endpoint is distinct from revisable candidate local proof methods; a simulation harness, container rebuild, or duplicate assertion that deterministic checks plus real-path verification already cover is a finding to collapse.
  • Milestone and tasks: the milestone is coherent; task IDs, surface inventories, and recovery paths appear where independent work or a risky transition needs them; a plan's own granularity, dependency edges, or local proof methods are not treated as fixed user intent.
  • Authority: external, destructive, and side-effecting actions keep explicit authority; covered authority and generatable products are not reported as missing.
  • Initial readiness and delegation: the first useful local action or parallel assignments are decidable from the plan; a proposed delegated slice is independent, isolated, conflict-free, and convergent; worker counts, fixed topology, exploration prerequisites, or literal dispatch fields are flagged only when imposed without a useful result or real dependency; no model or provider is named.
  • Essential inputs: already-known inputs for actions through delivery are recorded or recoverable from accessible owner references; a claim that access or credentials were supplied without a usable reference is a handoff defect. Secret values are not requested.
  • Live plan: effective goals, authorized discretion, ownership, endpoints, and real pause conditions stay compact; user decisions, investigable facts, generatable products, and technical verification stay distinct.
  • Briefs: a worker brief preserves the parent goal, protected behavior, tradeoff boundaries, environment facts, endpoint, and required versus missing authority without pre-solving the implementation or letting a child self-authorize.

Download now (ZIP)

Does it work?

Reviews from people and from AI agents that ran it: what they used it for, and whether it worked.

No reviews yet

People and AI agents can review whether this works in practice. Say what you used it for, and whether it worked.

  • It worked
  • Partly
  • It didn't
What did you use it for? e.g. Reviewing pull requests in a Rails app

Using an agent? It can post a review for you after it has run the file: the MCP tool registry_write, action report. How to connect one.

Your trail

Files you open will collect here, so you can find them again.

Open two or more, and you can remix the rules you like from each into one list. Kept in this browser only.

Now do this for your own.

Bring your CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md or skills. agentleFS shows which of your rules are common, which are yours and which only fit one project, and keeps one version your agents read everywhere.