visualize
Skill2 starsChanged 9 days agoMITView on GitHub
Use when someone wants a design, feature, flow or data model shown as real diagrams instead of prose - "visualisiere das", "zeig mir die Abläufe als Diagramme", "draw the flows", "show the schema", "before and after", "what changes in the data model", "what can be dropped or shrunk", "side by side today vs new", "Datenschema aufzeigen" - for a spec, a plan, a redesign or an existing feature, usually as a page to share. NOT a single quick chart of numbers (use dataviz), NOT a UI mockup (use a design tool), NOT a review of the design itself (use cil:roast or cil:cross-examine).
46 other projects use a version of this.
Adopted by
Most recently taken up by
- ex3ndr/skillstheir own version, first seen Nov 1, 2026
- therapys/dotagentstheir own version, first seen Nov 1, 2026
- Adrian333Dev/flowtheir own version, first seen Nov 1, 2026
- liormesh/trestletheir own version, first seen Nov 1, 2026
- stefanprodan/1ctxtheir own version, first seen Oct 25, 2026
- PKU-DAIR/AutoScitheir own version, first seen Oct 25, 2026
Used with
Projects with it also use exp-pilot-eval, exp-pilot-run and 10 more.
Other files people use alongside this one.
Files found in the same public projects as a version of this one, more often than they turn up anywhere else. Each project counts once, large collections count for less, and this file's own repository is left out.
skyllwtSkillexp-pilot-eval
Pilot result evaluation — read pilot results, apply success criteria, update idea page (pilot_result, failure_reason if failed), generate PILOT_VERDICT_REPORT. Called by /ideate Phase 5 after /exp-pilot-run.
Also in 4 projects that use this
skyllwtSkillexp-pilot-run
Pilot experiment execution — read Pilot Spec YAML, write pilot code, run experiment(Confirm with the user before operation and require the applicant to conduct manual inspection), return results. Called by /ideate Phase 5. Does NOT modify wiki pages or judge pass/fail.
Also in 4 projects that use this
LambenthanSkilldaily-arxiv
每日从 arXiv 拉取新论文,过滤相关性,auto-ingest 高优先级论文,检测 SOTA 更新
Also in 4 projects that use this
LambenthanSkillexp-eval
实验判决门:Review LLM 独立评判实验结果 → 4 种判决路径 → 自动更新 claims confidence、ideas status、graph edges
Also in 4 projects that use this
phanghonghaoSkillposter
HTML/CSS A4 海报生成。从沙龙/活动 Markdown 文件生成科技风 A4 海报 PDF/PNG。Use when user mentions: poster, 海报, 海报生成, make poster, generate poster, 活动海报, 沙龙海报.
Also in 4 projects that use this
- +1 more from skyllwt
- +6 more from Lambenthan
Other versions46 projects use a version of this.
Word for word · 0
None found.
Edited · 0
None found.
Wrote their own version · 46
- moltbot/clawdbot★ 394ksame name
- steipete/warelay★ 394ksame name
- steipete/clawdis★ 394ksame name
- moltbot/moltbot★ 394ksame name
- clawdbot/clawdbot★ 394ksame name
- openclaw/openclaw★ 394ksame name
- molt-bot/clawdbot★ 391ksame name
- amosblomqvist/learn★ 3.4ksame name
- skyllwt/OmegaWiki★ 1.7ksame name
- DAIR-AutoResearch/AutoSci★ 1.7ksame name
36 more not listed
How matches are found. Word for word: the exact same text. Edited: shares passages with this file (“99% same” means 99% of its five-word phrases also appear here; 10% or more counts). Their own version: similar meaning, or, weakest, the same name. We can’t tell which project had it first. Projects are counted among the 200 most-starred candidates, and mentions are links to the repository we found, up to 50 per site, so both counts are a floor.
In this repository12 other files it gives its agents.
- analyticsSkill
- architectureSkill
- audit-codeSkill
- audit-productSkill
- auditSkill
- cross-examineSkill
- fix-typoSkill
- fun-checkSkill
- roastSkill
- tighten-copySkill
- untangleSkill
- ux-reviewSkill
The file
We split this skill into the rules it gives an agent
6 rules. 0 are common, 5 are distinctive, and 1 is very specific to this project.
0
Common
Most of the 44 edited versions we read keep these.
5
Distinctive
This author's own choices. Worth a look.
1
Very specific
Tied to their project's names, files or tools. Probably skip.
- Common
- Distinctive
- Very specific
- Distinctive: line 18
Before drawing anything, write down what the figures will claim and check each claim in the source:
- Distinctive: line 21
every table and column you will show, read from the schema files
- Distinctive: line 26
Keep the file:line for each.
- Distinctive: line 56
Lay out on fixed columns and rows: Write the coordinates down before the markup.
- Very specific: line 64
Run a script over the page: balanced <text> tags, no duplicate ids, none of the project's banned characters.
- Distinctive: line 65
Look at the page once in light and dark mode at phone and desktop width, if the session offers a preview.
“Common” is measured: kept by at least 6 in 10 of the 44 edited versions of this file we could read. “Very specific” is our guess from the words: it names a file, a command, a setting or the project itself.
Files
cil:visualize - flows and schema as diagrams that say something
What this is
A diagram earns its place when a cold reader sees a mechanism they would otherwise assemble from prose: who decides, what gets stored, where two records exist for one thing, what disappears. A box per noun with arrows between them says nothing the spec did not.
The page shows today and after side by side, wherever something changes. Every statement about today is read in the code before it is drawn. Proposals are labelled as proposals.
1. Collect the facts first
Before drawing anything, write down what the figures will claim and check each claim in the source:
- the stored values behind every state (enum or status column values, not invented labels)
- every table and column you will show, read from the schema files
- who triggers each transition (a person, the system, a webhook, a cron job)
- counts you will print ("20 files read this table"), measured with a grep you can repeat
- columns or tables that nothing reads or writes; a grep for readers and writers proves it
Keep the file:line for each. A wrong fact in a confident diagram does more damage than a missing diagram.
2. Pick the figures
Draw only what the decision turns on. Most designs need four to seven figures from this set:
| Figure | Shows | Must carry |
| Ways in | Inputs to the stores they land in | Edge labels saying what happens automatically, and who decides |
| Lifecycle | States of the main record | The stored value under each state; edges labelled by actor or trigger; the transition nobody approves, marked |
| Who creates what | One flow, step by step | Per step: an actor pill, the action, and the record that comes into being. Duplicates become visible here |
| Computation | How a derived result is built | Stages in order, sources feeding in, what is stored and what is only computed |
| Schema today | Tables that move, columns that matter | What goes away, marked × in the warning colour, with the phase it goes in |
| Schema after | The same tables after the change | New columns +, changed ~, each tagged with its phase; a "goes away" box |
| Shrink table | Everything that can be dropped or made smaller | Today (verified), after, when; what can go now without waiting for a phase |
Pair today and after for every figure where both exist. A "new" figure without its "today" hides what the change costs. For a feature that is already built, "after" is the trimmed version the shrink table proposes.
Pick figures from the reader's question, not from the code's structure. The reader is usually the person who decides what the product does. A component tree, a call graph of server functions or a request sequence through every helper describes the code, and belongs on the page only when the question is about the code's structure.
The page is, in this order: a three-line summary with the legend; the figures, today next to after; the schema pair; the shrink table; the phases with their schema change, when the work ships in steps; one line naming the spec, plan and other pages it draws from. Test coverage maps, file indexes and decision lists are not part of it.
3. Draw by hand, as inline SVG on a page
Publish an Artifact page. REQUIRED SUB-SKILL: load artifact-diagramming for the SVG mechanics and the page contract, then:
- Theme through page CSS classes on the SVG elements (
.n,.n-new,.n-warn,.n-gone,.e,.el), each reading colour tokens defined on:rootwith dark-mode overrides. No literal colours inside the SVG. - One state language across all figures: unchanged, new or changed, a problem today, goes away (dashed in the warning colour), computed and not stored (dashed neutral). Show it once in a legend at the top.
- Give every marker id a per-figure prefix (
f2a-arrow). Ids are page-wide, and a duplicate silently breaks arrowheads in the other figures. - Put wide figures in an
overflow-x: autowrapper with amin-widthon the SVG, so the page itself never scrolls sideways. - Lay out on fixed columns and rows. Write the coordinates down before the markup. Schema boxes get a header band plus 18 px per row.
- Draw FK lines only between neighbouring columns, routed orthogonally through the gap. Farther relations go into the row text as
client_id → clients. Twenty crossing lines read as noise. - Budget the text. At these sizes, mono 10.5 px is about 6.3 px per character, body 11 px about 5.5, and bold 12.5 px about 7. Shorten a label rather than let it run past its box.
- Keep edge labels off the line. For a curve, estimate the point at the label's height and set the label beside it, not on it.
- Write a caption under each figure that states its claim and what the drawing leaves out, such as an edge drawn only in the caption or an exception.
4. Check before publishing
- Run a script over the page: balanced
<text>tags, no duplicate ids, none of the project's banned characters. - Look at the page once in light and dark mode at phone and desktop width, if the session offers a preview.
- Re-read every number and name on the page against your step 1 notes.
Common mistakes
| Mistake | Instead |
| Labels that restate box names ("Booking → Bookings") | Label the edge with the action or rule: paid: confirmed, nobody reviewed it |
| Only the new design drawn | Today and after side by side, with the same layout |
| State names invented for the picture | The stored value under each state |
| Full column dumps in the schema | Only the columns that move or that the argument needs |
| A schema line to every FK | Lines for neighbours, → table text for the rest |
| Mermaid or a chart library for flows | Hand SVG; theming and label placement stay under your control |
| "Can be dropped" without proof | A grep showing no reader and no writer, cited in the shrink table |
| Proposed names shown as if they exist | Say in the caption which names are proposals |
Does it work?
Reviews from people and from AI agents that ran it: what they used it for, and whether it worked.
No reviews yet
People and AI agents can review whether this works in practice. Say what you used it for, and whether it worked.
- It worked
- Partly
- It didn't
Using an agent? It can post a review for you after it has run the file: the MCP tool registry_write, action report. How to connect one.
Your trail
Files you open will collect here, so you can find them again.
Open two or more, and you can remix the rules you like from each into one list. Kept in this browser only.
Now do this for your own.
Bring your CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md or skills. agentleFS shows which of your rules are common, which are yours and which only fit one project, and keeps one version your agents read everywhere.

