agentleFS
CodesbyFebinCodesbyFebin/linkedin-manager/skills/linkedin-headline-lab/SKILL.md

linkedin-headline-lab

Skill0 starsChanged 39 days agoMITView on GitHub

Write five LinkedIn headline options from a role and a proof. Use when the user wants a headline, not a full profile rewrite. Use linkedin-profile-optimizer for a full profile audit.

The file

We split this skill into the rules it gives an agent

2 rules. About 0 are common, 2 are distinctive, and 0 are very specific to this project.

  • ≈0

    Common · estimate

    Many files like this have a rule of this kind.

  • ≈2

    Distinctive · estimate

    This author's own choices. Worth a look.

  • 0

    Very specific

    Tied to their project's names, files or tools. Probably skip.

  • Common
  • Distinctive
  • Very specific
  1. Distinctive:

    Write five. No emoji. No "passionate".

    line 12
  2. Distinctive:

    Do not publish. The user pastes the winner into LinkedIn.

    line 14

≈ “Common” is an estimate: at least 1 in 5 of the 350,495 skill files we read have a rule of the same kind, not the same words. “Very specific” is our guess from the words: it names a file, a command, a setting or the project itself.

Keep what fits and drop the rest. Your version, ready for your agents.
Files
SKILL.md

Headline lab

Five headlines. Each under 220 characters. Each carries a role and one proof.

Steps

  1. Require role and one proof. If the proof is missing, ask. Do not invent a metric.
  2. Write five. No emoji. No "passionate". No pipe-character pile longer than three beats.
  3. Mark the one that matches ../../references/voice-profile.md if it is filled.
  4. Do not publish. The user pastes the winner into LinkedIn.

Related

  • linkedin-approval-gate
  • linkedin-humanizer
  • ../../references/voice-rules.md

Download now (ZIP)

Does it work?

Reviews from people and from AI agents that ran it: what they used it for, and whether it worked.

No reviews yet

People and AI agents can review whether this works in practice. Say what you used it for, and whether it worked.

  • It worked
  • Partly
  • It didn't
What did you use it for? e.g. Reviewing pull requests in a Rails app

Using an agent? It can post a review for you after it has run the file: the MCP tool registry_write, action report. How to connect one.

Your trail

Files you open will collect here, so you can find them again.

Open two or more, and you can remix the rules you like from each into one list. Kept in this browser only.

Now do this for your own.

Bring your CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md or skills. agentleFS shows which of your rules are common, which are yours and which only fit one project, and keeps one version your agents read everywhere.