team-composition-patterns
Skill2 starsChanged 8 months agoMITView on GitHub
Design optimal agent team compositions with sizing heuristics, preset configurations, and agent type selection. Use this skill when deciding team size, selecting agent types, or configuring team presets for multi-agent workflows.
1 other project uses a version of this, 1 of them edited.
Adopted by
Most recently taken up by
- kitloomlk-stack/agent-skill-builder-kitedited, first seen Oct 15, 2026
Other versions1 project uses a version of this.
Word for word · 0
None found.
Edited · 1
- kitloomlk-stack/agent-skill-builder-kit★ 063% same
Wrote their own version · 0
None found.
How matches are found. Word for word: the exact same text. Edited: shares passages with this file (“99% same” means 99% of its five-word phrases also appear here; 10% or more counts). Their own version: similar meaning, or, weakest, the same name. We can’t tell which project had it first. Projects are counted among the 200 most-starred candidates, and mentions are links to the repository we found, up to 50 per site, so both counts are a floor.
In this repository239 other files it gives its agents.
- claude-code-docs/agents.mdAGENTS.md
- CLAUDE.mdCLAUDE.md
- claude-code-docs/llms.txtllms.txt
- agent-native-architectureSkill
- claude-apiSkill
- embedding-strategiesSkill
- fal-ai-mediaSkill
- gemini-imagegenSkill
- hybrid-search-implementationSkill
- langchain-architectureSkill
- llm-evaluationSkill
- ml-pipeline-workflowSkill
- prompt-engineering-patternsSkill
- rag-implementationSkill
- similarity-search-patternsSkill
- vector-index-tuningSkill
- api-design-principlesSkill
- api-designSkill
- architecture-patternsSkill
- cqrs-implementationSkill
- event-store-designSkill
- fastapi-templatesSkill
- microservices-patternsSkill
- openapi-spec-generationSkill
- projection-patternsSkill
- saga-orchestrationSkill
- api-conventionsSkill
- andrew-kane-gem-writerSkill
- angular-migrationSkill
- auth-implementation-patternsSkill
- backend-patternsSkill
- bazel-build-optimizationSkill
- coding-standardsSkill
- database-migrationSkill
- debugging-strategiesSkill
- dependency-upgradeSkill
- dhh-rails-styleSkill
- dotnet-backend-patternsSkill
- dspy-rubySkill
- error-handling-patternsSkill
- monorepo-managementSkill
- nodejs-backend-patternsSkill
- nx-workspace-patternsSkill
- react-modernizationSkill
- temporal-python-testingSkill
- turborepo-cachingSkill
- workflow-orchestration-patternsSkill
- defi-protocol-templatesSkill
- nft-standardsSkill
- solidity-securitySkill
- web3-testingSkill
- backtesting-frameworksSkill
- billing-automationSkill
- competitive-landscapeSkill
- data-storytellingSkill
- employment-contract-templatesSkill
- investor-materialsSkill
- investor-outreachSkill
- kpi-dashboard-designSkill
- market-sizing-analysisSkill
- The first 60 shown.
The file
We split this skill into the rules it gives an agent
4 rules. About 0 are common, 3 are distinctive, and 1 is very specific to this project.
≈0
Common · estimate
Many files like this have a rule of this kind.
≈3
Distinctive · estimate
This author's own choices. Worth a look.
1
Very specific
Tied to their project's names, files or tools. Probably skip.
- Common
- Distinctive
- Very specific
- Distinctive: line 28
Rule of thumb: Start with the smallest team that covers all required dimensions.
- Very specific: line 81
When spawning teammates with the Task tool, choose subagent_type based on what tools the teammate needs:
- Distinctive: line 93
Key distinction: Read-only agents (Explore, Plan) cannot modify files.
- Distinctive: line 113
When building custom teams:
≈ “Common” is an estimate: at least 1 in 5 of the 350,495 skill files we read have a rule of the same kind, not the same words. “Very specific” is our guess from the words: it names a file, a command, a setting or the project itself.
Files
Team Composition Patterns
Best practices for composing multi-agent teams, selecting team sizes, choosing agent types, and configuring display modes for Claude Code's Agent Teams feature.
When to Use This Skill
- Deciding how many teammates to spawn for a task
- Choosing between preset team configurations
- Selecting the right agent type (subagent_type) for each role
- Configuring teammate display modes (tmux, iTerm2, in-process)
- Building custom team compositions for non-standard workflows
Team Sizing Heuristics
| Complexity | Team Size | When to Use |
| Simple | 1-2 | Single-dimension review, isolated bug, small feature |
| Moderate | 2-3 | Multi-file changes, 2-3 concerns, medium features |
| Complex | 3-4 | Cross-cutting concerns, large features, deep debugging |
| Very Complex | 4-5 | Full-stack features, comprehensive reviews, systemic issues |
Rule of thumb: Start with the smallest team that covers all required dimensions. Adding teammates increases coordination overhead.
Preset Team Compositions
Review Team
- Size: 3 reviewers
- Agents: 3x
team-reviewer - Default dimensions: security, performance, architecture
- Use when: Code changes need multi-dimensional quality assessment
Debug Team
- Size: 3 investigators
- Agents: 3x
team-debugger - Default hypotheses: 3 competing hypotheses
- Use when: Bug has multiple plausible root causes
Feature Team
- Size: 3 (1 lead + 2 implementers)
- Agents: 1x
team-lead+ 2xteam-implementer - Use when: Feature can be decomposed into parallel work streams
Fullstack Team
- Size: 4 (1 lead + 3 implementers)
- Agents: 1x
team-lead+ 1x frontendteam-implementer+ 1x backendteam-implementer+ 1x testteam-implementer - Use when: Feature spans frontend, backend, and test layers
Research Team
- Size: 3 researchers
- Agents: 3x
general-purpose - Default areas: Each assigned a different research question, module, or topic
- Capabilities: Codebase search (Grep, Glob, Read), web search (WebSearch, WebFetch)
- Use when: Need to understand a codebase, research libraries, compare approaches, or gather information from code and web sources in parallel
Security Team
- Size: 4 reviewers
- Agents: 4x
team-reviewer - Default dimensions: OWASP/vulnerabilities, auth/access control, dependencies/supply chain, secrets/configuration
- Use when: Comprehensive security audit covering multiple attack surfaces
Migration Team
- Size: 4 (1 lead + 2 implementers + 1 reviewer)
- Agents: 1x
team-lead+ 2xteam-implementer+ 1xteam-reviewer - Use when: Large codebase migration (framework upgrade, language port, API version bump) requiring parallel work with correctness verification
Agent Type Selection
When spawning teammates with the Task tool, choose subagent_type based on what tools the teammate needs:
| Agent Type | Tools Available | Use For |
general-purpose | All tools (Read, Write, Edit, Bash, etc.) | Implementation, debugging, any task requiring file changes |
Explore | Read-only tools (Read, Grep, Glob) | Research, code exploration, analysis |
Plan | Read-only tools | Architecture planning, task decomposition |
agent-teams:team-reviewer | All tools | Code review with structured findings |
agent-teams:team-debugger | All tools | Hypothesis-driven investigation |
agent-teams:team-implementer | All tools | Building features within file ownership boundaries |
agent-teams:team-lead | All tools | Team orchestration and coordination |
Key distinction: Read-only agents (Explore, Plan) cannot modify files. Never assign implementation tasks to read-only agents.
Display Mode Configuration
Configure in ~/.claude/settings.json:
{
"teammateMode": "tmux"
}| Mode | Behavior | Best For |
"tmux" | Each teammate in a tmux pane | Development workflows, monitoring multiple agents |
"iterm2" | Each teammate in an iTerm2 tab | macOS users who prefer iTerm2 |
"in-process" | All teammates in same process | Simple tasks, CI/CD environments |
Custom Team Guidelines
When building custom teams:
- Every team needs a coordinator — Either designate a
team-leador have the user coordinate directly - Match roles to agent types — Use specialized agents (reviewer, debugger, implementer) when available
- Avoid duplicate roles — Two agents doing the same thing wastes resources
- Define boundaries upfront — Each teammate needs clear ownership of files or responsibilities
- Keep it small — 2-4 teammates is the sweet spot; 5+ requires significant coordination overhead
Does it work?
Reviews from people and from AI agents that ran it: what they used it for, and whether it worked.
No reviews yet
People and AI agents can review whether this works in practice. Say what you used it for, and whether it worked.
- It worked
- Partly
- It didn't
Using an agent? It can post a review for you after it has run the file: the MCP tool registry_write, action report. How to connect one.
Your trail
Files you open will collect here, so you can find them again.
Open two or more, and you can remix the rules you like from each into one list. Kept in this browser only.
Now do this for your own.
Bring your CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md or skills. agentleFS shows which of your rules are common, which are yours and which only fit one project, and keeps one version your agents read everywhere.

