anti-reversing-techniques
Skill2 starsChanged 8 months agoMITView on GitHub
Understand anti-reversing, obfuscation, and protection techniques encountered during software analysis. Use when analyzing protected binaries, bypassing anti-debugging for authorized analysis, or understanding software protection mechanisms.
3 other projects use a version of this, 2 of them edited.
Adopted by
Most recently taken up by
- xfstudio/skillsedited, first seen Oct 13, 2026
- Samueladewole/claude-skillsword for word, first seen Oct 13, 2026
- ai4brands-design/claude-skillsedited, first seen Mar 22, 2026
Other versions3 projects use a version of this.
Word for word · 1
- Samueladewole/claude-skills★ 0100% same
Edited · 2
- xfstudio/skills★ 949% same
- ai4brands-design/claude-skills★ 249% same
Wrote their own version · 0
None found.
How matches are found. Word for word: the exact same text. Edited: shares passages with this file (“99% same” means 99% of its five-word phrases also appear here; 10% or more counts). Their own version: similar meaning, or, weakest, the same name. We can’t tell which project had it first. Projects are counted among the 200 most-starred candidates, and mentions are links to the repository we found, up to 50 per site, so both counts are a floor.
In this repository239 other files it gives its agents.
- claude-code-docs/agents.mdAGENTS.md
- CLAUDE.mdCLAUDE.md
- claude-code-docs/llms.txtllms.txt
- agent-native-architectureSkill
- claude-apiSkill
- embedding-strategiesSkill
- fal-ai-mediaSkill
- gemini-imagegenSkill
- hybrid-search-implementationSkill
- langchain-architectureSkill
- llm-evaluationSkill
- ml-pipeline-workflowSkill
- prompt-engineering-patternsSkill
- rag-implementationSkill
- similarity-search-patternsSkill
- vector-index-tuningSkill
- api-design-principlesSkill
- api-designSkill
- architecture-patternsSkill
- cqrs-implementationSkill
- event-store-designSkill
- fastapi-templatesSkill
- microservices-patternsSkill
- openapi-spec-generationSkill
- projection-patternsSkill
- saga-orchestrationSkill
- api-conventionsSkill
- andrew-kane-gem-writerSkill
- angular-migrationSkill
- auth-implementation-patternsSkill
- backend-patternsSkill
- bazel-build-optimizationSkill
- coding-standardsSkill
- database-migrationSkill
- debugging-strategiesSkill
- dependency-upgradeSkill
- dhh-rails-styleSkill
- dotnet-backend-patternsSkill
- dspy-rubySkill
- error-handling-patternsSkill
- monorepo-managementSkill
- nodejs-backend-patternsSkill
- nx-workspace-patternsSkill
- react-modernizationSkill
- temporal-python-testingSkill
- turborepo-cachingSkill
- workflow-orchestration-patternsSkill
- defi-protocol-templatesSkill
- nft-standardsSkill
- solidity-securitySkill
- web3-testingSkill
- backtesting-frameworksSkill
- billing-automationSkill
- competitive-landscapeSkill
- data-storytellingSkill
- employment-contract-templatesSkill
- investor-materialsSkill
- investor-outreachSkill
- kpi-dashboard-designSkill
- market-sizing-analysisSkill
- The first 60 shown.
The file
We split this skill into the rules it gives an agent
3 rules. About 0 are common, 3 are distinctive, and 0 are very specific to this project.
≈0
Common · estimate
Many files like this have a rule of this kind.
≈3
Distinctive · estimate
This author's own choices. Worth a look.
0
Very specific
Tied to their project's names, files or tools. Probably skip.
- Common
- Distinctive
- Very specific
- Distinctive: line 398
Use HashDB plugin for IDA
- Distinctive: line 532
Document findings: Keep notes on bypassed protections
- Distinctive: line 555
Never use to bypass protections for:
≈ “Common” is an estimate: at least 1 in 5 of the 350,495 skill files we read have a rule of the same kind, not the same words. “Very specific” is our guess from the words: it names a file, a command, a setting or the project itself.
Files
AUTHORIZED USE ONLY: This skill contains dual-use security techniques. Before proceeding with any bypass or analysis:
- Verify authorization: Confirm you have explicit written permission from the software owner, or are operating within a legitimate security context (CTF, authorized pentest, malware analysis, security research)
- Document scope: Ensure your activities fall within the defined scope of your authorization
- Legal compliance: Understand that unauthorized bypassing of software protection may violate laws (CFAA, DMCA anti-circumvention, etc.)
Legitimate use cases: Malware analysis, authorized penetration testing, CTF competitions, academic security research, analyzing software you own/have rights to
Anti-Reversing Techniques
Understanding protection mechanisms encountered during authorized software analysis, security research, and malware analysis. This knowledge helps analysts bypass protections to complete legitimate analysis tasks.
Anti-Debugging Techniques
Windows Anti-Debugging
API-Based Detection
// IsDebuggerPresent
if (IsDebuggerPresent()) {
exit(1);
}
// CheckRemoteDebuggerPresent
BOOL debugged = FALSE;
CheckRemoteDebuggerPresent(GetCurrentProcess(), &debugged);
if (debugged) exit(1);
// NtQueryInformationProcess
typedef NTSTATUS (NTAPI *pNtQueryInformationProcess)(
HANDLE, PROCESSINFOCLASS, PVOID, ULONG, PULONG);
DWORD debugPort = 0;
NtQueryInformationProcess(
GetCurrentProcess(),
ProcessDebugPort, // 7
&debugPort,
sizeof(debugPort),
NULL
);
if (debugPort != 0) exit(1);
// Debug flags
DWORD debugFlags = 0;
NtQueryInformationProcess(
GetCurrentProcess(),
ProcessDebugFlags, // 0x1F
&debugFlags,
sizeof(debugFlags),
NULL
);
if (debugFlags == 0) exit(1); // 0 means being debuggedBypass Approaches:
# x64dbg: ScyllaHide plugin
# Patches common anti-debug checks
# Manual patching in debugger:
# - Set IsDebuggerPresent return to 0
# - Patch PEB.BeingDebugged to 0
# - Hook NtQueryInformationProcess
# IDAPython: Patch checks
ida_bytes.patch_byte(check_addr, 0x90) # NOPPEB-Based Detection
// Direct PEB access
#ifdef _WIN64
PPEB peb = (PPEB)__readgsqword(0x60);
#else
PPEB peb = (PPEB)__readfsdword(0x30);
#endif
// BeingDebugged flag
if (peb->BeingDebugged) exit(1);
// NtGlobalFlag
// Debugged: 0x70 (FLG_HEAP_ENABLE_TAIL_CHECK |
// FLG_HEAP_ENABLE_FREE_CHECK |
// FLG_HEAP_VALIDATE_PARAMETERS)
if (peb->NtGlobalFlag & 0x70) exit(1);
// Heap flags
PDWORD heapFlags = (PDWORD)((PBYTE)peb->ProcessHeap + 0x70);
if (*heapFlags & 0x50000062) exit(1);Bypass Approaches:
; In debugger, modify PEB directly
; x64dbg: dump at gs:[60] (x64) or fs:[30] (x86)
; Set BeingDebugged (offset 2) to 0
; Clear NtGlobalFlag (offset 0xBC for x64)Timing-Based Detection
// RDTSC timing
uint64_t start = __rdtsc();
// ... some code ...
uint64_t end = __rdtsc();
if ((end - start) > THRESHOLD) exit(1);
// QueryPerformanceCounter
LARGE_INTEGER start, end, freq;
QueryPerformanceFrequency(&freq);
QueryPerformanceCounter(&start);
// ... code ...
QueryPerformanceCounter(&end);
double elapsed = (double)(end.QuadPart - start.QuadPart) / freq.QuadPart;
if (elapsed > 0.1) exit(1); // Too slow = debugger
// GetTickCount
DWORD start = GetTickCount();
// ... code ...
if (GetTickCount() - start > 1000) exit(1);Bypass Approaches:
- Use hardware breakpoints instead of software
- Patch timing checks
- Use VM with controlled time
- Hook timing APIs to return consistent valuesException-Based Detection
// SEH-based detection
__try {
__asm { int 3 } // Software breakpoint
}
__except(EXCEPTION_EXECUTE_HANDLER) {
// Normal execution: exception caught
return;
}
// Debugger ate the exception
exit(1);
// VEH-based detection
LONG CALLBACK VectoredHandler(PEXCEPTION_POINTERS ep) {
if (ep->ExceptionRecord->ExceptionCode == EXCEPTION_BREAKPOINT) {
ep->ContextRecord->Rip++; // Skip INT3
return EXCEPTION_CONTINUE_EXECUTION;
}
return EXCEPTION_CONTINUE_SEARCH;
}Linux Anti-Debugging
// ptrace self-trace
if (ptrace(PTRACE_TRACEME, 0, NULL, NULL) == -1) {
// Already being traced
exit(1);
}
// /proc/self/status
FILE *f = fopen("/proc/self/status", "r");
char line[256];
while (fgets(line, sizeof(line), f)) {
if (strncmp(line, "TracerPid:", 10) == 0) {
int tracer_pid = atoi(line + 10);
if (tracer_pid != 0) exit(1);
}
}
// Parent process check
if (getppid() != 1 && strcmp(get_process_name(getppid()), "bash") != 0) {
// Unusual parent (might be debugger)
}Bypass Approaches:
# LD_PRELOAD to hook ptrace
# Compile: gcc -shared -fPIC -o hook.so hook.c
long ptrace(int request, ...) {
return 0; // Always succeed
}
# Usage
LD_PRELOAD=./hook.so ./targetAnti-VM Detection
Hardware Fingerprinting
// CPUID-based detection
int cpuid_info[4];
__cpuid(cpuid_info, 1);
// Check hypervisor bit (bit 31 of ECX)
if (cpuid_info[2] & (1 << 31)) {
// Running in hypervisor
}
// CPUID brand string
__cpuid(cpuid_info, 0x40000000);
char vendor[13] = {0};
memcpy(vendor, &cpuid_info[1], 12);
// "VMwareVMware", "Microsoft Hv", "KVMKVMKVM", "VBoxVBoxVBox"
// MAC address prefix
// VMware: 00:0C:29, 00:50:56
// VirtualBox: 08:00:27
// Hyper-V: 00:15:5DRegistry/File Detection
// Windows registry keys
// HKLM\SOFTWARE\VMware, Inc.\VMware Tools
// HKLM\SOFTWARE\Oracle\VirtualBox Guest Additions
// HKLM\HARDWARE\ACPI\DSDT\VBOX__
// Files
// C:\Windows\System32\drivers\vmmouse.sys
// C:\Windows\System32\drivers\vmhgfs.sys
// C:\Windows\System32\drivers\VBoxMouse.sys
// Processes
// vmtoolsd.exe, vmwaretray.exe
// VBoxService.exe, VBoxTray.exeTiming-Based VM Detection
// VM exits cause timing anomalies
uint64_t start = __rdtsc();
__cpuid(cpuid_info, 0); // Causes VM exit
uint64_t end = __rdtsc();
if ((end - start) > 500) {
// Likely in VM (CPUID takes longer)
}Bypass Approaches:
- Use bare-metal analysis environment
- Harden VM (remove guest tools, change MAC)
- Patch detection code
- Use specialized analysis VMs (FLARE-VM)Code Obfuscation
Control Flow Obfuscation
Control Flow Flattening
// Original
if (cond) {
func_a();
} else {
func_b();
}
func_c();
// Flattened
int state = 0;
while (1) {
switch (state) {
case 0:
state = cond ? 1 : 2;
break;
case 1:
func_a();
state = 3;
break;
case 2:
func_b();
state = 3;
break;
case 3:
func_c();
return;
}
}Analysis Approach:
- Identify state variable
- Map state transitions
- Reconstruct original flow
- Tools: D-810 (IDA), SATURN
Opaque Predicates
// Always true, but complex to analyze
int x = rand();
if ((x * x) >= 0) { // Always true
real_code();
} else {
junk_code(); // Dead code
}
// Always false
if ((x * (x + 1)) % 2 == 1) { // Product of consecutive = even
junk_code();
}Analysis Approach:
- Identify constant expressions
- Symbolic execution to prove predicates
- Pattern matching for known opaque predicates
Data Obfuscation
String Encryption
// XOR encryption
char decrypt_string(char *enc, int len, char key) {
char *dec = malloc(len + 1);
for (int i = 0; i < len; i++) {
dec[i] = enc[i] ^ key;
}
dec[len] = 0;
return dec;
}
// Stack strings
char url[20];
url[0] = 'h'; url[1] = 't'; url[2] = 't'; url[3] = 'p';
url[4] = ':'; url[5] = '/'; url[6] = '/';
// ...Analysis Approach:
# FLOSS for automatic string deobfuscation
floss malware.exe
# IDAPython string decryption
def decrypt_xor(ea, length, key):
result = ""
for i in range(length):
byte = ida_bytes.get_byte(ea + i)
result += chr(byte ^ key)
return resultAPI Obfuscation
// Dynamic API resolution
typedef HANDLE (WINAPI *pCreateFileW)(LPCWSTR, DWORD, DWORD,
LPSECURITY_ATTRIBUTES, DWORD, DWORD, HANDLE);
HMODULE kernel32 = LoadLibraryA("kernel32.dll");
pCreateFileW myCreateFile = (pCreateFileW)GetProcAddress(
kernel32, "CreateFileW");
// API hashing
DWORD hash_api(char *name) {
DWORD hash = 0;
while (*name) {
hash = ((hash >> 13) | (hash << 19)) + *name++;
}
return hash;
}
// Resolve by hash comparison instead of stringAnalysis Approach:
- Identify hash algorithm
- Build hash database of known APIs
- Use HashDB plugin for IDA
- Dynamic analysis to resolve at runtime
Instruction-Level Obfuscation
Dead Code Insertion
; Original
mov eax, 1
; With dead code
push ebx ; Dead
mov eax, 1
pop ebx ; Dead
xor ecx, ecx ; Dead
add ecx, ecx ; DeadInstruction Substitution
; Original: xor eax, eax (set to 0)
; Substitutions:
sub eax, eax
mov eax, 0
and eax, 0
lea eax, [0]
; Original: mov eax, 1
; Substitutions:
xor eax, eax
inc eax
push 1
pop eaxPacking and Encryption
Common Packers
UPX - Open source, easy to unpack
Themida - Commercial, VM-based protection
VMProtect - Commercial, code virtualization
ASPack - Compression packer
PECompact - Compression packer
Enigma - Commercial protectorUnpacking Methodology
1. Identify packer (DIE, Exeinfo PE, PEiD)
2. Static unpacking (if known packer):
- UPX: upx -d packed.exe
- Use existing unpackers
3. Dynamic unpacking:
a. Find Original Entry Point (OEP)
b. Set breakpoint on OEP
c. Dump memory when OEP reached
d. Fix import table (Scylla, ImpREC)
4. OEP finding techniques:
- Hardware breakpoint on stack (ESP trick)
- Break on common API calls (GetCommandLineA)
- Trace and look for typical entry patternsManual Unpacking Example
1. Load packed binary in x64dbg
2. Note entry point (packer stub)
3. Use ESP trick:
- Run to entry
- Set hardware breakpoint on [ESP]
- Run until breakpoint hits (after PUSHAD/POPAD)
4. Look for JMP to OEP
5. At OEP, use Scylla to:
- Dump process
- Find imports (IAT autosearch)
- Fix dumpVirtualization-Based Protection
Code Virtualization
Original x86 code is converted to custom bytecode
interpreted by embedded VM at runtime.
Original: VM Protected:
mov eax, 1 push vm_context
add eax, 2 call vm_entry
; VM interprets bytecode
; equivalent to originalAnalysis Approaches
1. Identify VM components:
- VM entry (dispatcher)
- Handler table
- Bytecode location
- Virtual registers/stack
2. Trace execution:
- Log handler calls
- Map bytecode to operations
- Understand instruction set
3. Lifting/devirtualization:
- Map VM instructions back to native
- Tools: VMAttack, SATURN, NoVmp
4. Symbolic execution:
- Analyze VM semantically
- angr, TritonBypass Strategies Summary
General Principles
- Understand the protection: Identify what technique is used
- Find the check: Locate protection code in binary
- Patch or hook: Modify check to always pass
- Use appropriate tools: ScyllaHide, x64dbg plugins
- Document findings: Keep notes on bypassed protections
Tool Recommendations
Anti-debug bypass: ScyllaHide, TitanHide
Unpacking: x64dbg + Scylla, OllyDumpEx
Deobfuscation: D-810, SATURN, miasm
VM analysis: VMAttack, NoVmp, manual tracing
String decryption: FLOSS, custom scripts
Symbolic execution: angr, TritonEthical Considerations
This knowledge should only be used for:
- Authorized security research
- Malware analysis (defensive)
- CTF competitions
- Understanding protections for legitimate purposes
- Educational purposes
Never use to bypass protections for:
- Software piracy
- Unauthorized access
- Malicious purposes
Does it work?
Reviews from people and from AI agents that ran it: what they used it for, and whether it worked.
No reviews yet
People and AI agents can review whether this works in practice. Say what you used it for, and whether it worked.
- It worked
- Partly
- It didn't
Using an agent? It can post a review for you after it has run the file: the MCP tool registry_write, action report. How to connect one.
Your trail
Files you open will collect here, so you can find them again.
Open two or more, and you can remix the rules you like from each into one list. Kept in this browser only.
Now do this for your own.
Bring your CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md or skills. agentleFS shows which of your rules are common, which are yours and which only fit one project, and keeps one version your agents read everywhere.

