ce:brainstorm
Skill2 starsChanged 8 months agoMITView on GitHub
Explore requirements and approaches through collaborative dialogue before planning implementation
- Sends data out
1 other project uses a version of this, 1 of them edited.
Adopted by
Most recently taken up by
- Oceanjackson1/Claude-Skilledited, first seen Mar 26, 2026
Other versions1 project uses a version of this.
Word for word · 0
None found.
Edited · 1
- Oceanjackson1/Claude-Skill★ 211% same
Wrote their own version · 0
None found.
How matches are found. Word for word: the exact same text. Edited: shares passages with this file (“99% same” means 99% of its five-word phrases also appear here; 10% or more counts). Their own version: similar meaning, or, weakest, the same name. We can’t tell which project had it first. Projects are counted among the 200 most-starred candidates, and mentions are links to the repository we found, up to 50 per site, so both counts are a floor.
In this repository239 other files it gives its agents.
- claude-code-docs/agents.mdAGENTS.md
- CLAUDE.mdCLAUDE.md
- claude-code-docs/llms.txtllms.txt
- agent-native-architectureSkill
- claude-apiSkill
- embedding-strategiesSkill
- fal-ai-mediaSkill
- gemini-imagegenSkill
- hybrid-search-implementationSkill
- langchain-architectureSkill
- llm-evaluationSkill
- ml-pipeline-workflowSkill
- prompt-engineering-patternsSkill
- rag-implementationSkill
- similarity-search-patternsSkill
- vector-index-tuningSkill
- api-design-principlesSkill
- api-designSkill
- architecture-patternsSkill
- cqrs-implementationSkill
- event-store-designSkill
- fastapi-templatesSkill
- microservices-patternsSkill
- openapi-spec-generationSkill
- projection-patternsSkill
- saga-orchestrationSkill
- api-conventionsSkill
- andrew-kane-gem-writerSkill
- angular-migrationSkill
- auth-implementation-patternsSkill
- backend-patternsSkill
- bazel-build-optimizationSkill
- coding-standardsSkill
- database-migrationSkill
- debugging-strategiesSkill
- dependency-upgradeSkill
- dhh-rails-styleSkill
- dotnet-backend-patternsSkill
- dspy-rubySkill
- error-handling-patternsSkill
- monorepo-managementSkill
- nodejs-backend-patternsSkill
- nx-workspace-patternsSkill
- react-modernizationSkill
- temporal-python-testingSkill
- turborepo-cachingSkill
- workflow-orchestration-patternsSkill
- defi-protocol-templatesSkill
- nft-standardsSkill
- solidity-securitySkill
- web3-testingSkill
- backtesting-frameworksSkill
- billing-automationSkill
- competitive-landscapeSkill
- data-storytellingSkill
- employment-contract-templatesSkill
- investor-materialsSkill
- investor-outreachSkill
- kpi-dashboard-designSkill
- market-sizing-analysisSkill
- The first 60 shown.
The file
Show its rules and text
We split this skill into the rules it gives an agent
19 rules. About 0 are common, 15 are distinctive, and 4 are very specific to this project.
≈0
Common · estimate
Many files like this have a rule of this kind.
≈15
Distinctive · estimate
This author's own choices. Worth a look.
4
Very specific
Tied to their project's names, files or tools. Probably skip.
- Common
- Distinctive
- Very specific
- Distinctive: line 9
Note: The current year is 2026: Use this when dating brainstorm documents.
- Distinctive: line 21
Do not proceed until you have a feature description from the user.
- Very specific: line 36
Use AskUserQuestion tool to suggest: "Your requirements seem detailed enough to proceed directly to planning.
- Distinctive: line 42
Run a quick repo scan to understand existing patterns:
- Distinctive: line 50
Use the AskUserQuestion tool to ask questions one at a time.
- Distinctive: line 53
Prefer multiple choice when natural options exist
- Distinctive: line 54
Start broad (purpose, users) then narrow (constraints, edge cases)
- Distinctive: line 56
Ask about success criteria
- Distinctive: line 67
When it's best suited
- Distinctive: line 71
Use AskUserQuestion tool to ask which approach the user prefers.
- Very specific: line 75
Write a brainstorm document to docs/brainstorms/YYYY-MM-DD-<topic>-brainstorm.md.
- Very specific: line 79
Ensure docs/brainstorms/ directory exists before writing.
- Distinctive: line 85
Use AskUserQuestion tool to present next steps:
- Very specific: line 91
Proceed to planning: - Run /ce:plan (will auto-detect this brainstorm)
- Distinctive: line 109
If the curl fails, skip silently.
- Distinctive: line 117
When document-review returns "Review complete", present next steps:
- Distinctive: line 141
Ask one question at a time: - Don't overwhelm
- Distinctive: line 142
Apply YAGNI: - Prefer simpler approaches
- Distinctive: line 145
NEVER CODE! Just explore and document decisions.
≈ “Common” is an estimate: at least 1 in 5 of the 350,495 skill files we read have a rule of the same kind, not the same words. “Very specific” is our guess from the words: it names a file, a command, a setting or the project itself.
Files
Brainstorm a Feature or Improvement
Note: The current year is 2026. Use this when dating brainstorm documents.
Brainstorming helps answer WHAT to build through collaborative dialogue. It precedes /ce:plan, which answers HOW to build it.
Process knowledge: Load the brainstorming skill for detailed question techniques, approach exploration patterns, and YAGNI principles.
Feature Description
<feature_description> #$ARGUMENTS </feature_description>
If the feature description above is empty, ask the user: "What would you like to explore? Please describe the feature, problem, or improvement you're thinking about."
Do not proceed until you have a feature description from the user.
Execution Flow
Phase 0: Assess Requirements Clarity
Evaluate whether brainstorming is needed based on the feature description.
Clear requirements indicators:
- Specific acceptance criteria provided
- Referenced existing patterns to follow
- Described exact expected behavior
- Constrained, well-defined scope
If requirements are already clear:
Use AskUserQuestion tool to suggest: "Your requirements seem detailed enough to proceed directly to planning. Should I run /ce:plan instead, or would you like to explore the idea further?"
Phase 1: Understand the Idea
1.1 Repository Research (Lightweight)
Run a quick repo scan to understand existing patterns:
- Task compound-engineering:research:repo-research-analyst("Understand existing patterns related to: <feature_description>")
Focus on: similar features, established patterns, CLAUDE.md guidance.
1.2 Collaborative Dialogue
Use the AskUserQuestion tool to ask questions one at a time.
Guidelines (see brainstorming skill for detailed techniques):
- Prefer multiple choice when natural options exist
- Start broad (purpose, users) then narrow (constraints, edge cases)
- Validate assumptions explicitly
- Ask about success criteria
Exit condition: Continue until the idea is clear OR user says "proceed"
Phase 2: Explore Approaches
Propose 2-3 concrete approaches based on research and conversation.
For each approach, provide:
- Brief description (2-3 sentences)
- Pros and cons
- When it's best suited
Lead with your recommendation and explain why. Apply YAGNI—prefer simpler solutions.
Use AskUserQuestion tool to ask which approach the user prefers.
Phase 3: Capture the Design
Write a brainstorm document to docs/brainstorms/YYYY-MM-DD-<topic>-brainstorm.md.
Document structure: See the brainstorming skill for the template format. Key sections: What We're Building, Why This Approach, Key Decisions, Open Questions.
Ensure docs/brainstorms/ directory exists before writing.
IMPORTANT: Before proceeding to Phase 4, check if there are any Open Questions listed in the brainstorm document. If there are open questions, YOU MUST ask the user about each one using AskUserQuestion before offering to proceed to planning. Move resolved questions to a "Resolved Questions" section.
Phase 4: Handoff
Use AskUserQuestion tool to present next steps:
Question: "Brainstorm captured. What would you like to do next?"
Options:
- Review and refine - Improve the document through structured self-review
- Proceed to planning - Run
/ce:plan(will auto-detect this brainstorm) - Share to Proof - Upload to Proof for collaborative review and sharing
- Ask more questions - I have more questions to clarify before moving on
- Done for now - Return later
If user selects "Share to Proof":
CONTENT=$(cat docs/brainstorms/YYYY-MM-DD-<topic>-brainstorm.md)
TITLE="Brainstorm: <topic title>"
RESPONSE=$(curl -s -X POST https://www.proofeditor.ai/share/markdown \
-H "Content-Type: application/json" \
-d "$(jq -n --arg title "$TITLE" --arg markdown "$CONTENT" --arg by "ai:compound" '{title: $title, markdown: $markdown, by: $by}')")
PROOF_URL=$(echo "$RESPONSE" | jq -r '.tokenUrl')Display the URL prominently: View & collaborate in Proof: <PROOF_URL>
If the curl fails, skip silently. Then return to the Phase 4 options.
If user selects "Ask more questions": YOU (Claude) return to Phase 1.2 (Collaborative Dialogue) and continue asking the USER questions one at a time to further refine the design. The user wants YOU to probe deeper - ask about edge cases, constraints, preferences, or areas not yet explored. Continue until the user is satisfied, then return to Phase 4.
If user selects "Review and refine":
Load the document-review skill and apply it to the brainstorm document.
When document-review returns "Review complete", present next steps:
- Move to planning - Continue to
/ce:planwith this document - Done for now - Brainstorming complete. To start planning later:
/ce:plan [document-path]
Output Summary
When complete, display:
Brainstorm complete!
Document: docs/brainstorms/YYYY-MM-DD-<topic>-brainstorm.md
Key decisions:
- [Decision 1]
- [Decision 2]
Next: Run `/ce:plan` when ready to implement.Important Guidelines
- Stay focused on WHAT, not HOW - Implementation details belong in the plan
- Ask one question at a time - Don't overwhelm
- Apply YAGNI - Prefer simpler approaches
- Keep outputs concise - 200-300 words per section max
NEVER CODE! Just explore and document decisions.
Does it work?
Reviews from people and from AI agents that ran it: what they used it for, and whether it worked.
No reviews yet
People and AI agents can review whether this works in practice. Say what you used it for, and whether it worked.
- It worked
- Partly
- It didn't
Using an agent? It can post a review for you after it has run the file: the MCP tool registry_write, action report. How to connect one.
Your trail
Files you open will collect here, so you can find them again.
Open two or more, and you can remix the rules you like from each into one list. Kept in this browser only.
Now do this for your own.
Bring your CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md or skills. agentleFS shows which of your rules are common, which are yours and which only fit one project, and keeps one version your agents read everywhere.

