python-anti-patterns
Skill2 starsChanged 8 months agoMITView on GitHub
Common Python anti-patterns to avoid. Use as a checklist when reviewing code, before finalizing implementations, or when debugging issues that might stem from known bad practices.
- Reads credentials
We split this skill into the rules it gives an agent
8 rules. 8 are common, 0 are distinctive, and 0 are very specific to this project.
8
Common
Most of the 5 edited versions we read keep these.
0
Distinctive
This author's own choices. Worth a look.
0
Very specific
Tied to their project's names, files or tools. Probably skip.
- Common
- Distinctive
- Very specific
- Common: line 72
Fix: Use environment variables with typed settings.
- Common: line 96
Fix: Use DTOs/response models.
- Common: line 211
Fix: Use context managers.
- Common: line 229
Fix: Use async-native libraries.
- Common: line 265
Fix: Use type parameters.
- Common: line 284
Fix: Test error conditions and edge cases.
- Common: line 314
Fix: Use integration tests for critical paths.
- Common: line 318
Before finalizing code, verify:
“Common” is measured: kept by at least 6 in 10 of the 5 edited versions of this file we could read. “Very specific” is our guess from the words: it names a file, a command, a setting or the project itself.
Files
Python Anti-Patterns Checklist
A reference checklist of common mistakes and anti-patterns in Python code. Review this before finalizing implementations to catch issues early.
When to Use This Skill
- Reviewing code before merge
- Debugging mysterious issues
- Teaching or learning Python best practices
- Establishing team coding standards
- Refactoring legacy code
Note: This skill focuses on what to avoid. For guidance on positive patterns and architecture, see the python-design-patterns skill.
Infrastructure Anti-Patterns
Scattered Timeout/Retry Logic
# BAD: Timeout logic duplicated everywhere
def fetch_user(user_id):
try:
return requests.get(url, timeout=30)
except Timeout:
logger.warning("Timeout fetching user")
return None
def fetch_orders(user_id):
try:
return requests.get(url, timeout=30)
except Timeout:
logger.warning("Timeout fetching orders")
return NoneFix: Centralize in decorators or client wrappers.
# GOOD: Centralized retry logic
@retry(stop=stop_after_attempt(3), wait=wait_exponential())
def http_get(url: str) -> Response:
return requests.get(url, timeout=30)Double Retry
# BAD: Retrying at multiple layers
@retry(max_attempts=3) # Application retry
def call_service():
return client.request() # Client also has retry configured!Fix: Retry at one layer only. Know your infrastructure's retry behavior.
Hard-Coded Configuration
# BAD: Secrets and config in code
DB_HOST = "prod-db.example.com"
API_KEY = "sk-12345"
def connect():
return psycopg.connect(f"host={DB_HOST}...")Fix: Use environment variables with typed settings.
# GOOD
from pydantic_settings import BaseSettings
class Settings(BaseSettings):
db_host: str = Field(alias="DB_HOST")
api_key: str = Field(alias="API_KEY")
settings = Settings()Architecture Anti-Patterns
Exposed Internal Types
# BAD: Leaking ORM model to API
@app.get("/users/{id}")
def get_user(id: str) -> UserModel: # SQLAlchemy model
return db.query(UserModel).get(id)Fix: Use DTOs/response models.
# GOOD
@app.get("/users/{id}")
def get_user(id: str) -> UserResponse:
user = db.query(UserModel).get(id)
return UserResponse.from_orm(user)Mixed I/O and Business Logic
# BAD: SQL embedded in business logic
def calculate_discount(user_id: str) -> float:
user = db.query("SELECT * FROM users WHERE id = ?", user_id)
orders = db.query("SELECT * FROM orders WHERE user_id = ?", user_id)
# Business logic mixed with data access
if len(orders) > 10:
return 0.15
return 0.0Fix: Repository pattern. Keep business logic pure.
# GOOD
def calculate_discount(user: User, orders: list[Order]) -> float:
# Pure business logic, easily testable
if len(orders) > 10:
return 0.15
return 0.0Error Handling Anti-Patterns
Bare Exception Handling
# BAD: Swallowing all exceptions
try:
process()
except Exception:
pass # Silent failure - bugs hidden foreverFix: Catch specific exceptions. Log or handle appropriately.
# GOOD
try:
process()
except ConnectionError as e:
logger.warning("Connection failed, will retry", error=str(e))
raise
except ValueError as e:
logger.error("Invalid input", error=str(e))
raise BadRequestError(str(e))Ignored Partial Failures
# BAD: Stops on first error
def process_batch(items):
results = []
for item in items:
result = process(item) # Raises on error - batch aborted
results.append(result)
return resultsFix: Capture both successes and failures.
# GOOD
def process_batch(items) -> BatchResult:
succeeded = {}
failed = {}
for idx, item in enumerate(items):
try:
succeeded[idx] = process(item)
except Exception as e:
failed[idx] = e
return BatchResult(succeeded, failed)Missing Input Validation
# BAD: No validation
def create_user(data: dict):
return User(**data) # Crashes deep in code on bad inputFix: Validate early at API boundaries.
# GOOD
def create_user(data: dict) -> User:
validated = CreateUserInput.model_validate(data)
return User.from_input(validated)Resource Anti-Patterns
Unclosed Resources
# BAD: File never closed
def read_file(path):
f = open(path)
return f.read() # What if this raises?Fix: Use context managers.
# GOOD
def read_file(path):
with open(path) as f:
return f.read()Blocking in Async
# BAD: Blocks the entire event loop
async def fetch_data():
time.sleep(1) # Blocks everything!
response = requests.get(url) # Also blocks!Fix: Use async-native libraries.
# GOOD
async def fetch_data():
await asyncio.sleep(1)
async with httpx.AsyncClient() as client:
response = await client.get(url)Type Safety Anti-Patterns
Missing Type Hints
# BAD: No types
def process(data):
return data["value"] * 2Fix: Annotate all public functions.
# GOOD
def process(data: dict[str, int]) -> int:
return data["value"] * 2Untyped Collections
# BAD: Generic list without type parameter
def get_users() -> list:
...Fix: Use type parameters.
# GOOD
def get_users() -> list[User]:
...Testing Anti-Patterns
Only Testing Happy Paths
# BAD: Only tests success case
def test_create_user():
user = service.create_user(valid_data)
assert user.id is not NoneFix: Test error conditions and edge cases.
# GOOD
def test_create_user_success():
user = service.create_user(valid_data)
assert user.id is not None
def test_create_user_invalid_email():
with pytest.raises(ValueError, match="Invalid email"):
service.create_user(invalid_email_data)
def test_create_user_duplicate_email():
service.create_user(valid_data)
with pytest.raises(ConflictError):
service.create_user(valid_data)Over-Mocking
# BAD: Mocking everything
def test_user_service():
mock_repo = Mock()
mock_cache = Mock()
mock_logger = Mock()
mock_metrics = Mock()
# Test doesn't verify real behaviorFix: Use integration tests for critical paths. Mock only external services.
Quick Review Checklist
Before finalizing code, verify:
- No scattered timeout/retry logic (centralized)
- No double retry (app + infrastructure)
- No hard-coded configuration or secrets
- No exposed internal types (ORM models, protobufs)
- No mixed I/O and business logic
- No bare
except Exception: pass - No ignored partial failures in batches
- No missing input validation
- No unclosed resources (using context managers)
- No blocking calls in async code
- All public functions have type hints
- Collections have type parameters
- Error paths are tested
- Edge cases are covered
Common Fixes Summary
| Anti-Pattern | Fix |
| Scattered retry logic | Centralized decorators |
| Hard-coded config | Environment variables + pydantic-settings |
| Exposed ORM models | DTO/response schemas |
| Mixed I/O + logic | Repository pattern |
| Bare except | Catch specific exceptions |
| Batch stops on error | Return BatchResult with successes/failures |
| No validation | Validate at boundaries with Pydantic |
| Unclosed resources | Context managers |
| Blocking in async | Async-native libraries |
| Missing types | Type annotations on all public APIs |
| Only happy path tests | Test errors and edge cases |
Other versions6 projects use a version of this.
Word for word · 1
- NorkzYT/claude-code-autopilot★ 2100% same
Edited · 4
- zebbern/termstack★ 499% same
- liushikuan63/Qoder-Optimization★ 297% same
- drzioner/gitwise★ 199% same
- gabepublic/api-autonom-test-01★ 050% same
Wrote their own version · 1
- JoseVelazcoH/python-skills★ 0same name
How matches are found. Word for word: the exact same text. Edited: shares passages with this file (“99% same” means 99% of its five-word phrases also appear here; 10% or more counts). Their own version: similar meaning, or, weakest, the same name. We can’t tell which project had it first. Projects are counted among the 200 most-starred candidates, and mentions are links to the repository we found, up to 50 per site, so both counts are a floor.
In this repository239 other files it gives its agents.
- claude-code-docs/agents.mdAGENTS.md
- CLAUDE.mdCLAUDE.md
- claude-code-docs/llms.txtllms.txt
- agent-native-architectureSkill
- claude-apiSkill
- embedding-strategiesSkill
- fal-ai-mediaSkill
- gemini-imagegenSkill
- hybrid-search-implementationSkill
- langchain-architectureSkill
- llm-evaluationSkill
- ml-pipeline-workflowSkill
- prompt-engineering-patternsSkill
- rag-implementationSkill
- similarity-search-patternsSkill
- vector-index-tuningSkill
- api-design-principlesSkill
- api-designSkill
- architecture-patternsSkill
- cqrs-implementationSkill
- event-store-designSkill
- fastapi-templatesSkill
- microservices-patternsSkill
- openapi-spec-generationSkill
- projection-patternsSkill
- saga-orchestrationSkill
- api-conventionsSkill
- andrew-kane-gem-writerSkill
- angular-migrationSkill
- auth-implementation-patternsSkill
- backend-patternsSkill
- bazel-build-optimizationSkill
- coding-standardsSkill
- database-migrationSkill
- debugging-strategiesSkill
- dependency-upgradeSkill
- dhh-rails-styleSkill
- dotnet-backend-patternsSkill
- dspy-rubySkill
- error-handling-patternsSkill
- monorepo-managementSkill
- nodejs-backend-patternsSkill
- nx-workspace-patternsSkill
- react-modernizationSkill
- temporal-python-testingSkill
- turborepo-cachingSkill
- workflow-orchestration-patternsSkill
- defi-protocol-templatesSkill
- nft-standardsSkill
- solidity-securitySkill
- web3-testingSkill
- backtesting-frameworksSkill
- billing-automationSkill
- competitive-landscapeSkill
- data-storytellingSkill
- employment-contract-templatesSkill
- investor-materialsSkill
- investor-outreachSkill
- kpi-dashboard-designSkill
- market-sizing-analysisSkill
- The first 60 shown.
Does it work?
Reviews from people and from AI agents that ran it: what they used it for, and whether it worked.
No reviews yet
People and AI agents can review whether this works in practice. Say what you used it for, and whether it worked.
- It worked
- Partly
- It didn't
Using an agent? It can post a review for you after it has run the file: the MCP tool registry_write, action report. How to connect one.
Your trail
Files you open will collect here, so you can find them again.
Open two or more, and you can remix the rules you like from each into one list. Kept in this browser only.
Now do this for your own.
Bring your CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md or skills. agentleFS shows which of your rules are common, which are yours and which only fit one project, and keeps one version your agents read everywhere.

