agentleFS
CodeAlive-AICodeAlive-AI/ai-driven-development/skills/prompt-engineering/SKILL.md

prompt-engineering

Skill169 starsChanged 56 days agoMITView on GitHub

Universal prompt engineering techniques for any LLM. Use when crafting, optimizing, or reviewing prompts for AI models. Triggers on requests like "improve this prompt", "write a system prompt", "optimize my instructions", "help me prompt engineer", "audit this prompt", "review my prompt", or when building agentic systems that need structured prompts.

85 other projects use a version of this, 1 of them edited.

Adopted by

Most recently taken up by

Used with

Projects with it also use security-checklist, multi-agent-orchestration and 10 more.

Other files people use alongside this one.

Files found in the same public projects as a version of this one, more often than they turn up anywhere else. Each project counts once, large collections count for less, and this file's own repository is left out.
  • atuljha23Skill

    security-checklist

    OWASP-style quick reference — authn/authz, injection, secrets, sessions, crypto, dependencies. Use during code review and before committing security-sensitive changes.

    Also in 3 projects that use this

  • javalenciacaiSkill

    multi-agent-orchestration

    Design and coordinate multi-agent systems where specialized agents work together to solve complex problems. Covers agent communication, task delegation, workflow orchestration, and result aggregation. Use when building coordinated agent teams, complex workflows, or systems requiring specialized expertise across domains.

    Also in 4 projects that use this

  • xfstudioSkill

    llm-evaluation

    Implement comprehensive evaluation strategies for LLM applications using automated metrics, human feedback, and benchmarking. Use when testing LLM performance, measuring AI application quality, or establishing evaluation frameworks.

    Also in 3 projects that use this

  • GoogleSkill

    coding-principles

    Enforces engineering, architecture, public API, and code quality standards distilled from human reviewer feedback across A2UI pull requests. Use when authoring new code, refactoring, addressing review feedback, or reviewing PR diffs. Don't use for release publishing or spec blueprint generation without code or PR changes.

    Also in 3 projects that use this

  • pproencaSkill

    refactoring

    Code refactoring best practices based on Martin Fowler's catalog and Clean Code principles. This skill should be used when refactoring existing code, improving code structure, reducing complexity, eliminating code smells, or reviewing code for maintainability. Triggers on tasks involving extract method, rename, decompose conditional, reduce coupling, or improve readability.

    Also in 6 projects that use this

  • mjunaidcaSkill

    tool-design

    Design tools that agents can use effectively. Use when creating new tools for agents, debugging tool-related failures, or optimizing existing tool sets.

    Also in 3 projects that use this

The file

We split this skill into the rules it gives an agent

4 rules. 0 are common, 3 are distinctive, and 1 is very specific to this project.

  • 0

    Common

    Most of the 75 edited versions we read keep these.

  • 3

    Distinctive

    This author's own choices. Worth a look.

  • 1

    Very specific

    Tied to their project's names, files or tools. Probably skip.

  • Common
  • Distinctive
  • Very specific
  1. Distinctive:

    Use XML tags to create clear, parseable prompts:

    line 14
  2. Very specific:

    Use consistent tag names throughout (<instructions>, not sometimes <steps>)

    line 33
  3. Distinctive:

    When adapting prompts across models or versions:

    line 197
  4. Distinctive:

    When asked to audit, review, or improve a prompt, follow this workflow.

    line 263

“Common” is measured: kept by at least 6 in 10 of the 75 edited versions of this file we could read. “Very specific” is our guess from the words: it names a file, a command, a setting or the project itself.

Keep what fits and drop the rest. Your version, ready for your agents.
Files
SKILL.md

Prompt Engineering

Universal techniques for crafting effective prompts across any LLM.

Core Principles

1. Structure with XML Tags

Use XML tags to create clear, parseable prompts:

<context>Background information here</context>
<instructions>
1. First step
2. Second step
</instructions>
<examples>Sample inputs/outputs</examples>
<output_format>Expected structure</output_format>

Benefits:

  • Clarity: Separates context, instructions, and examples
  • Accuracy: Prevents model from mixing up sections
  • Flexibility: Easy to modify individual parts
  • Parseability: Enables structured output extraction

Best practices:

  • Use consistent tag names throughout (<instructions>, not sometimes <steps>)
  • Reference tags explicitly: "Using the data in <context> tags..."
  • Nest tags for hierarchy: <examples><example id="1">...</example></examples>
  • Combine with other techniques: <thinking> for chain-of-thought, <answer> for final output

2. Control Output Shape

Specify explicit constraints on length, format, and structure:

<output_spec>
- Default: 3-6 sentences or ≤5 bullets
- Simple yes/no questions: ≤2 sentences
- Complex multi-step tasks:
  - 1 short overview paragraph
  - ≤5 bullets: What changed, Where, Risks, Next steps, Open questions
- Use Markdown with headers, bullets, tables when helpful
- Avoid long narrative paragraphs; prefer compact structure
</output_spec>

3. Prevent Scope Drift

Explicitly constrain what the model should NOT do:

<constraints>
- Implement EXACTLY and ONLY what is requested
- No extra features, components, or embellishments
- If ambiguous, choose the simplest valid interpretation
- Do NOT invent values, make assumptions, or add unrequested elements
</constraints>

4. Handle Ambiguity Explicitly

Prevent hallucinations and overconfidence:

<uncertainty_handling>
- If the question is ambiguous:
  - Ask 1-3 precise clarifying questions, OR
  - Present 2-3 plausible interpretations with labeled assumptions
- When facts may have changed: answer in general terms, state uncertainty
- Never fabricate exact figures or references when uncertain
- Prefer "Based on the provided context..." over absolute claims
</uncertainty_handling>

5. Long-Context Grounding

For inputs >10k tokens, add re-grounding instructions:

<long_context_handling>
- First, produce a short internal outline of key sections relevant to the request
- Re-state user constraints explicitly before answering
- Anchor claims to sections ("In the 'Data Retention' section...")
- Quote or paraphrase fine details (dates, thresholds, clauses)
</long_context_handling>

Agentic Prompts

Tool Usage Rules

<tool_usage>
- Prefer tools over internal knowledge for:
  - Fresh or user-specific data (tickets, orders, configs)
  - Specific IDs, URLs, or document references
- Parallelize independent reads when possible
- After write operations, restate: what changed, where, any validation performed
</tool_usage>

User Updates

<user_updates>
- Send brief updates (1-2 sentences) only when:
  - Starting a new major phase
  - Discovering something that changes the plan
- Avoid narrating routine operations
- Each update must include a concrete outcome ("Found X", "Updated Y")
- Do not expand scope beyond what was asked
</user_updates>

Self-Check for High-Risk Outputs

<self_check>
Before finalizing answers in sensitive contexts (legal, financial, safety):
- Re-scan for unstated assumptions
- Check for ungrounded numbers or claims
- Soften overly strong language ("always", "guaranteed")
- Explicitly state assumptions
</self_check>

Structured Extraction

For data extraction tasks, always provide a schema:

<extraction_spec>
Extract data into this exact schema (no extra fields):
{
  "field_name": "string",
  "optional_field": "string | null",
  "numeric_field": "number | null"
}
- If a field is not present in source, set to null (don't guess)
- Re-scan source for missed fields before returning
</extraction_spec>

Web Research Prompts

<research_guidelines>
- Browse the web for: time-sensitive topics, recommendations, navigational queries, ambiguous terms
- Include citations after paragraphs with web-derived claims
- Use multiple sources for key claims; prioritize primary sources
- Research until additional searching won't materially change the answer
- Structure output with Markdown: headers, bullets, tables for comparisons
</research_guidelines>

Example: Before/After

Without structure:

You're a financial analyst. Generate a Q2 report for investors. Include Revenue, Margins, Cash Flow. Use this data: {{DATA}}. Make it professional and concise.

With structure:

You're a financial analyst at AcmeCorp generating a Q2 report for investors.

<context>
AcmeCorp is a B2B SaaS company. Investors value transparency and actionable insights.
</context>

<data>
{{DATA}}
</data>

<instructions>
1. Include sections: Revenue Growth, Profit Margins, Cash Flow
2. Highlight strengths and areas for improvement
3. Use concise, professional tone
</instructions>

<output_format>
- Use bullet points with metrics and YoY changes
- Include "Action:" items for areas needing improvement
- End with 2-3 bullet Outlook section
</output_format>

Prompt Migration Checklist

When adapting prompts across models or versions:

  1. Switch model, keep prompt identical — isolate the variable
  2. Pin reasoning/thinking depth to match prior model's profile
  3. Run evals — if results are good, ship
  4. If regressions, tune prompt — adjust verbosity/format/scope constraints
  5. Re-eval after each small change — one change at a time

Quick Reference

TechniqueTag PatternUse Case
Separate sections<context>, <instructions>, <data>Any complex prompt
Control length<output_spec> with word/bullet limitsPrevent verbosity
Prevent drift<constraints> with explicit "do NOT"Feature creep
Handle uncertainty<uncertainty_handling>Factual queries
Chain of thought<thinking>, <answer>Reasoning tasks
Extraction<schema> with JSON structureData parsing
Research<research_guidelines>Web-enabled agents
Self-check<self_check>High-risk domains
Tool usage<tool_usage_rules>Agentic systems
Eagerness control<persistence>, <context_gathering>Agent autonomy
Persona<role> + behavioral constraintsTone & style

Prompting Techniques Catalog

Comprehensive catalog of prompting techniques. Full details, examples, and academic references in references/prompting-techniques.md.

TechniqueUse Case
Zero-Shot PromptingDirect task execution without examples; classification, translation, summarization
Few-Shot PromptingIn-context learning via exemplars; format control, label calibration, style matching
Chain-of-Thought (CoT)Step-by-step reasoning; arithmetic, logic, commonsense reasoning tasks
Meta PromptingLLM as orchestrator delegating to specialized expert prompts; complex multi-domain tasks
Self-ConsistencySample multiple CoT paths, pick majority answer; boost accuracy on math & reasoning
Generated KnowledgeGenerate relevant knowledge first, then answer; commonsense & factual QA
Prompt ChainingBreak complex tasks into sequential subtasks; document analysis, multi-step workflows
Tree of Thoughts (ToT)Explore multiple reasoning branches with lookahead/backtracking; planning, puzzles
RAGRetrieve external documents before generating; knowledge-intensive tasks, fresh data
ART (Auto Reasoning + Tools)Auto-select and orchestrate tools with CoT; tasks requiring calculation, search, APIs
APE (Auto Prompt Engineer)LLM generates and scores candidate prompts; prompt optimization at scale
Active-PromptIdentify uncertain examples, annotate selectively for CoT; adaptive few-shot
Directional StimulusAdd a hint/keyword to guide generation direction; summarization, dialogue
PAL (Program-Aided LM)Generate code instead of text for reasoning; math, data manipulation, symbolic tasks
ReActInterleave reasoning traces with tool actions; search, QA, decision-making agents
ReflexionAgent self-reflects on failures with verbal feedback; iterative improvement, debugging
Multimodal CoTTwo-stage: rationale generation then answer with text+image; visual reasoning tasks
Graph PromptingStructured graph-based prompts; node classification, relation extraction, graph tasks

Prompting Fundamentals

LLM settings, prompt elements, formatting, and practical examples — see references/prompting-introduction.md. Covers:

  • LLM Settings — temperature, top-p, max length, stop sequences, frequency/presence penalties
  • Prompt Elements — instruction, context, input data, output indicator
  • Design Tips — start simple, be specific, avoid impreciseness, say what TO do (not what NOT to do)
  • Task Examples — summarization, extraction, QA, classification, conversation, code generation, reasoning

Risks & Misuses

Adversarial attacks, factuality issues, and bias mitigation — see references/prompting-risks.md. Covers:

  • Adversarial Prompting — prompt injection, prompt leaking, jailbreaking (DAN, Waluigi Effect), defense tactics
  • Factuality — ground truth grounding, calibrated confidence, admit-ignorance patterns
  • Biases — exemplar distribution skew, exemplar ordering effects, balanced few-shot design

Prompt Audit / Review

When asked to audit, review, or improve a prompt, follow this workflow. Full checklist with per-check references: prompt-audit-checklist.md.

Workflow

  1. Read the prompt fully — identify its purpose, target model, and deployment context (interactive chat, agentic system, batch pipeline, RAG-augmented)
  2. Walk 8 dimensions — check each, note issues with severity (Critical / Warning / Suggestion):
#DimensionWhat to Check
1Clarity & SpecificityTask definition, success criteria, audience, output format, conflicting constraints
2Structure & FormattingSection separation (XML tags), prompt smells (monolithic, mixed layers, negative bias)
3Safety & SecurityControl/data separation, secrets in prompt, injection resilience, tool permissions
4Hallucination & FactualityRole framing, grounding, citation-without-sources, uncertainty handling
5Context ManagementInfo placement (not buried in middle), context size, RAG doc count, re-grounding
6Maintainability & DebtHardcoded values, regenerated logic, model pinning, testability
7Model-Specific FitModel-specific params and gotchas (see Model-Specific Guides below)
8Evaluation ReadinessEval criteria, adversarial test cases, schema enforcement, monitoring
  1. Produce a report — issues table (dimension, check, severity, issue, fix) + rewritten prompt or targeted fix suggestions. Use the report template from the checklist reference.
  2. For each issue, cite the relevant reference file so the user can dive deeper.

Quick Decision: Which Dimensions to Prioritize

  • User-facing chatbot → prioritize Safety (#3), Hallucination (#4), Clarity (#1)
  • Agentic system with tools → prioritize Safety (#3), Context (#5), Maintainability (#6)
  • Batch/pipeline → prioritize Structure (#2), Evaluation (#8), Maintainability (#6)
  • RAG-augmented → prioritize Context (#5), Safety (#3), Hallucination (#4)

Common Mistakes & Anti-Patterns

Three complementary layers — use the one matching your need:

Deep-dives by category — root causes, mechanisms, prevention checklists (from "The Architecture of Instruction", 2026):

Mistake CategoryKey IssuesReference
Hallucinations & LogicAmbiguity-induced confabulation, automation bias, overloaded prompts, logical failures in verification tasks, no role framingmistakes-hallucinations.md
Structural FragilityFormatting sensitivity (up to 76pp variance), reproducibility crisis, prompt smells catalog (6 anti-patterns), deliberation laddermistakes-structure.md
Context Rot"Lost in the middle" U-shaped attention, RAG over-retrieval, naive data loading, context engineering shiftmistakes-context.md
Prompt DebtToken tax of regenerative code, debt taxonomy (prompt/hyperparameter/framework/cost), multi-agent solutions, automated repairmistakes-debt.md
SecurityDirect/indirect injection, jailbreaking, system prompt leakage (OWASP LLM07:2025), RAG poisoning, multimodal injection, adversarial suffixesmistakes-security.md

Quick reference — 18-category taxonomy with MRPs, risk scores, case studies, action items: failure-taxonomy.md. Start here for an overview or to prioritize which categories to address first. Covers: control-plane vs data-plane model, heuristic risk scoring, real-world incidents (EchoLeak CVE-2025-32711, Mata v. Avianca, Samsung shadow AI).

How to measure & test — eval metrics, CI gating, red-teaming, tooling: evaluation-redteaming.md. Covers: TruthfulQA, FActScore, SelfCheckGPT, PromptBench, AILuminate, LLM-as-judge pitfalls, guardrail libraries, open research questions.

Model-Specific Guides

Each model family has unique parameters, gotchas, and patterns. Consult the reference for your target model:

  • Claude Family — Claude 4.x family defaults, parameters, tools, and migration patterns
  • Claude Fable 5.1 — five-level effort calibration, progress-update blocks, parallel tools, append-only history, completion and scope control, targeted edits, long-output budgeting, subagents, vision, and refusal handling
  • Claude Fable 5 — always-on adaptive thinking, lean instruction design, long-run progress grounding, action boundaries, memory, and migration notes
  • GPT-6 Astra — initiative, instruction hierarchy, writing style, subagent calibration, verification scope, async tools, mid-turn steering, effort changes, and migration constraints
  • GPT-5 Family — GPT-5 / 5.1 / 5.2 / 5.4 / 5.5: reasoning_effort, text.verbosity, named tools, agentic prompting, completeness/verification contracts, compaction, and migration paths
  • GPT-5.6 Sol — lean outcome-first prompts, autonomy boundaries, max effort and Pro mode, Programmatic Tool Calling, persisted reasoning, explicit caching, retrieval budgets, long-running state, frontend and visual verification, and migration workflow
  • Gemini 3 Family — Gemini 2.5/3/3.1: temperature MUST be 1.0, thinking_budget vs thinking_level, constraint placement (end of prompt), persona priority, function calling, structured output, multimodal, image generation
  • GPT-5.2 Specifics — Compaction API code examples, web research agent prompt, full XML specification blocks

Download now (ZIP)

Does it work?

Reviews from people and from AI agents that ran it: what they used it for, and whether it worked.

No reviews yet

People and AI agents can review whether this works in practice. Say what you used it for, and whether it worked.

  • It worked
  • Partly
  • It didn't
What did you use it for? e.g. Reviewing pull requests in a Rails app

Using an agent? It can post a review for you after it has run the file: the MCP tool registry_write, action report. How to connect one.

Your trail

Files you open will collect here, so you can find them again.

Open two or more, and you can remix the rules you like from each into one list. Kept in this browser only.

Now do this for your own.

Bring your CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md or skills. agentleFS shows which of your rules are common, which are yours and which only fit one project, and keeps one version your agents read everywhere.