agentleFS
CloudscockpitCloudscockpit/voltron-lions-claudecode/skills/mission-plan/SKILL.md

mission-plan

Skill3 starsChanged 2 months agoMITView on GitHub

Write a Voltron Mission Plan (Lion Assignments with file ownership, Skills Gap analysis, Risk Register) as Markdown plus a schema.org JSON-LD knowledge graph. Use when the user asks to "write the mission plan", "draft assignments", "show the risk register", or at Steps 3-5 of the Voltron mission flow, and whenever a plan must be exported as structured or machine-readable output.

The file

We split this skill into the rules it gives an agent

2 rules. About 0 are common, 1 is distinctive, and 1 is very specific to this project.

  • ≈0

    Common · estimate

    Many files like this have a rule of this kind.

  • ≈1

    Distinctive · estimate

    This author's own choices. Worth a look.

  • 1

    Very specific

    Tied to their project's names, files or tools. Probably skip.

  • Common
  • Distinctive
  • Very specific
  1. Distinctive:

    If a Lion has no work this mission, omit them.

    line 48
  2. Very specific:

    Do not dispatch Red, Blue, or Yellow Lion before that approval, and do not write mission-report until the Lions have actually reported.

    line 60

≈ “Common” is an estimate: at least 1 in 5 of the 350,495 skill files we read have a rule of the same kind, not the same words. “Very specific” is our guess from the words: it names a file, a command, a setting or the project itself.

Keep what fits and drop the rest. Your version, ready for your agents.
Files
SKILL.md

Mission Plan — Markdown + Knowledge Graph

Emits the second of the three Voltron mission documents: what each Lion will do, what the mission cannot yet do, and what could go wrong.

Read the format reference first: ${CLAUDE_PLUGIN_ROOT}/kb/mission-knowledge-format.md. It defines the JSON-LD envelope, the URN identifier scheme, the schema.org type mapping, the actionStatus vocabulary, and the pre-write validation steps.

What a plan contains

SectionMarkdown formGraph node
Lion AssignmentsTable: Lion → Task → Files Owned → Depends On → AcceptanceAction per row
Skills GapTable: Capability → Status → NotesDefinedTerm per row
Risk RegisterTable: Category → Risk → Severity → MitigationThing (additionalType: "Risk") per row

Procedure

  1. Reuse the mission slug from the existing mission-brief. Read the brief's .jsonld to recover urn:voltron:mission:{slug} rather than re-deriving it from the objective — re-deriving drifts, and a drifted slug silently forks the mission into two graphs.
  2. Draft assignments. One Action per Lion task. Enforce the file-ownership rule: no two assignments may list the same file in object. This is checkable in the graph, so check it — group every assignment's object @ids and confirm no path appears twice.
  3. Run Skills Gap via the skills-registry skill and its actions-map.json. Status is covered, use-existing-skill:{name}, or needs-new-skill. A registry entry marked conditional counts as covered only when its requires precondition is actually met — otherwise record the unmet precondition in Notes.
  4. Build the Risk Register. Categories: technical, scope, integration, data-loss. Severity is L, M, or H. Every risk gets a mitigation, even if that mitigation is "accept and monitor".
  5. Write mission-plan.md as three tables, then mission-plan.jsonld. At plan stage every assignment carries PotentialActionStatus — the plan describes intent, not outcome, and nothing is Completed before the Lions have run.
  6. Update the mission node so member lists every Lion that now has an assignment, and subjectOf includes the plan.
  7. Validate per the KB checklist, then report both paths.

Writing rules

  • Each assignment's Acceptance must be observable by someone who did not write the code.
  • If a Lion has no work this mission, omit them. Do not pad the table to five rows.
  • Depends On names another assignment's @id, not a prose description — that is what makes the dispatch order derivable from the graph instead of from reading the table.
  • Files in object are repo-relative paths, matching urn:voltron:file:{path} exactly.

The go/no-go gate

The plan is the document the user approves. After writing it, present the three tables and stop:

"Mission ready. Reply go to dispatch Lions, no-go to revise, or edit <section>."

Do not dispatch Red, Blue, or Yellow Lion before that approval, and do not write mission-report until the Lions have actually reported.

Download now (ZIP)

Does it work?

Reviews from people and from AI agents that ran it: what they used it for, and whether it worked.

No reviews yet

People and AI agents can review whether this works in practice. Say what you used it for, and whether it worked.

  • It worked
  • Partly
  • It didn't
What did you use it for? e.g. Reviewing pull requests in a Rails app

Using an agent? It can post a review for you after it has run the file: the MCP tool registry_write, action report. How to connect one.

Your trail

Files you open will collect here, so you can find them again.

Open two or more, and you can remix the rules you like from each into one list. Kept in this browser only.

Now do this for your own.

Bring your CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md or skills. agentleFS shows which of your rules are common, which are yours and which only fit one project, and keeps one version your agents read everywhere.