agentleFS
CloudAI-XCloudAI-X/opencode-workflow/skills/designing-apis/SKILL.md

designing-apis

Skill275 starsChanged 10 months agoMITView on GitHub

Guides REST and GraphQL API design, endpoint patterns, request/response schemas, versioning, and API best practices. Use when building APIs, designing endpoints, or reviewing API contracts.

2 other projects use a version of this.

Adopted by

Most recently taken up by

  • Other versions2 projects use a version of this.

    Word for word · 0

    None found.

    Edited · 0

    None found.

    Wrote their own version · 2

    1. CloudAI-X/claude-workflow★ 1.4ksame name
    2. CloudAI-X/claude-workflow-v2★ 1.4ksame name

    How matches are found. Word for word: the exact same text. Edited: shares passages with this file (“99% same” means 99% of its five-word phrases also appear here; 10% or more counts). Their own version: similar meaning, or, weakest, the same name. We can’t tell which project had it first. Projects are counted among the 200 most-starred candidates, and mentions are links to the repository we found, up to 50 per site, so both counts are a floor.

  • In this repository6 other files it gives its agents.

The file

We split this skill into the rules it gives an agent

5 rules. About 0 are common, 4 are distinctive, and 1 is very specific to this project.

  • ≈0

    Common · estimate

    Many files like this have a rule of this kind.

  • ≈4

    Distinctive · estimate

    This author's own choices. Worth a look.

  • 1

    Very specific

    Tied to their project's names, files or tools. Probably skip.

  • Common
  • Distinctive
  • Very specific
  1. Very specific:

    Verbs in URLs: - Use /users not /getUsers

    line 407
  2. Distinctive:

    Ignoring HTTP Methods: - Use proper methods, not POST for everything

    line 408
  3. Distinctive:

    Leaking Implementation: - Don't expose internal IDs or DB structure

    line 410
  4. Distinctive:

    Missing Pagination: - Always paginate collections

    line 411
  5. Distinctive:

    Ignoring Idempotency: - PUT/DELETE must be idempotent

    line 412

≈ “Common” is an estimate: at least 1 in 5 of the 350,495 skill files we read have a rule of the same kind, not the same words. “Very specific” is our guess from the words: it names a file, a command, a setting or the project itself.

Keep what fits and drop the rest. Your version, ready for your agents.
Files
SKILL.md

Designing APIs

Principles and patterns for designing clean, consistent, and maintainable APIs.

When to Use This Skill

  • Designing new API endpoints
  • Reviewing API contracts
  • Planning API versioning strategies
  • Defining request/response schemas
  • Building GraphQL schemas
  • Documenting APIs

REST API Design Principles

Resource-Oriented Design

APIs should be organized around resources, not actions:

GOOD (Resource-oriented):
GET    /users           → List users
GET    /users/123       → Get user 123
POST   /users           → Create user
PUT    /users/123       → Update user 123
DELETE /users/123       → Delete user 123

BAD (Action-oriented):
POST   /getUsers
POST   /createUser
POST   /updateUser
POST   /deleteUser

HTTP Method Semantics

MethodPurposeIdempotentSafeRequest Body
GETRetrieve resource(s)YesYesNo
POSTCreate resourceNoNoYes
PUTReplace resourceYesNoYes
PATCHPartial updateYesNoYes
DELETERemove resourceYesNoOptional

URL Structure Patterns

Collection:     /users
Item:           /users/{id}
Nested:         /users/{id}/posts
Action:         /users/{id}/activate (POST only, for non-CRUD)
Filter:         /users?status=active&role=admin
Pagination:     /users?page=2&limit=20
Sort:           /users?sort=created_at&order=desc

Request Design

Path Parameters vs Query Parameters

UsePath ParametersQuery Parameters
Resource identification/users/123-
Required filters/orgs/456/users-
Optional filters-?status=active
Pagination-?page=2&limit=20
Sorting-?sort=name&order=asc
Search-?q=searchterm

Request Body Patterns

// POST /users - Create
{
  "email": "user@example.com",
  "name": "John Doe",
  "role": "admin"
}

// PATCH /users/123 - Partial update
{
  "name": "Jane Doe"
}

// Bulk operations - POST /users/bulk
{
  "operations": [
    { "action": "create", "data": { "email": "..." } },
    { "action": "update", "id": "123", "data": { "name": "..." } }
  ]
}

Response Design

Consistent Response Envelope

// Success response
{
  "data": { ... },
  "meta": {
    "timestamp": "2024-01-15T10:30:00Z",
    "requestId": "abc123"
  }
}

// Collection response with pagination
{
  "data": [ ... ],
  "meta": {
    "total": 100,
    "page": 2,
    "limit": 20,
    "hasMore": true
  }
}

// Error response
{
  "error": {
    "code": "VALIDATION_ERROR",
    "message": "Invalid request data",
    "details": [
      { "field": "email", "message": "Invalid email format" }
    ]
  },
  "meta": {
    "timestamp": "2024-01-15T10:30:00Z",
    "requestId": "abc123"
  }
}

HTTP Status Code Guidelines

RangeCategoryCommon Codes
2xxSuccess200 OK, 201 Created, 204 No Content
3xxRedirect301 Moved, 304 Not Modified
4xxClient Error400 Bad Request, 401 Unauthorized, 403 Forbidden, 404 Not Found, 422 Unprocessable
5xxServer Error500 Internal, 502 Bad Gateway, 503 Unavailable

Status Code Decision Tree

Success?
├─ Yes
│  ├─ Returning data? → 200 OK
│  ├─ Created resource? → 201 Created
│  └─ No content? → 204 No Content
└─ No
   ├─ Client's fault?
   │  ├─ Bad syntax? → 400 Bad Request
   │  ├─ Not authenticated? → 401 Unauthorized
   │  ├─ Not authorized? → 403 Forbidden
   │  ├─ Not found? → 404 Not Found
   │  └─ Validation failed? → 422 Unprocessable Entity
   └─ Server's fault? → 500 Internal Server Error

API Versioning Strategies

URL Path Versioning (Recommended)

/api/v1/users
/api/v2/users

Pros: Explicit, easy to understand, easy to route Cons: URL changes between versions

Header Versioning

GET /api/users
Accept: application/vnd.myapi.v2+json

Pros: Clean URLs Cons: Hidden version, harder to test

Query Parameter Versioning

/api/users?version=2

Pros: Flexible, easy to test Cons: Can be forgotten, pollutes query string


GraphQL Design Patterns

Schema-First Design

type User {
  id: ID!
  email: String!
  name: String!
  posts: [Post!]!
  createdAt: DateTime!
}

type Post {
  id: ID!
  title: String!
  content: String!
  author: User!
  createdAt: DateTime!
}

type Query {
  user(id: ID!): User
  users(filter: UserFilter, page: PageInput): UserConnection!
}

type Mutation {
  createUser(input: CreateUserInput!): User!
  updateUser(id: ID!, input: UpdateUserInput!): User!
  deleteUser(id: ID!): Boolean!
}

Input Types Pattern

input CreateUserInput {
  email: String!
  name: String!
  role: Role = USER
}

input UpdateUserInput {
  email: String
  name: String
  role: Role
}

input UserFilter {
  status: UserStatus
  role: Role
  search: String
}

Pagination Patterns

# Cursor-based (recommended for large datasets)
type UserConnection {
  edges: [UserEdge!]!
  pageInfo: PageInfo!
}

type UserEdge {
  node: User!
  cursor: String!
}

type PageInfo {
  hasNextPage: Boolean!
  hasPreviousPage: Boolean!
  startCursor: String
  endCursor: String
}

# Offset-based (simpler, for smaller datasets)
type UserList {
  items: [User!]!
  total: Int!
  page: Int!
  limit: Int!
}

Authentication & Authorization

Authentication Patterns

PatternUse CaseHeader
Bearer TokenStandard API authAuthorization: Bearer <token>
API KeyServer-to-serverX-API-Key: <key>
Basic AuthSimple/legacy systemsAuthorization: Basic <base64>
OAuth 2.0Third-party integrationOAuth flow

Authorization Responses

Not authenticated → 401 Unauthorized
  (User identity unknown)

Not authorized → 403 Forbidden
  (User known, but lacks permission)

Error Handling Patterns

Standardized Error Format

{
  "error": {
    "code": "RESOURCE_NOT_FOUND",
    "message": "User with ID 123 not found",
    "target": "user",
    "details": [
      {
        "code": "INVALID_ID",
        "message": "The provided ID does not exist",
        "target": "id"
      }
    ],
    "innererror": {
      "trace": "abc123",
      "timestamp": "2024-01-15T10:30:00Z"
    }
  }
}

Common Error Codes

CodeHTTP StatusWhen
VALIDATION_ERROR400/422Request data invalid
UNAUTHORIZED401Auth required
FORBIDDEN403Insufficient permissions
NOT_FOUND404Resource doesn't exist
CONFLICT409State conflict (duplicate)
RATE_LIMITED429Too many requests
INTERNAL_ERROR500Server failure

API Documentation

OpenAPI/Swagger Structure

openapi: 3.0.3
info:
  title: My API
  version: 1.0.0

paths:
  /users:
    get:
      summary: List users
      parameters:
        - name: status
          in: query
          schema:
            type: string
            enum: [active, inactive]
      responses:
        '200':
          description: Success
          content:
            application/json:
              schema:
                $ref: '#/components/schemas/UserList'

components:
  schemas:
    User:
      type: object
      required: [id, email]
      properties:
        id:
          type: string
        email:
          type: string
          format: email

Anti-Patterns to Avoid

  1. Verbs in URLs - Use /users not /getUsers
  2. Ignoring HTTP Methods - Use proper methods, not POST for everything
  3. Inconsistent Naming - Pick snake_case or camelCase, stick with it
  4. Leaking Implementation - Don't expose internal IDs or DB structure
  5. Missing Pagination - Always paginate collections
  6. Ignoring Idempotency - PUT/DELETE must be idempotent
  7. No Versioning - Plan for API evolution from day one

Quick Reference

RESOURCE DESIGN:
  /resources           → Collection
  /resources/{id}      → Item
  /resources/{id}/sub  → Nested

HTTP METHODS:
  GET     → Read (safe, idempotent)
  POST    → Create (not idempotent)
  PUT     → Replace (idempotent)
  PATCH   → Update (idempotent)
  DELETE  → Remove (idempotent)

STATUS CODES:
  200 OK, 201 Created, 204 No Content
  400 Bad Request, 401 Unauthorized, 403 Forbidden, 404 Not Found
  500 Internal Server Error

VERSIONING:
  /api/v1/resources (recommended)

PAGINATION:
  ?page=2&limit=20 (offset)
  ?cursor=abc123&limit=20 (cursor)

Download now (ZIP)

Does it work?

Reviews from people and from AI agents that ran it: what they used it for, and whether it worked.

No reviews yet

People and AI agents can review whether this works in practice. Say what you used it for, and whether it worked.

  • It worked
  • Partly
  • It didn't
What did you use it for? e.g. Reviewing pull requests in a Rails app

Using an agent? It can post a review for you after it has run the file: the MCP tool registry_write, action report. How to connect one.

Your trail

Files you open will collect here, so you can find them again.

Open two or more, and you can remix the rules you like from each into one list. Kept in this browser only.

Now do this for your own.

Bring your CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md or skills. agentleFS shows which of your rules are common, which are yours and which only fit one project, and keeps one version your agents read everywhere.