ClickHouse Managed Postgres RCA

Version 0.1.0 ClickHouse Inc May 2026 ClickHouse-managed Postgres (Beta APIs)

Abstract

This skill walks an AI agent through an evidence-based root-cause analysis loop for a ClickHouse-managed Postgres instance. It surfaces two Beta ClickHouse Cloud APIs — the Prometheus metrics endpoint (postgresInstancePrometheusGet) for system signal, and the Slow Query Patterns API (slowQueryPatternsGetList) for per-pattern evidence — and guides the agent to scrape system gauges, pull the dominant slow query patterns, triage the signal against a small heuristic library (full scan, hot loop, write congestion at v0.1), and produce a structured, recommend-only report. The skill never executes DDL and never kills queries.

This file is the full compiled guide: the workflow followed by every rule expanded inline, for agents that want all of it in a single context load. The canonical sources are SKILL.md (entry point) and the individual files under rules/.

Core principles

• Resolve the live API shape first. Both endpoints are Beta; paths and field names shift. Discover them from the OpenAPI spec and build a semantic role map. Never hardcode field names.
• Reason from IO and timing, not from a plan tree. There are no EXPLAIN plans, scan-type counters, or vacuum timestamps on this surface.
• Triage before diagnosing. Match the combined signal to a heuristic; if nothing fits cleanly, surface what you saw and ask rather than inventing a hypothesis.
• Recommend only. Write the fix, explain it, and let a human apply it.

Workflow

Six steps, in order. Steps 2 and 3 share only auth (no data dependency) and can run in parallel.

1. Discover the live API shape — fetch the OpenAPI spec, locate both operations by operationId, resolve paths and the slow-query response schema, and build a session role map. See OpenAPI discovery.
2. Scrape Prometheus once for system gauges — CacheHitRatio, ActiveConnections, MemoryUsedPercent, FilesystemUsedPercent. A second scrape for counter deltas is opt-in (write-congestion only). See Prometheus scrape.
3. Pull top slow query patterns — the primary diagnostic; per-pattern accumulated totals over the window. See Slow Query Patterns API.
4. Triage — match the combined Prom + slow-query signal to a heuristic shape. See Triage.
5. Reason, then recommend — symptom, evidence, hypothesis, short-term fix, long-term follow-ups. See Output template.
6. Do not apply the fix — never run DDL, never kill queries. See Recommend-only boundary.

Rule index

1. OpenAPI discovery — rules/openapi-discovery.md
2. Prometheus scrape — rules/prometheus-scrape.md
3. Slow Query Patterns API — rules/slow-query-patterns-fields.md
4. Triage — rules/triage.md
5. Heuristic: full scan — rules/heuristic-full-scan.md
6. Heuristic: hot loop (N+1) — rules/heuristic-hot-loop.md
7. Heuristic: write-path congestion — rules/heuristic-write-congestion.md
8. Output template — rules/output-template.md
9. Recommend-only boundary — rules/recommend-only.md

OpenAPI discovery

Both endpoints this skill uses are Beta. Field names and paths may shift. Before constructing any requests, resolve the current shape from the live OpenAPI spec.

How (with 24h cache)

The spec changes rarely. Cache the resolved paths + role map to /tmp/ch-cloud-rca-cache.json after a successful discovery, and reuse it for up to 24 hours before re-fetching.

Boilerplate (run at session start):

CACHE=/tmp/ch-cloud-rca-cache.json
TTL=86400  # 24 hours

if [ -f "$CACHE" ]; then
  if command -v stat >/dev/null 2>&1; then
    # macOS BSD stat; GNU stat fallback for Linux
    mtime=$(stat -f %m "$CACHE" 2>/dev/null || stat -c %Y "$CACHE")
  fi
  age=$(( $(date +%s) - mtime ))
else
  age=$((TTL + 1))
fi

if [ "$age" -lt "$TTL" ]; then
  echo "openapi-discovery: using cache ($((age/3600))h old)"
else
  echo "openapi-discovery: re-fetching spec"
  curl -s https://api.clickhouse.cloud/v1 > /tmp/ch-cloud-openapi.json
  # ...then parse + write $CACHE; see "Cache format" below.
fi

The cache lets the skill skip the ~863 KB fetch + parse on every session. Twenty-four hours is generous; the underlying schema shifts on a weeks-to-months cadence, not daily.

Cache format

After a fresh fetch, write the resolved knowledge to /tmp/ch-cloud-rca-cache.json:

{
  "paths": {
    "postgresInstancePrometheusGet": "/v1/organizations/{organizationId}/postgres/{postgresId}/prometheus",
    "slowQueryPatternsGetList": "/v1/organizations/{organizationId}/postgres/{postgresId}/slowQueryPatterns"
  },
  "role_map": {
    "call_count": "callCount",
    "total_duration": "totalDurationUs",
    "total_rows": "totalRows",
    "blocks_read_from_disk": "totalSharedBlksRead",
    "blocks_served_from_cache": "totalSharedBlksHit",
    ...
  }
}

cat /tmp/ch-cloud-rca-cache.json is also a useful debugging hook between sessions: it shows exactly what the agent thinks the API looks like.

Invalidating the cache

Two reasons to invalidate before the 24h TTL expires:

1. A request returned HTTP 400 with a message mentioning a field name that's in role_map — the field was renamed or removed. Re-fetch.
2. The user explicitly asks for a refresh. Run rm /tmp/ch-cloud-rca-cache.json and re-run discovery.

Don't invalidate on every 4xx — date-format or value errors won't shift the spec.

Operations to locate

• slowQueryPatternsGetList (tag: Postgres) — list slow query patterns for a Postgres service.
• postgresInstancePrometheusGet (tag: Prometheus) — scrape Prom for a Postgres service.

Find them by operationId, not by path. Paths may move between spec versions; operation IDs are the stable contract.

What to extract per operation

From the matched paths entry:

• The HTTP path template (e.g. /v1/organizations/{organizationId}/postgres/{postgresId}/...).
• Path parameter names — typically organizationId and a Postgres-service ID (current spec calls it postgresId).
• Required query parameters. The slow-query endpoint currently requires from_date and to_date (ISO 8601 UTC).

From the responses['200'].content['application/json'].schema (follow $ref into components.schemas):

• For slowQueryPatternsGetList: the response envelope wraps result: array of <PatternSchema>. Walk into the <PatternSchema> properties.

For postgresInstancePrometheusGet, the response is text/plain in Prometheus exposition format. There's no JSON schema; field discovery for Prom happens by scraping the endpoint and reading the metric names directly.

Build a role map for the slow-query schema

For each property in the resolved pattern schema, identify its semantic role from the description field, not from the name. Build a session-scoped map { role: actual_field_name }.

Roles to identify:

When you reference these in your reasoning, use the resolved actual name (e.g., the spec's current camelCase or snake_case spelling), not the role.

Spotting drift

If you can't find a property whose description matches a role:

• Note it explicitly: "Role blocks_served_from_cache: no matching field in the current spec."
• Proceed with the diminished signal (e.g., for full-scan detection, fall back to disk-reads only — but flag the ambiguity in the recommendation).
• Don't guess at field names. Unresolved roles are real gaps.

Reference: May 2026 spec snapshot

For sanity-checking only. The live spec is authoritative.

call_count               -> callCount
error_count              -> errorCount
total_duration           -> totalDurationUs
avg_duration             -> avgDurationUs
max_duration             -> maxDurationUs
p50 / p95 / p99          -> p50DurationUs / p95DurationUs / p99DurationUs
total_rows               -> totalRows
blocks_read_from_disk    -> totalSharedBlksRead
blocks_served_from_cache -> totalSharedBlksHit
total_cpu_time           -> totalCpuTimeUs
total_wal_bytes          -> totalWalBytes
query_text               -> queryText
db_operation             -> dbOperation

Always rebuild from the live spec; don't paste this in as a substitute for discovery.

Prometheus scrape

How

Use the path resolved during OpenAPI discovery (postgresInstancePrometheusGet). HTTP Basic with the user's ClickHouse Cloud API key/secret.

curl -s -u "$CH_CLOUD_KEY:$CH_CLOUD_SECRET" \
  "https://api.clickhouse.cloud/<resolved path>" > /tmp/pg-prom.txt

The response is Prometheus exposition format text (lines like PostgresServer_X{...} <value>).

Default: one scrape, gauges only

The skill's default Prom step is a single scrape that extracts current values from gauges. No wait, no second scrape. The Slow Query Patterns API gives the per-pattern rate-of-change data — see slow-query-patterns-fields.md — so the only role left for Prom is system-level context.

Gauges to read on the single scrape:

• PostgresServer_CacheHitRatio — current ratio. Below ~95% on a workload that should fit in cache = cache thrash.
• PostgresServer_ActiveConnections — current count (often split by state label: active / idle / idle in transaction). Climbing toward a known pool ceiling = client fan-out or stuck queries.
• PostgresServer_MemoryUsedPercent — current. Helps qualify cache hit ratio (low memory usage but bad hit ratio = the workload is bigger than RAM).
• PostgresServer_FilesystemUsedPercent — current. High = storage pressure, separate concern from query latency.

Opt-in: rate-of-change from two scrapes

Only do a second scrape when Step 4 triage hints at write congestion or you need a signal that's nowhere else:

• PostgresServer_Deadlocks_Total — non-zero delta means lock-cycle deadlocks: Postgres detected a circular lock wait and aborted one transaction to break it. This is not the same as a serialization conflict (SQLSTATE 40001 under SERIALIZABLE / REPEATABLE READ) — different mechanism, different fix (consistent lock ordering vs. retry/isolation review). See sub-patterns A and C in heuristic-write-congestion.md. Not surfaced in Slow Query Patterns.
• PostgresServer_TransactionsRolledBack_Total vs _Committed_Total — rollback rate; also not directly in Slow Query Patterns.
• PostgresServer_DiskWrites_Total — global write pressure (useful for sub-pattern B / WAL congestion in heuristic-write-congestion.md).

When doing the second scrape, the upstream collector refreshes exposed values roughly once per minute (verified empirically, May 2026 — not stated in the docs). A gap shorter than ~60s returns identical counter values. Use ≥90s, 120s is the safe default. If your delta on every counter is zero despite live traffic, suspect that you scraped within one refresh window.

curl -s -u "$CH_CLOUD_KEY:$CH_CLOUD_SECRET" \
  "https://api.clickhouse.cloud/<resolved path>" > /tmp/pg-prom-1.txt
sleep 120
curl -s -u "$CH_CLOUD_KEY:$CH_CLOUD_SECRET" \
  "https://api.clickhouse.cloud/<resolved path>" > /tmp/pg-prom-2.txt

Document the gap you used so a reader can sanity-check.

What this surface does NOT show

No per-query metrics. No scan-type counters. No autovacuum/analyze timestamps. No load averages. The per-query story lives in Slow Query Patterns.

Field name caveat

Metric names listed above match the user-facing docs at https://clickhouse.com/docs/cloud/managed-postgres/monitoring/metrics. Confirm exact casing in the actual scrape output on first use; the API is Beta and names may shift.

Slow Query Patterns API

Endpoint (resolve from OpenAPI)

Operation: slowQueryPatternsGetList (tag: Postgres). Beta.

Before constructing a request, follow openapi-discovery.md to resolve the current path, required query params, and response schema. The reference snapshot below documents what May 2026 looked like; the live spec is authoritative.

Reference path (May 2026 snapshot):

GET https://api.clickhouse.cloud/v1/organizations/{organizationId}/postgres/{postgresId}/slowQueryPatterns

Auth: HTTP Basic with a ClickHouse Cloud API key (username) and secret (password).

Required query params

The slow-query endpoint requires a time window:

• from_date — ISO 8601 UTC date-time.
• to_date — ISO 8601 UTC date-time.

For RCA, default to the last 15 minutes.

Useful optional query params

• sort_by — sort key. Reference values from the May 2026 snapshot: total_duration (default), avg_duration, call_count, total_blks_read, total_cpu_time, error_count, max_duration, p50_duration, p95_duration, p99_duration, total_rows, total_shared_blks_hit, total_wal_bytes. Confirm enum values from the live spec.
• sort_order — default desc.
• limit — default 20, max 500.
• db_name, db_user, db_operation, app — filters.

Request template

The API requires millisecond precision on the date-time strings (.000Z). RFC 3339 strings without milliseconds (e.g., 2026-05-29T10:00:00Z) are rejected with HTTP 400 even though the spec just says format: date-time. Use the format below:

from_date=$(date -u -v-15M +%Y-%m-%dT%H:%M:%S.000Z 2>/dev/null \
            || date -u -d '15 minutes ago' +%Y-%m-%dT%H:%M:%S.000Z)
to_date=$(date -u +%Y-%m-%dT%H:%M:%S.000Z)

# Use curl -G with --data-urlencode so the params are encoded
# correctly. Substitute the path resolved from
# openapi-discovery.md.
curl -s -G -u "$CH_CLOUD_KEY:$CH_CLOUD_SECRET" \
  "https://api.clickhouse.cloud/<resolved path>" \
  --data-urlencode "from_date=$from_date" \
  --data-urlencode "to_date=$to_date" \
  --data-urlencode "sort_by=total_duration" \
  --data-urlencode "limit=10"

If a request returns HTTP 400 with body BAD_REQUEST: '<your date>', the parser rejected that specific value — verify millisecond precision and the Z suffix.

Response envelope

Standard ClickHouse Cloud envelope:

{
  "status": 200,
  "requestId": "<uuid>",
  "result": [ { /* pattern */ }, ... ]
}

Field roles (from openapi-discovery.md)

Use the role map you built during discovery. The roles you need for the heuristics:

• query_id — pattern identifier.
• query_text — normalized SQL.
• db_operation — SELECT / INSERT / UPDATE / DELETE / UTILITY.
• call_count — executions in the window.
• total_duration — aggregate runtime.
• avg_duration — mean per-call latency.
• p50, p95, p99 — percentile latencies.
• total_rows — rows returned/affected across all calls.
• blocks_read_from_disk — pages read from disk (cache misses).
• blocks_served_from_cache — pages served from cache.
• total_wal_bytes — WAL bytes generated.
• error_count — failed executions.

When citing values in your reasoning, name the resolved field (e.g., totalSharedBlksRead in the May 2026 snapshot), not the role.

Derived values

The API does not return a cache hit ratio. Compute:

cache_hit_ratio = <blocks_served_from_cache>
                / max(<blocks_served_from_cache> + <blocks_read_from_disk>, 1)

Per-call IO ratio for the full-scan heuristic:

blks_touched_per_row = (<blocks_served_from_cache> + <blocks_read_from_disk>)
                     / max(<total_rows>, 1)

Use total blocks touched (hit + read), not just disk reads. A hot table fully resident in cache still produces a high blks_touched_per_row if every call scans it.

Expect ClickHouse Cloud internal probes in the top-N

The control plane runs its own monitoring queries against managed Postgres instances — SELECT pg_current_wal_lsn(), SELECT pg_is_in_recovery(), SHOW log_directory, and a handful of similar admin probes. They appear in the Slow Query Patterns response with high callCount (one per probe interval) but totalDurationUs ≈ 0 and zero IO. They don't affect the diagnosis but waste top-N slots.

Two-step filter:

1. Ask for limit=10 (or higher) on the request so the user-traffic patterns survive even if internal probes fill the top slots.
2. Post-filter the response — skip any pattern where totalDurationUs is below, say, 1,000,000 (1s aggregate over the window). Real user-traffic patterns will always clear that threshold; internal probes won't.

patterns = [p for p in resp['result'] if p['totalDurationUs'] >= 1_000_000]

Then take the top 3 by totalDurationUs from what remains.

The app filter param accepts equality only (no app != bin/monitor), so server-side filtering doesn't work for "exclude internal probes." Post-filter is the path.

What this surface does NOT show

• No EXPLAIN plans.
• No scan-type counters.
• No table or column statistics.
• The list is filtered server-side to "slow" patterns — there may be other patterns the API doesn't surface.

Reason from the IO and timing signal, not the plan tree.

Triage

A decision tree for picking the right heuristic. Run this after scraping Prometheus and pulling slow query patterns, but before applying any specific heuristic.

Field names below reference roles from your session's role map (per openapi-discovery.md).

Step 1 — Read system context from the single Prom scrape

From the gauges in prometheus-scrape.md:

• CacheHitRatio well below ~95% on a workload that should fit in cache → cache thrash, real signal on its own.
• ActiveConnections near the pool ceiling → client fan-out or stuck queries.
• All gauges healthy → the system is fine; whatever's slow is per-query, not system-wide. Move on to Step 2.

(Confirm Prom metric names against the live scrape; user-facing docs are at https://clickhouse.com/docs/cloud/managed-postgres/monitoring/metrics.)

Note: the per-pattern rate-of-change data you'd otherwise derive from two Prom scrapes lives in Slow Query Patterns — that's Step 2. You only need a second Prom scrape when this step or Step 2 hints at write-congestion (see heuristic-write-congestion.md).

Step 2 — What does the slow query pattern shape look like?

Read the top 3 patterns by <total_duration> after filtering out CH Cloud internal probes (see slow-query-patterns-fields.md → "Expect ClickHouse Cloud internal probes"). For each, look at the relationship between <call_count>, <avg_duration>, <total_rows>, and <blocks_read_from_disk> + <blocks_served_from_cache>:

Step 3 — If signal is ambiguous, do not invent

If no single pattern matches a row above, report the top three with their key ratios and ask the user which one corresponds to a workload they recognize. Do not pick a heuristic at random.

What this skill does NOT cover yet

• Replication lag.
• Schema bloat / autovacuum starvation.
• TLS/connection-pool misconfiguration.
• Specific query rewrites (the heuristics recommend indexes/batching, not query refactors).

If the signal points at one of the above, say so and surface it rather than forcing a fit. New heuristics for these patterns are welcome as PRs.

Heuristic: full scan

Use when the triage decision tree pointed here: read-heavy Prom signal + one slow query pattern dominates with high blks_touched_per_row and a low derived cache hit ratio.

Field names below reference roles, not literal API properties. Substitute the resolved actual names from your session's role map (built per openapi-discovery.md).

The ratio

For the candidate pattern:

blks_touched_per_row =
  (<blocks_served_from_cache> + <blocks_read_from_disk>)
  / max(<total_rows>, 1)

A ratio in the hundreds or thousands per row returned is the full-scan signature even without a plan.

Use blocks touched (hit + read), not just disk reads. A hot table fully cached still produces a high blks_touched_per_row if every call scans it. Disk-only thinking misses cache-resident full scans.

When you report numbers, cite the resolved field names from your role map so the user can verify against their own API response.

What it cannot distinguish

Two causes look identical on this surface:

1. Missing index on the predicate / sort column(s).
2. Existing index ignored by the planner — stale stats, a type mismatch in the comparison, a function applied to the indexed column, or a non-sargable predicate.

You cannot tell them apart without seeing a plan. Flag both possibilities in the recommendation.

Recommending an index

If the user confirms there is no covering index, recommend:

CREATE INDEX CONCURRENTLY <descriptive_name>
  ON <table> (<predicate_cols>[, <order_cols> [ASC|DESC]])
  [WHERE <selectivity_predicate>];

Rules of thumb:

• CONCURRENTLY, always. Never block writes on a running instance. Note in the recommendation that this takes longer but doesn't lock.
• Include the ORDER BY column. If the query's ORDER BY matches, put it in the index in the right direction so the index can serve the sort.
• Partial index when the predicate is highly selective.

Recommending an investigation (if an index already exists)

If the user reports a covering index already exists:

1. EXPLAIN (ANALYZE, BUFFERS) <the slow query> — confirm the planner is or isn't using the index.
2. If it isn't, check for: function on indexed column, type mismatch in the predicate, stale stats (ANALYZE the table), or a bad cost estimate.

Heuristic: hot loop (N+1)

Use when the triage decision tree pointed here: one pattern has a very high <call_count> and a very low <avg_duration>, but its <total_duration> is one of the largest on the instance.

Field names reference roles from your session's role map (per openapi-discovery.md). Substitute resolved actual names when citing values.

The shape

A pattern executing thousands of times per minute with a sub-millisecond mean is the application calling the database in a tight loop — typically:

• Rendering a list and issuing one query per row.
• A poorly batched job: per-record SELECT or INSERT where a single statement could handle many.
• A retry loop hammering a fast-but-pointless query.

The database is healthy here. The caller is the problem.

Confirmation signals

Strong evidence:

• <avg_duration> < ~1 ms but <call_count> is in the tens of thousands over a short window.
• <blocks_read_from_disk> per call is small — the query is cheap; the issue is volume.
• The derived cache hit ratio is high on this pattern (it's hitting cache; it's just hitting it a lot).
• The <query_text> looks like a single-row lookup or small write: SELECT ... WHERE id = $1, INSERT ... VALUES (...).

Weak/contraindicating evidence:

• High <avg_duration> — that's not a hot loop, that's a slow query at scale.
• Multiple patterns simultaneously elevated — broader load issue, not a single hot loop.

Recommending a fix

The fix lives in the application, not the database. Be specific about what to look for, since you can't see the app code:

1. Identify the caller. Suggest the user grep app logs or tracing for the normalized <query_text>. The framework's ORM-generated queries usually have a distinctive shape.
2. Batch the loop. For reads: SELECT ... WHERE id = ANY($1) with the array of IDs. For writes: INSERT ... VALUES (...), (...), (...) or COPY.
3. Cache where applicable. If the same single-row lookup happens in a render loop, the app likely should be reading once and reusing.

What NOT to recommend

• Indexes — <avg_duration> is small; there's probably already one. Adding more won't help.
• DB-side statement_timeout — papers over the loop.
• Connection pool tweaks — the loop is the cause, not the pool.

Heuristic: write-path congestion

Use when the triage decision tree pointed here: top patterns have <db_operation> of INSERT/UPDATE/DELETE with large <total_wal_bytes>, or the user reports symptoms (timeouts, retries) that this skill's per-pattern view alone can't confirm.

This is the one heuristic that may need the opt-in second Prom scrape (see prometheus-scrape.md) — specifically to get a non-zero delta on PostgresServer_Deadlocks_Total and a rollback/commit ratio from PostgresServer_TransactionsRolledBack_Total vs _Committed_Total. Neither is exposed in Slow Query Patterns.

Field names reference roles from your session's role map (per openapi-discovery.md).

The shape

Three sub-patterns live under "write congestion." Distinguish before recommending.

Sub-pattern A: deadlocks

PostgresServer_Deadlocks_Total delta > 0 over the window. At least two concurrent transactions are taking locks in incompatible orders.

Recommend:

• Surface the deadlock count and ask the user to check Postgres logs for deadlock detected entries — these log the exact statements involved, which the API doesn't.
• Common cause: two transactions update the same set of rows in different orders. Fix is application-side: lock rows in a consistent order (e.g., always sort by primary key before issuing updates).

Sub-pattern B: slow individual writes

One write pattern with high <avg_duration>. Could be a wide row insert under contention, a large update touching many rows, or WAL congestion under heavy concurrent writes.

Recommend:

• For wide rows: check column count and TOAST-eligible fields. Consider whether some columns belong in a side table.
• For wide updates (high <total_rows> per call): batch into smaller chunks with explicit transactions, so each chunk commits separately.
• For concurrent-write pressure: surface <total_wal_bytes>. If high, the bottleneck is WAL flush — the user may need to tune commit_delay / synchronous_commit (with durability tradeoffs the user must own) or scale the instance.

Sub-pattern C: high error rate

<error_count> is unusually large relative to <call_count>, or PostgresServer_TransactionsRolledBack_Total delta is high relative to commits.

Recommend:

• Application is throwing exceptions mid-transaction or hitting serialization conflicts on SERIALIZABLE / REPEATABLE READ isolation.
• Surface the error / rollback rate; ask the user to check app error logs for the actual exception traces — the API doesn't expose those.

What NOT to recommend

• An index — write congestion is rarely indexed away. More indexes make writes slower.
• Vacuum tuning unless there's specific evidence of bloat — this surface doesn't expose bloat metrics, so don't guess.
• Hardware sizing — out of scope for a single-pattern RCA. Surface the WAL/commit pressure and recommend the user discuss with their account team.

Output template

Every RCA response uses this structure. Do not deviate.

## Symptom

<one or two sentences on what the Prometheus signal showed,
naming the specific metrics and the rate-of-change or value
that flagged the issue>

## Evidence

The dominant slow query pattern(s) from
`slowQueryPatternsGetList`:

```json
<the actual JSON object(s), trimmed to the fields that matter
for the heuristic you applied — typically call_count,
total_duration, avg_duration, total_rows, blocks_read_from_disk,
blocks_served_from_cache, query_text. Use the resolved actual
field names from your session's role map, not the role labels.>
```

Key derived values (if applicable to the heuristic):
- `blks_touched_per_row` = <number>
- `call_count` over the window = <number>
- derived cache hit ratio = <number>

## Hypothesis

<the heuristic you matched (e.g., full scan, hot loop, write
congestion) and the most likely underlying cause. If the
heuristic cannot distinguish between two causes from this
surface alone, state both and explain what would
distinguish them.>

## Recommended action

<the concrete fix. For an index recommendation:>

```sql
CREATE INDEX CONCURRENTLY <descriptive_name>
  ON <table> (<cols>) [WHERE <predicate>];
```

<For an application-side fix: a specific code/query change to
make, e.g. "batch the loop into a single SELECT with
`WHERE id = ANY($1)`".>

<For a configuration/operational concern: the specific check
or follow-up the user should run, e.g. "check Postgres logs
for `deadlock detected` entries to see the conflicting
statements".>

One sentence on why this action addresses the diagnosed cause.

## Long-term follow-ups

- <bullet — e.g., audit other unindexed filterable columns on
  the same table>
- <bullet — e.g., add a CI check that flags new ORM-generated
  per-row queries>

## What I did NOT do

- I did not run any DDL.
- I did not cancel or kill any queries.
- I did not modify any application code or configuration.
- A human should review the recommendation above and apply it.

Style rules

• Quote real values from the API response, not hand-waved numbers.
• For DDL recommendations, default to CREATE INDEX CONCURRENTLY — never block writes on a running instance.
• For application-side recommendations, be specific about what to grep / look for in the codebase, since you cannot see it directly.
• If you cannot fully diagnose from the data available, say so. Surface what you saw and ask for the missing piece rather than overreaching.

Recommend-only boundary

This skill never executes mutations on the Postgres instance.

Never do

• Run CREATE INDEX, ALTER, DROP, VACUUM, ANALYZE, REINDEX, or any other DDL/DML on the user's instance.
• Call pg_cancel_backend or pg_terminate_backend.
• Modify any configuration, role, or extension.
• Open a psql session to the user's instance and run commands inside it on their behalf.

What you do instead

Write the exact SQL the human should run, explain why, and state explicitly that you did not run it. Use the structure in rules/output-template.md.

If the user asks you to apply the fix

Decline and explain. Example response:

I can't apply the fix on your instance — this skill is recommend-only by contract. The SQL above is ready to copy; you can run it from psql or whatever client you use. I'm happy to help interpret the result or roll back if it doesn't behave as expected.

The point of the boundary is that an agent reasoning from incomplete information (no plans, no full table stats) shouldn't be mutating production. The recommendation may be right but a human should sanity-check the call.

Read-only operations are fine

The two API calls this skill makes — Prometheus scrape and slow-query-patterns list — are read-only. You can re-scrape or re-list freely to confirm a fix took effect after the human applies it.