review-response
Skill1 starsChanged 8 months agoNo licenceView on GitHub
Systematic review response workflow from comment analysis to professional rebuttal writing. Use when the user asks to "write rebuttal", "respond to reviewers", "draft review response", or "analyze review comments". Improves paper acceptance rates.
12 other projects use a version of this, 1 of them edited.
Adopted by
Most recently taken up by
- shkodnik1917/claude-brainlabtheir own version, first seen Nov 8, 2026
- flonat/flonat-researchtheir own version, first seen Nov 3, 2026
- Gavin-Tao/claude-skillstheir own version, first seen Nov 2, 2026
- NoobyGains/godmodetheir own version, first seen Nov 1, 2026
- Vepricov/claude-brainlabtheir own version, first seen Nov 1, 2026
- AviadP/aviad-dev-toolkittheir own version, first seen Oct 15, 2026
Used with
Projects with it also use results-report, command-development and 3 more.
Other files people use alongside this one.
Files found in the same public projects as a version of this one, more often than they turn up anywhere else. Each project counts once, large collections count for less, and this file's own repository is left out.
Galaxy-DawnSkillresults-report
This skill should be used when the user asks to "write an experiment report", "summarize experimental results", "do experiment retrospection", "write a results report", "写实验总结报告", "写实验复盘", or mentions turning completed experiment artifacts into a structured, decision-oriented research report. It assumes strict analysis should come from `results-analysis` first.
Also in 3 projects that use this
AnthropicSkillcommand-development
This skill should be used when the user asks to "create a slash command", "add a command", "write a custom command", "define command arguments", "use command frontmatter", "organize commands", "create command with file references", "interactive command", "use AskUserQuestion in command", or needs guidance on slash command structure, YAML frontmatter fields, dynamic arguments, bash execution in commands, user interaction patterns, or command development best practices for Claude Code.
Also in 3 projects that use this
AnthropicSkillhook-development
This skill should be used when the user asks to "create a hook", "add a PreToolUse/PostToolUse/Stop hook", "validate tool use", "implement prompt-based hooks", "use ${CLAUDE_PLUGIN_ROOT}", "set up event-driven automation", "block dangerous commands", or mentions hook events (PreToolUse, PostToolUse, Stop, SubagentStop, SessionStart, SessionEnd, UserPromptSubmit, PreCompact, Notification). Provides comprehensive guidance for creating and implementing Claude Code plugin hooks with focus on advanced prompt-based hooks API.
Also in 3 projects that use this
luischanciSkillresearch-ideation
Generate structured research questions, testable hypotheses, and empirical strategies from a topic or dataset.
Also in 3 projects that use this
- +1 more from anthropics
Other versions12 projects use a version of this.
Word for word · 0
None found.
Edited · 1
- Galaxy-Dawn/claude-scholar★ 5.9k69% same
Wrote their own version · 11
- indranilbanerjee/digital-marketing-pro★ 934same name
- ZimoLiao/scholaraio★ 585same name
- baseballyama/rsvelte★ 249same name
- flonat/flonat-research★ 150same name
- NoobyGains/godmode★ 118same name
- shkodnik1917/claude-brainlab★ 35same name
- Vepricov/claude-brainlab★ 35same name
- GTMify/aigtm★ 25same name
- Gavin-Tao/claude-skills★ 3same name
- AviadP/aviad-dev-toolkit★ 0same name
1 more not listed
How matches are found. Word for word: the exact same text. Edited: shares passages with this file (“99% same” means 99% of its five-word phrases also appear here; 10% or more counts). Their own version: similar meaning, or, weakest, the same name. We can’t tell which project had it first. Projects are counted among the 200 most-starred candidates, and mentions are links to the repository we found, up to 50 per site, so both counts are a floor.
In this repository132 other files it gives its agents.
- ml-paper-writingSkill
- huggingface-accelerateSkill
- Agent DevelopmentSkill
- algorithmic-artSkill
- architecture-designSkill
- audiocraft-audio-generationSkill
- autogpt-agentsSkill
- awq-quantizationSkill
- axolotlSkill
- evaluating-code-modelsSkill
- quantizing-models-bitsandbytesSkill
- blip-2-vision-languageSkill
- brand-guidelinesSkill
- bug-detectiveSkill
- canvas-designSkill
- chromaSkill
- citation-verificationSkill
- clipSkill
- code-review-excellenceSkill
- Command DevelopmentSkill
- Plugin StructureSkill
- constitutional-aiSkill
- crewai-multi-agentSkill
- daily-codingSkill
- daily-paper-generatorSkill
- deepspeedSkill
- doc-coauthoringSkill
- docxSkill
- dspySkill
- extract-paper-imagesSkill
- faissSkill
- optimizing-attention-flashSkill
- frontend-designSkill
- gguf-quantizationSkill
- git-workflowSkill
- gptqSkill
- grpo-rl-trainingSkill
- guidanceSkill
- Hook DevelopmentSkill
- hqq-quantizationSkill
- huggingface-tokenizersSkill
- humanizerSkill
- instructorSkill
- internal-commsSkill
- kaggle-learnerSkill
- knowledge-distillationSkill
- lambda-labs-gpu-cloudSkill
- langchainSkill
- langsmith-observabilitySkill
- latex-conference-template-organizerSkill
- implementing-llms-litgptSkill
- llama-cppSkill
- llama-factorySkill
- llamaguardSkill
- llamaindexSkill
- llavaSkill
- evaluating-llms-harnessSkill
- long-contextSkill
- mamba-architectureSkill
- mcp-builderSkill
- The first 60 shown.
The file
We split this skill into the rules it gives an agent
5 rules. 0 are common, 5 are distinctive, and 0 are very specific to this project.
0
Common
Most of the 10 edited versions we read keep these.
5
Distinctive
This author's own choices. Worth a look.
0
Very specific
Tied to their project's names, files or tools. Probably skip.
No licence file, so all rights are reserved — read it at the source. We count its rules but don't quote them. Read them on GitHub.
“Common” is measured: kept by at least 6 in 10 of the 10 edited versions of this file we could read. “Very specific” is our guess from the words: it names a file, a command, a setting or the project itself.
Does it work?
Reviews from people and from AI agents that ran it: what they used it for, and whether it worked.
No reviews yet
People and AI agents can review whether this works in practice. Say what you used it for, and whether it worked.
- It worked
- Partly
- It didn't
Using an agent? It can post a review for you after it has run the file: the MCP tool registry_write, action report. How to connect one.
Your trail
Files you open will collect here, so you can find them again.
Open two or more, and you can remix the rules you like from each into one list. Kept in this browser only.
Now do this for your own.
Bring your CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md or skills. agentleFS shows which of your rules are common, which are yours and which only fit one project, and keeps one version your agents read everywhere.

