getting-started
Skill1 starsChanged 29 days agoMITView on GitHub
This is the front door to the CRO, research & reporting toolkit. Use it FIRST when someone is getting started, is unsure which skill to use, or makes a broad/vague request. Trigger phrases: "where do I start", "what can this do", "how do I use this", "get started", "set up", "onboard me", "help me with my store/page/campaign", "what should I focus on", "I don't know where to begin". It orients the user, captures a reusable engagement brief, and routes to the right skill, command, or agent.
32 other projects use a version of this.
Adopted by
Most recently taken up by
- seayniclabs/homelab-infra-mcptheir own version, first seen Nov 8, 2026
- AnyOrgName/php-skillstheir own version, first seen Nov 8, 2026
- celigo/aitheir own version, first seen Nov 5, 2026
- orgiggly/claude-plugintheir own version, first seen Nov 2, 2026
- claude-world/director-mode-litetheir own version, first seen Nov 1, 2026
- seayniclabs/lathetheir own version, first seen Nov 1, 2026
Other versions32 projects use a version of this.
Word for word · 0
None found.
Edited · 0
None found.
Wrote their own version · 32
- NVIDIA-NeMo/Curator★ 1.9ksame name
- davekilleen/Dex★ 509same name
- aivrar/portable-hermes-agent★ 239same name
- GoogleCloudPlatform/race-condition★ 232same name
- taskade/mcp★ 170same name
- claude-world/director-mode-lite★ 80same name
- dylantarre/design-system-skills★ 50same name
- crewAIInc/skills★ 45same name
- aks129/HealthClawGuardrails★ 33same name
- ayrshare/ayrshare-social-media-api-claude-plugin★ 19same name
22 more not listed
How matches are found. Word for word: the exact same text. Edited: shares passages with this file (“99% same” means 99% of its five-word phrases also appear here; 10% or more counts). Their own version: similar meaning, or, weakest, the same name. We can’t tell which project had it first. Projects are counted among the 200 most-starred candidates, and mentions are links to the repository we found, up to 50 per site, so both counts are a floor.
In this repository7 other files it gives its agents.
The file
We split this skill into the rules it gives an agent
5 rules. 0 are common, 2 are distinctive, and 3 are very specific to this project.
0
Common
Most of the 32 edited versions we read keep these.
2
Distinctive
This author's own choices. Worth a look.
3
Very specific
Tied to their project's names, files or tools. Probably skip.
- Common
- Distinctive
- Very specific
- Distinctive: line 24
Before doing real work, establish the shared context every other skill reads first.
- Very specific: line 25
Look for an existing brief at ./cro-engagement.md (the default.
- Very specific: line 26
If absent and the task is more than a one-off, offer to capture one.
- Very specific: line 35
Write/update ./cro-engagement.md from the template.
- Distinctive: line 60
Don't interrogate the user — ask only the brief questions that matter for the task at hand, and infer the rest.
“Common” is measured: kept by at least 6 in 10 of the 32 edited versions of this file we could read. “Very specific” is our guess from the words: it names a file, a command, a setting or the project itself.
Files
Getting Started (begin here)
The front door. Orient the user, capture a reusable engagement brief, then route to the right tool. Run this whenever someone is starting, is unsure which skill applies, or asks something broad.
What this toolkit does (say this plainly)
A strategist's kit to: audit a conversion funnel, research customers, plan and read out tests, run deep sourced research, write conversion copy, sharpen positioning/outbound, and turn it into polished reports + redesign blueprints, with a verifier that checks the work before it ships. It uses AI where the evidence says AI is reliable (coding feedback, checking pages against fixed rules, drafting variants, running the maths) and keeps judgement calls with you.
Step 1 — Engagement brief (persistent context)
Before doing real work, establish the shared context every other skill reads first.
- Look for an existing brief at
./cro-engagement.md(the default; or ask the user for the path). If present, read it, summarize it back in 2–3 lines, and ask if anything changed. - If absent and the task is more than a one-off, offer to capture one. Ask only what's needed (skip anything already obvious from the request), using
references/engagement-brief-template.md:- Client / brand and what they sell; price tier (mass / premium / luxury).
- ICP (who buys, what they value).
- Surface in scope (PDP / collection / cart / checkout / landing / lead-gen / SaaS signup / whole funnel).
- Primary goal & metric (e.g., add-to-cart rate, RPV, lead conversion).
- Brand voice & tokens (tone, banned words, colors/fonts/logo if known).
- Connected data/tools (analytics/Shopify MCP, web search, theme/codebase access), the testing tool, and traffic per key template.
- Research assets (review export, tickets, past surveys, recordings) and the test log path.
- Known constraints (timeline, what's off-limits, who the audience for deliverables is).
- Write/update
./cro-engagement.mdfrom the template. Keep it short and current; confirm before overwriting.
Why: the skills are most powerful when they share one context (so they stop re-asking and stay consistent). This is the coherence layer for the whole suite.
Step 2 — Route to the right tool
Match the user's intent to a component using references/routing-map.md. Quick version:
- "Why isn't this converting / audit this page or funnel" → /cro-audit or the
ecommerce-cro-auditskill (it can delegate to thecro-auditoragent). - "Research X thoroughly / with sources" → /deep-research or
deep-research-synthesis(fans outdeep-researcheragents). - "Turn this into a report / write it up" → /build-report or
report-information-design(or thereport-builderagent). - "What are customers saying / analyse reviews / survey questions / user test" →
voc-research(bulk coding via thevoc-coderagent). - "Plan / size / read out a test", "how long should it run", "did it win" → /experiment or
experiment-design. - "Write/rewrite copy, headline, CTA, email, ad" →
conversion-copywriting. - "Cold outreach, follow-up cadence, positioning, value prop, qualify a deal" →
outbound-and-positioning. - "Check this before it ships" → the
cro-verifieragent.
Step 3 — Show the recommended end-to-end flow
For a full engagement, the canonical path is: Brief (this skill) → /cro-audit (funnel data + rendered checklist + customer evidence → evidence-tagged hypotheses, test plans, report, verification) → copy variants → /experiment readout + test log. Offer to kick off the first step.
Reference map
references/engagement-brief-template.md— the brief template, field definitions, where it lives, and update cadence.references/routing-map.md— full intent → skill/command/agent map and the end-to-end playbook.
Guardrails
Don't interrogate the user — ask only the brief questions that matter for the task at hand, and infer the rest. Don't overwrite an existing brief without confirming. If the user clearly already knows what they want, skip the orientation and route straight there.
Does it work?
Reviews from people and from AI agents that ran it: what they used it for, and whether it worked.
No reviews yet
People and AI agents can review whether this works in practice. Say what you used it for, and whether it worked.
- It worked
- Partly
- It didn't
Using an agent? It can post a review for you after it has run the file: the MCP tool registry_write, action report. How to connect one.
Your trail
Files you open will collect here, so you can find them again.
Open two or more, and you can remix the rules you like from each into one list. Kept in this browser only.
Now do this for your own.
Bring your CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md or skills. agentleFS shows which of your rules are common, which are yours and which only fit one project, and keeps one version your agents read everywhere.

