show-your-work
Skill2 starsChanged 8 months agoMITView on GitHub
Generates shareable artifacts from what the user built — impact summaries, how-to guides, before/after comparisons, and presentation-ready slides. Use when the user wants to share what they built with their team, manager, or organization.
4 other projects use a version of this.
Adopted by
Most recently taken up by
- dheerajjha/show-your-worktheir own version, first seen Oct 11, 2026
- quatico-solutions/agent-skillstheir own version, first seen Jul 2, 2026
- ahirmaan/show-your-worktheir own version, first seen Jun 25, 2026
- muyuhill/100books-to-skillstheir own version, first seen Jun 11, 2026
Other versions4 projects use a version of this.
Word for word · 0
None found.
Edited · 0
None found.
Wrote their own version · 4
- muyuhill/100books-to-skills★ 14same name
- dheerajjha/show-your-work★ 4same name
- ahirmaan/show-your-work★ 2same name
- quatico-solutions/agent-skills★ 2same name
How matches are found. Word for word: the exact same text. Edited: shares passages with this file (“99% same” means 99% of its five-word phrases also appear here; 10% or more counts). Their own version: similar meaning, or, weakest, the same name. We can’t tell which project had it first. Projects are counted among the 200 most-starred candidates, and mentions are links to the repository we found, up to 50 per site, so both counts are a floor.
In this repository18 other files it gives its agents.
- agent-architectSkill
- api-explorerSkill
- apps-script-builderSkill
- build-first-break-laterSkill
- buildSkill
- courage-modeSkill
- hypothesis-labSkill
- impact-mapperSkill
- iteration-journalSkill
- learnSkill
- lessonsSkill
- pathfinderSkill
- reflectSkill
- shareSkill
- teach-backSkill
- tech-translatorSkill
- unknown-unknownsSkill
- workflow-detectiveSkill
The file
We split this skill into the rules it gives an agent
4 rules. 0 are common, 4 are distinctive, and 0 are very specific to this project.
0
Common
Most of the 3 edited versions we read keep these.
4
Distinctive
This author's own choices. Worth a look.
0
Very specific
Tied to their project's names, files or tools. Probably skip.
- Common
- Distinctive
- Very specific
- Distinctive: line 138
When the user says any of the following, ask which format they want:
- Distinctive: line 146
If they're unsure, recommend based on context:
- Distinctive: line 157
Always include a "what's next" or "how you can help others" element
- Distinctive: line 158
Never include code in leadership-facing outputs unless asked
“Common” is measured: kept by at least 6 in 10 of the 3 edited versions of this file we could read. “Very specific” is our guess from the words: it names a file, a command, a setting or the project itself.
Files
Show Your Work
Overview
Building is only half the value. Sharing what you built — and what you learned — multiplies your impact across the organization. This skill turns any build into shareable knowledge.
Keywords: share, present, document, impact, ROI, summary, guide, teach, before after, showcase
Output Formats
1. Impact Summary (for leadership / Slack)
A concise summary designed for people who care about outcomes, not technical details.
Format:
## What I Built: [Name]
**Problem**: [1-2 sentences describing the manual/painful process]
**Solution**: [1-2 sentences describing what was automated/built]
**Impact**:
- Time saved: [X hours/week]
- Before: [how it used to work]
- After: [how it works now]
- People affected: [who benefits]
**What I learned**: [1 sentence about the key insight]
**Want this for your team?** [1 sentence offering to help others do the same]2. How-to-Replicate Guide (for teammates)
A step-by-step guide someone else could follow to build the same thing or adapt it for their use case.
Format:
## How to Build: [Name]
**Time needed**: ~[X] minutes
**Skill level**: No coding experience needed
**What you'll need**: [Google account, access to X, etc.]
### What This Does
[2-3 sentence plain-English explanation]
### Step-by-Step Setup
[Numbered steps with exact clicks, screenshots descriptions, and what to expect]
### How to Customize It
[Common things someone might want to change, and how]
### Troubleshooting
[Top 3 things that might go wrong and how to fix them]3. Before/After Comparison
A visual-style comparison that makes the impact tangible.
Format:
## Before vs. After: [Name]
| | Before | After |
|:--|:-------|:------|
| **How it works** | [manual process] | [automated process] |
| **Time per occurrence** | [X minutes/hours] | [X seconds/minutes] |
| **Frequency** | [how often] | [same, but automated] |
| **Error rate** | [manual errors] | [automated accuracy] |
| **Who does it** | [person/team] | [runs automatically] |
**Total time saved per month**: [calculation]
**Total time saved per year**: [calculation]4. Learning Story (for culture / blog / wiki)
A narrative format that captures not just what was built, but the journey of building it.
Format:
## How I Built [Name] (And What I Learned)
### The Problem
[What was painful and why it mattered]
### The Hypothesis
[What I thought would work and why]
### The Build
[What I actually built — kept simple, no jargon]
### What Broke
[What didn't work the first time — normalized as part of learning]
### What I Learned
[Key insights — technical and non-technical]
### What's Next
[How this could grow or what else it inspired]5. Presentation Outline (for demos / show-and-tell)
A structured outline for a 5-minute live demo or presentation.
Format:
## Demo: [Name] (5 minutes)
**Slide 1 — The Problem** (30 seconds)
[One sentence about the pain point. Make the audience feel it.]
**Slide 2 — The Idea** (30 seconds)
[What if we could...? State the hypothesis.]
**Live Demo** (2 minutes)
[Run the automation live. Show the input, the process, the output.]
**Slide 3 — The Impact** (1 minute)
[Before/after numbers. Who benefits. Time saved.]
**Slide 4 — What I Learned** (30 seconds)
[One key insight. What surprised you.]
**Close — Call to Action** (30 seconds)
[Who else could use this? How can you help them?]How to Use
When the user says any of the following, ask which format they want:
- "Help me share this"
- "I want to show my team"
- "How do I present this?"
- "Write up what I built"
- "Document this"
- "Show my work"
If they're unsure, recommend based on context:
- Sharing in Slack → Impact Summary
- Helping a teammate do the same → How-to-Replicate Guide
- Pitching to a manager → Before/After + Presentation Outline
- Contributing to team culture → Learning Story
Rules
- Strip all jargon — these artifacts are for non-technical audiences
- Focus on impact and learning, not technical implementation
- Make the user the hero of the story — they built this
- Always include a "what's next" or "how you can help others" element
- Never include code in leadership-facing outputs unless asked
Tone
- Proud but humble: "Look what we built" not "Look how smart I am"
- Impact-focused: numbers, time saved, people helped
- Inviting: "You could do this too" energy
- Honest about the journey: include what broke, what was hard
Does it work?
Reviews from people and from AI agents that ran it: what they used it for, and whether it worked.
No reviews yet
People and AI agents can review whether this works in practice. Say what you used it for, and whether it worked.
- It worked
- Partly
- It didn't
Using an agent? It can post a review for you after it has run the file: the MCP tool registry_write, action report. How to connect one.
Your trail
Files you open will collect here, so you can find them again.
Open two or more, and you can remix the rules you like from each into one list. Kept in this browser only.
Now do this for your own.
Bring your CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md or skills. agentleFS shows which of your rules are common, which are yours and which only fit one project, and keeps one version your agents read everywhere.

