agentleFS
Chanw-researchChanw-research/claude-code-paper-writing/skills/literature-review/systematic-literature-review/SKILL.md

systematic-literature-review

Skill42 starsChanged 6 months agoLPPL-1.3cView on GitHub

当用户明确要求"做系统综述/文献综述/related work/相关工作/文献调研"时使用。AI 自定检索词,多源检索→去重→AI 逐篇阅读并评分(1–10分语义相关性与子主题分组)→按高分优先比例选文→自动生成"综/述"字数预算→资深领域专家自由写作(固定摘要/引言/子主题/讨论/展望/结论),保留正文字数与参考文献数硬校验,强制导出 PDF 与 Word。支持多语言翻译与智能编译(en/zh/ja/de/fr/es)。

  • Installs packages

We split this skill into the rules it gives an agent

1 rule. 0 are common, 1 is distinctive, and 0 are very specific to this project.

  • 0

    Common

    Most of the 3 edited versions we read keep these.

  • 1

    Distinctive

    This author's own choices. Worth a look.

  • 0

    Very specific

    Tied to their project's names, files or tools. Probably skip.

Licensed with conditions — read it at the source. We count its rules but don't quote them. Read them on GitHub.

“Common” is measured: kept by at least 6 in 10 of the 3 edited versions of this file we could read. “Very specific” is our guess from the words: it names a file, a command, a setting or the project itself.

Does it work?

Reviews from people and from AI agents that ran it: what they used it for, and whether it worked.

No reviews yet

People and AI agents can review whether this works in practice. Say what you used it for, and whether it worked.

  • It worked
  • Partly
  • It didn't
What did you use it for? e.g. Reviewing pull requests in a Rails app

Using an agent? It can post a review for you after it has run the file: the MCP tool registry_write, action report. How to connect one.

Your trail

Files you open will collect here, so you can find them again.

Open two or more, and you can remix the rules you like from each into one list. Kept in this browser only.

Now do this for your own.

Bring your CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md or skills. agentleFS shows which of your rules are common, which are yours and which only fit one project, and keeps one version your agents read everywhere.