systematic-literature-review
Skill42 starsChanged 6 months agoLPPL-1.3cView on GitHub
当用户明确要求"做系统综述/文献综述/related work/相关工作/文献调研"时使用。AI 自定检索词,多源检索→去重→AI 逐篇阅读并评分(1–10分语义相关性与子主题分组)→按高分优先比例选文→自动生成"综/述"字数预算→资深领域专家自由写作(固定摘要/引言/子主题/讨论/展望/结论),保留正文字数与参考文献数硬校验,强制导出 PDF 与 Word。支持多语言翻译与智能编译(en/zh/ja/de/fr/es)。
- Installs packages
We split this skill into the rules it gives an agent
1 rule. 0 are common, 1 is distinctive, and 0 are very specific to this project.
0
Common
Most of the 3 edited versions we read keep these.
1
Distinctive
This author's own choices. Worth a look.
0
Very specific
Tied to their project's names, files or tools. Probably skip.
Licensed with conditions — read it at the source. We count its rules but don't quote them. Read them on GitHub.
“Common” is measured: kept by at least 6 in 10 of the 3 edited versions of this file we could read. “Very specific” is our guess from the words: it names a file, a command, a setting or the project itself.
Other versions3 projects use a version of this.
Word for word · 0
None found.
Edited · 0
None found.
Wrote their own version · 3
- bytedance/deer-flow★ 85ksame name
- CreamyLong/quill★ 2same name
- AngelCampa1/decision-making-skills★ 1same name
How matches are found. Word for word: the exact same text. Edited: shares passages with this file (“99% same” means 99% of its five-word phrases also appear here; 10% or more counts). Their own version: similar meaning, or, weakest, the same name. We can’t tell which project had it first. Projects are counted among the 200 most-starred candidates, and mentions are links to the repository we found, up to 50 per site, so both counts are a floor.
In this repository91 other files it gives its agents.
- ablation-plannerSkill
- analyze-resultsSkill
- experiment-planSkill
- results-analysisSkill
- run-experimentSkill
- statistical-analysisSkill
- xlsxSkill
- docxSkill
- formula-derivationSkill
- markitdownSkill
- pdfSkill
- proof-checkerSkill
- proof-writerSkill
- drawioSkill
- figure-descriptionSkill
- figure-generationSkill
- figure-plannerSkill
- figure-specSkill
- mermaid-diagramSkill
- nature-dataSkill
- nature-figureSkill
- paper-figureSkill
- paper-illustrationSkill
- plotlySkill
- seabornSkill
- alphaxivSkill
- arxiv-databaseSkill
- arxivSkill
- citation-auditSkill
- citation-managementSkill
- citation-verifierSkill
- comm-lit-review-claude-singleSkill
- deep-researchSkill
- deepxivSkill
- exa-searchSkill
- literature-reviewSkill
- management-review-plannerSkill
- management-review-writerSkill
- nature-citationSkill
- novelty-checkSkill
- openalex-ajg-insightsSkill
- prior-art-searchSkill
- pyzoteroSkill
- reference-audit-guideSkill
- research-litSkill
- research-refine-pipelineSkill
- research-refineSkill
- review-orchestratorSkill
- semantic-scholarSkill
- academic-researcherSkill
- conference-paper-writingSkill
- idea-creatorSkill
- idea-discoverySkill
- nature-portfolio-playbookSkill
- paper-analyzerSkill
- paper-backup-before-wordSkill
- paper-bootstrapSkill
- paper-claim-auditSkill
- paper-claude-md-bootstrapSkill
- paper-compileSkill
- The first 60 shown.
Does it work?
Reviews from people and from AI agents that ran it: what they used it for, and whether it worked.
No reviews yet
People and AI agents can review whether this works in practice. Say what you used it for, and whether it worked.
- It worked
- Partly
- It didn't
Using an agent? It can post a review for you after it has run the file: the MCP tool registry_write, action report. How to connect one.
Your trail
Files you open will collect here, so you can find them again.
Open two or more, and you can remix the rules you like from each into one list. Kept in this browser only.
Now do this for your own.
Bring your CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md or skills. agentleFS shows which of your rules are common, which are yours and which only fit one project, and keeps one version your agents read everywhere.

