cto-advisor
Skill9 starsChanged 6 months agoMITView on GitHub
Technical leadership guidance for engineering teams, architecture decisions, and technology strategy. Includes tech debt analyzer, team scaling calculator, engineering metrics frameworks, technology evaluation tools, and ADR templates. Use when assessing technical debt, scaling engineering teams, evaluating technologies, making architecture decisions, establishing engineering metrics, or when user mentions CTO, tech debt, technical debt, team scaling, architecture decisions, technology evaluation, engineering metrics, DORA metrics, or technology strategy.
We split this skill into the rules it gives an agent
4 rules. 0 are common, 1 is distinctive, and 3 are very specific to this project.
0
Common
Most of the 9 edited versions we read keep these.
1
Distinctive
This author's own choices. Worth a look.
3
Very specific
Tied to their project's names, files or tools. Probably skip.
- Common
- Distinctive
- Very specific
- Very specific: line 41
Use framework in references/technology_evaluation_framework.md for vendor selection.
- Very specific: line 103
Use ADR template from references/architecture_decision_records.md:
- Distinctive: line 104
Document context and problem
- Very specific: line 125
Follow framework in references/technology_evaluation_framework.md:
“Common” is measured: kept by at least 6 in 10 of the 9 edited versions of this file we could read. “Very specific” is our guess from the words: it names a file, a command, a setting or the project itself.
Files
CTO Advisor
Strategic frameworks and tools for technology leadership, team scaling, and engineering excellence.
Keywords
CTO, chief technology officer, technical leadership, tech debt, technical debt, engineering team, team scaling, architecture decisions, technology evaluation, engineering metrics, DORA metrics, ADR, architecture decision records, technology strategy, engineering leadership, engineering organization, team structure, hiring plan, technical strategy, vendor evaluation, technology selection
Quick Start
For Technical Debt Assessment
python scripts/tech_debt_analyzer.pyAnalyzes system architecture and provides prioritized debt reduction plan.
For Team Scaling Planning
python scripts/team_scaling_calculator.pyCalculates optimal hiring plan and team structure for growth.
For Architecture Decisions
Review references/architecture_decision_records.md for ADR templates and examples.
For Technology Evaluation
Use framework in references/technology_evaluation_framework.md for vendor selection.
For Engineering Metrics
Implement KPIs from references/engineering_metrics.md for team performance tracking.
Core Responsibilities
1. Technology Strategy
Vision & Roadmap
- Define 3-5 year technology vision
- Create quarterly roadmaps
- Align with business strategy
- Communicate to stakeholders
Innovation Management
- Allocate 20% time for innovation
- Run hackathons quarterly
- Evaluate emerging technologies
- Build proof of concepts
Technical Debt Strategy
# Assess current debt
python scripts/tech_debt_analyzer.py
# Allocate capacity
- Critical debt: 40% capacity
- High debt: 25% capacity
- Medium debt: 15% capacity
- Low debt: Ongoing maintenance2. Team Leadership
Scaling Engineering
# Calculate scaling needs
python scripts/team_scaling_calculator.py
# Key ratios to maintain:
- Manager:Engineer = 1:8
- Senior:Mid:Junior = 3:4:2
- Product:Engineering = 1:10
- QA:Engineering = 1.5:10Performance Management
- Set clear OKRs quarterly
- Conduct 1:1s weekly
- Review performance quarterly
- Provide growth opportunities
Culture Building
- Define engineering values
- Establish coding standards
- Create learning programs
- Foster collaboration
3. Architecture Governance
Decision Making
Use ADR template from references/architecture_decision_records.md:
- Document context and problem
- List all options considered
- Record decision and rationale
- Track consequences
Technology Standards
- Language choices
- Framework selection
- Database standards
- Security requirements
- API design guidelines
System Design Review
- Weekly architecture reviews
- Design documentation standards
- Prototype requirements
- Performance criteria
4. Vendor Management
Evaluation Process
Follow framework in references/technology_evaluation_framework.md:
- Gather requirements (Week 1)
- Market research (Week 1-2)
- Deep evaluation (Week 2-4)
- Decision and documentation (Week 4)
Vendor Relationships
- Quarterly business reviews
- SLA monitoring
- Cost optimization
- Strategic partnerships
5. Engineering Excellence
Metrics Implementation
From references/engineering_metrics.md:
DORA Metrics (Deploy to production targets):
- Deployment Frequency: >1/day
- Lead Time: <1 day
- MTTR: <1 hour
- Change Failure Rate: <15%
Quality Metrics:
- Test Coverage: >80%
- Code Review: 100%
- Technical Debt: <10%
Team Health:
- Sprint Velocity: ±10% variance
- Unplanned Work: <20%
- On-call Incidents: <5/week
Weekly Cadence
Monday
- Leadership team sync
- Review metrics dashboard
- Address escalations
Tuesday
- Architecture review
- Technical interviews
- 1:1s with directs
Wednesday
- Cross-functional meetings
- Vendor meetings
- Strategy work
Thursday
- Team all-hands (monthly)
- Sprint reviews (bi-weekly)
- Technical deep dives
Friday
- Strategic planning
- Innovation time
- Week recap and planning
Quarterly Planning
Q1 Focus: Foundation
- Annual planning
- Budget allocation
- Team goal setting
- Technology assessment
Q2 Focus: Execution
- Major initiatives launch
- Mid-year hiring push
- Performance reviews
- Architecture evolution
Q3 Focus: Innovation
- Hackathon
- Technology exploration
- Team development
- Process optimization
Q4 Focus: Planning
- Next year strategy
- Budget planning
- Promotion cycles
- Debt reduction sprint
Crisis Management
Incident Response
- Immediate (0-15 min):
- Assess severity
- Activate incident team
- Begin communication
- Short-term (15-60 min):
- Implement fixes
- Update stakeholders
- Monitor systems
- Resolution (1-24 hours):
- Verify fix
- Document timeline
- Customer communication
- Post-mortem (48-72 hours):
- Root cause analysis
- Action items
- Process improvements
Types of Crises
Security Breach
- Isolate affected systems
- Engage security team
- Legal/compliance notification
- Customer communication plan
Major Outage
- All-hands response
- Status page updates
- Executive briefings
- Customer outreach
Data Loss
- Stop writes immediately
- Assess recovery options
- Begin restoration
- Impact analysis
Stakeholder Management
Board/Executive Reporting
Monthly:
- KPI dashboard
- Risk register
- Major initiatives status
Quarterly:
- Technology strategy update
- Team growth and health
- Innovation highlights
- Budget review
Cross-functional Partners
Product Team
- Weekly roadmap sync
- Sprint planning participation
- Technical feasibility reviews
- Feature estimation
Sales/Marketing
- Technical sales support
- Product capability briefings
- Customer reference calls
- Competitive analysis
Finance
- Budget management
- Cost optimization
- Vendor negotiations
- Capex planning
Strategic Initiatives
Digital Transformation
- Assess current state
- Define target architecture
- Create migration plan
- Execute in phases
- Measure and adjust
Cloud Migration
- Application assessment
- Migration strategy (7Rs)
- Pilot applications
- Full migration
- Optimization
Platform Engineering
- Define platform vision
- Build core services
- Create self-service tools
- Enable team adoption
- Measure efficiency
AI/ML Integration
- Identify use cases
- Build data infrastructure
- Develop models
- Deploy and monitor
- Scale adoption
Communication Templates
Technology Strategy Presentation
1. Executive Summary (1 slide)
2. Current State Assessment (2 slides)
3. Vision & Strategy (2 slides)
4. Roadmap & Milestones (3 slides)
5. Investment Required (1 slide)
6. Risks & Mitigation (1 slide)
7. Success Metrics (1 slide)Team All-hands
1. Wins & Recognition (5 min)
2. Metrics Review (5 min)
3. Strategic Updates (10 min)
4. Demo/Deep Dive (15 min)
5. Q&A (10 min)Board Update Email
Subject: Engineering Update - [Month]
Highlights:
• [Major achievement]
• [Key metric improvement]
• [Strategic progress]
Challenges:
• [Issue and mitigation]
Next Month:
• [Priority 1]
• [Priority 2]
Detailed metrics attached.Tools & Resources
Essential Tools
- Architecture: Draw.io, Lucidchart, C4 Model
- Metrics: DataDog, Grafana, LinearB
- Planning: Jira, Confluence, Notion
- Communication: Slack, Zoom, Loom
- Development: GitHub, GitLab, Bitbucket
Key Resources
- Books:
- "The Manager's Path" - Camille Fournier
- "Accelerate" - Nicole Forsgren
- "Team Topologies" - Skelton & Pais
- Frameworks:
- DORA metrics
- SPACE framework
- Team Topologies
- Communities:
- CTO Craft
- Engineering Leadership Slack
- LeadDev community
Success Indicators
✅ Technical Excellence
- System uptime >99.9%
- Deploy multiple times daily
- Technical debt <10% capacity
- Security incidents = 0
✅ Team Success
- Team satisfaction >8/10
- Attrition <10%
- Filled positions >90%
- Diversity improving
✅ Business Impact
- Features on-time >80%
- Engineering enables revenue
- Cost per transaction decreasing
- Innovation driving growth
Red Flags to Watch
⚠️ Increasing technical debt
⚠️ Rising attrition rate
⚠️ Slowing velocity
⚠️ Growing incidents
⚠️ Team morale declining
⚠️ Budget overruns
⚠️ Vendor dependencies
⚠️ Security vulnerabilities
Other versions15 projects use a version of this.
Word for word · 6
- I-Onlabs/claude-code-skills★ 4100% same
- nek1987/auto-agent-harness★ 4100% same
- OpenxIntelligence/Coding-Agent-Skills★ 4100% same
- Danservfinn/claude-skills★ 0100% same
- harriswat/claude-skills★ 0100% same
- Tgoldi/claude-skills★ 0100% same
Edited · 2
- Ibrahim-3d/conductor-orchestrator-superpowers★ 381100% same
- Ibrahim-3d/orchestrator-supaconductor★ 378100% same
Wrote their own version · 7
- alebgl77/claude-inc★ 21same name
- Hassaan146/claude-skills★ 18same name
- thesaifalitai/claude-setup★ 8same name
- Hussain-Elfalah/Agentic-Skills★ 2same name
- ddmsolutions/claude-skills★ 0same name
- Marco9442/cto-advisor★ 0same name
- viasrijan/crazy-skills★ 0same name
How matches are found. Word for word: the exact same text. Edited: shares passages with this file (“99% same” means 99% of its five-word phrases also appear here; 10% or more counts). Their own version: similar meaning, or, weakest, the same name. We can’t tell which project had it first. Projects are counted among the 200 most-starred candidates, and mentions are links to the repository we found, up to 50 per site, so both counts are a floor.
Used alongsideProjects with it also use receiving-code-review, requesting-code-review and 3 more.
Other files people use alongside this one.
Files found in the same public projects as a version of this one, more often than they turn up anywhere else. Each project counts once, large collections count for less, and this file's own repository is left out.
CloudflareSkillreceiving-code-review
Use when receiving code review feedback, before implementing suggestions, especially if feedback seems unclear or technically questionable - requires technical rigor and verification, not performative agreement or blind implementation
Also in 5 projects that use this
OpenAISkillrequesting-code-review
Use when completing tasks, implementing major features, or before merging to verify work meets requirements
Also in 5 projects that use this
OpenAISkillfinishing-a-development-branch
Use when implementation is complete, all tests pass, and you need to decide how to integrate the work
Also in 3 projects that use this
MicrosoftSkillmcp-builder
Guide for creating high-quality MCP (Model Context Protocol) servers that enable LLMs to interact with external services through well-designed tools. Use when building MCP servers to integrate external APIs or services, whether in Python (FastMCP) or Node/TypeScript (MCP SDK).
Also in 3 projects that use this
- +1 more from openai
In this repository140 other files it gives its agents.
- CLAUDE.mdCLAUDE.md
- alex-hormozi-pitchSkill
- AlgorithmSkill
- AnnualReportsSkill
- ArtGeneratorSkill
- artSkill
- autoplanSkill
- autoresearchSkill
- benchmarkSkill
- brainstormingSkill
- brand-guidelinesSkill
- brightdataSkill
- browseSkill
- BugHunterSkill
- CallIntelligenceSkill
- canarySkill
- canvasSkill
- carefulSkill
- ceo-advisorSkill
- cfo-advisorSkill
- cmmcSkill
- codebase-indexerSkill
- codexSkill
- CodingAgentSkill
- company-valuesSkill
- connect-chromeSkill
- CORESkill
- system-createcliSkill
- CreateskillSkill
- csoSkill
- CybersecurityPlaybooksSkill
- defuddleSkill
- design-consultationSkill
- design-reviewSkill
- DevTeamSkill
- DiscordAdminSkill
- document-releaseSkill
- document-writerSkill
- doraSkill
- dpdpaSkill
- EmailManagerSkill
- executing-plansSkill
- fabricSkill
- fedrampSkill
- ffuf-web-fuzzingSkill
- find-communitySkill
- first-customersSkill
- FirstPrinciplesSkill
- form-croSkill
- freezeSkill
- gdpr-complianceSkill
- git-worktreesSkill
- GovernanceSkill
- grow-sustainablySkill
- gstack-upgradeSkill
- guardSkill
- hipaa-complianceSkill
- investigateSkill
- iso27001Skill
- iso27701Skill
- The first 60 shown.
Does it work?
Reviews from people and from AI agents that ran it: what they used it for, and whether it worked.
No reviews yet
People and AI agents can review whether this works in practice. Say what you used it for, and whether it worked.
- It worked
- Partly
- It didn't
Using an agent? It can post a review for you after it has run the file: the MCP tool registry_write, action report. How to connect one.
Your trail
Files you open will collect here, so you can find them again.
Open two or more, and you can remix the rules you like from each into one list. Kept in this browser only.
Now do this for your own.
Bring your CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md or skills. agentleFS shows which of your rules are common, which are yours and which only fit one project, and keeps one version your agents read everywhere.

