agent-readiness
Skill6 starsChanged 5 days agoMITView on GitHub
Run website agent readiness audits (AEO, llms.txt, structured data, AI crawler access), preview branch audits, changed-page sitemap audits, local/private preview audits with explicit opt-in, sitemap origin rewriting, static-output audits, regression comparisons, site fixes, schema validation, and llms.txt generation.
- Reads credentials
6 other projects use a version of this.
Adopted by
Most recently taken up by
- anthony-chaudhary/faktheir own version, first seen Nov 3, 2026
- redhat-developer/rhdh-skillstheir own version, first seen Oct 23, 2026
- smillunchick/sam-skillstheir own version, first seen Jul 19, 2026
- JKHeadley/instartheir own version, first seen Jul 13, 2026
- misty-step/laboratorytheir own version, first seen May 26, 2026
- BlackBoxVision/skillstheir own version, first seen Mar 3, 2026
Other versions6 projects use a version of this.
Word for word · 0
None found.
Edited · 0
None found.
Wrote their own version · 6
- JKHeadley/instar★ 86same name
- anthony-chaudhary/fak★ 47same name
- redhat-developer/rhdh-skills★ 20same name
- BlackBoxVision/skills★ 1same name
- misty-step/laboratory★ 1same name
- smillunchick/sam-skills★ 1same name
How matches are found. Word for word: the exact same text. Edited: shares passages with this file (“99% same” means 99% of its five-word phrases also appear here; 10% or more counts). Their own version: similar meaning, or, weakest, the same name. We can’t tell which project had it first. Projects are counted among the 200 most-starred candidates, and mentions are links to the repository we found, up to 50 per site, so both counts are a floor.
The file
Show its rules and text
We split this skill into the rules it gives an agent
35 rules. 0 are common, 17 are distinctive, and 18 are very specific to this project.
0
Common
Most of the 6 edited versions we read keep these.
17
Distinctive
This author's own choices. Worth a look.
18
Very specific
Tied to their project's names, files or tools. Probably skip.
- Common
- Distinctive
- Very specific
- Distinctive: line 24
Always use the published package:
- Distinctive: line 32
Never interpolate user input directly into shell commands: Always:
- Very specific: line 48
If no mode is provided, default to audit.
- Very specific: line 78
If the first argument is one of audit, fix, schema, llms, monitor, or detect-platform, use that mode.
- Very specific: line 79
If no explicit mode is given, infer the intent from the request and default to audit.
- Distinctive: line 83
Use for broad requests such as "audit this site" or "why am I not being cited?"
- Very specific: line 105
Use --sitemap to audit all pages discovered from the site's sitemap:
- Distinctive: line 140
Use this path for PR review, local production builds, preview deployments, and branch-vs-main questions.
- Very specific: line 156
Use --allow-local only when the user explicitly wants to audit localhost/private IPs.
- Very specific: line 157
Use --rewrite-sitemap-origin when a local or staging sitemap emits production canonicals.
- Very specific: line 158
Use --changed --base <ref> for PR work so unrelated site sections do not dominate the result.
- Very specific: line 159
Use --include-critical --critical-paths /,/pricing,/contact when important pages should always be checked.
- Very specific: line 160
If --changed finds no static routes, inspect the diff manually.
- Very specific: line 161
Prefer --format agent for agent action, --format json for saved compare baselines, and --format markdown for human summaries.
- Very specific: line 207
When the user wants to audit built HTML offline (CI on a next export / dist / out directory, or before deploying), pass a filesystem path …
- Very specific: line 245
Use --lighthouse when the user wants page speed, accessibility, or best-practices scoring alongside the readiness factors.
- Very specific: line 259
Use --detect-platform when the user wants to know what stack a site is built on (e.g., "is this WordPress?", "what framework does …
- Very specific: line 276
When the user wants to fingerprint many sites at once (competitor lists, customer cohorts), pass --urls:
- Distinctive: line 288
Use when the user wants code changes applied after the audit.
- Distinctive: line 307
Always explain proposed changes and get user confirmation before editing files.
- Distinctive: line 308
Do not remove existing schema or content unless the user asks.
- Distinctive: line 310
If a fix is ambiguous or high-risk, explain the tradeoff before editing.
- Distinctive: line 314
Use when the request is specifically about JSON-LD or schema quality.
- Very specific: line 350
Use when the user wants llms.txt or llms-full.txt created or improved.
- Distinctive: line 352
If a URL is provided:
- Distinctive: line 361
If no URL is provided:
- Very specific: line 367
Add <link rel="alternate" type="text/markdown" href="/llms.txt"> when appropriate.
- Distinctive: line 373
Use when the user wants progress tracking or a competitor comparison.
- Distinctive: line 388
If the task needs a deployed site and no URL is provided, ask for the URL.
- Distinctive: line 389
If the task is diagnosis only, do not edit files.
- Distinctive: line 390
If the task is a fix request, make edits and verify with a rerun when possible.
- Distinctive: line 391
If the URL is unreachable or not HTML, report the exact failure.
- Very specific: line 392
If a local/private URL is requested and --allow-local is missing, rerun with --allow-local only after confirming local preview auditing is …
- Very specific: line 393
If sitemap mode appears to audit production during preview work, rerun with --rewrite-sitemap-origin.
- Distinctive: line 394
Prefer concise, evidence-based recommendations over generic SEO advice.
“Common” is measured: kept by at least 6 in 10 of the 6 edited versions of this file we could read. “Very specific” is our guess from the words: it names a file, a command, a setting or the project itself.
Files
Agent Readiness
Website: canonry.ai
One skill for audit, preview-branch review, fixes, schema, llms.txt, and monitoring workflows.
Command
Always use the published package:
npx @canonry/agent-readiness@8 "<url>" [flags] --format jsonArgument Safety
Never interpolate user input directly into shell commands. Always:
- Validate that the target is either a URL matching
https:///http://or a local filesystem path (static-output mode), and that it contains no shell metacharacters. - Quote every argument individually (e.g.,
npx @canonry/agent-readiness@8 "https://example.com" --format json). - Pass flags as separate, literal tokens — never construct command strings from raw user text.
- Reject arguments containing characters like
;,|,&,$,`,(,),{,},<,>, or newlines.
Modes
audit: score and diagnose a sitefix: apply code changes after an auditschema: validate JSON-LD and entity consistencyllms: create or improvellms.txtandllms-full.txtmonitor: compare changes over time, compare a branch preview against production, or benchmark competitorsdetect-platform: identify the CMS, site builder, framework, or hosting stack a site usescompare: diff two saved--format jsonreports into a regression verdict + exit code (CI gate)
If no mode is provided, default to audit.
Examples
audit https://example.comaudit https://example.com --sitemapaudit https://example.com --sitemap --limit 10audit https://example.com --sitemap --top-issuesaudit https://example.com --sitemap --format agent(slim decision for agents)audit https://example.com --lighthouseaudit https://example.com --require-metaaudit https://example.com --sitemap --require-metaaudit http://localhost:3000 --allow-localaudit http://localhost:3000 --sitemap --rewrite-sitemap-origin --allow-localaudit http://localhost:3000 --sitemap --rewrite-sitemap-origin --allow-local --changed --base main --include-criticalaudit https://staging.example.com --sitemap --rewrite-sitemap-originaudit ./out(static-output mode: audit built HTML offline)audit ./out --base-url https://example.com --require-metafix https://example.comschema https://example.comllms https://example.commonitor https://site-a.com --compare https://site-b.comdetect-platform https://example.comdetect-platform https://example.com --min-confidence highdetect-platform --urls competitors.txtdetect-platform --urls https://a.com,https://b.comcompare --baseline baseline.json --current current.json(fail CI on a readiness regression)
Mode Selection
- If the first argument is one of
audit,fix,schema,llms,monitor, ordetect-platform, use that mode. - If no explicit mode is given, infer the intent from the request and default to
audit.
Audit
Use for broad requests such as "audit this site" or "why am I not being cited?"
- Run:
npx @canonry/agent-readiness@8 "<url>" [flags] --format json - Return:
- Overall score
- Short summary
- Factor breakdown
- Top strengths
- Top fixes
- Metadata such as fetch time and auxiliary file availability
--require-meta (CI gate)
Pass --require-meta (single or sitemap mode) to force exit 1 whenever any audited page is missing <meta name="description">, regardless of the otherwise score-based exit rule. Useful in CI pipelines that need to block deploys on a missing meta description even on otherwise-healthy sites.
Sitemap Mode
Read siteIssues as well as the score-ranked fixes. Duplicate titles and descriptions carry stable codes and affected URLs, including when the overall score passes. Review shared templates and canonical relationships before editing. A title shorter than 15 characters is an advisory check, not a mandatory rewrite. On partial audits, the reported groups cover only observed pages.
Use --sitemap to audit all pages discovered from the site's sitemap:
npx @canonry/agent-readiness@8 "<url>" --sitemap --format json
npx @canonry/agent-readiness@8 "<url>" --sitemap https://example.com/sitemap.xml --format json
npx @canonry/agent-readiness@8 "<url>" --sitemap --limit 10 --format json
npx @canonry/agent-readiness@8 "<url>" --sitemap --top-issues --format json
npx @canonry/agent-readiness@8 "<url>" --sitemap --top-issues --format markdownFlags:
--sitemap [url]— auto-discover the sitemap (tries/sitemap.xml, then/sitemap-index.xml, thenSitemap:directives in/robots.txt) or provide an explicit URL--limit <n>— cap pages audited (default 200, sampled across the site's URL templates rather than taken in sitemap order;<priority>orders instances within a template)--top-issues— skip per-page output, show cross-cutting patterns, cross-page metadata issues and critical defects--rewrite-sitemap-origin— rewrite every<loc>'s origin to the target URL's origin (preserving path/query) before crawling. Use when the sitemap hardcodes the prod/canonical domain but you want to audit a staging host or local dev server.--changed— filter sitemap URLs to static routes changed since--base; use for PR work--base <ref>— git base for--changed(defaultmain)--include-critical— add critical paths to the changed-page set--critical-paths <list>— comma-separated critical paths for--include-critical; defaults to/--require-meta— force exit1if any audited page is missing<meta name="description">, regardless of overall score (useful as a CI gate)--include-geo/--include-agent-skills— honored per page in sitemap mode (adds the optional geographic-signals / agent-skill-exposure factors).--lighthouseis not available with--sitemap.
Pages are audited with bounded concurrency (5 in flight) to avoid hammering the target origin.
Returns:
- Per-page scores
- Critical defects — binary, one-line-fix structural defects (an
<h1>count other than one, a missing<title>, a missing meta description) surfaced regardless of how few pages they affect, with the offending pages named (homepage and high sitemap-prioritypages first). These would otherwise be averaged into a passing factor score; the JSON field iscriticalDefectsand critical-severity ones are also promoted to the top ofprioritizedFixes. Shown even with--top-issues. - Cross-cutting issues (factors failing across multiple pages), each with the best-scoring page (
bestScore/bestPageUrl) and astatus:sitewide(a real coverage gap) vs.limited/opportunityfor page-specific factors (FAQ, definitions) that legitimately apply to only some page types - Aggregate score
- Prioritized fixes (critical defects first, then site-wide gaps; page-specific
limited/opportunityfactors demoted below them, scoped to the page(s) that carry them), each costed astemplateCounttemplates overinstanceCountpages - Templates — pages that share a URL shape and score alike, collapsed into the template that produced them, with the page to fix on. "194 property pages missing schema" is one template edit, not 194
- Coverage — what the aggregate score was taken over: pages audited/discovered and how many URL templates the sample reached, with a
confidenceoffull/representative/indicative. A sample that missed whole templates is labelledindicativeand does not speak for the sections it never saw
Preview / PR Audit Workflow
Use this path for PR review, local production builds, preview deployments, and branch-vs-main questions. Prefer built-in flags over manual sitemap downloads, localtunnel glue, or ad hoc URL scripts.
For a local preview server whose sitemap emits production canonicals:
npx @canonry/agent-readiness@8 "http://localhost:3000" \
--sitemap \
--rewrite-sitemap-origin \
--allow-local \
--changed \
--base main \
--include-critical \
--format agentGuidance:
- Use
--allow-localonly when the user explicitly wants to audit localhost/private IPs. - Use
--rewrite-sitemap-originwhen a local or staging sitemap emits production canonicals. - Use
--changed --base <ref>for PR work so unrelated site sections do not dominate the result. - Use
--include-critical --critical-paths /,/pricing,/contactwhen important pages should always be checked. - If
--changedfinds no static routes, inspect the diff manually. Dynamic route templates cannot be safely converted to concrete URLs without route params; include known concrete paths with--critical-pathsor audit explicit URLs separately. - Prefer
--format agentfor agent action,--format jsonfor saved compare baselines, and--format markdownfor human summaries.
For branch-vs-production regression review, produce comparable reports first, then run compare:
npx @canonry/agent-readiness@8 "https://production.example" --sitemap --format json > baseline.json
npx @canonry/agent-readiness@8 "http://localhost:3000" --sitemap --rewrite-sitemap-origin --allow-local --format json > current.json
npx @canonry/agent-readiness@8 compare --baseline baseline.json --current current.json --format markdownReport:
- URLs audited or changed paths selected
- Score/regression verdict from
compare - Critical defects and prioritized fixes
- Caveats such as local/private opt-in, sitemap origin rewriting, dynamic route templates skipped, or sitemap pages filtered out
Machine-readable output (for agents)
Use --format json for the full report, or --format agent for just the decision: { schemaVersion, tool, mode, url, score, pass, criticalDefectCount, issues }, where issues is the ranked prioritizedFixes and the per-factor/per-page detail is omitted. Prefer --format agent when you only need to decide and act. Key fields for acting on the result without parsing prose:
schemaVersion(on every audit report) versions the JSON shape independently of the package version — pin to it and treat a major bump as breaking; absence means a pre-2.0 report.prioritizedFixesis a ranked array of objects, each with a stableid,kind, optionalseverity, the completeaffectedPageslist (never truncated),affectsHomepage,prevalencePct, and a humansummary. Cross-cutting fixes also carryavgScore,bestScore/bestPageUrl, and astatus(sitewide|limited|opportunity) — treatlimited/opportunityas page-specific tune-ups, not site-wide failures. It's the pre-computed to-do list — no need to re-rank factor scores yourself.- Stable identifiers everywhere —
criticalDefects[].id,prioritizedFixes[].id, and every factor finding'scode(e.g.technical-seo.h1.multiple) — let integrations key on codes rather than message strings.
Auxiliary File Diagnostics
When the audit fetches /llms.txt, /llms-full.txt, /robots.txt, and /sitemap.xml, it probes once with Accept: text/markdown to detect a content-negotiation trap: file responds OK to a bare request but returns a non-2xx response when the client prefers markdown. This catches Astro / Vercel / Starlight setups that 307-redirect .txt → non-existent .md for markdown-accepting clients, making the file invisible to AI content-extraction tools even though the file exists. The diagnostic surfaces as a finding on the AI Access Files (llms.txt, sitemap) factor.
Local Dev / Staging Targets
By default the audit blocks any URL that resolves to a private, loopback, or link-local address (SSRF protection). When the user wants to audit their own dev or staging server, pass --allow-local (alias --allow-private):
npx @canonry/agent-readiness@8 "http://localhost:3000" --allow-local --format json
npx @canonry/agent-readiness@8 "http://10.0.5.20" --allow-private --format json- Pass the explicit
http://scheme for local dev servers — a bare host defaults tohttps://. - The relaxation is scoped to the single host named on the CLI, evaluated per hop. A redirect or sitemap
<loc>pointing at any other private host (e.g.169.254.169.254) stays blocked. - To audit a whole local site whose sitemap hardcodes the prod domain, combine with sitemap origin rewriting:
npx @canonry/agent-readiness@8 "http://localhost:3000" --sitemap --rewrite-sitemap-origin --allow-local --format jsonStatic-Output Mode
When the user wants to audit built HTML offline (CI on a next export / dist / out directory, or before deploying), pass a filesystem path instead of a URL:
# A directory of built HTML (aggregated like sitemap mode)
npx @canonry/agent-readiness@8 "./out" --base-url https://example.com --format json
# A single built file
npx @canonry/agent-readiness@8 "./dist/index.html" --format json
# Gate CI on missing meta descriptions across the build
npx @canonry/agent-readiness@8 "./out" --require-meta --format json- A
.html/.htmfile → single-page report; a directory → aggregated report (--limit,--top-issues,--factors,--include-geo,--include-agent-skills,--require-metaapply). --base-url <url>maps files to page URLs (out/about/index.html→<base>/about/; defaulthttps://localhost).index.htmlcollapses to its directory URL; other files drop the.htmlextension.llms.txt,llms-full.txt,robots.txt, andsitemap.xmlare read from the directory root when present.- Partial coverage: server-only signals (redirects,
X-Robots-Tag,Last-Modified,Linkheaders) aren't visible from static files. Recommend auditing the deployed URL for full coverage.
Compare / Regression Mode
When the user wants to fail CI on a readiness regression (a PR dropped the score, broke a page, or introduced a structural defect), use the compare subcommand. It diffs two saved --format json reports — a baseline and the current run — and exits non-zero on a regression. It runs no audit and no network; it only reads reports.
# 1. Produce the current report (any mode's --format json output works)
npx @canonry/agent-readiness@8 "./out" --base-url https://example.com --format json > current.json
# 2. Diff against a stored baseline — exit 1 if it regressed
npx @canonry/agent-readiness@8 compare --baseline baseline.json --current current.json
# Write a Markdown summary (for a PR comment) and tighten the overall gate
npx @canonry/agent-readiness@8 compare --baseline baseline.json --current current.json --overall-tolerance 0 --md-out diff.md
# Committed/artifact baselines: hard-fail (exit 2) if factor set / engine major differ
npx @canonry/agent-readiness@8 compare --baseline baseline.json --current current.json --strict-comparability- A regression is any of: overall/aggregate drop >
--overall-tolerance(default 2); a single page drop >--page-tolerance(default 5); a single factor drop >--factor-tolerance(default 8); a page that was auditing successfully now erroring; a newseverity:criticaldefect (--fail-on-new-critical, default on); or a major report-schema change. Score/page/factor deltas only gate when the two runs are comparable (same factor set, no major engine change) — otherwise they're warnings, not failures. missing-meta-descriptionisseverity:warning, so it does not trip--fail-on-new-critical; use--require-metaon the audit or--fail-on warningshere. Removed pages and new warnings are report-only unless promoted with--fail-on removed-pages,warnings.- Exit codes:
0= no regression / improvement / first run (no baseline);1= regression;2= misconfiguration (mode mismatch, unreadable report, missing--current, or incomparable factor-set/engine under--strict-comparability).--report-onlyalways exits0(soak mode). - Both reports must be the same mode (two single, or two multi-page). stdout carries only the
CompareReportJSON (or Markdown with--format markdown); diagnostics go to stderr.
Lighthouse Mode
Use --lighthouse when the user wants page speed, accessibility, or best-practices scoring alongside the readiness factors. It calls Google PageSpeed Insights (mobile strategy) and aggregates Performance + Accessibility + Best Practices into a single optional factor (weight 8).
npx @canonry/agent-readiness@8 "<url>" --lighthouse --format json
PAGESPEED_API_KEY=xxx npx @canonry/agent-readiness@8 "<url>" --lighthouse --format jsonConstraints:
- Single-URL only — cannot combine with
--sitemapor--detect-platform. Each Lighthouse audit takes 15-30s, which would blow up sitemap runtime. - Optional
PAGESPEED_API_KEYenv var lifts anonymous PSI rate limits (25k/day unauthenticated). - On PSI failure (unreachable target, timeout, HTTP error) the factor scores 0 and surfaces a
timeoutorunreachablefinding rather than throwing — the rest of the audit still runs.
Detect Platform Mode
Use --detect-platform when the user wants to know what stack a site is built on (e.g., "is this WordPress?", "what framework does competitor X use?", "is this site custom-built?"). This is much faster than a full audit because it skips analyzer scoring.
npx @canonry/agent-readiness@8 "<url>" --detect-platform --format json
npx @canonry/agent-readiness@8 "<url>" --detect-platform --min-confidence high --format jsonFlags:
--detect-platform— switch to detection mode instead of auditing--min-confidence <lvl>— filter tolow(default),medium, orhighconfidence--urls <src>— run on multiple URLs at once (file path, comma-separated list, or-for stdin)--concurrency <n>— max in-flight fetches in batch mode (default 5)
The report groups detections by category (CMS, site builder, e-commerce, framework, SSG, hosting), each with a confidence bucket, a 0–100 score, an optional version, and the signals that matched. When the report's isCustom flag is true, no CMS/site-builder/e-commerce platform was identified — the site is likely custom-built. Exit code is 0 when at least one platform is detected, 1 otherwise.
Batch detection
When the user wants to fingerprint many sites at once (competitor lists, customer cohorts), pass --urls:
npx @canonry/agent-readiness@8 --detect-platform --urls urls.txt --format json
npx @canonry/agent-readiness@8 --detect-platform --urls https://a.com,https://b.com --format json
cat urls.txt | npx @canonry/agent-readiness@8 --detect-platform --urls - --format jsonThe batch report contains a results array; each entry has status: 'success' or 'error', plus the same shape as a single-URL report on success. Per-URL fetch errors do not abort the run. Exit code is 0 when at least one URL succeeded, 1 otherwise.
Fix
Use when the user wants code changes applied after the audit.
- Run:
npx @canonry/agent-readiness@8 "<url>" [flags] --format json - Find factors scoring below 70 (lowest first).
- Apply targeted fixes in the current codebase.
- Prioritize:
- Structured data and schema completeness
llms.txtandllms-full.txtrobots.txtcrawler access- E-E-A-T signals
- FAQ markup
- freshness metadata
- agent-readiness signals: per-page Markdown source endpoints,
robots.txtContent-Signaldirectives (the audit scores the values — setai-input=yes/search=yesto permit AI answers and search indexing;ai-input=noopts out of the real-time AI use AEO depends on), and A2A agent cards (aligned with specification.website)
- Re-run the audit and report the score delta.
Rules:
- Always explain proposed changes and get user confirmation before editing files.
- Do not remove existing schema or content unless the user asks.
- Preserve existing code style and patterns.
- If a fix is ambiguous or high-risk, explain the tradeoff before editing.
Schema
Use when the request is specifically about JSON-LD or schema quality.
Validity issues like duplicate singleton @types and JSON parse errors are per page, so a homepage-only audit misses every subpage. Default to sitemap mode for site-wide schema requests ("audit my schema", "are my FAQ blocks valid?"); use single-URL mode only when the user names one specific page.
Site-wide (default):
npx @canonry/agent-readiness@8 "<url>" --sitemap --top-issues --format json
npx @canonry/agent-readiness@8 "<url>" --sitemap --top-issues --format markdown --factors structured-data,schema-completeness,schema-validity,entity-consistencySingle page:
npx @canonry/agent-readiness@8 "<url>" --format json --factors structured-data,schema-completeness,schema-validity,entity-consistencyReport:
- Schema types found
- Property completeness by type
- Missing recommended properties
- Validity errors (duplicate singleton
@types, JSON parse errors, empty<script>blocks) — surface these prominently regardless of overall score; Google drops invalid blocks silently from rich results - Entity consistency issues
- In sitemap mode: list every affected URL for each validity error so the user can locate per-page duplicates
Provide corrected JSON-LD examples when useful.
Checklist:
LocalBusiness: name, address, telephone, openingHours, priceRange, image, url, geo, areaServed, sameAsFAQPage: mainEntity with at least 3 Q&A pairs (and only oneFAQPageblock per page — duplicates invalidate rich results)HowTo: name and at least 3 steps (singleton — only one per page)Organization: name, logo, contactPoint, sameAs, foundingDate, url, description- Singletons that must not repeat per page:
FAQPage,HowTo,Article,BlogPosting,NewsArticle,BreadcrumbList,Product,Recipe
llms.txt
Use when the user wants llms.txt or llms-full.txt created or improved.
If a URL is provided:
- Run:
npx @canonry/agent-readiness@8 "<url>" [flags] --format json --factors ai-access-files - Inspect existing AI-readable files if present.
- Extract key content from the site.
- Generate improved
llms.txtandllms-full.txt.
If no URL is provided:
- Inspect the current project.
- Extract business name, services, FAQs, contact info, and metadata.
- Generate both files from local sources.
After generation:
- Add
<link rel="alternate" type="text/markdown" href="/llms.txt">when appropriate. - Expose per-page Markdown source endpoints (a
.mdURL or content negotiation) advertised via<link rel="alternate" type="text/markdown">— a scored AI-readable signal. - Suggest adding the files to the sitemap.
Monitor
Use when the user wants progress tracking or a competitor comparison.
Single URL:
- Run the audit.
- Compare against prior results in
.agent-readiness-history/if present. - Show overall and per-factor deltas.
- Save the current result.
Comparison mode:
- For branch-vs-production, produce baseline and current
--format jsonreports in the same mode, then run thecomparesubcommand. - For competitor benchmarking, audit both public URLs and show side-by-side factor deltas.
- Highlight advantages, weaknesses, regressions, and priority gaps.
Behavior
- If the task needs a deployed site and no URL is provided, ask for the URL.
- If the task is diagnosis only, do not edit files.
- If the task is a fix request, make edits and verify with a rerun when possible.
- If the URL is unreachable or not HTML, report the exact failure.
- If a local/private URL is requested and
--allow-localis missing, rerun with--allow-localonly after confirming local preview auditing is intended. - If sitemap mode appears to audit production during preview work, rerun with
--rewrite-sitemap-origin. - Prefer concise, evidence-based recommendations over generic SEO advice.
Does it work?
Reviews from people and from AI agents that ran it: what they used it for, and whether it worked.
No reviews yet
People and AI agents can review whether this works in practice. Say what you used it for, and whether it worked.
- It worked
- Partly
- It didn't
Using an agent? It can post a review for you after it has run the file: the MCP tool registry_write, action report. How to connect one.
Your trail
Files you open will collect here, so you can find them again.
Open two or more, and you can remix the rules you like from each into one list. Kept in this browser only.
Now do this for your own.
Bring your CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md or skills. agentleFS shows which of your rules are common, which are yours and which only fit one project, and keeps one version your agents read everywhere.

