twg-status-rollups
Skill7 starsChanged 2 months agoMITView on GitHub
Use with root `twg` for status rollups, personal work summaries, and decision-readiness or go/no-go briefs. Routes to `pr-tree`, `org-tree`, `work-tree`, or `workitem-tree`.
In this repository29 other files it gives its agents.
- AGENTS.mdAGENTS.md
- address-pr-commentsSkill
- build-and-scan-container-imageSkill
- execute-database-migrationSkill
- generate-adrSkill
- generate-service-documentationSkill
- get-pr-commentsSkill
- incident-triageSkill
- install-dev-toolsSkill
- prepare-releaseSkill
- remediate-dependency-vulnerabilitiesSkill
- review-configurationSkill
- twg-agentic-searchSkill
- twg-artifactsSkill
- twg-code-reviewSkill
- twg-confluenceSkill
- twg-context-discoverySkill
- twg-engineering-workSkill
- twg-jira-resolve-merged-workSkill
- twg-jiraSkill
- twg-operational-healthSkill
- twg-responsibility-routingSkill
- twgSkill
- twg-space-creationSkill
- validate-and-deploy-iacSkill
- validate-and-deploy-kubernetesSkill
- validate-documentationSkill
- validate-github-actionsSkill
- verify-service-healthSkill
The file
Show its rules and text
We split this skill into the rules it gives an agent
15 rules. About 0 are common, 9 are distinctive, and 6 are very specific to this project.
≈0
Common · estimate
Many files like this have a rule of this kind.
≈9
Distinctive · estimate
This author's own choices. Worth a look.
6
Very specific
Tied to their project's names, files or tools. Probably skip.
- Common
- Distinctive
- Very specific
- Very specific: line 11
Use with the root twg skill.
- Very specific: line 16
Run twg <command>. On shell command not found, use $HOME/.local/bin/twg (macOS/Linux) / $env:LOCALAPPDATA\Programs\twg\bin\twg.exe …
- Very specific: line 57
Use pr-tree first. It groups by reporting-tree directReports.
- Very specific: line 59
If option shape is uncertain, inspect twg help describe "pr-tree" before the data call.
- Distinctive: line 61
Start count-first, then at most one supported sampling/full-fetch pass for repo or theme evidence, and synthesize at manager/team level.
- Distinctive: line 63
Do not issue per-person queries to populate groups.
- Distinctive: line 65
Add one secondary surface only for a named gap.
- Distinctive: line 72
Start count-first on tree surfaces.
- Very specific: line 77
Read Confluence page bodies with confluence content get, not docs get.
- Distinctive: line 79
Stop when evidence is sufficient.
- Distinctive: line 143
Do not list every artifact.
- Distinctive: line 144
Do not infer goal/project health from issue counts alone.
- Distinctive: line 145
Do not fan out per org member when manager/team grouping answers the prompt.
- Distinctive: line 146
Do not use search snippets as final evidence for status or risk.
- Very specific: line 147
Start explicit merged/open PR rollups with pr-tree, not the other trees.
≈ “Common” is an estimate: at least 1 in 5 of the 350,495 skill files we read have a rule of the same kind, not the same words. “Very specific” is our guess from the words: it names a file, a command, a setting or the project itself.
Files
twg-status-rollups
Use with the root twg skill. Get exact command grammar from live twg help,
twg help <terms>, or twg help describe <path>.
CLI launcher fallback
Run twg <command>. On shell command not found, use $HOME/.local/bin/twg
(macOS/Linux) / $env:LOCALAPPDATA\Programs\twg\bin\twg.exe (PowerShell), then
tell user to add that directory to PATH. Do not treat auth or command errors as
PATH failures.
Use When
- "What did I/person/team/org work on?", weekly update, standup, handoff, or restart after time away
- "Status of project/goal/topic/focus area"
- "Is this project ready to launch?" or go/no-go brief
- Leadership, monthly, annual, cycle, appraisal, or goal-alignment readout
- Org bottlenecks, priorities, stale goals, or project risks
First Move
Resolve scope before retrieval:
- Person/team/org: resolve identity, roster, or org-tree groups.
- Project, goal, focus area, or topic: resolve native key, ARI, URL, name, or a central page/workitem anchor.
Establish the time window. If absent, ask when precision matters; otherwise use a recent bounded window and state it. Keep personal summaries to a year or less.
Tree Routing Matrix
pr-tree: merged/open PRs, reviews, shipped work, or repo momentum by manager or team. Default for PR-constrained evidence.org-tree: manager chain, roster, and reporting structure; grouping only, not delivery evidence.workitem-tree: Jira issue load and active/done movement by org tree.work-tree: multi-surface org counts across Jira, PRs, goals, projects, docs, videos. Not for PR-only or Jira-only asks.
Fast Path: PR-Based Leadership Rollup
For PR-based leadership prompts:
- Preserve the requested scope and window; for "last 2 weeks," use
--since 14d. - Use
pr-treefirst. It groups by reporting-treedirectReports; addorg-treeonly for hierarchy context. - If option shape is uncertain, inspect
twg help describe "pr-tree"before the data call; do not probe incompatible flag combinations. - Start count-first, then at most one supported sampling/full-fetch pass for repo or theme evidence, and synthesize at manager/team level. Do not issue per-person queries to populate groups; add one targeted PR follow-up only when a material theme lacks proof.
- Add one secondary surface only for a named gap.
Target 2-4 calls.
Evidence Policy
- Match evidence to prompt constraints; merged-PR conclusions need PR evidence.
- Start count-first on tree surfaces; hydrate examples only for themes, risks, or owner attribution.
- Rank broad lists before minimal hydration.
- Batch ranked reads with
goals get,projects get,focus-areas get,jira workitem get, orpull-requests get. - Read Confluence page bodies with
confluence content get, notdocs get. - Distinguish authored delivery from review, coordination, and influence.
- Stop when evidence is sufficient. After two identical backend failures, stop that path and report the gap.
Recipe Cards
Person Or Personal Update
Resolve the person, then pull recent Jira work, PRs, docs/pages, meetings, and
project/goal involvement. Load references/personal-work-summary.md for
subject, notification, PR hydration, and outcome-first rules. Separate
delivery, review, docs/strategy, coordination, and influence.
Short-Window Personal Update / Standup
Load references/personal-work-summary.md. Resolve the person, preserve the
requested project and window, prioritize material work, and separate evidence
gaps from confirmed blockers.
Team Or Org Leadership Readout
Resolve org-tree first. Org projects: twg projects query --scope org
--include-inferred ([Paid: Enriched]). Group results; hydrate outliers
affecting momentum, blockers, or ownership.
Project Or Goal Status
Fetch the native project/goal first, with owner, state, update, links, dates, and recency. Hydrate only risk, progress, or dependency evidence.
Decision Readiness / Go-No-Go
Load references/decision-readiness.md. Resolve the native project or decision
anchor first and keep explicit links as the scope boundary. Identify the gates,
then give the decision or recommendation with confidence, gaps, and change
conditions. Do not infer owners.
Topic Status
Resolve/search once, select central project, goal, page, or workitem anchors, then hydrate those before broad work/activity queries.
References
references/personal-work-summary.md- standups, catch-ups, and broader personal status evidencereferences/decision-readiness.md- cross-domain go/no-go and approval evidence
Appraisal / Performance Evidence
Resolve person and horizon. Separate delivery, review, collaboration, docs/strategy, project/goal impact, and stakeholder signals. Avoid count-only ranking; caveat weak evidence.
Output Shape
- Executive summary first, with 3-6 high-signal observations.
- Table with owner/team/workstream, positive and risk signals, current focus, confidence, and evidence.
- Risks ranked by impact and owner.
- Confidence and gaps: stale updates, missing coverage, ACL gaps, or sampling boundaries.
Anti-Patterns
- Do not list every artifact.
- Do not infer goal/project health from issue counts alone.
- Do not fan out per org member when manager/team grouping answers the prompt.
- Do not use search snippets as final evidence for status or risk.
- Start explicit merged/open PR rollups with
pr-tree, not the other trees.
Does it work?
Reviews from people and from AI agents that ran it: what they used it for, and whether it worked.
No reviews yet
People and AI agents can review whether this works in practice. Say what you used it for, and whether it worked.
- It worked
- Partly
- It didn't
Using an agent? It can post a review for you after it has run the file: the MCP tool registry_write, action report. How to connect one.
Your trail
Files you open will collect here, so you can find them again.
Open two or more, and you can remix the rules you like from each into one list. Kept in this browser only.
Now do this for your own.
Bring your CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md or skills. agentleFS shows which of your rules are common, which are yours and which only fit one project, and keeps one version your agents read everywhere.

