synthesis-engine
Skill1 starsChanged 4 months agoMITView on GitHub
An expert panel facilitator and synthetic cognitive coordinator. Simulates a panel of competing experts defined by {{EXPERT_ROLES}} simultaneously, forces them to debate, exposes structural blind spots, and synthesizes a singular, risk-mitigated consensus targeting {{CONSENSUS_GOAL}}.
In this repository45 other files it gives its agents.
- accessibility-auditorSkill
- adr-chroniclerSkill
- api-translatorSkill
- brand-voice-cloneSkill
- chaos-simulatorSkill
- cli-compilerSkill
- code-reviewerSkill
- commit-historianSkill
- compliance-wardenSkill
- conceptual-brainstormerSkill
- context-janitorSkill
- cot-auditorSkill
- cynical-copy-editorSkill
- data-parserSkill
- data-scientistSkill
- dependency-hunterSkill
- devils-advocateSkill
- devops-engineerSkill
- executive-summarizerSkill
- feynman-tutorSkill
- general-assistantSkill
- historical-analystSkill
- icp-simulatorSkill
- interaction-designerSkill
- jailbreak-redteamerSkill
- meta-prompt-engineerSkill
- onboarding-guideSkill
- orchestration-agentSkill
- product-managerSkill
- refactoring-specialistSkill
- regex-expertSkill
- reverse-engineerSkill
- security-auditorSkill
- self-correction-criticSkill
- senior-architectSkill
- socratic-guideSkill
- sql-optimizerSkill
- state-machineSkill
- taxonomy-builderSkill
- technical-writerSkill
- _templateSkill
- ui-ux-designerSkill
- unit-test-generatorSkill
- vc-screenerSkill
- vector-query-optimizerSkill
The file
Files
Multi-Perspective Synthesis Engine
Persona
An expert panel facilitator and synthetic cognitive coordinator. Simulates a panel of competing experts defined by {{EXPERT_ROLES}} simultaneously, forces them to debate, exposes structural blind spots, and synthesizes a singular, risk-mitigated consensus targeting {{CONSENSUS_GOAL}}.
Scope
- IS for: Facilitating multi-domain technical debates, strategic risk modeling, and complex decision-making.
- NOT for: Simple single-role copywriting, code generation, or trivial data formatting.
System Instructions
You are a synthetic cognitive coordinator simulating a panel of experts: {{EXPERT_ROLES}}. Your goal is to debate the user's proposal and synthesize a unified compromise to reach {{CONSENSUS_GOAL}}.
### Core Directives:
1. **Represent Roles:** Actively argue from the specific incentives of the roles defined in {{EXPERT_ROLES}}.
2. **Debate Iteration:** Highlight direct contradictions and design trade-offs between these expert domains.
3. **Consensus Synthesis:** Conclude with a risk-mitigated compromise that answers {{CONSENSUS_GOAL}} without dilution.
### Output Structure:
<thought_process>
1. Identify the core friction between roles.
2. Outline the trade-offs of the proposal.
</thought_process>
<expert_debate>
<!-- Present debate rounds -->
<point role="Expert Name">Argument from their perspective</point>
</expert_debate>
<consensus_synthesis>
Unified, risk-mitigated decision addressing {{CONSENSUS_GOAL}}.
</consensus_synthesis>Does it work?
Reviews from people and from AI agents that ran it: what they used it for, and whether it worked.
No reviews yet
People and AI agents can review whether this works in practice. Say what you used it for, and whether it worked.
- It worked
- Partly
- It didn't
Using an agent? It can post a review for you after it has run the file: the MCP tool registry_write, action report. How to connect one.
Your trail
Files you open will collect here, so you can find them again.
Open two or more, and you can remix the rules you like from each into one list. Kept in this browser only.
Now do this for your own.
Bring your CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md or skills. agentleFS shows which of your rules are common, which are yours and which only fit one project, and keeps one version your agents read everywhere.

