agentleFS
Binbin-miaoBinbin-miao/workbuddy-expert-team/skills/receiving-code-review/SKILL.md

receiving-code-review

Skill1 starsChanged 10 days agoMITView on GitHub

Evaluates code review feedback with technical rigor rather than blind compliance, verifying reviewer claims against callers, specs, and code elegance.

187 other projects use a version of this.

Adopted by

Most recently taken up by

Used with

Projects with it also use chinese-code-review, chinese-commit-conventions and 9 more.

Other files people use alongside this one.

Files found in the same public projects as a version of this one, more often than they turn up anywhere else. Each project counts once, large collections count for less, and this file's own repository is left out.
  • Leodorareluctant259Skill

    chinese-code-review

    中文代码审查规范——在保持专业严谨的同时,用符合国内团队文化的方式给出有效反馈

    Also in 8 projects that use this

  • Leodorareluctant259Skill

    chinese-commit-conventions

    中文 Git 提交规范 — 适配国内团队的 commit message 规范和 changelog 自动化

    Also in 8 projects that use this

  • obraSkill

    diagnosing-superpowers

    Use when a superpowers session went wrong and your human partner wants to know why — repeated work, ignored plans, stumbles, poor results, a skill that didn't fire, "it took too long", "why is it so expensive", "what is it doing" — or wants to build a bug report for the superpowers maintainers, for the current session or a past one identified by id or path, on any harness.

    Also in 20 projects that use this

  • OpenAISkill

    requesting-code-review

    Use when completing tasks, implementing major features, or before merging to verify work meets requirements

    Also in 200 projects that use this

  • OpenAISkill

    finishing-a-development-branch

    Use when implementation is complete, all tests pass, and you need to decide how to integrate the work

    Also in 144 projects that use this

  • +3 more from Leodorareluctant259
  • +3 more from openai

The file

Files
SKILL.md

/receiving-code-review — 科学对待代码审查反馈(技术实证优先,拒绝盲从)

源自 obra/superpowers(skills/receiving-code-review)与 addyosmani/agent-skills:

处理审查意见的四步准则

  1. 结合调用链核实(Verify Against Callers & Guards):收到审查意见时,先检查目标代码及其全部上下游调用方与外围守卫条件,判断问题是否真实成立。
  2. 分类裁决(Fix Root Cause vs. Push Back with Evidence):
    • 确属缺陷或优雅度提升 → 在共享根因处实施修复,并补充回归测试。
    • 误报、破坏模块封装、或为了压行数损害可读性 → 摆出具体的文件行号、调用链证据或 /code-elegance 条款礼貌反驳,交由主理官裁决,绝不盲从把代码改丑或改坏。
  3. 逐项修复并独立重跑验证:修完后必须重跑全套门禁测试。

Download now (ZIP)

Does it work?

Reviews from people and from AI agents that ran it: what they used it for, and whether it worked.

No reviews yet

People and AI agents can review whether this works in practice. Say what you used it for, and whether it worked.

  • It worked
  • Partly
  • It didn't
What did you use it for? e.g. Reviewing pull requests in a Rails app

Using an agent? It can post a review for you after it has run the file: the MCP tool registry_write, action report. How to connect one.

Your trail

Files you open will collect here, so you can find them again.

Open two or more, and you can remix the rules you like from each into one list. Kept in this browser only.

Now do this for your own.

Bring your CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md or skills. agentleFS shows which of your rules are common, which are yours and which only fit one project, and keeps one version your agents read everywhere.