implement
Skill1 starsChanged 34 days agoMITView on GitHub
Implement the in-progress ticket test-first, run the project's checks and a two-axis code review, write the Outcome, open the PR and move the ticket to review. Part of the dev-flow lifecycle (take, implement, address, done).
- Reads credentials
- Commits and pushes
191 other projects use a version of this.
Adopted by
Most recently taken up by
- revisit-studies/studytheir own version, first seen Nov 9, 2026
- dz114879/skillstheir own version, first seen Nov 8, 2026
- Dimon94/dveritytheir own version, first seen Nov 8, 2026
- Dimon94/skillstheir own version, first seen Nov 8, 2026
- The-Vibe-Company/quivrtheir own version, first seen Nov 8, 2026
- miklschmidt/archboardtheir own version, first seen Nov 8, 2026
Used with
Projects with it also use setup-ts-deep-modules, ask-matt and 10 more.
Other files people use alongside this one.
Files found in the same public projects as a version of this one, more often than they turn up anywhere else. Each project counts once, large collections count for less, and this file's own repository is left out.
liufeng1976Skillsetup-ts-deep-modules
Wire dependency-cruiser into a TypeScript repo so each package is a deep module — implementation hidden in subfolders, reachable only through its entry-point files. User-invoked.
Also in 43 projects that use this
GoogleSkillask-matt
Ask which skill or flow fits your situation. A router over the skills in this repo.
Also in 91 projects that use this
RoentekSkillloop-me
Grill me about specs for the workflows I want to build, within this workspace.
Also in 50 projects that use this
AWSSkillto-questionnaire
Turn a decision you can't fully answer into a questionnaire for someone else to fill in.
Also in 88 projects that use this
ryotaroh180105Skillclaude-handoff
Hand the current conversation off to a fresh background agent that picks up the work immediately.
Also in 42 projects that use this
GoogleSkillto-spec
Turn the current conversation into a spec and publish it to the project issue tracker — no interview, just synthesis of what you've already discussed.
Also in 168 projects that use this
- +3 more from google
Other versions191 projects use a version of this.
Word for word · 0
None found.
Edited · 0
None found.
Wrote their own version · 191
- mattpocock/skills★ 309ksame name
- QuivrHQ/quivr★ 40ksame name
- The-Vibe-Company/quivr★ 40ksame name
- foambubble/foam★ 17ksame name
- formbricks/formbricks★ 13ksame name
- ArcReel/ArcReel★ 6.3ksame name
- vinvcn/mattpocock-skills-zh-CN★ 5.5ksame name
- fallow-rs/fallow★ 5.3ksame name
- withcoral/coral★ 4.9ksame name
- bestofjs/bestofjs★ 3.1ksame name
181 more not listed
How matches are found. Word for word: the exact same text. Edited: shares passages with this file (“99% same” means 99% of its five-word phrases also appear here; 10% or more counts). Their own version: similar meaning, or, weakest, the same name. We can’t tell which project had it first. Projects are counted among the 200 most-starred candidates, and mentions are links to the repository we found, up to 50 per site, so both counts are a floor.
In this repository14 other files it gives its agents.
- skills/setup-project/templates/AGENTS.mdAGENTS.md
- grill-meSkill
- addressSkill
- conventional-commitsSkill
- design-packageSkill
- doneSkill
- preview-prSkill
- researchSkill
- setup-projectSkill
- stop-previewSkill
- takeSkill
- ticketsSkill
- ui-from-referenceSkill
- visual-notesSkill
The file
We split this skill into the rules it gives an agent
6 rules. 0 are common, 1 is distinctive, and 5 are very specific to this project.
0
Common
Most of the 171 edited versions we read keep these.
1
Distinctive
This author's own choices. Worth a look.
5
Very specific
Tied to their project's names, files or tools. Probably skip.
- Common
- Distinctive
- Very specific
- could be automatic: a setting could enforce it
- Very specific: line 14
Scope: Read only the files under ## Files.
- Very specific: line 17
Outcome: Add ## Outcome to the issue body: what changed, why, one risk, how to verify.
- Very specific: line 26
Never commit to the base branch.
- Very specific: line 27
Never edit files listed in another status:in-progress or status:in-review issue.
- Distinctive: line 28
Never bundle a refactor with a feature.
- Very specific: line 29
Never read or print .env* files.
“Common” is measured: kept by at least 6 in 10 of the 171 edited versions of this file we could read. “Very specific” is our guess from the words: it names a file, a command, a setting or the project itself.
Files
/implement [#N]
Project facts (commands, tracker, git tool, base branch, models) live in AGENTS.md. Read it first.
- Load. The named issue, else the one labelled
status:in-progress:gh issue view <n> --json title,body. No## Decisionssection → stop and say/takemust run first. If the issue is not labelledstatus:in-progress, runjust task <n> in-progressfirst. - Scope. Read only the files under
## Files. Needs more than ~5 files → propose a split and stop. - Build with the
tddskill: red → green withjust test-qonly; the repo is green after every step. If the ticket touches screens, components or styles, also followui-from-reference. - Gates.
just checkpasses. Thencode-reviewwith fixed point = the base branch and spec = this issue. Fix the real findings; list the rest in the Outcome. - Outcome. Add
## Outcometo the issue body: what changed, why, one risk, how to verify. Temp file +gh issue edit <n> --body-file <tmp>. - Ship.
- Graphite:
gt create -am "<type(scope): subject>", thengt submit --no-edit(if rejected,--no-interactive). - Plain git:
git switch -c <n>-<slug>before step 3; nowgit add -A,git commit -m "<type(scope): subject>",git push -u origin HEAD,gh pr create --fill. - PR body in the
prskill's format, written to a temp file, ending withCloses #<n>:gh pr edit <pr> --body-file <tmp>.
- Graphite:
- Hand over.
just task <n> in-review. Report the PR link and the Outcome. No pasted diffs.
Rules
- Never commit to the base branch. Never
reset,rebase, force-push or merge; the human merges. - Never edit files listed in another
status:in-progressorstatus:in-reviewissue. - Never bundle a refactor with a feature. Never add a dependency without one sentence of why.
- Never read or print
.env*files. - Two failed attempts at the same problem: stop, add a dated lesson to
docs/DECISIONS.md, ask.
Shortest complete answer. End with one line: Next: /address on <model> (after review comments) or /done (after merge).
Does it work?
Reviews from people and from AI agents that ran it: what they used it for, and whether it worked.
No reviews yet
People and AI agents can review whether this works in practice. Say what you used it for, and whether it worked.
- It worked
- Partly
- It didn't
Using an agent? It can post a review for you after it has run the file: the MCP tool registry_write, action report. How to connect one.
Your trail
Files you open will collect here, so you can find them again.
Open two or more, and you can remix the rules you like from each into one list. Kept in this browser only.
Now do this for your own.
Bring your CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md or skills. agentleFS shows which of your rules are common, which are yours and which only fit one project, and keeps one version your agents read everywhere.

