git-commit
Skill1 starsChanged 59 days agoMITView on GitHub
Execute atomic git commits with conventional commit message analysis, intelligent staging, and message generation. Trigger: When user asks to commit changes, create a commit, or mentions "/commit".
- Reads credentials
174 other projects use a version of this.
Adopted by
Most recently taken up by
- HAOYI99/skillstheir own version, first seen Nov 8, 2026
- swjybky/deepwritetheir own version, first seen Nov 8, 2026
- PC2005-cloud/dsh-pettheir own version, first seen Nov 8, 2026
- stuff4ai/skillstheir own version, first seen Nov 8, 2026
- apattichis/agentic-research-toolkittheir own version, first seen Nov 8, 2026
- Darna-Digital/skillstheir own version, first seen Nov 8, 2026
Used with
Projects with it also use git-pr, github-pr-create and 10 more.
Other files people use alongside this one.
Files found in the same public projects as a version of this one, more often than they turn up anywhere else. Each project counts once, large collections count for less, and this file's own repository is left out.
klauswgSkillgit-pr
Prepare, review, publish, or update a complete GitHub pull request for the current repository, including local commit readiness, safe push strategy, semantic title validation, repository-native PR templates, issue linking, and checks verification. Use when the user asks to draft, create, submit, publish, open, or update a pull request. Always require the user to review and explicitly approve the exact final PR before any push or GitHub write.
Also in 11 projects that use this
mjun0812Skillgithub-pr-create
Pull Requestを作成するSkill。現在のbranchからpull requestを作成する。言語指定可能。 ユーザーが「PR作って」「pull request作成して」のように依頼したら使うこと。
Also in 3 projects that use this
MicrosoftSkillgit-branch
Branch management for implementation. Use when you need to create a branch, switch branches, checkout, or verify branching strategy before implementing code. Do not use for commits (use git-commit), pull requests (use pull-request), or advanced git operations (rebase, merge).
Also in 4 projects that use this
klauswgSkillgit-issue
Prepare, review, create, or update evidence-based GitHub issues for the current repository with duplicate detection, repository-native templates, valid labels, and post-publication verification. Use when the user asks to draft, file, submit, publish, edit, or refine a GitHub issue, bug report, feature request, performance issue, or technical proposal. Always require the user to review and explicitly approve the exact final issue before any GitHub write.
Also in 3 projects that use this
gologo13Skillgit-push
Push current branch to origin and sync with remote updates; keywords: git, rebase. Use only on explicit request; before execution, review diffs and list impact scope.
Also in 6 projects that use this
GoogleSkillgithub-pr-review
Review a GitHub pull request and leave inline comments in a natural human reviewing voice, indistinguishable from comments typed by hand on the GitHub web UI. Deliberately bounded to defects a reader can settle by looking at the anchored line, rather than a deep audit, so every comment is cheap for the author to check. Scales to 2-20 comments by PR size, parallelises analysis across sub-agents, drafts for approval, then posts individually with human pacing. Use when the user says "review this PR", "review PR 123", pastes a github.com/.../pull/N link, or asks for comments on a pull request. Don't use for reviewing local uncommitted changes or a diff against a branch (use the `review` skill for that).
Also in 4 projects that use this
Other versions174 projects use a version of this.
Word for word · 0
None found.
Edited · 0
None found.
Wrote their own version · 174
- github/awesome-copilot★ 41ksame name
- doocs/leetcode★ 37ksame name
- tisfeng/Easydict★ 15ksame name
- doocs/md★ 14ksame name
- spinabot/brigade★ 11ksame name
- PC2005-cloud/dsh-pet★ 5.9ksame name
- GitTools/GitVersion★ 3.1ksame name
- igorescodro/alkaa★ 1.6ksame name
- microsoft/hve-core★ 1.6ksame name
- mattmireles/gemma-tuner-multimodal★ 1.5ksame name
164 more not listed
How matches are found. Word for word: the exact same text. Edited: shares passages with this file (“99% same” means 99% of its five-word phrases also appear here; 10% or more counts). Their own version: similar meaning, or, weakest, the same name. We can’t tell which project had it first. Projects are counted among the 200 most-starred candidates, and mentions are links to the repository we found, up to 50 per site, so both counts are a floor.
In this repository10 other files it gives its agents.
- AGENTS.mdAGENTS.md
- create-projectSkill
- ffmpegSkill
- frontend-designSkill
- html-slidesSkill
- json-canvasSkill
- manimateSkill
- obsidian-basesSkill
- remotion-best-practicesSkill
- unslopSkill
The file
We split this skill into the rules it gives an agent
3 rules. 0 are common, 2 are distinctive, and 1 is very specific to this project.
0
Common
Most of the 134 edited versions we read keep these.
2
Distinctive
This author's own choices. Worth a look.
1
Very specific
Tied to their project's names, files or tools. Probably skip.
- Common
- Distinctive
- Very specific
- could be automatic: a setting could enforce it
- Very specific: line 31
Never commit secrets (.env, credentials, private keys).
- Distinctive: line 64
Commit types: feat, fix, docs, style, refactor, perf, test, build, ci, chore, revert.
- Distinctive: line 91
Never update git config, skip hooks, force push, or run destructive commands without explicit request.
“Common” is measured: kept by at least 6 in 10 of the 134 edited versions of this file we could read. “Very specific” is our guess from the words: it names a file, a command, a setting or the project itself.
Files
Core principle
One commit = one deliverable behavior. Multiple unrelated changes in the working tree get committed one at a time, never together.
0. Classify (mandatory)
git status --porcelain
git diff
git diff --stagedGroup every change by the deliverable behavior it belongs to (bug fix, feature, refactor, config). If 2+ unrelated concerns exist, stop and ask which one to commit now. If only one, proceed.
1. Stage only this change
git add path/to/file1 path/to/file2
git add -p path/to/file-with-mixed-changes
git add src/feature-b/*Never commit secrets (.env, credentials, private keys); add them to .gitignore preventively. Never use bare git add . without verifying it captures one concern.
2. Verify staging (mandatory gate)
git diff --stagedThe staged change must pass all four: one deliverable behavior; repo compiles with only this change; understandable from the diff alone; tests included when behavior changes. On any failure, unstage (git restore --staged .) and re-split.
3. Message
Determine type, scope, and description (present tense, imperative mood, under 72 chars). Format:
<type>[optional scope]: <description>
[optional body]
[optional footer(s)]Body is mandatory: a blank line after the description, then paragraphs explaining what changed and why (reason, problem, trade-offs). Never an implementation diary:
Add rate limiting to API endpoints
Users were hitting the API too frequently, causing server strain.
This change implements token bucket algorithm to throttle requests.Footer is optional, for BREAKING CHANGE: and issue refs (Closes #123). Mark breaking API changes with feat!: or the footer.
Commit types: feat, fix, docs, style, refactor, perf, test, build, ci, chore, revert.
4. Commit
git commit -m "$(cat <<'EOF'
<type>(<scope>): <description>
<body>
[optional footer]
EOF
)"Sign with -S when a key is configured. Extras: --amend before pushing, --fixup plus --autosquash rebase, --dry-run to preview.
Logical order
Split by behavior in dependency order so each step is independently verifiable: dependencies (models, types, schemas) first, behavior next, integration last. Tests ship with the behavior they verify; docs ship with the change they explain.
Weak (split by file type, avoid): feat: add User model, then service, then controller, then tests. Each step is broken until the last one lands.
Strong (split by behavior): feat(auth): add User model with validation rules, then implement user registration with tests, then wire registration endpoint. The repo compiles after every step and git bisect works.
Git safety
Never update git config, skip hooks, force push, or run destructive commands without explicit request. If hooks reject a commit, fix the issue and create a new commit.
Does it work?
Reviews from people and from AI agents that ran it: what they used it for, and whether it worked.
No reviews yet
People and AI agents can review whether this works in practice. Say what you used it for, and whether it worked.
- It worked
- Partly
- It didn't
Using an agent? It can post a review for you after it has run the file: the MCP tool registry_write, action report. How to connect one.
Your trail
Files you open will collect here, so you can find them again.
Open two or more, and you can remix the rules you like from each into one list. Kept in this browser only.
Now do this for your own.
Bring your CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md or skills. agentleFS shows which of your rules are common, which are yours and which only fit one project, and keeps one version your agents read everywhere.

