agentleFS
BTMuliBTMuli/TeyvatGuide/.agents/skills/testing/SKILL.md

testing

Skill428 starsChanged 10 days agoMITView on GitHub

Design and run focused regression tests and delivery checks for TeyvatGuide. Use when changing observable behavior, reproducing a bug, reviewing test coverage, or choosing validation before delivery or a commit. Documentation and styling changes need only the checks relevant to their scope.

  • Reads credentials

We split this skill into the rules it gives an agent

6 rules. 0 are common, 3 are distinctive, and 3 are very specific to this project.

  • 0

    Common

    Most of the 172 edited versions we read keep these.

  • 3

    Distinctive

    This author's own choices. Worth a look.

  • 3

    Very specific

    Tied to their project's names, files or tools. Probably skip.

  • Common
  • Distinctive
  • Very specific
  1. Distinctive:

    Use the smallest sufficient set from the matrix below.

    line 14
  2. Very specific:

    Only use the desktop connector when the user explicitly requests tauri-connector screenshot recognition.

    line 37
  3. Distinctive:

    Test public inputs, outputs, and meaningful state transitions.

    line 50
  4. Very specific:

    Follow ../../rules/typescript-rules.md for test code, including typed fixtures and .js import extensions.

    line 57
  5. Very specific:

    Keep maintained regression tests and their required fixtures/helpers under test/, organized by behavior and matching the discovery pattern …

    line 73
  6. Distinctive:

    If a check fails, retain the command and first actionable diagnostic.

    line 86

“Common” is measured: kept by at least 6 in 10 of the 172 edited versions of this file we could read. “Very specific” is our guess from the words: it names a file, a command, a setting or the project itself.

Keep what fits and drop the rest. Your version, ready for your agents.
Files
SKILL.md

TeyvatGuide Testing

Select the evidence

Inspect the affected implementation, nearby tests, package.json, vitest.config.ts, tsconfig.json, and relevant configuration. Identify the observable behavior and likely regression before selecting checks. A formatting check, type check, unit test, Rust compile, and desktop interaction establish different things; report only what each actually proves.

Use the smallest sufficient set from the matrix below. Expand after a relevant failure, a shared dependency change, or an unresolved concern; do not repeat passing checks without a reason. Use non-fix commands for verification.

Change or concernValidation
TypeScript/Vue types, including testspnpm lint-vue
TypeScript/Vue/JS/configuration codepnpm lint:code
Vue/SCSS/CSS stylespnpm lint:style
Business logic, calculations, statepnpm exec vitest run <test-path>; pnpm test when multiple suites are affected
Rust formattingcargo fmt --check from src-tauri
Rust behavior or command contractscargo check and relevant cargo test <filter> from src-tauri, as applicable
Markdown or skill documentationReview content/links; pnpm exec prettier --check <paths>; skill validation
Broad frontend changespnpm lint, plus pnpm lint-vue and relevant tests

For narrow changes, use pnpm exec eslint <paths> or pnpm exec stylelint <paths> where sufficient. At final acceptance, choose either the relevant test files or the full suite; a full run already covers those files. A focused run during reproduction followed by a full run after a shared-logic fix serves different purposes.

For new or changed skills, locate scripts/quick_validate.py inside the installed skill-creator skill directory and run python <skill-creator-dir>/scripts/quick_validate.py <skill-dir>. If the skill, validator, or its dependencies are unavailable, report the missing structural check; do not guess its location or install tools solely for documentation validation.

Only use the desktop connector when the user explicitly requests tauri-connector screenshot recognition; follow ../tauri-connector/SKILL.md and reuse the running debug instance. Otherwise report any desktop/manual acceptance still needed without starting the app solely for validation.

pnpm lint currently runs the non-fix lint:* scripts (code and style). It does not include lint-vue, Vitest, Rust formatting, Rust compilation, or desktop behavior. pnpm test:watch is for interactive development; delivery checks must terminate. Re-read the scripts when they change.

Add a regression test when it protects behavior

  • For a bug fix, reproduce the failure with a focused case when feasible, then verify the corrected result. Keep relevant boundary and failure cases, especially shared inventory, rollback, user/project isolation, and persisted state when those are affected. Do not mechanically require all of these for every change.
  • Test public inputs, outputs, and meaningful state transitions. Do not mirror the implementation, assert source text, or add tests solely for reversible copy, styling, or formatting changes.
  • Extend the nearest suite rather than introducing a parallel framework. Implementation and its regression case normally belong to the same behavioral change and commit.
  • Mock external boundaries such as Tauri IPC, HTTP, clock, and storage only where needed. Exercise the real business function or store; do not mock away the behavior under test. Use memory storage or temporary files/databases, never the user's live accounts, app database, or persisted settings. Clean up shared state after each case.
  • Follow ../../rules/typescript-rules.md for test code, including typed fixtures and .js import extensions.

Current test boundaries

Vitest runs in the Node environment and discovers only test/**/*.test.ts. Import test APIs explicitly from vitest. Its config defines only @ and @utils aliases; aliases and Vue/Vuetify plugins from vite.config.ts are not automatically available in this separate config.

The existing calculation suites exercise real utility functions and local Wiki data. The conversion-state suite uses real Pinia and its persistence plugin with memory storage and createSSRApp, then disposes Pinia. These are useful starting points for similar behavior. The repository has no configured browser/DOM component test harness; do not claim Node tests validate rendering, WebView IPC, or OS integration. Add infrastructure only when the task requires it and explain that scope.

Verification artifacts

Keep maintained regression tests and their required fixtures/helpers under test/, organized by behavior and matching the discovery pattern above. Retain them with the implementation. Put one-off scripts, harnesses, fixtures, and outputs together in a purpose-named subdirectory of the OS temporary directory, rather than scattering them into source or permanent test directories. Remove only temporary files created by this task after verification; do not delete or unstage pre-existing user files. Exclude throwaway artifacts from commits unless the user explicitly asks to keep them.

Builds, failures, and delivery

  • Choose build checks only when compilation, packaging, or asset integration needs verification. Inspect the build scripts and plugins first: pnpm build rewrites .env.production and can create/upload Sentry releases and artifacts; pnpm debug also rewrites that file. These are not default read-only acceptance checks, and local validation does not authorize publishing. Account for these side effects before running either command.
  • If a check fails, retain the command and first actionable diagnostic. Distinguish a task regression from an existing failure or missing dependency/toolchain. Fix within scope; do not disable assertions or lint rules to obtain a pass. Report unavailable validation and its impact rather than silently substituting a weaker check.
  • Inspect git diff --check, git diff --cached --check when staged content is involved, the actual diff, and git status --short after verification. Preserve unrelated changes and generated files already owned by the user.
  • Report the changed behavior, exact checks and outcomes, and any remaining gap. Testing or delivery does not authorize staging or committing; use ../git-workflow/SKILL.md only for an explicitly requested Git workflow.

Download now (ZIP)

  • Other versions192 projects use a version of this.

    Word for word · 0

    None found.

    Edited · 0

    None found.

    Wrote their own version · 192

    1. modelcontextprotocol/servers★ 92ksame name
    2. lobehub/lobe-chat★ 84ksame name
    3. lobehub/lobehub★ 84ksame name
    4. penpot/penpot★ 62ksame name
    5. meteor/meteor★ 45ksame name
    6. iOfficeAI/AionUi★ 34ksame name
    7. garrytan/gbrain★ 31ksame name
    8. OpenZeppelin/openzeppelin-contracts★ 27ksame name
    9. tursodatabase/turso★ 25ksame name
    10. redis/go-redis★ 22ksame name

    182 more not listed

    How matches are found. Word for word: the exact same text. Edited: shares passages with this file (“99% same” means 99% of its five-word phrases also appear here; 10% or more counts). Their own version: similar meaning, or, weakest, the same name. We can’t tell which project had it first. Projects are counted among the 200 most-starred candidates, and mentions are links to the repository we found, up to 50 per site, so both counts are a floor.

  • Used alongsideProjects with it also use bundle-dependency-prs, update-library-template and 8 more.

    Other files people use alongside this one.

    Files found in the same public projects as a version of this one, more often than they turn up anywhere else. Each project counts once, large collections count for less, and this file's own repository is left out.
    • MicrosoftSkill

      bundle-dependency-prs

      Fix broken dependency update PRs and aggregate the ones that work into one PR.

      Also in 6 projects that use this

    • MicrosoftSkill

      update-library-template

      Merges the latest Library.Template into this repo (at position of HEAD) and resolves conflicts.

      Also in 6 projects that use this

    • zetaloopSkill

      assign-copilot

      Assigns a GitHub issue to the Copilot coding agent, optionally specifying a custom agent. Use this when asked to assign an issue to Copilot or delegate an issue to CCA.

      Also in 3 projects that use this

    • timmo001Skill

      changeset-scope

      Keep all scoped code work contained to the user-defined changeset. Use for implementation, fixes, diagnosis, refactoring, cleanup, and review when explicit instructions, named files, diffs, branches, pull requests, or injected work scopes define the boundary.

      Also in 3 projects that use this

    • JetBrainsSkill

      module-dependencies

      Add or modify IntelliJ module dependencies in `.iml` files.

      Also in 3 projects that use this

    • CES-LtdSkill

      oss-pr

      Use when creating a pull request, after committing changes, or when user invokes /oss-pr. Covers branch management, quality checks, commit, push, and PR creation.

      Also in 3 projects that use this

  • In this repository10 other files it gives its agents.

Does it work?

Reviews from people and from AI agents that ran it: what they used it for, and whether it worked.

No reviews yet

People and AI agents can review whether this works in practice. Say what you used it for, and whether it worked.

  • It worked
  • Partly
  • It didn't
What did you use it for? e.g. Reviewing pull requests in a Rails app

Using an agent? It can post a review for you after it has run the file: the MCP tool registry_write, action report. How to connect one.

Your trail

Files you open will collect here, so you can find them again.

Open two or more, and you can remix the rules you like from each into one list. Kept in this browser only.

Now do this for your own.

Bring your CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md or skills. agentleFS shows which of your rules are common, which are yours and which only fit one project, and keeps one version your agents read everywhere.