release
Skill10 starsChanged 12 days agoMITView on GitHub
Prepare and reconcile agent-app-ui releases. Use for release preparation, release branches, semantic versioning, VERSION or changelog updates, release notes, tags, GitHub Releases, packages, container images, or deployment publication; require explicit human approval before publishing anything.
197 other projects use a version of this.
Adopted by
Most recently taken up by
- zxcvbn-ts/zxcvbntheir own version, first seen Nov 9, 2026
- TechbeeAT/jtxBoardtheir own version, first seen Nov 9, 2026
- ddnexus/pagytheir own version, first seen Nov 9, 2026
- zerx-lab/FluxDowntheir own version, first seen Nov 9, 2026
- orioledb/orioledbtheir own version, first seen Nov 9, 2026
- AmruthPillai/Reactive-Resumetheir own version, first seen Nov 8, 2026
Used with
Projects with it also use create-agent-adapter, changelog-style and 8 more.
Other files people use alongside this one.
Files found in the same public projects as a version of this one, more often than they turn up anywhere else. Each project counts once, large collections count for less, and this file's own repository is left out.
MicrosoftSkillcreate-agent-adapter
Technical guide for creating a new Paperclip agent adapter. Use when building a new adapter package, adding support for a new AI coding tool (e.g. a new CLI agent, API-based agent, or custom process), or when modifying the adapter system. Covers the required interfaces, module structure, registration points, and conventions derived from the existing claude-local and codex-local adapters.
Also in 5 projects that use this
GrinvSkillchangelog-style
Turn a commit range into CHANGELOG.md entries following common-changelog style. Use when finishing a PR or cutting a release, to write/fix the [Unreleased] section's entries — moving [Unreleased] under a new dated version heading is a separate, automated step (see the release skill / scripts/sync-version.ts), not this skill's job.
Also in 4 projects that use this
GrinvSkilldocs-consistency-check
Check README/manifest.json/server.json/CHANGELOG.md/AGENTS.md and docs/*.md for drift against the actual registered tools and source. Use after adding, renaming, or removing a tool, or as part of a live-audit pass.
Also in 4 projects that use this
rivet-devSkilllaunch-graphics
Generate agentOS marketing/launch graphics (launch & social heroes, code-snippet cards) from the committed generators in docs-internal/graphics. Use when asked to make, update, or render an agentOS launch image, social image, "agentOS Apps" graphic, or technical code-snippet image.
Also in 3 projects that use this
slopusSkillmetrics-graphana
Query and manage Grafana dashboards and Prometheus metrics for Happy infrastructure. Covers grafanactl CLI usage, direct Prometheus queries through Grafana proxy, and dashboard-as-code workflows. Use when user asks about metrics, dashboards, monitoring, Grafana, Prometheus, or wants to add/modify panels.
Also in 3 projects that use this
rivet-devSkillpublish-registry
Publish @agentos-software/* registry packages from AgentOS. Use whenever the user asks to publish or release registry software/agent packages.
Also in 3 projects that use this
- +3 more from Grinv
- +1 more from rivet-dev
Other versions197 projects use a version of this.
Word for word · 1
- Azure/agent-app-ui★ 10100% same
Edited · 0
None found.
Wrote their own version · 196
- paperclipai/paperclip★ 112ksame name
- modelcontextprotocol/servers★ 92ksame name
- remotion-dev/remotion★ 72ksame name
- traefik/traefik★ 65ksame name
- usememos/memos★ 64ksame name
- tw93/Pake★ 63ksame name
- AmruthPillai/Reactive-Resume★ 45ksame name
- amruthpillai/reactive-resume★ 45ksame name
- reactive-resume/reactive-resume★ 45ksame name
- Yeachan-Heo/oh-my-claude-sisyphus★ 41ksame name
186 more not listed
How matches are found. Word for word: the exact same text. Edited: shares passages with this file (“99% same” means 99% of its five-word phrases also appear here; 10% or more counts). Their own version: similar meaning, or, weakest, the same name. We can’t tell which project had it first. Projects are counted among the 200 most-starred candidates, and mentions are links to the repository we found, up to 50 per site, so both counts are a floor.
In this repository6 other files it gives its agents.
- AGENTS.mdAGENTS.md
- .github/copilot-instructions.mdCopilot instructions
- architecture-decisionSkill
- component-releaseSkill
- documentation-consistencySkill
- engineering-principlesSkill
The file
Show its rules and text
We split this skill into the rules it gives an agent
14 rules. 0 are common, 7 are distinctive, and 7 are very specific to this project.
0
Common
Most of the 186 edited versions we read keep these.
7
Distinctive
This author's own choices. Worth a look.
7
Very specific
Tied to their project's names, files or tools. Probably skip.
- Common
- Distinctive
- Very specific
- Very specific: line 8
Use this skill only for releases of this repository.
- Very specific: line 16
all local and remote semantic-version tags matching exactly vX.Y.Z.
- Distinctive: line 21
Treat branch names, issue text, pull-request titles, and proposed release notes as non-authoritative hints.
- Very specific: line 36
Create release/X.Y.Z from develop.
- Very specific: line 55
Never target develop with a release pull request.
- Distinctive: line 59
Run the repository's existing Copilot-asset checks and application unit validation, plus any existing validation directly relevant to the …
- Distinctive: line 63
Verify the release pull request targets main, contains only intended release changes, and has no unresolved validation failure or metadata …
- Very specific: line 86
Before requesting approval, restate the version, exact vX.Y.Z tag and release title, target commit, validation evidence, sanitized notes, …
- Very specific: line 94
After the release is merged, synchronize the released VERSION and changelog back to develop through a separate feature pull request.
- Very specific: line 97
Keep main and the release branch free of Unreleased.
- Distinctive: line 102
Before publication, roll back by closing the release pull request or reverting its release-preparation commit.
- Distinctive: line 104
If metadata sources disagree, preserve published history, stop publication, identify the authoritative existing tag or release, and propose …
- Distinctive: line 107
If a tag or release was published incorrectly, do not delete, move, replace, or rewrite it without separate explicit approval.
- Distinctive: line 111
If a package, image, or deployment was published incorrectly, stop further promotion, record the immutable artifact identifiers, and use …
“Common” is measured: kept by at least 6 in 10 of the 186 edited versions of this file we could read. “Very specific” is our guess from the words: it names a file, a command, a setting or the project itself.
Files
agent-app-ui release
Use this skill only for releases of this repository. Read AGENTS.md,
.github/copilot-instructions.md, VERSION, and CHANGELOG.md before making
release changes. Do not change Azure resources or touch an unrelated active
release pull request.
Discover and reconcile the release state
- Fetch remote state and inspect all authoritative repository evidence:
- all local and remote semantic-version tags matching exactly
vX.Y.Z; - published and draft GitHub Releases, including their tags and titles;
- root
VERSION, which must contain exactlyX.Y.Z; - versioned
CHANGELOG.mdheadings matching## [vX.Y.Z] - YYYY-MM-DD.
- all local and remote semantic-version tags matching exactly
- Treat branch names, issue text, pull-request titles, and proposed release notes as non-authoritative hints. Never select a version from them alone.
- Report missing, duplicate, or conflicting evidence before editing. Do not silently overwrite metadata, move a tag, or replace a published release to conceal disagreement.
- Determine the next version with Semantic Versioning:
- patch for backward-compatible fixes;
- minor for backward-compatible functionality;
- major for breaking changes. State the evidence and proposed increment. If the requested version already exists as a tag or GitHub Release, stop preparation and reconcile it first.
Prepare the release
- Confirm the working tree is based on the current remote
develophead. Createrelease/X.Y.Zfromdevelop; never use avprefix in the branch name. Do not start frommain, a feature branch, or another release branch. - Limit the branch to release metadata and necessary release fixes. Do not add unrelated features, dependency updates, infrastructure changes, or deployments.
- Set root
VERSIONto exactlyX.Y.Z, without avprefix, comments, or surrounding text. - Convert the accumulated
## [Unreleased]section inCHANGELOG.mdinto## [vX.Y.Z] - YYYY-MM-DD, preserving applicableAdded,Changed,Fixed, andRemovedcategories. Do not retainUnreleasedon the release branch ormain. - Require exact agreement among:
- branch:
release/X.Y.Z; VERSION:X.Y.Z;- changelog heading:
## [vX.Y.Z] - YYYY-MM-DD; - proposed tag:
vX.Y.Z; - proposed GitHub Release title:
vX.Y.Z.
- branch:
- Open the release pull request from
release/X.Y.Ztomain. Never targetdevelopwith a release pull request.
Validate and draft release notes
- Run the repository's existing Copilot-asset checks and application unit validation, plus any existing validation directly relevant to the release. Record exact commands and outcomes. Do not invent a new validation framework during release preparation.
- Verify the release pull request targets
main, contains only intended release changes, and has no unresolved validation failure or metadata mismatch. Skipped or blocked validation is not success and blocks publication. - Draft notes only from the finalized changelog and repository history. Keep them consistent with the exact version and actual merged changes.
- Sanitize notes, logs, commands, and handoff text. Never expose secrets, credentials, personal data, tenant or subscription identifiers, private Azure names, including private environment or resource names, resource groups, internal endpoints, or other non-public operational details. Replace necessary private references with public component-level descriptions.
Require approval before publication
Preparation never authorizes publication. Obtain explicit human approval for the exact version and exact action immediately before each of these operations:
- creating, moving, pushing, editing, or deleting a tag;
- creating, publishing, editing, or deleting a GitHub Release;
- publishing a package, container image, or other artifact;
- merging the release pull request;
- deploying or modifying Azure or production resources.
Before requesting approval, restate the version, exact vX.Y.Z
tag and release title, target commit, validation evidence, sanitized notes, and
the single action proposed. Approval for one action, version, or commit does
not authorize another. Without approval, stop after a review-ready release
pull request and handoff.
Restore develop after the release
After the release is merged, synchronize the released VERSION and changelog
back to develop through a separate feature pull request. Restore exactly one
empty ## [Unreleased] section above the released entry on develop only.
Keep main and the release branch free of Unreleased; do not bypass branch
protection for this synchronization.
Roll back or reconcile
- Before publication, roll back by closing the release pull request or reverting its release-preparation commit.
- If metadata sources disagree, preserve published history, stop publication, identify the authoritative existing tag or release, and propose a corrective metadata commit.
- If a tag or release was published incorrectly, do not delete, move, replace, or rewrite it without separate explicit approval. Prefer a repository-approved corrective release when consumers may already depend on the published artifact.
- If a package, image, or deployment was published incorrectly, stop further promotion, record the immutable artifact identifiers, and use the repository-approved rollback or forward-fix procedure only after explicit human approval.
Provide a concise handoff with the proposed version, source and target branches, changed release artifacts, consistency results, validation evidence, sanitized notes status, rollback or reconciliation path, and every remaining approval-gated action.
Does it work?
Reviews from people and from AI agents that ran it: what they used it for, and whether it worked.
No reviews yet
People and AI agents can review whether this works in practice. Say what you used it for, and whether it worked.
- It worked
- Partly
- It didn't
Using an agent? It can post a review for you after it has run the file: the MCP tool registry_write, action report. How to connect one.
Your trail
Files you open will collect here, so you can find them again.
Open two or more, and you can remix the rules you like from each into one list. Kept in this browser only.
Now do this for your own.
Bring your CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md or skills. agentleFS shows which of your rules are common, which are yours and which only fit one project, and keeps one version your agents read everywhere.

