documentation-consistency
Skill22 starsChanged 3 months agoMITView on GitHub
Keeps GPT-RAG MCP service and umbrella documentation aligned with shipped behavior. Use for capabilities, configuration keys, deployment steps, endpoints, defaults, operations, or breaking changes.
We split this skill into the rules it gives an agent
5 rules. 0 are common, 3 are distinctive, and 2 are very specific to this project.
0
Common
Most of the 10 edited versions we read keep these.
3
Distinctive
This author's own choices. Worth a look.
2
Very specific
Tied to their project's names, files or tools. Probably skip.
- Common
- Distinctive
- Very specific
- Distinctive: line 9
Search this repository for the capability, configuration key, endpoint, parameter, and previous terminology.
- Very specific: line 11
Update service setup and Inspector guidance in README.md and operational diagnosis in TROUBLESHOOTING.md.
- Very specific: line 13
If umbrella GPT-RAG deployment, configuration, or user experience changes, search and update the docs branch of Azure/GPT-RAG in the same …
- Distinctive: line 16
Keep repository READMEs focused.
- Distinctive: line 18
Verify examples against executable defaults and current protocol contracts.
“Common” is measured: kept by at least 6 in 10 of the 10 edited versions of this file we could read. “Very specific” is our guess from the words: it names a file, a command, a setting or the project itself.
Files
GPT-RAG MCP documentation consistency
- Identify the user, orchestrator, or operator behavior that changed.
- Search this repository for the capability, configuration key, endpoint, parameter, and previous terminology.
- Update service setup and Inspector guidance in
README.mdand operational diagnosis inTROUBLESHOOTING.md. - If umbrella GPT-RAG deployment, configuration, or user experience changes,
search and update the
docsbranch ofAzure/GPT-RAGin the same coordinated change. - Keep repository READMEs focused; link to published GPT-RAG documentation instead of duplicating broad product guidance.
- Verify examples against executable defaults and current protocol contracts.
- Report every documentation file, branch, or pull request in the implementation handoff.
A visible change is incomplete until documentation is updated or the search demonstrates that no documentation is affected.
Other versions10 projects use a version of this.
Word for word · 0
None found.
Edited · 4
- Azure/agent-landing-zone★ 1.2k16% same
- Azure/GPT-RAG★ 1.2k16% same
- Azure/agent-app-orchestrator★ 10511% same
- Azure/gpt-rag-orchestrator★ 10511% same
Wrote their own version · 6
- Azure/agent-app-ingestion★ 188same name
- Azure/gpt-rag-ingestion★ 188same name
- wallstop/unity-helpers★ 176same name
- Azure/bicep-ptn-aiml-landing-zone★ 19same name
- Azure/agent-app-ui★ 10same name
- Azure/gpt-rag-ui★ 10same name
How matches are found. Word for word: the exact same text. Edited: shares passages with this file (“99% same” means 99% of its five-word phrases also appear here; 10% or more counts). Their own version: similar meaning, or, weakest, the same name. We can’t tell which project had it first. Projects are counted among the 200 most-starred candidates, and mentions are links to the repository we found, up to 50 per site, so both counts are a floor.
Used alongsideProjects with it also use deployment-operations, iac-validation and 10 more.
Other files people use alongside this one.
Files found in the same public projects as a version of this one, more often than they turn up anywhere else. Each project counts once, large collections count for less, and this file's own repository is left out.
Microsoft AzureSkilldeployment-operations
Safely investigates and operates AI Landing Zone preflight, What-If, azd, Azure DevOps, and jumpbox bootstrap paths. Use for approved deployment operations or incident diagnosis.
Also in 3 projects that use this
Microsoft AzureSkilliac-validation
Builds an evidence-based validation plan for AI Landing Zone Copilot assets, Bicep, parameters, scripts, and Azure deployment behavior. Use after implementation or during regression investigation.
Also in 3 projects that use this
- +10 more from Azure
In this repository6 other files it gives its agents.
- AGENTS.mdAGENTS.md
- .github/copilot-instructions.mdCopilot instructions
- architecture-decisionSkill
- component-releaseSkill
- engineering-principlesSkill
- mcp-capability-developmentSkill
Does it work?
Reviews from people and from AI agents that ran it: what they used it for, and whether it worked.
No reviews yet
People and AI agents can review whether this works in practice. Say what you used it for, and whether it worked.
- It worked
- Partly
- It didn't
Using an agent? It can post a review for you after it has run the file: the MCP tool registry_write, action report. How to connect one.
Your trail
Files you open will collect here, so you can find them again.
Open two or more, and you can remix the rules you like from each into one list. Kept in this browser only.
Now do this for your own.
Bring your CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md or skills. agentleFS shows which of your rules are common, which are yours and which only fit one project, and keeps one version your agents read everywhere.

