azure-deployment-preflight
Skill274 starsChanged 28 days agoMITView on GitHub
Run preflight validation on ARM templates before deployment. Performs what-if analysis, permission checks, and generates a structured report with resource changes (create/modify/delete). Use before any deployment to preview changes and catch issues early.
1 other project uses a version of this.
Adopted by
Most recently taken up by
- github/awesome-copilottheir own version, first seen Oct 25, 2026
Other versions1 project uses a version of this.
Word for word · 0
None found.
Edited · 0
None found.
Wrote their own version · 1
- github/awesome-copilot★ 41ksame name
How matches are found. Word for word: the exact same text. Edited: shares passages with this file (“99% same” means 99% of its five-word phrases also appear here; 10% or more counts). Their own version: similar meaning, or, weakest, the same name. We can’t tell which project had it first. Projects are counted among the 200 most-starred candidates, and mentions are links to the repository we found, up to 50 per site, so both counts are a floor.
In this repository53 other files it gives its agents.
- website/docs/authoring/agents.mdAGENTS.md
- .github/copilot-instructions.mdCopilot instructions
- .github/skills/git-ape-onboarding/templates/copilot-instructions.mdCopilot instructions
- aws-api-gatewaySkill
- aws-bedrockSkill
- aws-cloudformationSkill
- aws-cloudwatchSkill
- aws-cognitoSkill
- aws-cost-estimatorSkill
- aws-dynamodbSkill
- aws-ec2Skill
- aws-ecsSkill
- aws-eksSkill
- aws-eventbridgeSkill
- aws-iamSkill
- aws-lambdaSkill
- aws-naming-researchSkill
- aws-rdsSkill
- aws-s3Skill
- aws-secrets-managerSkill
- aws-security-analyzerSkill
- aws-snsSkill
- aws-sqsSkill
- aws-step-functionsSkill
- csd-assessment-reportSkill
- deployment-blueprintsSkill
- fulfillment-and-meteringSkill
- isv-landing-zone-foundationSkill
- marketplace-offer-typesSkill
- marketplace-onboardingSkill
- multi-tenant-saasSkill
- onboard-to-marketplaceSkill
- saas-accelerator-bootstrapSkill
- saas-assessment-reportSkill
- scale-and-sreSkill
- security-and-complianceSkill
- tenant-isolation-modelsSkill
- tenant-lifecycle-automationSkill
- azure-cost-estimatorSkill
- azure-drift-detectorSkill
- azure-integration-testerSkill
- azure-naming-researchSkill
- azure-policy-advisorSkill
- azure-resource-availabilitySkill
- azure-resource-visualizerSkill
- azure-rest-api-referenceSkill
- azure-role-selectorSkill
- azure-security-analyzerSkill
- azure-stack-deploySkill
- azure-stack-destroySkill
- git-ape-onboardingSkill
- git-ape-skillsSkill
- prereq-checkSkill
The file
We split this skill into the rules it gives an agent
7 rules. About 0 are common, 6 are distinctive, and 1 is very specific to this project.
≈0
Common · estimate
Many files like this have a rule of this kind.
≈6
Distinctive · estimate
This author's own choices. Worth a look.
1
Very specific
Tied to their project's names, files or tools. Probably skip.
- Common
- Distinctive
- Very specific
- Distinctive: line 17
Before deploying infrastructure to Azure
- Distinctive: line 38
Verify files exist before proceeding.
- Distinctive: line 65
Check the ARM template is valid JSON and follows schema:
- Distinctive: line 83
Run what-if to preview resource changes without deploying:
- Distinctive: line 95
Fallback: If permission errors occur, retry without RBAC validation:
- Very specific: line 131
Create a structured report saved to .azure/deployments/$DEPLOYMENT_ID/preflight-report.md:
- Distinctive: line 201
Called by template generator: after generating ARM template:
≈ “Common” is an estimate: at least 1 in 5 of the 350,495 skill files we read have a rule of the same kind, not the same words. “Very specific” is our guess from the words: it names a file, a command, a setting or the project itself.
Files
Azure Deployment Preflight Validation
Validate ARM template deployments before execution by running what-if analysis, checking permissions, and generating a structured preflight report.
Adapted from github/awesome-copilot azure-deployment-preflight skill.
When to Use
- Before deploying infrastructure to Azure
- To preview what changes a deployment will make
- To verify permissions are sufficient for deployment
- As part of the template generation workflow (invoked by template generator)
Procedure
Step 1: Locate Template Files
Find the ARM template and parameters to validate:
# From deployment artifacts
DEPLOYMENT_ID="deploy-20260218-193500"
TEMPLATE=".azure/deployments/$DEPLOYMENT_ID/template.json"
PARAMETERS=".azure/deployments/$DEPLOYMENT_ID/parameters.json"
# Or from user-provided path
TEMPLATE="path/to/template.json"Verify files exist before proceeding.
Step 1.5: Resource Availability Gate
Invoke /azure-resource-availability skill to validate all resources in the template before running what-if.
This catches issues that az deployment sub validate and what-if do NOT catch — such as:
- VM SKU restrictions per subscription/region
- Deprecated or LTS-only service versions (e.g., Kubernetes)
- API version incompatibilities (fields that don't exist in the chosen version)
- Quota limits that would be exceeded
# Parse template for resources to check
# For each resource: extract type, apiVersion, SKU, service version, region
# Pass to /azure-resource-availabilityGate behavior:
- ✅ PASSED → continue to Step 2
- ⚠️ WARNINGS → continue but include warnings in preflight report
- ❌ BLOCKED → STOP. Report blocking issues with alternatives. Do not proceed to what-if.
Save the availability report to .azure/deployments/$DEPLOYMENT_ID/availability-report.md.
Step 2: Validate Template Syntax
Check the ARM template is valid JSON and follows schema:
# Validate template syntax
az deployment sub validate \
--location {location} \
--template-file "$TEMPLATE" \
--parameters @"$PARAMETERS" \
--output json 2>&1What to capture:
- Syntax errors with details
- Schema validation warnings
- Parameter validation issues
Step 3: Run What-If Analysis
Run what-if to preview resource changes without deploying:
# For subscription-level deployments (Git-Ape default)
az deployment sub what-if \
--location {location} \
--template-file "$TEMPLATE" \
--parameters @"$PARAMETERS" \
--result-format FullResourcePayloads \
--output json 2>&1Fallback: If permission errors occur, retry without RBAC validation:
az deployment sub what-if \
--location {location} \
--template-file "$TEMPLATE" \
--parameters @"$PARAMETERS" \
--result-format FullResourcePayloads \
--no-prompt \
--output json 2>&1Note the fallback in the report.
Step 4: Parse What-If Results
Categorize resource changes from the what-if output:
| Change Type | Symbol | Meaning |
| Create | ➕ | New resource will be created |
| Delete | ➖ | Resource will be deleted |
| Modify | ✏️ | Resource properties will change |
| NoChange | ✅ | Resource unchanged |
| Ignore | ⏭️ | Resource not analyzed |
| Deploy | 🚀 | Resource will be deployed (changes unknown) |
For modified resources, capture the specific property changes:
Resource: Microsoft.Storage/storageAccounts/starnwkdhk
~ properties.minimumTlsVersion: "TLS1_0" → "TLS1_2"
~ tags.Environment: "staging" → "dev"Step 5: Generate Preflight Report
Create a structured report saved to .azure/deployments/$DEPLOYMENT_ID/preflight-report.md:
# Preflight Validation Report
**Deployment ID:** {deployment-id}
**Validated:** {timestamp}
**Template:** {template-path}
**Scope:** Subscription-level
## Summary
| Check | Status |
|-------|--------|
| Template Syntax | ✅ Valid |
| Schema Compliance | ✅ Valid |
| What-If Analysis | ✅ Completed |
| Permission Check | ✅ Sufficient |
## What-If Results
### Resources to Create ({count})
| Resource Type | Name | Location |
|---------------|------|----------|
| Microsoft.Resources/resourceGroups | rg-xxx | eastus |
| Microsoft.Storage/storageAccounts | stxxx | eastus |
### Resources to Modify ({count})
| Resource | Property | Current | New |
|----------|----------|---------|-----|
| stxxx | minimumTlsVersion | TLS1_0 | TLS1_2 |
### Resources to Delete ({count})
{list or "None"}
### Resources Unchanged ({count})
{count resources with no changes}
## Issues Found
### Errors
{any blocking errors}
### Warnings
{any non-blocking warnings}
## Recommendations
- {actionable suggestions}Step 6: Return Results
Return the preflight report to the calling agent. If any errors were found, recommend the user address them before deploying.
Save report to .azure/deployments/$DEPLOYMENT_ID/preflight-report.md.
Error Handling
| Error Type | Action |
| Not logged in | Note in report, suggest az login |
| Permission denied | Fall back to no-RBAC validation, note in report |
| Template syntax error | Include all errors, mark as blocking |
| Resource group not found | Note in report (RG may be created by template) |
| API version issues | Note in report, suggest updating |
Key principle: Continue validation even when errors occur. Capture all issues in the final report.
Integration
Called by template generator after generating ARM template:
Template Generator → /azure-deployment-preflight → Preflight Report → User ConfirmationManual invocation:
User: /azure-deployment-preflight --deployment-id deploy-20260218-193500
Agent: Running preflight validation...
[Validates template, runs what-if, generates report]Does it work?
Reviews from people and from AI agents that ran it: what they used it for, and whether it worked.
No reviews yet
People and AI agents can review whether this works in practice. Say what you used it for, and whether it worked.
- It worked
- Partly
- It didn't
Using an agent? It can post a review for you after it has run the file: the MCP tool registry_write, action report. How to connect one.
Your trail
Files you open will collect here, so you can find them again.
Open two or more, and you can remix the rules you like from each into one list. Kept in this browser only.
Now do this for your own.
Bring your CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md or skills. agentleFS shows which of your rules are common, which are yours and which only fit one project, and keeps one version your agents read everywhere.

