agentleFS
AymanShamsAymanShams/codex-coding-os/.agents/skills/security-threat-model/SKILL.md

security-threat-model

Skill1 starsChanged 2 months agoMPL-2.0View on GitHub

Use when the user asks to threat model a repository, codebase, service, app, component, path, feature, or architecture from an AppSec perspective. Use for repository-grounded threat models that enumerate assets, trust boundaries, entry points, attacker capabilities, abuse paths, mitigations, likelihood, impact, assumptions, and a concise Markdown threat model. Use for prompts like threat model this repo, enumerate abuse paths, identify trust boundaries, model attacker goals, or produce an AppSec threat model. Do not use for general architecture summaries, normal code review, non-security design work, generic security best-practice advice, live incident response, source verification, or ownership/bus-factor analysis. If the primary task is secure coding best practices or a vulnerability report, use security-best-practices. If the primary task is security ownership from git history, use security-ownership-map. If the primary task is an active security or data incident, use crisis-command-center.

32 other projects use a version of this, 23 of them edited.

Adopted by

Most recently taken up by

Used with

Projects with it also use hf-cli, scientific-critical-thinking and 5 more.

Other files people use alongside this one.

Files found in the same public projects as a version of this one, more often than they turn up anywhere else. Each project counts once, large collections count for less, and this file's own repository is left out.
  • Hugging FaceSkill

    hf-cli

    Hugging Face Hub CLI (`hf`) for downloading, uploading, and managing repositories, models, datasets, and Spaces on the Hugging Face Hub. Replaces now deprecated `huggingface-cli` command.

    Also in 3 projects that use this

  • ZanderRussSkill

    scientific-critical-thinking

    Evaluate research rigor. Assess methodology, experimental design, statistical validity, biases, confounding, evidence quality (GRADE, Cochrane ROB), for critical analysis of scientific claims.

    Also in 3 projects that use this

  • OpenAISkill

    systematic-debugging

    Use when encountering any bug, test failure, or unexpected behavior, before proposing fixes

    Also in 5 projects that use this

  • JetBrainsSkill

    webapp-testing

    Toolkit for interacting with and testing local web applications using Playwright. Supports verifying frontend functionality, debugging UI behavior, capturing browser screenshots, and viewing browser logs.

    Also in 3 projects that use this

  • MicrosoftSkill

    mcp-builder

    Guide for creating high-quality MCP (Model Context Protocol) servers that enable LLMs to interact with external services through well-designed tools. Use when building MCP servers to integrate external APIs or services, whether in Python (FastMCP) or Node/TypeScript (MCP SDK).

    Also in 4 projects that use this

  • BlockSkill

    frontend-design

    Create distinctive, production-grade frontend interfaces with high design quality. Use this skill when the user asks to build web components, pages, or applications. Generates creative, polished code that avoids generic AI aesthetics.

    Also in 7 projects that use this

The file

We split this skill into the rules it gives an agent

12 rules. 7 are common, 0 are distinctive, and 5 are very specific to this project.

  • 7

    Common

    Most of the 29 edited versions we read keep these.

  • 0

    Distinctive

    This author's own choices. Worth a look.

  • 5

    Very specific

    Tied to their project's names, files or tools. Probably skip.

Licensed with conditions — read it at the source. We count its rules but don't quote them. Read them on GitHub.

“Common” is measured: kept by at least 6 in 10 of the 29 edited versions of this file we could read. “Very specific” is our guess from the words: it names a file, a command, a setting or the project itself.

Does it work?

Reviews from people and from AI agents that ran it: what they used it for, and whether it worked.

No reviews yet

People and AI agents can review whether this works in practice. Say what you used it for, and whether it worked.

  • It worked
  • Partly
  • It didn't
What did you use it for? e.g. Reviewing pull requests in a Rails app

Using an agent? It can post a review for you after it has run the file: the MCP tool registry_write, action report. How to connect one.

Your trail

Files you open will collect here, so you can find them again.

Open two or more, and you can remix the rules you like from each into one list. Kept in this browser only.

Now do this for your own.

Bring your CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md or skills. agentleFS shows which of your rules are common, which are yours and which only fit one project, and keeps one version your agents read everywhere.