office-document-review
Skill136 starsChanged 3 months agoMITView on GitHub
office-document-review — Review and proofread office documents in OneDrive or local file trees, including batch folder discovery, document text extraction, and spelling/grammar cleanup workflows.
We split this skill into the rules it gives an agent
23 rules. About 0 are common, 19 are distinctive, and 4 are very specific to this project.
≈0
Common · estimate
Many files like this have a rule of this kind.
≈19
Distinctive · estimate
This author's own choices. Worth a look.
4
Very specific
Tied to their project's names, files or tools. Probably skip.
- Common
- Distinctive
- Very specific
- Distinctive: line 24
Use this skill when the user wants you to inspect a OneDrive/SharePoint-style folder tree, locate a subfolder by name/date, and proofread …
- Distinctive: line 39
Prefer a filesystem path over guessing from the user’s wording.
- Distinctive: line 41
If the exact folder cannot be found, list the visible folder names and state what is missing before asking for clarification.
- Distinctive: line 44
Use the live file tree to locate the target folder and confirm the actual path.
- Very specific: line 45
When the user gives a date-like folder name, search for variant spellings and punctuation (6-2-26, 6.2.26, 6_2_26, 6-2-2026) before …
- Very specific: line 54
When validating generated fixtures, compare extracted text against the fixture specification or authoritative .txt source before opening …
- Distinctive: line 56
If a file is not meaningfully text-reviewable after at least one appropriate format-specific fallback, say so explicitly instead of …
- Distinctive: line 61
Keep business wording intact unless the user asked for rewriting.
- Distinctive: line 68
If no issues are found, say that clearly.
- Distinctive: line 72
If the user wants edits, confirm the target files and whether they want tracked wording changes or a clean rewrite.
- Distinctive: line 78
If the user says they downloaded the files, re-inventory the local download folder first.
- Distinctive: line 79
Do not claim “everything is fine” for a batch until each file was actually inspected.
- Distinctive: line 80
If a document is large, inspect enough of it to make a real proofreading judgment rather than sampling one paragraph and extrapolating.
- Distinctive: line 81
Keep the user informed if the folder path is ambiguous instead of asking generic questions.
- Distinctive: line 85
Before closing the task, confirm:
- Distinctive: line 88
every target document was identified,
- Distinctive: line 97
Always verify the exact business OneDrive root before drilling into a dated subfolder.
- Very specific: line 98
If the user says "OneDrive" in a work/document-review context and does not qualify which account, default to the work tenant first …
- Distinctive: line 99
If folder recursion on a synced OneDrive tree is unstable, list the parent first and narrow the search in smaller steps instead of forcing …
- Very specific: line 100
When direct recursion throws Resource deadlock avoided, try a shallow parent find/inventory pass and then inspect the exact subfolder …
- Distinctive: line 101
If the user says they downloaded the files, re-inventory the local download folder first.
- Distinctive: line 102
Keep the final review file-by-file so the user can see what was actually checked.
- Distinctive: line 107
When the user asks for "edits needed," separate true spelling/grammar fixes from OCR or extraction artifacts and label each file …
≈ “Common” is an estimate: at least 1 in 5 of the 308,232 skill files we read have a rule of the same kind, not the same words. “Very specific” is our guess from the words: it names a file, a command, a setting or the project itself.
Files
Office Document Review
Use this skill when the user wants you to inspect a OneDrive/SharePoint-style folder tree, locate a subfolder by name/date, and proofread all documents in it for spelling and grammar.
This is a workflow skill, not a single-app skill: it covers local file-system browsing, document text extraction, and batch proofreading notes.
Triggers
- "go to the OneDrive folder"
- "look in folder X and then folder Y"
- "proofread all those documents"
- "check for spelling/grammar errors in the docs"
- "review the files in this folder"
Core workflow
- Resolve the real path first
- Prefer a filesystem path over guessing from the user’s wording.
- Folder names in casual speech may not match the actual on-disk name exactly.
- If the exact folder cannot be found, list the visible folder names and state what is missing before asking for clarification.
- Search the tree recursively
- Use the live file tree to locate the target folder and confirm the actual path.
- When the user gives a date-like folder name, search for variant spellings and punctuation (
6-2-26,6.2.26,6_2_26,6-2-2026) before assuming it does not exist.
- Inventory the documents
- Identify all files in the target folder.
- Group by extension and prioritize editable office docs (
.docx,.doc,.odt,.rtf,.txt) before PDFs or spreadsheets.
- Extract readable text
- For Word/Office files, extract the text in a way that preserves headings and paragraphs as much as possible.
- If the file-reading tool rejects
.docxas binary, do not classify the document as unreadable and do not repeat the same call across the batch. A DOCX is a ZIP package: validate it with Pythonzipfile, then usepython-docxwhen available or extractword/document.xmland convert paragraph/table XML to bounded text. Record package validity, paragraph/table counts, and extraction method. Use native Word or PDF rendering separately when layout—not just text—is under review. - When validating generated fixtures, compare extracted text against the fixture specification or authoritative
.txtsource before opening Word. A valid ZIP alone does not prove the fixture contains the intended content. - For scanned or image-based files, use OCR or an extraction tool first.
- If a file is not meaningfully text-reviewable after at least one appropriate format-specific fallback, say so explicitly instead of pretending to proofread it.
- Proofread for two passes
- Pass 1: spelling, grammar, punctuation, capitalization.
- Pass 2: obvious clarity issues, duplicated words, inconsistent dates/names, and broken formatting that would change meaning.
- Keep business wording intact unless the user asked for rewriting.
- Report findings file-by-file
- Summarize each document with:
- file name
- issue count
- short list of fixes or concerns
- If no issues are found, say that clearly.
- Do not silently modify files unless asked
- The default action is review/report.
- If the user wants edits, confirm the target files and whether they want tracked wording changes or a clean rewrite.
Pitfalls
- Casual folder names may be approximate; always verify the actual folder names seen in the tree.
- A folder search that returns the parent tree but not the exact folder is not a success; say what was found and what was not.
- If the user says they downloaded the files, re-inventory the local download folder first; do not assume the original folder contents or the original extension set survived the move.
- Do not claim “everything is fine” for a batch until each file was actually inspected.
- If a document is large, inspect enough of it to make a real proofreading judgment rather than sampling one paragraph and extrapolating.
- Keep the user informed if the folder path is ambiguous instead of asking generic questions.
Verification
Before closing the task, confirm:
- the folder path was resolved,
- every target document was identified,
- each document was reviewed or explicitly excluded with a reason,
- and the final report separates true findings from non-reviewable files.
Session note file
Practical notes
- Always verify the exact business OneDrive root before drilling into a dated subfolder.
- If the user says "OneDrive" in a work/document-review context and does not qualify which account, default to the work tenant first (
OneDrive - <work tenant>) rather than the personal OneDrive. Keep the two trees mentally separate and say which root you are using when ambiguity could matter. - If folder recursion on a synced OneDrive tree is unstable, list the parent first and narrow the search in smaller steps instead of forcing a full tree walk.
- When direct recursion throws
Resource deadlock avoided, try a shallow parentfind/inventory pass and then inspect the exact subfolder file-by-file. - If the user says they downloaded the files, re-inventory the local download folder first; do not assume the original folder contents or extensions survived the move.
- Keep the final review file-by-file so the user can see what was actually checked.
Session reference
- When the user asks for "edits needed," separate true spelling/grammar fixes from OCR or extraction artifacts and label each file accordingly.
Other versions1 project uses a version of this.
Word for word · 1
- AtlasOmnia/hermes-custom-pack★ 75100% same
Edited · 0
None found.
Wrote their own version · 0
None found.
How matches are found. Word for word: the exact same text. Edited: shares passages with this file (“99% same” means 99% of its five-word phrases also appear here; 10% or more counts). Their own version: similar meaning, or, weakest, the same name. We can’t tell which project had it first. Projects are counted among the 200 most-starred candidates, and mentions are links to the repository we found, up to 50 per site, so both counts are a floor.
In this repository72 other files it gives its agents.
- AGENTS.mdAGENTS.md
- apple-remindersSkill
- imessageSkill
- macos-app-automationSkill
- macos-storage-managementSkill
- hermes-agentSkill
- hermes-config-editingSkill
- hermes-context-optimizationSkill
- hermes-overnight-autonomySkill
- hermes-plugin-evaluationSkill
- hermes-session-maintenanceSkill
- local-model-selectionSkill
- opencodeSkill
- computer-useSkill
- claude-designSkill
- content-styleSkill
- marketing-collateral-designSkill
- dogfoodSkill
- codebase-inspectionSkill
- github-authSkill
- github-code-reviewSkill
- github-issuesSkill
- github-pre-push-gatesSkill
- github-pr-workflowSkill
- github-readme-maintenanceSkill
- github-repo-managementSkill
- github-workflowsSkill
- local-app-github-publishingSkill
- meal-trackerSkill
- hermes-desktop-pluginsSkill
- hermes-mnemosyneSkill
- hermes-self-evaluationSkill
- hermes-starter-onboardingSkill
- messaging-gateway-troubleshootingSkill
- mnemosyne-maintenanceSkill
- hermes-nightly-self-check-decisionsSkill
- hermes-plugin-developmentSkill
- skill-auditorSkill
- hermes-themesSkill
- notes-automation-workflowsSkill
- daily-note-wrapupSkill
- obsidianSkill
- vault-organizationSkill
- product-competitor-analysisSkill
- destination-trip-planningSkill
- discord-connectSkill
- domestic-trip-planningSkill
- google-workspaceSkill
- mapsSkill
- notionSkill
- session-artifact-indexingSkill
- daily-news-digestsSkill
- dynamic-content-extractionSkill
- evidence-based-repliesSkill
- external-model-reviewSkill
- hf-model-card-researchSkill
- local-discoverySkill
- marketplace-purchase-vettingSkill
- site-mappingSkill
- source-verificationSkill
- The first 60 shown.
Does it work?
Reviews from people and from AI agents that ran it: what they used it for, and whether it worked.
Reviews can't be read right now.
Your trail
Files you open will collect here, so you can find them again.
Open two or more, and you can remix the rules you like from each into one list. Kept in this browser only.
Now do this for your own.
Bring your CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md or skills. agentleFS shows which of your rules are common, which are yours and which only fit one project, and keeps one version your agents read everywhere.

