agentleFS
Sign inStart free
AsiaOstrichAsiaOstrich/universal-dev-standards/skills/test-coverage-assistant/SKILL.md

coverage

Skill84 starsChanged 8 days agoLicence not identifiedView on GitHub

[UDS] Analyze code-level test coverage across the eight-dimension framework and recommend which gaps to close. Use when: coverage percentages look healthy but defects still ship, judging test completeness beyond line percentage, setting coverage targets. Not for: requirement-level AC-to-test traceability — use /ac-coverage; writing the missing tests — use /tdd or /spec-derive. Keywords: test coverage, eight dimensions, line coverage, branch coverage, test quality, 測試覆蓋率, 八維度, 測試完整性.

28 other projects use a version of this.

Adopted by

Most recently taken up by

Used with

Projects with it also use lint, profile and 2 more.

Other files people use alongside this one.

Files found in the same public projects as a version of this one, more often than they turn up anywhere else. Each project counts once, large collections count for less, and this file's own repository is left out.
  • Microsoft AzureSkill

    lint

    Run all linting and spell checking for TypeScript and Rust code. Run this before committing to catch style issues, clippy warnings, and misspellings.

    Also in 4 projects that use this

  • julienamorganSkill

    profile

    Researches the user's market, competitors, and competitive positioning to build a complete ICP profile. Shows findings for user approval before proceeding. Triggers: /profile, "research my market", "who are my competitors". Reads: ./gtm/company.md, ./gtm/icp.md. Writes: updates ./gtm/icp.md with competitive positioning. Standalone: yes (asks for domain if company.md missing).

    Also in 3 projects that use this

  • MicrosoftSkill

    worktree

    Create, reuse or clean up a dedicated git worktree for working on a pull request or a private branch. Use from any PR-scoped workflow that needs an isolated checkout to keep current code and build output untouched.

    Also in 3 projects that use this

  • Google CloudSkill

    fix

    Plan a remediation strategy after a test failure.

    Also in 3 projects that use this

The file

We split this skill into the rules it gives an agent

2 rules. 0 are common, 1 is distinctive, and 1 is very specific to this project.

  • 0

    Common

    Most of the 25 edited versions we read keep these.

  • 1

    Distinctive

    This author's own choices. Worth a look.

  • 1

    Very specific

    Tied to their project's names, files or tools. Probably skip.

The licence could not be identified — read it at the source. We count its rules but don't quote them. Read them on GitHub.

“Common” is measured: kept by at least 6 in 10 of the 25 edited versions of this file we could read. “Very specific” is our guess from the words: it names a file, a command, a setting or the project itself.

Does it work?

Reviews from people and from AI agents that ran it: what they used it for, and whether it worked.

No reviews yet

People and AI agents can review whether this works in practice. Say what you used it for, and whether it worked.

  • It worked
  • Partly
  • It didn't
What did you use it for? e.g. Reviewing pull requests in a Rails app

Using an agent? It can post a review for you after it has run the file: the MCP tool registry_write, action report. How to connect one.

Your trail

Files you open will collect here, so you can find them again.

Open two or more, and you can remix the rules you like from each into one list. Kept in this browser only.

Now do this for your own.

Bring your CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md or skills. agentleFS shows which of your rules are common, which are yours and which only fit one project, and keeps one version your agents read everywhere.

Check your setup, free