agentleFS
Sign inStart free
AsiaOstrichAsiaOstrich/universal-dev-standards/skills/push/SKILL.md

push

Skill84 starsChanged 8 days agoLicence not identifiedView on GitHub

AI-assisted safety layer for git push operations with quality gates and collaboration guardrails. Use when: pushing commits, force pushing, pushing to protected branches, pushing feature branches. Not for: composing the commit — use /commit; branch and merge strategy decisions — use /git-workflow-guide. Keywords: git push, force push, protected branch, quality gate, push receipt, PR automation.

  • Commits and pushes

49 other projects use a version of this.

Adopted by

Most recently taken up by

Used with

Projects with it also use get-pr-reviews, push-everything and 7 more.

Other files people use alongside this one.

Files found in the same public projects as a version of this one, more often than they turn up anywhere else. Each project counts once, large collections count for less, and this file's own repository is left out.
  • saffron-healthSkill

    get-pr-reviews

    Get nicely formatted output of the last review comments on a PR. Used internally by other skills.

    Also in 3 projects that use this

  • saffron-healthSkill

    push-everything

    Stage ALL changes in the repository (not just session changes), commit, and push. Use when you need to commit all pending changes.

    Also in 3 projects that use this

  • NVIDIASkill

    generate-spec

    Produce a feature specification covering API changes, backward compatibility, cross-language impact, performance, and a file-level change plan. Use when designing a new feature, planning a significant change, or the user asks to spec something out.

    Also in 3 projects that use this

  • MicrosoftSkill

    merge

    Merge changes from the topic branch to the merge base branch. Use when the user wants to merge their session's work back to the base branch.

    Also in 3 projects that use this

  • MicrosoftSkill

    spec-review

    Independent, multi-model review of a design or spec **before** any code is written, for the microsoft/winappcli repo. Activate when a contributor asks to "review this spec", "review my design", "review this design doc", "validate this approach", "should we build this", "spec review", "design review", or "feature review". Fans out parallel sub-agents — each doing its OWN research against the real codebase and ecosystem rather than trusting the spec — covering necessity & scope, approach & alternatives, feasibility vs reality, risks & unknowns, DX & user impact, and a different-model-family cross-check. Emits a decision-oriented recommendation (proceed / proceed-with-changes / reconsider) to stdout. This is the PRE-CODE companion to the pr-review skill (which reviews code already written); use spec-review at the design/spec stage, not on an implemented diff. Does NOT write code or edit the spec.

    Also in 3 projects that use this

  • Hugging FaceSkill

    update-docs

    Update documentation across the repo after API changes. Finds stale references in docs, examples, docstrings, and fixes them.

    Also in 4 projects that use this

  • +2 more from saffron-health

The file

Show its rules and text

We split this skill into the rules it gives an agent

14 rules. 0 are common, 6 are distinctive, and 8 are very specific to this project.

  • 0

    Common

    Most of the 42 edited versions we read keep these.

  • 6

    Distinctive

    This author's own choices. Worth a look.

  • 8

    Very specific

    Tied to their project's names, files or tools. Probably skip.

The licence could not be identified — read it at the source. We count its rules but don't quote them. Read them on GitHub.

“Common” is measured: kept by at least 6 in 10 of the 42 edited versions of this file we could read. “Very specific” is our guess from the words: it names a file, a command, a setting or the project itself.

Does it work?

Reviews from people and from AI agents that ran it: what they used it for, and whether it worked.

No reviews yet

People and AI agents can review whether this works in practice. Say what you used it for, and whether it worked.

  • It worked
  • Partly
  • It didn't
What did you use it for? e.g. Reviewing pull requests in a Rails app

Using an agent? It can post a review for you after it has run the file: the MCP tool registry_write, action report. How to connect one.

Your trail

Files you open will collect here, so you can find them again.

Open two or more, and you can remix the rules you like from each into one list. Kept in this browser only.

Now do this for your own.

Bring your CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md or skills. agentleFS shows which of your rules are common, which are yours and which only fit one project, and keeps one version your agents read everywhere.

Check your setup, free