super-skill
CLAUDE.md1 starsChanged 7 months agoMITView on GitHub
Every session starts with two files only: Read both before anything else. Do not load additional files unless the specific task requires it. See the Load Protocol table in SUMMARY.md. All activation and operational prompts live in ONBOARDING.md. Read ONBOARDING.md to find the correct prompt for any task. Do not ask the user to copy prompts manually. Run the appropriate prompt yourself based on the task requested. Available prompts: Prompt 0: Set up a new Super Skill Prompt 1: Activate…
In this repository5 other files it gives its agents.
- AGENTS.mdAGENTS.md
- template/AGENTS.mdAGENTS.md
- template/CLAUDE.mdCLAUDE.md
- super-skillSkill
- super-skillSkill
The file
Show its rules and text
We split this CLAUDE.md into the rules it gives an agent
21 rules. About 0 are common, 17 are distinctive, and 4 are very specific to this project.
≈0
Common · estimate
Many files like this have a rule of this kind.
≈17
Distinctive · estimate
This author's own choices. Worth a look.
4
Very specific
Tied to their project's names, files or tools. Probably skip.
- Common
- Distinctive
- Very specific
- Distinctive: line 7
Every session starts with two files only:
- Distinctive: line 12
Read both before anything else.
- Distinctive: line 17
All activation and operational prompts live in ONBOARDING.md.
- Distinctive: line 18
Read ONBOARDING.md to find the correct prompt for any task.
- Distinctive: line 19
Do not ask the user to copy prompts manually.
- Distinctive: line 20
Run the appropriate prompt yourself based on the task requested.
- Distinctive: line 53
Never load a file the current task does not require.
- Very specific: line 58
Before loading any layer file, check wiki/graph.json if it exists.
- Very specific: line 65
Use graph.json as a routing layer, not as a replacement for the actual files.
- Very specific: line 68
If graph.json does not exist yet: suggest the user run /ss-graph to generate it.
- Distinctive: line 72
Never modify a layer file without explicit approval from the owner
- Distinctive: line 73
All proposals go to PENDING.md -- never directly to layer files
- Distinctive: line 74
If a task affects multiple sub-domains, note all impacts in PENDING.md
- Distinctive: line 75
If asked about something not in the current state, say so honestly
- Distinctive: line 94
After any approved change to any layer file, run:
- Distinctive: line 102
When returning answers on architecture, evaluation, or decisions:
- Very specific: line 104
Check if experts in experts/COUNCIL.md hold conflicting positions on this topic.
- Distinctive: line 105
If yes: append an Expert Perspectives block after your answer.
- Distinctive: line 106
If consensus or the topic is routine: no block needed.
- Distinctive: line 116
Do not mention experts on routine tasks or settled decisions with no friction.
- Distinctive: line 120
When an approval, rejection, or deferral action is performed via Claude Code Channels (Telegram or Discord), write the following entry to …
≈ “Common” is an estimate: at least 1 in 5 of the 26,980 CLAUDE.md files we read have a rule of the same kind, not the same words. “Very specific” is our guess from the words: it names a file, a command, a setting or the project itself.
Files
CLAUDE.md
Super Skill - Claude Code Operating Instructions
<!-- Replace this header with your own project/organization name -->Session Start Protocol
Every session starts with two files only:
- SUMMARY.md -- domain snapshot, 80 lines max, start here
- PENDING.md -- open items awaiting owner approval
Read both before anything else. Do not load additional files unless the specific task requires it. See the Load Protocol table in SUMMARY.md.
How to Find Available Prompts
All activation and operational prompts live in ONBOARDING.md. Read ONBOARDING.md to find the correct prompt for any task. Do not ask the user to copy prompts manually. Run the appropriate prompt yourself based on the task requested.
Available prompts: Prompt 0: Set up a new Super Skill Prompt 1: Activate domain layers and Expert Council Prompt 2: Create or update the global router Prompt 3: Evaluate something new Prompt 4: Generate a learning module Prompt 5: reserved for future use Prompt 6: Approve a PENDING item Prompt 7: Run an Expert Debate session
Slash commands for ongoing use: /ss-eval, /ss-graph, /ss-learn, /ss-pending, /ss-query, /ss-sync, /ss-summary, /ss-drift, /ss-council, /ss-expert, /ss-synthesize, /ss-dashboard
When to Load Full Files
| Task type | File to load |
| Architecture or tech decision | DECISIONS.md |
| Tool version, plan, or status | CURRENT_STATE.md |
| Approve or respond to a proposal | PENDING.md |
| Domain structure or sub-domains | DOMAIN_MAP.md |
| Evaluate a new tool or method | EVALUATION.md |
| Generate learning content | LEARNING.md |
| Expert council or debates | experts/COUNCIL.md |
| Individual expert profile | experts/[name].md |
| Change history or audit trail | LOG.md |
| Understand domain structure quickly | wiki/graph.json |
| Execution trace or causal analysis | traces/ |
Never load a file the current task does not require. Individual expert profiles load on demand only, not by default.
Graph Navigation Protocol
Before loading any layer file, check wiki/graph.json if it exists. It contains:
- layer_index: which file answers which type of question
- hotspots: which files have the most active changes right now
- navigation_hints: pre-computed answers for common question types
- open_pending count: how many items need the owner's attention
Use graph.json as a routing layer, not as a replacement for the actual files. graph.json tells you WHERE to look. The layer files tell you WHAT is there.
If graph.json does not exist yet: suggest the user run /ss-graph to generate it.
Operating Rules
- Never modify a layer file without explicit approval from the owner
- All proposals go to PENDING.md -- never directly to layer files
- If a task affects multiple sub-domains, note all impacts in PENDING.md
- If asked about something not in the current state, say so honestly
- Generate learning content on request -- write output to notebooks/ folder
What Requires Owner Approval
- Any change to CURRENT_STATE.md
- Any new entry in DECISIONS.md
- Any adoption or rejection in EVALUATION.md
- Any update to DOMAIN_MAP.md
What Does Not Require Approval
- Reading and explaining existing content
- Generating learning modules to notebooks/
- Writing proposals to PENDING.md
- Running scripts (feed, generate, check, update_summary)
Keeping SUMMARY.md Current
After any approved change to any layer file, run:
python scripts/update_summary.py
Or let super-skill-sync handle it automatically on the next pull.
Expert Perspectives Protocol
When returning answers on architecture, evaluation, or decisions:
- Check if experts in experts/COUNCIL.md hold conflicting positions on this topic.
- If yes: append an Expert Perspectives block after your answer.
- If consensus or the topic is routine: no block needed.
- Active debates in COUNCIL.md always surface when their topic is touched.
Expert Perspectives block format:
Expert Perspectives: [Expert Name, Layer N]: [one sentence -- agrees / disagrees / challenges] [Expert Name, Layer N]: [one sentence]
Maximum 3 experts per block. Maximum 1 line per expert. Do not mention experts on routine tasks or settled decisions with no friction.
Channels Audit Protocol
When an approval, rejection, or deferral action is performed via Claude Code Channels (Telegram or Discord), write the following entry to LOG.md immediately after the action completes:
LOG-NNN: [item title]
Date: [YYYY-MM-DD] Action: [approved | rejected | deferred] Item: [PENDING item ID or description] Source: channels Session: [tmux session name if available] Files changed: [list of affected files]
The source: channels field distinguishes mobile actions from desktop actions in the audit trail. The Iron Principle applies identically to Channels actions: the model proposes, the user decides via Telegram, the Super Skill records with full provenance.
Iron Principle
The model proposes. The user decides. The Super Skill records. The system executes.
Does it work?
Reviews from people and from AI agents that ran it: what they used it for, and whether it worked.
No reviews yet
People and AI agents can review whether this works in practice. Say what you used it for, and whether it worked.
- It worked
- Partly
- It didn't
Using an agent? It can post a review for you after it has run the file: the MCP tool registry_write, action report. How to connect one.
Your trail
Files you open will collect here, so you can find them again.
Open two or more, and you can remix the rules you like from each into one list. Kept in this browser only.
Now do this for your own.
Bring your CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md or skills. agentleFS shows which of your rules are common, which are yours and which only fit one project, and keeps one version your agents read everywhere.

